Problems of realization of the rights of convicted persons serving a sentence of imprisonment and transferred to a pre-trial detention center as a witness or victim

2020 ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Арби Русланович Акиев ◽  
Васильевич Фокин Фокин
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Correctional Facility ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Individual Rights ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Detention Center ◽  
The Russian Federation

Статья посвящена анализу юридических коллизий норм уголовно-исполнительного законодательства, возникающих при переводе осужденного, отбывающего наказание в виде лишения свободы, из исправительного учреждения в следственный изолятор в новом процессуальном статусе свидетеля или потерпевшего. Учитывая отличия в режиме и условиях содержания в ИУ и СИЗО, авторы поднимают проблемы реализации осужденным частных прав, закрепленных в УИК РФ, в период нахождения в СИЗО, предлагают пути решения. The article is devoted to the analysis of legal conflicts of the norms of the criminal Executive legislation that arise when a convicted person serving a sentence of imprisonment is transferred from a correctional institution to a pre-trial detention center in the new procedural status of a witness or victim. Given the differences in the regime and conditions of detention in a correctional facility and the detention center, the authors raise the problem of implementation of a convicted individual rights enshrined in the Penal Code of the Russian Federation in the period of detention, propose solutions.

scholarly journals Differentiation and individualization of execution imprisonment when changing the type of correctional institution

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-84
Author(s):  
S. P. Sereda ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Judicial Discretion ◽  
Direct Impact ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Penal Law ◽  
Legislative Framework ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article deals with the issues of differentiation and individualization of the execution of punishment in the form of imprisonment when changing the type of correctional institution, problems in the legislative framework and practice of applying the procedure and grounds for changing the type of correctional institution, comparing the specified institution of the penal law with incentives and penalties. The main requirements are analyzed, which should underlie the change in the scope of restrictions and deprivations constituting the content of the sentence of imprisonment when changing the type of correctional institution and the place of serving the sentence. It is noted that the perfection of legislative consolidation of the legal mechanisms under consideration has a direct impact on the achievement of the goals of punishment. The system of places of imprisonment in Russia has historically developed in the direction of increasing the differentiation of punishment in relation to various categories of convicts, reducing the proportion of judicial discretion. These trends are reflected in both the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. The types of correctional institutions are a concrete expression of the compulsory nature of punishment in the form of imprisonment, its content, which in turn is expressed in various kinds of restrictions on the rights and freedoms of the convicted person, which in general constitute the degree of his isolation from society. Therefore, a change in the type of correctional institution must mean a change in the degree and nature of the coercive influence on the person sentenced to imprisonment, the extent of restriction of his rights and freedoms. However the issues of determining the degree of correction of convicts are of particular importance, which requires detailed and precise legislative fixation.

scholarly journals Manifestation of Furor as an Element of a Gross Violation of the Regime in Places of Deprivation of Liberty

2020 ◽  
pp. 75-79
Author(s):  
Andrey A. Pavlenko ◽  
◽  
Andrey N. Gordopolov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Correctional Facility ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Physical Force ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of

Currently, when executing a sentence of imprisonment, officials of the penal system often encounter convicts who show gross disobedience, including via furor. The increase in the number of acts of violence against staff performing their official duties illustrates a situation that requires legal regulation. Penal legislation has no clear definition of the concept “furor”. It is only mentioned in Part 1 of Article 86 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. The discrepancy between the norms of the law of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation and the law on institutions and bodies on the application of security measures to convicts in furor reduces the effectiveness of the response actions of the penal system employees. For the formation of the most complete understanding of the concept “convict’s furor”, scientific works are analyzed; A.V. Brilliantov presents the most complete concept. The etymological meaning of the term is established. The history of the formation of the term “furor” in medical encyclopedias and reference books, and in the norms of law in the period from the end of the 19th century to the present is considered. A hypothesis is made that repeated malicious disobedience may be in the form of manifesting furor. A connection between the concepts of malicious violation of the sentence serving regime and the manifestation of furor in the norms of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation is noted. Part 1 of Article 86 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation mentions malicious disobedience to legal requirements, which is similar in content to Part 1 of Article 116 of this code, in which one of the malicious violations of the sentence serving regime is “a threat, disobedience to representatives of the administration of a correctional facility and their insult in the absence of signs of a crime”. As a result, two ways of solving the problem of inconsistency of the grounds for the application of security measures in the RF Penal Code and in the law on institutions and bodies are proposed. The first way is to exclude the term “manifestation of furor” from the list of grounds for applying security measures in the RF Penal Code. The second is defining the term “manifestation of furor” in the norms of law and its consolidation as the basis for the use of physical force and special means in the law on institutions and bodies.

Some questions connected with order of leaving of convicts to imprisonment in the penal system pre-trial detention center

2019 ◽  
pp. 16-22
Author(s):  
Ольга Александровна Алфимова
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Correctional Facility ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Detention Center ◽  
Detention Centers ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Correction System

В статье освещается правовая регламентация вопросов, связанных с условиями и порядком оставления осужденных к лишению свободы в следственных изоляторах уголовно-исполнительной системы. Решение об оставлении осужденного в СИЗО принимается администрацией СИЗО и оформляется приказом начальника. Приказ начальника СИЗО является, по сути, юридическим основанием для оставления осужденного для выполнения работ по хозяйственному обслуживанию и отбывания наказания в виде лишения свободы именно в данном учреждении, а не в том, которое назначил ему суд в обвинительном приговоре. Иными словами, можно сказать, что на сегодняшний день законом предусмотрен внесудебный порядок оставления осужденных в СИЗО для выполнения работ по хозяйственному обслуживанию. В связи с этим нельзя не согласиться с мнением некоторых специалистов, считающих, что такой порядок ставит в некую зависимость возможность отбывания наказания осужденными в СИЗО от воли администрации этого учреждения, а также предоставляет довольно широкий простор административному усмотрению. Вместе с тем, только суд наделен правом определять степень изоляции осужденных и режим отбывания наказания. Эти требования отражены в ст. 58 УК РФ. Это требование закона содержится и в п. 5 ст. 78 УИК РФ, однако в ситуации с оставлением в СИЗО складывается положение, когда решением его начальника, по сути, изменяется вступивший в силу приговор суда в части назначенного осужденному ранее вида ИУ. The legal regulation of the questions connected with conditions and order of leaving of convicts to imprisonment in pre-trial detention centers of penal correction system is covered in the present article. The decision on leaving of the convict in the pre-trial detention center is made by administration of the pre-trial detention center and made out by the order of the chief. The order of the chief of the pre-trial detention center is in fact a legislative basis for leaving of the convict for performance of work on economic service and serving sentence in the form of imprisonment in this establishment, but not in that which was appointed to it by court in a conviction. In other words it is possible to tell that today the law provided an extrajudicial order of leaving of convicts in the pre-trial detention center for performance of work on economic service. In this regard, it is necessary to agree with opinion of some authors considering that such order puts into certain dependence a possibility of serving sentence condemned in the pre-trial detention center from will of administration of this establishment and also provides enough “broad lands to an administrative discretion”. At the same time, only the court is given the right to define extent of isolation of convicts and the mode of serving sentence. These requirements are reflected in Art. 58 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. This requirement of the law contains also in Paragraph 5 of Art. 78 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation, however in a situation with leaving in the pre-trial detention center there is situation when the decision of his chief, in fact, the court verdict which came into force regarding the appointed correctional facility condemned before a look changes.

scholarly journals Regulation and organization of convicts’ work in places of deprivation of liberty: some challenges

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-116
Author(s):  
Elena Shamshilova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Regulatory Control ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Labor Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Compliance With The Law ◽  
High Level

The article is devoted to the process of convicts attracting to work as a means of their correction. The main goals of convicts’ employment are outlined, as well as the problems of regulatory control of this process. The data of the Prosecutor’s office on compliance with the law in correctional institutions in the sphere of attracting convicts to work are analyzed. The study of legislation in the field of convicts’ employment revealed fragmentary regulation of this process, which is explained by the consolidation of norms on attracting this category of persons to work in both the Penal and Labor Codes of the Russian Federation. Taking into account the fact that the basis for regulating issues in the sphere of execution of punishments is the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. The author concludes that it is necessary to make changes to the Penal legislation of Russia in the part concerning the organization of convicts attracting to work, as well as by adding rules on their dismissal. In addition, such problems in the sphere of employment of convicts as the lack of jobs, which entails a high level of non-working convicts, and the organization of remuneration that does not correspond to the stated in the labor legislation, were considered. Possible ways to solve these problems are suggested.

scholarly journals PREVENTION OF OFFENSES AMONG PERSONS HELD IN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS AS A MEASURE TO ENSURE THE PERSONAL SAFETY OF CONVICTED PERSONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139
Author(s):  
O.V. Pronina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Personal Safety ◽  
Law And Order ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Concept Of Law ◽  
Concept Of Law

The article considers the concept of "law and order in a correctional institution". The connection of the concept of "law and order" with the concept of "personal security of convicts"is analyzed. The author proposed changes and additions to the Instructions for the Prevention of Offenses among persons held in institutions of the penal system «approved by the order of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation of May 20, 2013. No. 72, which, in his opinion, will have a positive impact on the measures for the prevention of offenses in correctional institutions carried out by employees of the penitentiary system in order to ensure an appropriate level of law and order and ensure the personal safety of convicts.

Trends of humanization of the penal enforcement legislation, take into consideration the behavior of sentenced to deprivation of freedom

2019 ◽  
pp. 106-115
Author(s):  
Иван Андреевич Смирнов
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Positive Behavior ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Personal Accounts

В статье представлен ретроспективный анализ изменений, вносимых в Уголовно-исполнительный кодекс Российской Федерации с его принятия и до момента последней редакции 2018 г. Выделяются блоки норм как прогрессивного, так и регрессивного характера. В основание такого выделения положен критерий в виде «положительного поведения» осужденных, который проявляется в многоплановом аспекте. К типу прогрессивного характера автор относит следующие изменения, внесенные в УИК РФ: регулирование льготного исчисления сроков для перевода в облегченные условия отбывания наказания; поддержание социально полезных связей вне пределах ИУ; блок изменений, корректирующих поведение осужденных, подверженных строгому дисциплинарному взысканию; иное позитивное воздействие на осужденных. К категории регрессивного склада норм - нарушающие поэтапность позитивного воздействия в отношении положительно характеризующихся осужденных; изменения в поощрительном институте норм уголовно-исполнительного законодательства; изменения, связанные с возможностью расходования денежных средств на лицевых счетах осужденных; понижение возраста осужденных несовершеннолетних, подлежащих переводу в исправительные колонии. Отмечается слабая научная терминологическая разработка категорий положительно характеризующихся осужденных, что отражается на применении соответствующих норм. Отмечаются некоторые противоречия и нецелесообразность вносимых изменений, в связи с чем требуется корректировка и совершенствование уголовно-исполнительного законодательства. The article presents a retrospective analysis of changes, which were included in the Criminal Executive Code of the Russian Federation since its adoption and up to the time of last redaction 2018. Blocks of norms of both progressive and regressive nature are distinguished. The basis of this selection is a criterion in the form of “positive behavior” of convicts. The author refers to the type of progressive nature of the following changes, which were included in the Criminal Executive Code of the Russian Federation: regulation of preferential calculation sentence to transfer to the less-strict regime; the maintenance of socially useful links outside the confines of the correctional institution; block of changes correcting behavior of convicts subjected to strict disciplinary sanction; other positive influence on convicts. To the category of regressive composition of legal norms - infringing phasing positive impact in relation to the positively characterized convicts; changes in the incentive institute of norms of penal enforcement legislation; changes related to the possibility of spending money on the personal accounts of convicts; lowering age of convicted juveniles to be transferred to correctional colonies. In addition, there is a weak scientific terminological development of categories of positively characterized convicts, which affects the application of the relevant norms. Some contradictions and inexpediency of the made changes are noted in this connection correction and improvement of the penal enforcement legislation is required.

scholarly journals Features of the labor organization of persons sentenced to compulsory and correctional labor

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-63
Author(s):  
S. N. Kondratovskaya ◽  
◽  
E. V. Valkova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Controversial Issues ◽  
Labor Organization ◽  
National Legislation ◽  
Labor Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article covers controversial issues of legal regulation of labor of persons sentenced to compulsory and corrective labor. On the basis of an analysis of the norms of national legislation a conclusion was made on the priority of the norms of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation over the norms of labor legislation in the regulation of labor of convicts.

On the issue of creating integrated correctional institutions in the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
pp. 58-63
Author(s):  
Ирина Николаевна Коробова
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Multi Mode

В настоящее время происходит процесс активного реформирования уголовно-исполнительной системы, кроме того, параллельно проводится работа по изменению уголовно-исполнительного законодательства. Количество осужденных, содержащихся в местах лишения свободы, неизменно снижается, причем прослеживается определенная тенденция, когда исправительные учреждения одного вида режима переполнены, другие заполнены не в полном объеме, в связи с чем их количество уменьшается, в частности, на всей территории Российской Федерации имеется только 22 колонии для несовершеннолетних. В уголовно-исполнительном законодательстве РФ содержится норма, предусматривающая отбывание наказания в исправительном учреждении, расположенном в пределах территории субъекта Российской Федерации, в котором осужденный проживал или был осужден. Однако в настоящее время соблюдение данного принципа достаточно проблематично, и выходом из сложившейся ситуации может быть создание комплексных (мультирежимных) исправительных учреждений. Данное положение не противоречит и положениям международных стандартов исполнения наказаний, подобные положения имеются и в Минимальных стандартных правилах в отношении обращения с заключенными 2015 г., и в Европейских пенитенциарных правилах. Все это обосновывает актуальность изучаемой темы. Currently, there is a process of active reform of the penal system, in addition, work is being carried out in parallel to change the penal legislation. The number of convicts held in places of deprivation of liberty is constantly decreasing, and there is a certain trend when correctional institutions of one type of regime are overcrowded, while others are not filled in full, which is why their number is decreasing, in particular, there are only 22 juvenile colonies throughout the Russian Federation. Among the principles of deprivation of liberty, the penal legislation of the Russian Federation singles out the principle of serving a sentence in a correctional institution located within the territory of the subject of the Russian Federation where the convicted person lived or was convicted. However, at present, compliance with this principle is quite problematic, so the solution to this situation may be the creation of complex (multi-mode) correctional institutions. This provision does not contradict the provisions of international standards for the execution of sentences, such provisions are found in the standard Minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners of 2015, and in the European prison rules. All this justifies the relevance of the topic under study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document