scholarly journals Do antibiotics decrease prostate-specific antigen levels and reduce the need for prostate biopsy in type IV prostatitis? A systematic literature review

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. E25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel T. Buddingh ◽  
Marlies G.F. Maatje ◽  
Hein Putter ◽  
René F. Kropman ◽  
Rob C.M. Pelger
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Inflammation of the prostate can be a cause of elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in men referred for suspected prostate cancer. This systematic review assesses the evidence for antibiotic therapy in patients with type IV (asymptomatic) prostatitis with regard to reduction of PSA levels and discrimination between prostate cancer and inflammation.Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane registry were searched for papers reporting on cohorts of men with elevated PSA and type IV prostatitis that were treated with antibiotics.Results: The search yielded 160 papers, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria: two randomized trials and nine cohort studies. In total, the studies reported on 1011 patients with type IV prostatitis, of whom 926 were treated with antibiotics. PSA normalization was seen after antibiotic treatment in 33.2% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.9‒42.8). Meta-analysis of the randomized trials did not demonstrate a higher likelihood of PSA normalization in the antibiotics arm as compared to the control arm (odds ratio [OR] 1.27; 95% CI 0.58–2.76; p=0.553). Four studies performed prostate biopsies in all patients. Although three of these studies demonstrated lower prevalence of prostate cancer in patients in whom PSA had normalized, meta-analysis failed to show a statistically significant difference (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.06–2.49; p=0.319).Conclusions: The available evidence does not support antibiotic therapy for differentiation between benign and malignant cause of elevated PSA in men with type IV prostatitis.

scholarly journals Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) for the Detection of Prostate Cancer in Symptomatic Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel William David Merriel ◽  
Lucy Pocock ◽  
Emma Gilbert ◽  
Sam Creavin ◽  
Fiona M Walter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Database Search ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Reference Test ◽  
Psa Testing

Abstract BackgroundProstate Specific Antigen (PSA) is a commonly used test to detect prostate cancer. Attention has mostly focused on the use of PSA in screening asymptomatic patients, but the diagnostic accuracy of PSA for prostate cancer in patients with symptoms is less well understood.MethodsA systematic database search was conducted of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library. Studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of PSA for prostate cancer in patients with symptoms were included. Two investigators independently assessed the titles and abstracts of all database search hits and full texts of potentially relevant studies against the inclusion criteria, and data extracted into a proforma. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool by two investigators independently. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy were calculated with meta-analysis using bivariate mixed effects regression.Results563 search hits were assessed by title and abstract after de-duplication, with 75 full text papers reviewed. 19 studies met the inclusion criteria, 18 of which were conducted in secondary care settings (one from a screening study cohort). All studies used histology obtained by Transrectal Ultrasound guided biopsy (TRUS) as a reference test, usually only for patients with elevated PSA or abnormal prostate examination. Pooled data from 14,489 patients found estimated sensitivity of PSA for prostate cancer was 0.93 (95% CI 0.88, 0.96) and specificity was 0.20 (95% CI 0.12, 0.33). The area under the receiving-operator characteristic curve was 0.72 (95% CI 0.68, 0.76). All studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias in at least one QUADAS-2 domain.ConclusionsCurrently available evidence suggests PSA is highly sensitive but poorly specific for prostate cancer detection. However, significant limitations in study design and reference test reduces the certainty of this estimate. There is very limited evidence for the performance of PSA in primary care, the healthcare setting where most PSA testing is performed.

scholarly journals Prostate-Specific Antigen Density: A Measurement to Differentiate Benign Hypertrophy of Prostate from Prostate Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Chandan Kumar Nath ◽  
Bhupen Barman ◽  
Pranjal Phukan ◽  
Stephen L. Sailo ◽  
Biswajit Dey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen Density ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Set Up ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Background Determination of isolated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in asymptomatic individuals has not demonstrated sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be useful in the routine evaluation of prostate disease. To enhance the accuracy of serum PSA we have used a proportion of serum PSA and prostate volume, which we refer to as prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD). Prostate volume in this study was calculated using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Materials and Methods A total of 106 patients with prostatic disease clinically confined to the prostate glands were evaluated. Results and Observation The mean PSAD for prostate cancer was 0.15 ± 0.01 while that for benign hypertrophy of the prostate (BPH) was 0.11 ± 0.02 (p < 0.05). Significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted in the prostate volume in these two groups with the mean prostate volume measured by TRUS in the BPH to be 53.85 ± 9.71 mL compared with 58.14 ± 7.48 mL in the carcinoma. PSA density of 0.13 ng/mL can be used as a cutoff for the individual in our set-up who should go for prostate biopsy with sensitivity and specificity of over 90%. Conclusion These results suggest that PSAD may be useful in distinguishing BPH and prostate cancer.

On the Clinical Usefulness of the Free-to-Total Prostate-Specific Antigen Ratio

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ciatto ◽  
T. Rubeca ◽  
R. Franceschini ◽  
C. Trevisiol ◽  
M. Confortini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Clinical Usefulness ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Total Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Total Psa

The free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio (F/T PSA) is associated with the presence of prostate cancer and is thus used as an indicator for suspicion of prostate cancer and as a determinant for biopsy. We reviewed a recent retrospective series of 966 consecutive prostate biopsies where F/T PSA was blindly determined and did not influence biopsy indication. We simulated the association of F/T PSA with biopsy outcome and its impact as a biopsy determinant. When adopting an F/T PSA cutoff of 10%, 13%, 16% or 20% among random sextant biopsies in the 4–10 ng/mL total PSA range, the sensitivity was 15%, 37%, 55% and 72% and the specificity 89%, 80%, 64% and 44%, respectively. Using F/T PSA as a biopsy determinant, from 1.7 to 2.6 cancer biopsies would have been delayed to avoid 10 benign biopsies. As this balance is not acceptable, F/T PSA has no role as a biopsy indicator and its clinical use is questionable.

The prognostic value of mid-treatment prostate-specific antigen level in patients receiving salvage radiotherapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 289-289
Author(s):  
Jason Homza ◽  
John T. Nawrocki ◽  
Harmar D. Brereton ◽  
Christopher A. Peters
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Salvage Radiotherapy ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Treatment Intensification ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

289 Background: Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) may be employed as a potentially curative intervention for patients experiencing biochemical failure (serum prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 0.2 ng/mL) after prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Patients not showing a favorable response to SRT alone may require additional therapies and may benefit from earlier identification of this need. Methods: 131 consecutive patients received SRT during the timeframe of this study. 76 were deemed eligible based on the following criteria: prostatic adenocarcinoma diagnosis receiving SRT, no clinical evidence of metastasis, no hormone use prior to/during SRT, serum PSA measurement halfway through SRT, and minimum follow-up time of 3 months. Median follow-up time was 51.6 months. Eligible patients were divided into three groups based on PSA response by the midpoint of treatment: no change, decrease, or increase in PSA. The primary endpoint of the study was clinical failure (measured from SRT completion), defined as serum PSA value ≥0.2ng/mL above the post-radiotherapy nadir, initiation of androgen deprivation therapy, development of bone metastasis, or death from prostate cancer. Results: 13.1% experienced no change in PSA halfway through SRT (group 0), 68.4% of patients experienced a decrease (group 1), 18.4% experienced an increase (group 2). Four-year freedom from clinical failure was 60.0% for group 0, 58.3% for group 1, and 41.7% for group 2. Median time to clinical failure was 71.7 months for group 1, 26.8 months for group 2, and was not reached for group 0. Pairwise multiple comparison demonstrated a significant difference in four-year freedom from clinical failure between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.036). Conclusions: These data strongly suggest that changes in PSA are apparent midway through SRT and are associated with 4-year freedom from clinical failure. Further study is warranted to determine whether mid-treatment PSA during SRT may be used to identify a subset of patients that may benefit from treatment intensification.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZhenHeng Wei ◽  
ChuXin Chen ◽  
BoWen Li ◽  
YongYue Li ◽  
Hong Gu
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Castration Resistant

ObjectiveThe androgen receptor-targeting drugs abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide have shown positive results as treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC.MethodsWe retrieved relevant articles from PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE published before December 31, 2020. Eleven articles were initially selected, and four phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trials of abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide that involved 5199 patients with mCRPC were included. The end points were time to prostate-specific antigen progression (TTPP), according to the prostate-specific antigen working group criteria; overall survival (OS); and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS).ResultsFour randomized, controlled clinical trials involving 5199 patients were included in this study. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo alone, abiraterone significantly improved OS (HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.8, P&lt;0.00001), rPFS (HR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.57-0.71, P &lt; 0.00001), and TTPP (HR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.45-0.59, P &lt; 0.00001) in patients with mCRPC. Compared with placebo, enzalutamide significantly improved OS (HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.59-0.75, P&lt;0.00001), rPFS (HR=0.33, 95% CI: 0.29-0.37, P&lt; 0.00001), and TTPP (HR=0.19, 95% CI: 0.17-0.22, P &lt; 0.00001). An indirect comparison was performed to compare the efficacy of abiraterone and enzalutamide. The results showed that there was no significant difference between abiraterone and enzalutamide with regard to improving the OS of patients with mCRPC (HR=1.03, 95% CI: 0.854-1.242). Enzalutamide was superior to abiraterone with regard to improving rPFS in patients with mCRPC (HR=0.516, 95% CI: 0.438-0.608). With regard to improving TTPP, the efficacy of enzalutamide was better than that of abiraterone (HR=0.365, 95% CI: 0.303-0.441). In sAE, there was no difference between abiraterone and enzalutamide (P=0.21, I2 = 38%).ConclusionsCompared with placebo, both abiraterone and enzalutamide significantly prolonged OS, rPFS, and TTPP in patients with mCRPC. There was no difference in safety between abiraterone and enzalutamide. In addition, enzalutamide had better efficacy than abiraterone with regard to improving rPFS and TTPP but not OS, but the level of evidence was low. Therefore, a large direct comparison trial is needed to compare the efficacy of the two drugs.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO, identifier (CRD42021226808)

scholarly journals Prostate-specific antigen and (free prostate-specific antigen/ prostate-specific antigen) ratio in patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 17-25
Author(s):  
Amal A. Hussein ◽  
Rayah S. Baban ◽  
Alaa G. Hussein
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Control ◽  
Control Study

Background: Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in menworldwide. Many markers are suggested as markers of prostate cancer with differentspecificity and sensitivity.Objective : The present study’s main aim is to examine the possible utility ofprostate-specific antigen indices as markers of prostate cancer.Methods: A case-control study was conducted in the Department of Chemistry andBiochemistry, College of Medicine, Al- Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq from July2018 till March 2019, includes 84 subjects divided into three groups:Twenty Four patients with prostate cancer (PCA), thirty patients with benignprostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and thirty healthy subjects as a control group wereexamined in this study.Thirty healthy volunteer subjects were asked to be involved in this study as a controlgroup. Blood samples from these patients were collected before obtaining a prostaticbiopsy. Serum PSA, fPSA levels were quantified by the ELISA technique.Results: PSA cut-off value was found to be more than 9.57 ng/ml for Prostate Cancerpatients, values range between 3.17 - 9.57 ng/ml for BPH patients and cut-off valuefor control was found to be less than 3.17 ng/ml, while serum (fPSA/PSA) % cut-offvalue was less than 11.1% for Prostate Cancer patients, values range between 11.1% -31 % for BPH patients, and cut-off value was greater than 31% for the control group.Conclusion: There is a highly significant difference in serum PSA levels and(fPSA/PSA)% between the prostate cancer and control groups. Body mass indexshowed an inverse association with the risk of prostate cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document