scholarly journals Maintaining Your Emotional Wellness During COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre Logan

The world is a little scary and stressful right now because the COVID-19 outbreak has impacted many people’s lives in one way or another. Being anxious during a time like this is completely normal, but the fear and uncertainty can have a negative impact on your mental health. Now more than ever taking care of your mental health is a priority. We here at the Implementation Science and Practice Advances Research Center (iSPARC) have seen many great resources and tips come out to help people support their mental health during this crisis. We’ve pointed out some of the ones we think are the most helpful and listed them below. The resources we got these tips from are also available at the end of this tip sheet.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e30510212535
Author(s):  
Gabriel Kiaro Leite Nunes ◽  
Karinne Alice Santos de Araújo ◽  
Thais Ranielle Souza de Oliveira ◽  
Marcelina da Conceição Botelho Teixeira ◽  
Ieler Ferreira Ribeiro ◽  
...  

The COVID-19 pandemic brought about major changes in the lifestyle of the world population. Due to the lack of vaccines or a definitive treatment for disease, governments around the world have adopted social isolation and quarantine as methods to control the spread of the virus. Objective: Thus, the objective of this study was to discuss how social isolation and quarantine periods affected people's mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: An integrative literature review was carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic between March and September 2020, establishing the following guiding question: How did social isolation and quarantine affect the mental health and quality of life of the population in the COVID-19 pandemic? Results: The final sample consisted of nineteen (19) articles, two (2) addressed depression during the pandemic period, three (3) presented the pandemic and the relationship with sociodemographic aspects, five (5) analyzed mental health in the pandemic, four (4) reported the impact of COVID-19 on the population's style and quality of life and the last five (5) demonstrated the quality of human relationships and emotional aspects in the face of the pandemic. Conclusion: It was demonstrated that isolation and the quarantine period had a negative impact on the population's quality of life and long-term mental health.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-166
Author(s):  
Sunil Nepal ◽  
Sudip Nepal ◽  
Chakrakodi S. Shastry ◽  
Sharad Chand ◽  
U.P. Nandakumar ◽  
...  

Background: The novel coronavirus disease outbreak of 2019 was declared as a public health emergency by the World Health Organization. At present, the virus has spread throughout the world, leading to millions of cases and is further increasing. Objective: The main objective of this study is to review the impact of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the mental health of frontline workers, isolated and quarantined people and the general population. Methods: The relevant articles were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect database by using the keywords “Mental health”, “COVID-19”, “Impact of COVID-19”, “Frontline workers”, “Quarantine”, “Isolation”, “Immunity” and “Economy”. The retrieved articles were included in the study based on inclusion criteria to perform the review. All the selected scientific articles were critically reviewed and the information is summarized in this narrative review. Results: The majority of the studies stated that frontline health workers were at an increased risk of depression. The infected, suspects and quarantined people were reported with high stress, posttraumatic stress disorder, and suicidal thoughts. The pandemic has devastated the world’s economy, which has severely impacted global mental health. Conclusion: Mental health should be taken into account, and necessary interventional initiatives need to be considered both by the health authorities and the government to minimize the adversity of the consequences. The pandemic may disappear with the discovery of new vaccines or medications, but its negative impact on mental health may persist, particularly among vulnerable populations. Thus, mental health must be a matter of concern in the present scenario.


Author(s):  
Denise Lenares-Solomon ◽  
Christina Conti ◽  
Christina George

A person's mental health involves their social, psychological, and emotional wellness, all of which are important to their development. Lack of resources and access to effective mental health services can have a negative impact on the mental health of children residing in poverty-stricken rural communities. In advocating for this population, the authors have highlighted five factors that work as barriers in the mental health of children living in rural poverty. These factors were identified as early development, healthcare accessibility, parental/caretaker's educational level, educational system, and mental health stigma and stress. Furthermore, the authors presented a multi-layered approach for addressing these barriers. The components of the multi-layered approach include school-based resources, community-based resources, medical-based resources, and government-based resources. A case illustration is used to demonstrate the practical application of one aspect of the multi-layered approach – the school-based resources. Lastly, the authors stated that more research is needed for this population in regard to the effects of rural poverty on the mental health of children.


2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 495-507
Author(s):  
Astha Kumari

It has been observed that social media platforms have had both a positive and negative effect on how India has dealt with the COVID 19 pandemic. As the coronavirus took over the world, many took to social media to learn about how the virus spreads and what it is. Although this helped inform everyone on how to take precautions against this deadly virus, a lot of the information that users were reading was not verified or fact-checked and labeled as "fake news". In the modern world, information is spread very quickly through a variety of social media platforms. Because of this, there was widespread panic even before the COVID-19 virus had even reached India. Many citizens bought an excessive surplus of supplies such as masks, hand sanitizers, and food, which ultimately led to a shortage of these supplies for the 1.3 billion people in this country. The shortage of supplies along with the lockdown process which severely impacted the economy has led to an increase in price to the majority of essential products such as food, hand sanitizers, masks, etc. The most affected were the average day workers. Social media has caused widespread panic and hogging of essential supplies along with false facts of the virus itself, however, there are some things that we have benefited from due to social media. For example, social media has shown us the importance of social distancing and activities that we can do to keep our mental health in check while under lockdown. In short, I believe social media should be regulated and kept under watch by the government in certain aspects when it comes to spreading information about pandemics like covid19. If regulated properly we can avoid mass panic and anarchy and will be able to survive this pandemic as one.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-58
Author(s):  
Hasan Ahamed ◽  
Kazi Tanvir Hasan ◽  
Md. Tamzid Islam ◽  
Faisal Chowdhury Galib

Lockdown is considered to be the best of policies around the world to fight the deadly virus of COVID-19 which decimated hundreds of people in the last six months. However, this is not a cost-free measure. Billions of dollars worth of economic activities halted hinging upon these measures imposed by the governments of the countries. For instance, IMF predicted that the GDP growth will decline by 4.9 percent in 2020. Global trade is also expected to plummet by 27 percent in the second quarter of the year. In addition, paucity of recreational activities severely affects the mental health of the people. While imposing lockdown, both the cost and benefit should be analyzed to understand the real benefit of these measures on human life. This study critically examines the impact of the lockdown measures on mental health, and the economy of Bangladesh along with the efficacy of the measures on containing the virus. We found that the negative impact on the economy and mental health surpasses the positive impact of curbing the pandemic. It also compares the efficacy of the measures in different countries to find out the pattern that resembles with Bangladesh. From all the data, we conclude that the cost of lockdown measures in the country is greater than the benefit it brings to Bangladesh.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21551-e21551
Author(s):  
Maria monica Ratti ◽  
Alessandra Portaluppi ◽  
Federica Bertin ◽  
Eleonora Franchini ◽  
Claudio Verusio

e21551 Background: Caregiver and patient are a dyad in which the hardship of one inevitably results in a worsening of the other’s condition. Supporting caregivers so they can deal with their relatives’ cancerous condition is useful to improve both patient care and collaboration with medical teams (Zavagli et al., 2012). Burden of caregivers has psychological and physical negative impact on patients (Gritti et al., 2011). This research matches the effects of the oncological disease on the patients and the caregivers, to find similarities and differences in order to better understand their specific needs and optimizing the support provided to them in hospital setting. Methods: Two different sets of tests are composed of a particular registry paper, SF-36, MAC, BDI-II, STAI-Y, addressed to patients, and SF-36, ZBI, COPE, addressed to caregivers. The samples are made up of 250 patients (M = 107; W = 143) and 143 caregivers (M = 54; W = 89). 34% of the sample had changes in job life due the illness process (C1), while 69% of caregivers had changes in their social, working or familiar life due taking care patients (CC1). 40% of patients in sample of caregivers had received the diagnosis since less than 3 months (CD3), 23% from 3 to 6 months (CD3-6), 14% from 6 to 12 months (CD6-12) and 22% over 12 months (CD12). Results:C1 reported worse levels of “Mental Health Index” (t = 2,016; p = ,045), depression (t = -3,949; p = ,000) and anxiety (t = -3,363; p = ,001) than patients had not changes in job. CC1 had worse levels of “Mental Health Index” (t = 4,276; p = ,045) and burden (t = -6,402; p = ,000) than caregivers without changes in life. Patients who received the diagnosis since less than 3 months reported less “Fighting Spirit” coping style (F(210;8) = 2,76; p = ,006) and worse levels of “Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems” (F(211;8) = 2,346; p = ,020) than in other periods. CD12 reported worse levels of burden than CD3, CD3-6 and CD6-12 (F(136;3) = 3,67; p = ,014). Conclusions:The results suggest that patients and caregivers share a similar suffering related to life changes, but underscore a difference in the adaptation to the disease condition with increasing time from diagnosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Sergey Igumnov

During the pandemic, many countries go through a period of so-called “self-isolation” or quarantine, during which people are forced for a long time not to see their loved ones, not to visit places of importance to them and experiencing constant anxiety and un­certainty due to changing living conditions. This has had a very negative impact on most people’s mental state. Analyzing data from many countries around the world, the World Health Organization (WHO) notes that the fear, loneliness, isolation, stress and anxiety experienced by all people during the COVID-19 pan­demic can cause great mental health problems and countries need to be prepared for them. Metaanalysis of studies evaluating the prevalence of mental and behavioral disorders, self-harming behavior, acts of family violence, and problematic substance use in the COVID-19 pandemic show that depression, drug and alcohol addiction, self-harm and suicidal behavior are expected to increase, requiring increased prepa­redness by mental health services.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lysia Demetriou ◽  
Emma Cox ◽  
Claire E. Lunde ◽  
Christian M. Becker ◽  
Adriana L. Invitti ◽  
...  

Endometriosis is a chronic condition affecting ~10% of women globally. Little is known about the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on their care. This brief report is aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 on the care of people with endometriosis around the world, their priorities in relation to their clinical care during and coming out of the pandemic, and whether they believed that endometriosis makes them more vulnerable to COVID-19. An internet-based survey collected data in five languages between May 11, 2020, and June 8, 2020. Only participants with a surgical or radiological diagnosis of endometriosis aged 18 years or over were included. A total of 6,729 eligible respondents completed the survey with 80.7% [95% CI (79.7, 81.6)] reporting a negative impact on their care. This included difficulties obtaining medication (20.3%), cancelled/postponed gynaecology appointments (50.0%), and cancelled/postponed procedures (37.2%). More than half worried that their endometrioses make them more vulnerable to COVID-19 [54.2%; 95% CI (53.0, 55.4)]. The top three priorities were remarkably consistent around the world: contact with gynaecologists, knowing when procedures would be performed, and support with mental health (20.3% prioritising this aspect during the pandemic and 13.0% as restrictions begin to ease). This study shows the substantial impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on people with endometriosis and describes how they would like care prioritised moving forwards. The findings regarding significant support needs for mental health add further weight to the growing recognition of attending to such issues as part of good patient-centred care.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo Zhang ◽  
Si-qing Zhang ◽  
Si-meng Cheng ◽  
Jia-hao Wang ◽  
Yi-wen Tao ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Poverty and hunger are still severe problems faced by the world today, especially in developing countries. Starvation in childhood usually damaged mental health in later years. But, does this proposition apply China? The answer could not only verify the validity of the current research findings, but also provide certain significance for the intervention and formulation of global public health policy.Method: This research was based on the data of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey data in 2018, and 1820 elderly people were investigated. The impact of childhood starvation on mental health in later years was investigated by the Ordinary Least Squares method. Moreover, the robustness tests conducted by replacing independent variable to severity of childhood starvation and dividing the samples to different age ranges. Furthermore, heterogeneity was also analyzed based on different gender, different domicile where they born, and different level of education.Results: The childhood starvation was associated with less mental health scores in later life. The older who suffered from childhood starvation showed worsen mental health in later years, especially in the illiterate samples and the rural samples. However, there was no significant difference when considering different gender.Conclusions: Childhood starvation worsened the mental health in later life, and the level of education and being born in urban had a mediating effect to the relationship. In order to reduce the negative impact of childhood starvation on mental health, anti-poverty strategies, such as providing assistance to children who are hungry, and developing early intervention programs for children's development, should be promoted around the world. Meanwhile, the local development, industrialization and modernization, as well as children's educational attainment should also be promoted while preventing child hunger.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document