Classical Armenian declension
<!--[if gte mso 10]> <mce:style><! /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Vanlig tabell"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} > <! [endif] > <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">This paper looks in detail at the Classical Armenian declension. I argue that the system provides insights into two central issues in this empirical domain: the morphosyntactic structure of the forms which make up a case paradigm, and the fine working of spell-out. On the empirical side, I highlight a connection between case syncretism and its synthetic vs. analytic expression. More specifically, case syncretism in the language is restricted by contiguity in a linear order of cases. In the same ordering, analytic expression of categories gradually replaces synthetic expression. The technology which is proposed to account for this is a core part of nanosyntax (Starke 2005, this volume): fine grained syntax, and phrasal spell-out. Particular attention is devoted to the interaction of the Superset Principle and the “Biggest wins” theorem, two core components of the nanosyntactic spell-out machinery.</span><-->