scholarly journals Outlandish Spelling System Invented by Indonesian Internet Society: The Case of Language Usage in Social Networking Site

Author(s):  
Rizky Anugrah Putra ◽  
Sulis Triyono

Before having consistent alphabetic writing system, Bahasa Indonesia had encountered several developments in orthographic enhancement. Bahasa Indonesia need to be enhanced for several reasons such as to create national identity and also to provide an ideal spelling system. Orthography system helps the language user to associate the symbol, sound, and meaning. For those reasons, the spelling system is important in written language since most of information and knowledge are preserved in written form. As time passes, there is almost no barrier in human interaction since the distance is narrowed by the technology. To use it efficiently, the language users utilize their language to be shorter but it is easier to understand. However, it creates discrepancy in the orthography system which hinders the interlocutor to get the actual meaning of the written language. This article reveals an issue about orthography system which is made by internet society in which has unusual alphabetic spelling system. The peculiarity is caused by psychological and social factor which revert the spelling model to be identical to children (immature speech).

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 288
Author(s):  
Edeil Reis do Espírito Santo ◽  
Osvaldo Barreto Oliveira Júnior

O domínio do Sistema de Escrita Alfabética (SEA) requer do sujeito cognoscente um eivado esforço conceitual, no sentido de perceber o que a escrita representa e como ela representa. Nós, adultos, por vezes, nos esquecemos de que a construção da base alfabética é um processo que exige estratégias, levantamento de hipóteses e superação paulatina dessas hipóteses, numa ação de monitoramento cognitivo. O domínio progressivo das propriedades do SEA depende da compreensão conceitual da escrita como objeto do conhecimento e da capacidade do professor alfabetizador em, por meio dessa compreensão, engendrar propostas que contemplem ações interventivo-mediadoras voltadas à problematização dos conhecimentos e concepções prévias dos aprendentes, fazendo-os construir novos esquemas e ampliar suas estruturas cognitivas. Entender a escrita como código ou como sistema notacional tem implicações didático-pedagógicas e epistêmicas, haja vista a prática alfabetizadora ser condicionada pela forma como se pensa a escrita e o papel que o sujeito tem nesse processo de apropriação. Defendemos um ensino explícito das propriedades do sistema alfabético aliado aos usos socioculturais da escrita e da leitura, por entendermos que desse ensino intencional resulta a ajuda (mediação) que o docente presta ao sujeito aprendente no percurso em busca de se tornar um proficiente leitor e produtor de textos, afinal, o fim basilar da alfabetização é levar o sujeito a ler e escrever com autonomia, uma vez que leitura e escrita são ferramentas de inserção sociocultural. Contudo, sem domínio das convenções da notação alfabética não se participa de situações de escrita e de leitura como tecnologias inclusivas.Palavras-chave: Sistema de escrita alfabética. Psicogênese da língua escrita. Ação interventivo-mediadora.Alphabetical writing system: problematizing a conceptual systemABSTRACTThe domain of the Alphabetic Writing System (AWS) requires the cognoscent subject to express a conceptual effort in order to perceive what writing represents and how it represents it. Us, adults, sometimes forget that the construction of the alphabetical base is a process that requires strategies, hypothesis collection and gradual overcoming of these hypotheses, in a cognitive monitoring action. The progressive mastery of SEA properties depends on the conceptual understanding of writing as an object of knowledge and the ability of the literacy teacher to, through this understanding, generate proposals that contemplate intervening-mediating actions aimed at the problematization of knowledge and conceptions of learners, making them construct new schemes and expand their cognitive structures. Understanding writing as a code or as a notational system has didactic-pedagogical and epistemic implications, since the literacy practice is conditioned by the way in which writing is thought and the role that the subject has in this process of appropriation. We advocate an explicit teaching of the properties of the alphabetic system combined with the sociocultural uses of writing and reading, since we understand that from this intentional teaching results the help (mediation) that the teacher gives to the learner in the course in order to become a proficient reader and producer of texts, after all, the basic aim of literacy is to lead the subject to read and write with autonomy, since reading and writing are tools of socio-cultural insertion. However, without mastery of the conventions of alphabetic notation, writing and reading situations are not included as inclusive technologies.Keywords: Alphabetical writing system. Psychogenesis of written language. Interventional-mediating action.Sistema de escrita alfabética: problematizando un sistema conceptualRESUMENEl dominio del Sistema de Escritura Alfabética (SEA) requiere del sujeto cognoscente un eivado esfuerzo conceptual, en el sentido de percibir lo que la escritura representa y cómo ella representa. Los adultos a veces nos olvidamos de que la construcción de la base alfabética es un proceso que requiere estrategias, levantamiento de hipótesis y superación paulatina de esas hipótesis, en una acción de monitoreo cognitivo. El dominio progresivo de las propiedades del SEA depende de la comprensión conceptual de la escritura como objeto del conocimiento y de la capacidad del profesor alfabetizador en, por medio de esa comprensión, engendrar propuestas que contemplen acciones intervencionista mediadoras volcadas a la problematización de los conocimientos y concepciones previas de los alumnos, haciéndoles construir nuevos esquemas y ampliar sus estructuras cognitivas. Entender la escritura como código o como sistema notacional tiene implicaciones didáctico pedagógicas y epistémicas, hay que la práctica alfabetizadora estar condicionada por la forma en que se piensa la escritura y el papel que el sujeto tiene en ese proceso de apropiación. Defendemos una enseñanza explícita de las propiedades del sistema alfabético aliado a los usos socioculturales de la escritura y de la lectura, por entender que de esa enseñanza intencional resulta la ayuda (mediación) que el docente presta al sujeto aprendente en el recorrido en busca de convertirse en un proficiente lector y el productor de textos, alfinal, el fi n basilar de la alfabetización es llevar al sujeto a leer y escribir con autonomía, una vez que lectura y escritura son herramientas de inserción sociocultural. Sin embargo, sin dominio de las convenciones de la notación alfabética no se participa de situaciones de escritura y de lectura como tecnologías inclusivas.Palabras clave: Sistema de escritura alfabética. Psicogénesis de la lengua escrita. Acción intervencionista-mediadora.


Author(s):  
Rebecca Treiman ◽  
Brett Kessler

A six-year-old child knows the meanings of many spoken words; 10,000 by one estimate. He or she can understand oral questions, commands, and stories. Yet if this same information is presented in written form, the child is hard pressed to decipher it. How do children learn to read, and how do they reach a point at which reading seems as easy and natural as listening? This article considers the development of reading ability, focusing on the development of single-word reading in alphabetic writing systems. It examines how children grasp the idea that writing is related to language, and how they learn about the links between the letters in printed words and the sounds in the corresponding spoken words. First, the article discusses written language and spoken language in children, and then focuses on early learning about relations between writing and language. It also looks at the dual-route model, the single-route model, and the teaching of decoding.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Liu ◽  
James R. Booth

An important issue in dyslexia research is whether developmental dyslexia in different writing systems has a common neurocognitive basis across writing systems or whether there are specific neurocognitive alterations. In this chapter, we review studies that investigate the neurocognitive basis of dyslexia in Chinese, a logographic writing system, and compare the findings of these studies with dyslexia in alphabetic writing systems. We begin with a brief review of the characteristics of the Chinese writing system because to fully understand the commonality and specificity in the neural basis of Chinese dyslexia one must understand how logographic writing systems are structured differently than alphabetic systems.


Author(s):  
Noviah Dwi Putranti ◽  
Edi Winarko

AbstrakAnalisis sentimen dalam penelitian ini merupakan proses klasifikasi dokumen tekstual ke dalam dua kelas, yaitu kelas sentimen positif dan negatif.  Data opini diperoleh dari jejaring sosial Twitter berdasarkan query dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan sentimen publik terhadap objek tertentu yang disampaikan di Twitter dalam bahasa Indonesia, sehingga membantu usaha untuk melakukan riset pasar atas opini publik. Data yang sudah terkumpul dilakukan proses preprocessing dan POS tagger untuk menghasilkan model klasifikasi melalui proses pelatihan. Teknik pengumpulan kata yang memiliki sentimen dilakukan dengan pendekatan berdasarkan kamus, yang dihasilkan dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 18.069 kata. Algoritma Maximum Entropy digunakan untuk POS tagger dan algoritma yang digunakan untuk membangun model klasifikasi atas data pelatihan dalam penelitian ini adalah Support Vector Machine. Fitur yang digunakan adalah unigram dengan fitur pembobotan TFIDF. Implementasi klasifikasi diperoleh akurasi 86,81 %  pada pengujian 7 fold cross validation untuk tipe kernel Sigmoid. Pelabelan kelas secara manual dengan POS tagger menghasilkan akurasi 81,67%.  Kata kunci—analisis sentimen, klasifikasi, maximum entropy POS tagger, support vector machine, twitter.  AbstractSentiment analysis in this research classified textual documents into two classes, positive and negative sentiment. Opinion data obtained a query from social networking site Twitter of Indonesian tweet. This research uses  Indonesian tweets. This study aims to determine public sentiment toward a particular object presented in Twitter businesses conduct market. Collected data then prepocessed to help POS tagged to generate classification models through the training process. Sentiment word collection has done the dictionary based approach, which is generated in this study consists 18.069 words. Maximum Entropy algorithm is used for POS tagger and the algorithms used to build the classification model on the training data is Support Vector Machine. The unigram features used are the features of TFIDF weighting.Classification implementation 86,81 % accuration at examination of 7 validation cross fold for the type of kernel of Sigmoid. Class labeling manually with POS tagger yield accuration 81,67 %. Keywords—sentiment analysis, classification, maximum entropy POS tagger, support vector machine, twitter.


Edulib ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Doddy Rusmono ◽  
Susanti Agustina

Abstrak. Proses transfer ide dalam bentuk tulisan yang dilakukan oleh mahasiswa jurusan ilmu perpustakaan dan informasi sebagai mahasiswa jurusan non Bahasa Inggris (SNED) yang mempelajari Bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa asing (EFL) perlu diinvestigasi. Ketidakmampuan untuk menjembatani kesenjangan antara ide dalam bahasa ibu (Bahasa Inggris) dengan ide dalam bahasa pembaca (Bahasa Inggris) menghambat pemahaman pembaca, khususnya pembaca yang merupakan penutur asli Bahasa Inggris. Paragraf yang ditulis oleh mahasiswa SNED sebagai pembelajar Bahasa Inggris tidak dapat dipahami karena hambatan linguistik dan budaya. Sejumlah kecil mahasiswa yang membuat tulisan Bahasa Inggris dalam ujian tengah semester memperlihatkan gambaran ketidaktepatan dalam hal menyusun kalimat sehingga Bahasa Inggris mereka pada tingkatan tertentu terdengar seperti Bahasa Indonesia. Dalam hal ini kemampuan mereka untuk menggunakan Bahasa Inggris seperti layaknya bahasa Indonesia terbukti sangat rendah sehingga seorang penutur asli Bahasa Inggris yang mencoba untuk memahami ide mereka bisa salah memahaminya. Seorang pembelajar Bahasa Inggris harus memiliki kosakata yang cukup banyak dan setidaknya mengetahui aturan gramatikal seperti formulasi 9BP+3CC (Cd,Cx,Cdx) dan PoS misalnya, untuk melengkapi pemahaman sebelum benar-benar dapat mengekspresikan ide dalam tulisan Bahasa Inggris yang dapat dipahami. Selain itu, pengetahuan mahasiswa tentang budaya penutur Bahasa Inggris memainkan peranan yang sangat penting untuk menghasilkan tulisan yang bagus, sebagaimana yang diungkapkan oleh seorang ahli bahasa bahwa seringkali seorang pembelajar bahasa mengetahui aturan tata bahasa tetapi tidak memiliki pengetahuan yang cukup tentang budaya penutur asli. Mahasiswa mengalami kesulitan dalam mengkomunikasikan idenya dikarenakan ekspresi suatu ide terikat oleh budaya yang merupakan entitas independen. Budaya penutur asli mempengaruhi dan membentuk perasaan, sikap, dan respons terhadap pengalaman dan interaksi seorang pembelajar bahasa dengan yang lain. Oleh karena itu, upaya fasilitator untuk memperbaiki kemampuan menulis mahasiswa mungkin untuk dilakukan.Kata kunci: Penulisan paragraf, Bahasa, Kultur , Constraint, Betterment,  SNED. Abstract. Ideas transferred in the written form by Library and Information Science students as SNED (Students of Non-English Department)learning English in the environments of EFL (English as a Foreign Language) need investigating. Inability of bridging the gap between the ideas in their native language (Indonesian language) and the audience language (English language)hampers understanding on the readers' part, as especially a native speaker of English language. Paragraphs written by the SNED as English Language Learners (ELLs) are incomprehensible due to linguistic and cultural constraints. Quite a small number of students  willing to write in English in their Mid-term Examination give some picture of inappropriateness in terms of sentence structuring resulting in their English being “Indonesian” to some extent. Their “at-homeness”, in this case, proves to be so low that a native speaker of English trying to understand their ideas put into a paragraph will be more than likely misled. ELLs should have vocabularies in a sufficient number and know grammatical rules such as the one formulated as 9BP+3CC (Cd,Cx,Cdx) and the PoS at least, for instance, to equip themselves with before actually expressing their ideas in comprehensible English writing mode. Other than that, ELLs' knowledge of target culture (English, that is) plays a great role in producing a good writing as coined by a linguist: Most frequently confronted that students to a great extent know the rules of language, but are not knowledgeable enough about the target culture. In communicating their ideas, students found it difficult to do due to a culture-bound independent entity of idea expressions. The target culture influences and shape the ELLs' feelings, attitudes, and responses to the ELLs' experiences and interactions with others. It is indicated that any facilitator's efforts towards betterments in terms of writing better paragraphs by the ELLs should be a possibility.Key words: paragraph writing, linguistic, cultural, constraint, betterment, SNED.


Tamaddun ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-73
Author(s):  
Umar Mansyur

Indonesian language learning in schools is directed at improving students’ language skills, bothin the aspects of listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Speaking is one of the language skillsthat is vulnerable in relation to spoken ethics. Language ethics is defined as a normative rule oflanguage use which becomes a general guideline agreed by the language user community thatsuch a method is recognized as a language that is polite, respectful, and in accordance with thevalues that apply in society. Someone who is skilled at speaking must consider what will be saidbefore speaking. It is not wrong if the saying goes that language is someone’s personal mirror.The phrase shows that a person’s personality can be judged by his speech in language. Formany people, good words, gentle, polite, will portray someone as a good person and virtuouscharacter. Conversely, rude and bad words will also cause a bad image in the person. On thatbasis, Indonesian speech ethics has an important role in learning in schools which also contributes to the student’s character education curriculum.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
thobias sarbunan

Slang uses referred to modernity, language assimilation, and language variety in socialdiscourses; that underlined the background to the reason of young generation toassimilate and modification, as a tool for communicating also socialization. Importantly,slang even the outer level of young ages, will interpret as negative meanings, but theygoing to acquire in variety moment. That culture or we can appeal as language behave,promoting their boundaries as independent language user. In further slang became thesymbol of freedom of speech, the popularity of zoom generation, a group of human classentity, and modern life. All perspective above, that grounded and interrelated to slanguses, was implicating to the use of Anjay word [as the representative or reflection of thevarious slang in Indonesia]. A word such Anjay, transported from negative meaningswhich rooting of [dog-word; in Bahasa Indonesia as Anjing] became one of popular slangthat expressed of enthusiasm, adore, joke, love, and friendship to one object.Unpredictable and unthinkable, why, today, as researcher try to describe this topic, thatword was problematic to the outer ages of young generation. We have to notice that,Anjay popularity have been using for years, and Indonesian known as one of our Prokemor in English call Slang. Besides that, the highest trend of the uses of that word wasachieving in period of YouTube golden age likes in the mid of pandemic. There hasnumerous user of Anjay word in the moment of speaking. To adhere that issue, researcherwas in purpose to describe from scientific attention, in short the interchangeable oflanguage scope to the Anjay word in depth, the method was literature study that compiledof journal-thesis-and bachelor paper. Result showed that slang in general studies, wereseveral of type. So that, we have to consider not also the root of word, but the locus,segment of the user, the reason behind the slang used, and the other language studiesfactor, such as semantic, lexicon, sociolinguistic, psycholinguistic. Shortly, Anjay wordinterpretation or description, considered as various slang that not only simply to relate fornegative meanings as its viral discussion, but as the language expression to the entitygroup such young ages.


1998 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan J. Rickard Liow ◽  
Kenneth K. L. Poon

ABSTRACTPhonological awareness has been shown to be important for early literacy development in unilingual readers of English. We investigated its impact in English and Mandarin for 57 multilingual pupils whose language backgrounds were English, Chinese (Mandarin/dialect), or Bahasa Indonesia, using a homophone decision task, an English lexicality spelling test, and a Hanyu Pinyin (romanised Mandarin) spelling test. All three groups of pupils were studying English and Mandarin in the same school, and so, somewhat unusually, the influence of their language background (especially script exposure) could be seen in the absence of differences in teaching strategies. In English, the results showed that a relationship between script exposure and phonological awareness develops in line with the orthographic depth hypothesis (Frost, Katz, & Bentin, 1987). The Bahasa Indonesia group exhibited the highest levels of alphabetic phonological awareness, followed by the English group and then the Chinese group. In Mandarin, the pupils' performance on the Hanyu Pinyin spelling test suggested that tonal phonological awareness is relatively independent of alphabetic phonological awareness. It seems that language background can influence the nature and development of phonological awareness, and that this in turn may affect children's strategies for the subsequent acquisition of a second (or third) written language.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Hui Chuang ◽  
Shinyi Lin ◽  
Tin-Chang Chang ◽  
Rattikorn Kaewmeesri

Although major contributions are being made by Social Networking Sites (SNS) in communications and e-commerce, very little attention has been given to its implementation. This study contributes to technology and human interaction domain by (1) extending the technology acceptance model (TAM), personality trait and telepresence in developing a comparative mode based on the behavioral intention, (2) testing the model with Partial Least Square (PLS) using Facebook user's data; and (3) comparing result across a developed (Taiwan) and an emerging (Thailand) economy. Results indicate TAM was to fit to test the behavioral intention model in these two economies. The findings support for the telepresence, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use, attitude and behavioral intention; however, the effect levels are different in these two countries (Taiwan vs. Thailand). In addition, only extraversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and neuroticism of the big-five personality have been discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document