Morphological evaluation of microcellular foamed composites developed through gas batch foaming integrating Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D printing technique

In this article, the development of microcellular structure foams has developed by integrating the two successful and existing technologies, namely CO2 gas batch foaming and Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D printing technique. It is a novel approach to manufacture complex design porous products for customized applications. The eventual cell morphologies of the extruded 3D printing filament depends on the process parameters pertaining to both microcellular foaming and 3D printing processes. Further, morphological study has been conducted to evaluate the cell morphologies of the 3D printing filament developed through customized FDM setup. During this process, the significance of various process parameters including saturation pressure, saturation time, desorption time, feed rate and extrusion temperature were thoroughly studied. To pursue this study base material used was acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). The 3D printed filaments consisted of cells with an average cell size in the range of 2.3–276 µm and the average cell density in the range of 4.7 × 104 to 4.3 × 109 cells/cm3. Finally, it has found that by controlling the process parameters different cell morphologies can be developed as per the end application.

Amorphous Polymers’ Foaming and Blends with Organic Foaming-Aid Structured Additives in Supercritical CO2, a Way to Fabricate Porous Polymers from Macro to Nano Porosities in Batch or Continuous Processes

Organic polymers can be made porous via continuous or discontinuous expansion processes in scCO2. The resulting foams properties are controlled by the interplay of three groups of parameters: (i) Chemical, (ii) physico-chemical, and (iii) technological/process that are explained in this paper. The advantages and drawbacks of continuous (extrusion, injection foaming) or discontinuous (batch foaming) foaming processes in scCO2, will be discussed in this article; especially for micro or nano cellular polymers. Indeed, a challenge is to reduce both specific mass (e.g., ρ < 100 kg·m−3) and cell size (e.g., average pore diameter ϕaveragepores < 100 nm). Then a particular system where small “objects” (coreshells CS, block copolymer MAM) are perfectly dispersed at a micrometric to nanometric scale in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) will be presented. Such “additives”, considered as foaming aids, are aimed at “regulating” the foaming and lowering the pore size and/or density of PMMA based foams. Differences between these additives will be shown. Finally, in a PMMA/20 wt% MAM blend, via a quasi one-step batch foaming, a “porous to nonporous” transition is observed in thick samples. A lower limit of pore size (around 50 nm) seems to arise.

Thermoplastic polyurethane foams: From autoclave batch foaming to bead foam extrusion

Two ester-based and one ether-based thermoplastic polyurethane grades have been used to produce thermoplastic polyurethane foams. The foaming process comprised pressure-induced batch foaming, foam extrusion, and bead foam extrusion by using an underwater granulator. Foam density and morphological properties, such as cell size, cell size distribution, and cell density, were measured through different analytical methods. Through autoclave batch foaming a minimum cell size of 10 µm and density of 202 kg/m3 is obtained, which is lower than the densities previously reported in the literature for thermoplastic polyurethane. Extrusion foaming however could not achieve the same range of foam expansion given that the lowest density achieved is 635 kg/m3 and a minimum cell size equal to 46 µm. The production of thermoplastic polyurethane bead foams is also reported for the first time. The minimum density of the obtained foamed beads is 306 kg/m3 and the lowest cell size is 55 µm.