High Performance Friction Reducer for Slickwater Fracturing Applications: Laboratory Study and Field Implementation

Proppant placement in a tight formation is extremely challenging. Therefore, using a high viscous friction reducer (HVFR) as a fracturing fluid for stimulation treatment in tight gas reservoirs is increasing within the industry because it can transport proppant, help reduce pipe friction generated during hydraulic-fracturing treatments, and efficiently clean up similar to the lower viscosity friction reducers (FRs). In this paper the implementation of the robust HVFR that is building higher viscosity at low concentrations, which minimizes energy loss and promotes turbulent flow within the pipe during the pumping of low viscosity, is discussed in detail. Performance evaluation of the new HVFR was conducted in the laboratory and compared to the lower viscosity FR. The study consisted of viscosity measurements at 70 and 180°F, compatibility with other additives, and proppant transport capabilities. Additionally, the viscosity generated from both FRs was compared using two water sources: water well A and treated sewage water. Viscosity measurements were performed across a wide range of FR and HVFR concentrations and under varying shear rates using a digital viscometer. To validate drag reduction capabilities for this HVFR in the field, the same groundwater with low salinity and low total dissolved solids (TDS) content were used for comparison purposes. The test plan for this new HVFR was for a well to be drilled to a total depth of 17,801 ft MD (10,693 ft TVD) with a 6,016-ft lateral section. Another part of the plan was to complete 41 stages—the first stage with the toe initiator, and subsequent stages using ball drops until Stage 8, were completed using the current FR. For Stage 8, the drag reduction from the new HVFR was evaluated against the current FR only during the pad stage. Then, FR or HVFR concentrations were used, with a gradual reduction from 2 to 1 gpt without compromising proppant placement from stages 9 to 37, alternating current FR and the new HVFR every four stages. From Stage 38 to 41, the same approach was used but with treated sewage water and alternating every other stage using current FR or HVFR at 1gpt. The implementation of the new HVFR showed better friction reduction when using the same concentration of the current FR. Also, achieving better average treating pressures with lower concentration. Based on that it is a cost-effective solution and the performance is better, this lead to reduce the HVFR volume to be pumped per stage compared to the current FR. Applications/Significance/Novelty For this study, drag reduction capabilities for this new HVFR were validated in the field at higher pumping rate conditions, potentially optimizing (reducing) the polymer concentration during a freshwater application. It was shown that lower concentrations of this HVFR provided higher viscosity, which helps improve proppant transport and operation placement.

Zipper Fracturing of Horizontal Cluster Wells: Game Changing Unconventional Fracturing in UAE

Following the increase in demand for natural gas production in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), unconventional hydraulic fracturing in the country has grown exponentially and with it the demand for new technology and efficiency to fast-track the process from fracturing to production. Diyab field has historically been a challenging field for fracturing given the high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) conditions, presence of H2S, and the strike-slip to thrust faulting conditions. Meanwhile, operational efficiency is necessary for economic development of this shale gas reservoir. Hence "zipper fracturing" was introduced in UAE with modern technologies to enable both operational efficiency and reservoir stimulation performance. The introduction of zipper fracturing in UAE is considered a game changer as it shifted the focus from single-well fracturing to multiple well pads that allow for fracturing to take place in one well while the adjacent well is undergoing a pumpdown plug-and-perf operation using wireline. The overall setup of the zipper surface manifold allowed for faster transitions between the two wells; hence, it also rendered using large storage tanks a viable option since the turnover between stages would be short. Thus, two large modular tanks were installed and utilised to allow 160,000 bbl of water storage on site. Similarly, the use of high-viscosity friction reducer (HVFR) has directly replaced the common friction reducer additive or guar-based gel for shale gas operation. HVFR provides higher viscosity to carry larger proppant concentrations without the reservoir damage, and the flexibility and simplicity of optimizing fluid viscosity on-the-fly to ensure adequate fracture width and balance near-wellbore fracture complexity. Fully utilizing dissolvable fracture plugs was also applied to mitigate the risk of casing deformation and the subsequent difficulty of milling plugs after the fracturing treatment. Furthermore, fracture and completion design based on geologic modelling helped reduce risk of interaction between the hydraulic fractures and geologic abnormalities. With the application of advanced logistical planning, personnel proficiency, the zipper operation field process, clustered fracture placement, and the pump-down plug-and-perforation operation, the speed of fracturing reached a maximum of 4.5 stages per day, completing 67 stages in total between two wells placing nearly 27 million lbm of proppant across Hanifa formation. The maximum proppant per stage achieved was 606,000 lbm. The novelty of this project lies in the first-time application of zipper fracturing, as well as the first application of dry HVFR fracturing fluid and dissolvable fracturing plugs in UAE. These introductions helped in improving the overall efficiency of hydraulic fracturing in one of UAE's most challenging unconventional basins in the country, which is quickly demanding quicker well turnovers from fracturing to production.

Laboratory Investigation of Impact of Slickwater Composition on Multiphase Permeability Evolution in Tight Sandstones

Summary Fracturing fluid filtrate that leaks off during injection is imbibed by strong capillary forces present in low-permeability sandstones and may severely reduce the effective gas permeability during cleanup and post-fracture production. This work aims to investigate the role fracturing fluid filtrate from slickwater has on rock-fluid and fluid-fluid interactions and to quantify the resulting multiphase permeability evolution during imbibition and drainage of the filtrate by means of specialized core laboratory techniques. Three suites of experiments were conducted. In the first suite of experiments, a fluid leakoff test was conducted on selected core samples to determine the extent of polymer invasion and leakoff characteristics. In the second suite, multigas relative permeability measurements were conducted on sandstone plugs saturated with fracturing fluid filtrate. A combination of controlled fluid evaporation and pulse decay permeability technique was used to measure liquid and gas effective permeabilities for both drainage and imbibition cycles. These experiments aim to capture dynamic permeability evolution during invasion and cleanup of fracturing fluid (slickwater). The final suite of experiments consists of adsorption flow tests to investigate, identify, and quantify possible mechanisms for adsorption of the polymeric molecules of friction reducers present in the fluid filtrate to the pore walls of the rock sample. Imbibition tests and observations of contact angles were conducted to validate possible wettability changes. Results from multiphase permeability flow tests show an irreversible reduction in endpoint brine permeability and relative permeability with increasing concentration of friction reducer. Our results also show that effective gas permeability during drainage/cleanup of the imbibed slickwater fluid is controlled to a large degree by trapped gas saturation than by changes in interfacial tension. Adsorption flow tests identified adsorption of polymeric molecules of the friction reducer present in the fluid to the pore walls of the rock. The adsorption friction reducer increases the wettability of the rock surface and results in the reduction of liquid relative permeability. The originality of this work is to diagnose formation damage mechanisms from laboratory experiments that adequately capture multiphase permeability evolution specific to a slickwater fluid system, during imbibition and cleanup. This will be useful in optimizing fracturing fluid selection.

Critical Examination of Variables Effecting Friction Loop Results for Friction Reducer Selection

Friction reducer evaluations for field application selection are conducted in laboratory benchtop recirculating flow loops or once-through systems. Industry standard procedures and benchtop flow loop (loop) system specifications for friction reduction assessment are nonexistent, though standardization efforts are recently documented. Research and papers correlating friction reducer performance to brine and additives have been published, however other key variables can significantly affect performance and therefore must be addressed to maximize product recommendation accuracy. This paper illustrates how variances affect results. Benchtop recirculating loops used for testing friction reduction products for a specific field's application vary significantly in system components, configurations, and test analyses. Crucial loop system variance examples include differing pipe diameters, pump configurations, flow meter types and placement, differential pressure section and full run lengths, reservoir designs, mixing conditions, and end performance calculations. Oil and gas producers and service companies are trending towards outsourcing friction reducers to independent testing laboratories for loop assessment results prior to recommending friction reducers for end use field applications. These recommendations may have inherent selection bias depending upon the loop system's components and configuration. Friction reduction calculations during loop testing do not consistently consider changes in viscosity and temperature, thereby altering absolute results when evaluating performance. To apply the simplified assumptions in standard pressure, drop methodology, equivalency in flow rate, density, viscosity, and temperature within the run must be maintained. Performance of the friction reducer in a specific brine and additive test run should primarily be dependent upon dosage and method of injecting friction reducer into the loop, however other variables can contribute to performance results. We presume equivalency in pipe roughness and proper loop cleansing. The effects of these variables on friction reduction response applying wide-ranging factors of flowrate, density, viscosity, and temperature are evaluated using designed experiments with responses plotted and illustrated in Cartesian and contour graphs. The result of these designed experiments identified that certain variables are more influential on friction reducers’ measured performances in standard loop experiments and require observation and documentation during performance testing. The final study in this work generated vastly different performance curves when all of the aspects of loop design, entry and differential run lengths, flow rate, injection method, friction reducer types and loadings, and brine types, densities, viscosities, and temperatures were held constant. The goal of benchtop loop testing is scaling for actual field applications. Scaling discrepancies persist however due to differing pipe diameters, fluid circuit designs, and pump types and rates combined with changing brine compositions, proppant, and chemical additive effects on friction reducer products. Understanding that different benchtop loops, or potentially the same benchtop loop, will generate differing results is intriguing, yet unsettling.

A New Recipe for Friction-Reducer Suppliers: Polymer Plus Frac Water, Minus the Cost

The argument for making friction reducer on site is simple: only one truck is required to deliver dry polymer vs. three loads required for the same amount of liquid additive. For Downhole Chemical Solutions (DCS), reducing the number of trips and the amount of chemicals needed to create a stable liquid by mixing it as needed on site reduces the average cost of a gallon of friction reducer by around 30%, said Mark Van Domelen, vice president of technology for DCS. “The business is very cutthroat and competitive on the pricing of polyacrylamide. We can reduce the cost further on friction reducer,” using dry polymer, he said. Polyacrylamide is generally described as the key component in friction reducers. Suppliers also add some ingredients to create a stable liquid and others that are supposed to improve performance. When DCS delivers dry polymer to a well pad to mix it on-site, the only other ingredient is water provided by the customer. It has been a winning strategy change for the private company; it has grown rapidly, even during last year’s slump. DCS increased the number of mixing units from one to 16, and dry polymer sales have grown from 10% to 90%, Van Domelen said. One of the company’s customers is John Blevins, the chief operating officer for Houston-based Hibernia Resources III and an early adopter who was a lead author of a paper on making friction reducer on site while fracturing (SPE 204176). Blevin, who uses the words “friction reducer” and “polymer” interchangeably, is the rare C-level executive who likes to manage operations from a frac van at a company that normally completes one pad at a time. The polymer is polyacrylamide. When Blevin works with DCS on a well, he purchases it directly from one of the few chemical companies that will produce the polymer based on his specifications. The price on the DCS invoice will be a price per pound that covers the cost of the polymer and the service. At Hibernia, a small private-equity and employee-owned company, there is a powerful incentive to pay close attention to the details. “When we spend a nickel, that nickel is divided among us at some point in time. If we are efficiently frugal, we are going to be better off in the long run,” Blevins said. The paper, which was presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC), included a chart showing stage-by-stage costs, with the average cost for dry stages ranging from 27% to 31% lower than similar stages that were fractured using liquids. The simplicity of the mix is a plus for Blevins whose company is especially focused on how chemicals are likely to react downhole. “We did a 6-month study before we pumped anything in the ground to make sure we had the right combination” of fracturing additives, he said. “We do study nearly every well and every landing zone to ensure the chemicals used are compatible.”

Progress of Development and Application of Drag Reduction Agents for Slick-Water Fracturing

Fracturing technology is the key technology of shale oil and gas exploitation in the United States. The key of hydraulic fracturing lies in the formulation of fracturing fluid, which can improve the permeability of shale gas layer, reduce pumping resistance, optimize production conditions, reduce strata damage and other purposes. Slick-water is widely used in water-based fracturing for unconventional oil and gas exploitation, which can reduce the friction resistance. As the core of the slickwater fracturing fluid, the friction reducer determine the fluid’s performances. Combining with the related literature at home and abroad, this paper analyzes the mechanism of friction reducer, introduces the research and application progress of natural polysaccharide, surfactant and polyacrylamide. It is considered that both the instant powder polymer and W/W dispersion polymer have great application potential. The friction reducer with high-efficiency sand-carrying and salt resistance is the focus of future research.

Case Studies of Re-Fracturing Achimov Reservoirs with High-Viscous Friction Reducer on Salym Group of Oilfields

One of the main objectives for the successful development of the majority of producing oil and gas companies in western Siberia is the development of the Achimov strata. It contains a commercially attractive volume of reserves. This reservoir in most oilfields belongs to the hard-to-recover oil - it has a permeability of less than 2 mD. In this regard, the development of the Achimov strata is impossible without carrying out measures for production enhancement. Where most common is hydraulic fracturing. The wells tests with hydraulic fracturing conducted at the Salym group of fields showed that not all reserves are economically attractive, and the decline rate in the first year is extremely high. In this connection, the needs of finding more effective solutions for the production enhancement has become urgent. This article describes the results of pilot work on two wells using a mixture based on a high-viscosity friction reducer (HVFR) as the hydraulic fracturing fluid. The work was carried out at wells where hydraulic fracturing based on cross-linked gel had already been performed and the wells were launched into production. The results of the work, the lessons learned and the analysis of the subsequent production of these wells is the purpose of this work.

What’s the Best Friction Reducer? You Need To Figure It Out Yourself

Friction reducers are expected to play critical roles in fracturing, some better than others. Shale producers are belatedly realizing that there are many variables that can alter the performance of these chemicals used to reduce the power needed to hydraulically fracture a reservoir, and in higher doses, to thicken fluid, making it possible to deliver proppant more efficiently. There are wells that can justify paying more for a friction reducer formulated to stand up to difficult chemical challenges, and others that cannot. But there is no guide that describes how these key additives perform. Those who do evaluations will realize that a lot of details about friction reducers are proprietary and no industry standard provides guidance about the information needed to thoroughly assess their compatibility with reservoir conditions. “There hasn’t been a really good method to quantitatively evaluate friction reducers and what they do,” said Paul Carman, the completion fluid advisor for ConocoPhillips, who has not figured out what that method might be. Recently, Occidental Petroleum took a stab at answering the question with a paper discussing its evaluation of friction-reducer performance. It’s not a short answer. The paper delivered at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC) does not offer names of the products tested, how many were tested at any stage of the process, or details that might identify top performers (URTeC 5249). Those who dig deeper and ask fracturing experts will learn that the best friction reducer will depend on the job. And money, time, and research are required to gather the data needed for informed decision making. When Occidental began working on a system to evaluate friction reducers, they found little had been written on how to do it, said Nancy Zakhour, Occidental’s well design lead, a coauthor of the paper. There was a general paper from Shell on well chemical evaluation but little else. That shows how oil companies have come to rely on others to do performance testing. The shale business has not shown much interest in chemical performance until recently. Greater attention has turned to the many details that can incrementally improve shale well performance and to the research showing how friction reducers perform badly due to chemical reactions in some wells. These are not the only additives that may be affected by chemical reactions during and after fracturing. But friction reducers have grabbed the most attention because they do a couple important jobs.

Settling of Spherical Particles in High Viscosity Friction Reducer Fracture Fluids

Investigating the key factors that impact fluid rheology and proppant static settling velocity in high viscosity friction reducers (HVFRs) is a critical aspect for successful proppant transport in hydraulic fracture treatment. In this study, the rheological properties of HVFRs were tested at various temperature ranges (i.e., 25, 50, 75, and 100 °C) and different HVFR concentrations (i.e., 1, 2, 4, and 8 gpt). Three sizes of spherical particle diameters (i.e., 2, 4, and 6 mm) were selected to measure the static settling velocity. The fracture fluid was tested in two fracture models: an unconfined glass model and a confined rectangular model with two fracture widths (7 and 10 mm). The settling velocity in the confined and unconfined models was measured using an advanced video camera. HVFR results exhibited acceptable thermal stability even at higher temperatures, also the viscosity and elasticity increased considerably with increasing concentration. Increasing the temperature cut the friction reducer efficiency to suspend the spherical particles for a significant time, and that was observed clearly at temperatures that reached 75 °C. Spherical particles freely settled in the unconfined model due to the absence of the wall effect, and the settling velocity decreased significantly as the HVFR concentration increased. Additionally, the fracture angularity substantially slowed the proppant settling velocity due to both the wall effect and several types of friction. This research provides insights into the rheological parameters of a high viscosity friction reducer as a fracturing fluid and its efficiency in transporting particles in bounded and unbounded fracture networks.