The Social Life of the “Forever Chemical”

This article examines the social life of PFAS contamination (a class of several thousand synthetic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) and maps the growing research in the social sciences on the unique conundrums and complex travels of the “forever chemical.” We explore social, political, and cultural dimensions of PFAS toxicity, especially how PFAS move from unseen sites into individual bodies and into the public eye in late industrial contexts; how toxicity is comprehended, experienced, and imagined; the factors shaping regulatory action and ignorance; and how PFAS have been the subject of competing forms of knowledge production. Lastly, we highlight how people mobilize collectively, or become demobilized, in response to PFAS pollution/ toxicity. We argue that PFAS exposure experiences, perceptions, and responses move dynamically through a “toxicity continuum” spanning invisibility, suffering, resignation, and refusal. We off er the concept of the “toxic event” as a way to make sense of the contexts and conditions by which otherwise invisible pollution/toxicity turns into public, mass-mediated, and political episodes. We ground our review in our ongoing multisited ethnographic research on the PFAS exposure experience.

The Etymology of Despair in the Americas

Halfway into White Noise, Don DeLillo's novel from 1985, Jack Gladney packs his family in the car and leaves town running from a black chemical cloud. The “airborne toxic event” had triggered an emergency evacuation plan: floodlights from helicopters, sirens, unmarked cars from obscure agencies, clogged roads, makeshift shelters at a Boy Scout camp where the Red Cross would dispense juice and coffee. People are confused, they seek information wherever they can, “[s]mall crowds collected around certain men.” Among generalized bewilderment, Gladney observes a few individuals moving faster and more assertively than the rest, then getting into a Land Rover. In the chaotic scene of crisis, their confidence gets his attention. “Their bumper stickers read GUN CONTROL IS MIND CONTROL” Gladney reads. And his mind wanders: “In situations like this, you want to stick close to people in right-wing fringe groups. They've practiced staying alive.”

Postmodernism and Technology in Don Delillo's Novel The White Noise

This paper aims at investigating the effect of postmodernism and technology on the social life in Don Delillo's novel The White Noise. In this novel, Don Delillo portrays the chaotic life by using modern technology which has been presented by three ways. The first way is by television as being a source of information and entertainment. The second way is by the toxic event whereas the third is by Dylar's episode and its destructive consequences. He depicts that through the atmosphere of Jack's family plus its effects on the life and thoughts of the elders and society. He proves that technology is leading humanity not to safety, but to death. He further highlights that by showing the impact of technology on the life of the main characters in his novel The White Noise.

The in vitro toxicity of nitrile and epithionitrile derivatives of glucosinolates from rutabaga in human and bovine liver cells

Previous evidence suggests that select nitrile and epithionitrile derivatives of glucosinolates can cause liver disease in cows grazing on brassica forage crops. A toxic incidence in New Zealand in cattle grazing brassica led us to investigate the direct in vitro hepatotoxicity and possible inhibition of the ABCG2 transporter of five nitrile compounds. In this study, we investigated 1-cyano-2-hydroxy-3-butene (CHB, epithionitrile derivative of progoitrin), 1-cyano-2-hydroxy-3,4-epithiobutane (CHEB, nitrile derivative of progoitrin), 3-butenenitrile (nitrile from sinigrin), 4-pentenenitrile (nitrile from gluconapin), and 5-hexenenitrile (nitrile from glucobrassicanapin). Cell viability was assessed following 24- and 72-hr treatments with the 5 different compounds using the MTT assay (HepG2 cells and bovine primary liver cells). Additionally, ABCG2 transporter function was assessed. The results showed that none of the tested compounds caused cytotoxicity at concentrations up to 2 mM for 24hr. Over 72-hr the maximum concentration was 20 μM but no reduction in cell viability was observed. No inhibition of the ABCG2 transporter occured at concentrations up to 1 mM. Overall this study suggests that direct or secondary toxicity due to selected nitrile or epithionitrile derivatives of these glucosinolates was not the cause of the toxic event in cattle.

Proteasomal degradation of preemptive quality control (pQC) substrates is mediated by an AIRAPL–p97 complex

The initial folding of secreted proteins occurs in the ER lumen, which contains specific chaperones and where posttranslational modifications may occur. Therefore lack of translocation, regardless of entry route or protein identity, is a highly toxic event, as the newly synthesized polypeptide is misfolded and can promiscuously interact with cytosolic factors. Mislocalized proteins bearing a signal sequence that did not successfully translocate through the translocon complex are subjected to a preemptive quality control (pQC) pathway and are degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). In contrast to UPS-mediated, ER-associated degradation, few components involved in pQC have been identified. Here we demonstrate that on specific translocation inhibition, a p97–AIRAPL complex directly binds and regulates the efficient processing of polyubiquitinated pQC substrates by the UPS. We also demonstrate p97’s role in pQC processing of preproinsulin in cases of naturally occurring mutations within the signal sequence of insulin.

Microbial fuel-cell-based toxicity sensor for fast monitoring of acidic toxicity

Wastewater may contain various potential toxicants. A microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a device in which bacteria convert the chemical energy into electricity. If a toxic event occurs, microbial activity is inhibited and thus the power output of the MFC decreases. Therefore, an MFC could serve as an early toxicity warning device. A real-time biomonitoring system was developed using MFCs to detect the inflow of toxic substances into wastewater treatment systems. After the MFCs reached steady state, a toxic incident was created by adding HCl into the wastewater to alter its pH. Consequently, a rapid decrease in voltage was observed immediately, followed by a subsequent recovery. The optimal MFC design was a single-chamber air cathode MFC, where the anode and cathode were separated by a Selemion proton exchange membrane. Under an external resistance of 5 Ω, the maximum power averaged 0.23 ± 0.023 mW with domestic wastewater. The optimized MFC showed high sensitivity and fast recovery when exposed to the acidic toxic event. When the hydraulic retention time was decreased from 22 to 3.5 min, sensitivity of the MFC increased substantially. Finally, the extent of inhibition observed was found to be related to the toxicity level, suggesting that a dosage–response relationship exists.

A randomized cross-over trial comparing single-agents capecitabine (C) and UFT plus leucovorin (LV) in patients (Pts) with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC): Preliminary data of a patient preference study.

558 Background: Oral fluoropyrimidines such as C and UFT plus LV (U) are widely used pro-drugs dedicated to the care of CRC. Although their toxicity profile may slightly differ, no direct comparison between these treatments has been done as both molecules are converted into fluorouracil. To help the physicians to choose between C and U, we initiated this randomized cross-over trial aimed to assess patient's preference. Methods: Pts with advanced CRC received either a first cycle of C (1,250mg/m2 x 2/d for 14 days, q3 wks) or a first cycle of U (UFT 300mg/m2/d plus LV 75 mg/d in 3 divided doses every 8 hrs for 28 days, repeated at 35-day intervals). Patients were randomized to receive C at cycle 1 followed by U (arm A) or U at cycle 1 followed by C (arm B). After 2 cycles, pts were asked which treatment they preferred. Treatment was then continued with the chosen regimen. Preferences rates are presented with 95% confidence intervals and the two groups are compared with the chi-squared test. Results: 89 pts were enrolled from 10/2005 to 6/2010. Treatment arms were well balanced for baseline characteristics: male 57%; median age 66 years; PS 0-1 81%. Most of the pts were heavily pretreated (0/1/2/ and >2 previous chemotherapy lines: 6/2/15/66). 64 (arm A: 35, arm B: 29)/89 pts received at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy and were evaluable for preference. At cycle 1, 21% and 43% of the pts presented at least 1 severe toxic event with C and U, respectively. Pts with U at cycle 1 presented more likely with severe fatigue and anorexia. There was 1 toxic death under C (gr. 3 diarrhea, gr.4 neutropenia) at cycle 1. Overall, 66% (95%CI: 52-77%) of evaluable pts expressed preference for C, and there was a statistically significant difference between arms A and B (p<0.02) with more pts preferring C in arm A: 79% (95%CI: 61-91%), as compared to arm B: 50% (95%CI: 31-79%). Conclusions: Pts with advanced CRC preferred C over U, especially when given during the first cycle. No significant financial relationships to disclose.