In this paper the problem of inconsistency between current principle of Public Law and principles of humanity and anthropocent -rism, which is defined by the shortage of due diligence of scientists to the problem of essence transformation and functions of modernstate as the target of research of Public Law is investigated.Fundamental beliefs of domestic science of Public Law correspond to the traditional (industrial) awareness of a state as verticallyintegrated management system, it has an expressive hierarchic structure with a pyramidal distribution of power on the territory of itsinfluence and prescribes certain rules (laws), which are mandatory.A post-industrial, human-centered state is an institution of civil society (namely, the highest form of its organization), which distinguishesit from a traditional state, where there is a single source of “state administration” – is a group of people or one person whorepresents the leadership. The act becomes a law not because the act is issued and provided by the state, but because such activity ofthe state is legitimized by the society. That is, the state appears as one of the instruments of legal regulation, but only under the conditionof its public legitimacy. In such a state, law is not the output of governmental power aimed at regulating and managing society, but atthe means of regulating and limiting governmental power, which is created by people for human activity, and the state itself becomesan active participant in law-making and guarantor of proper implementation of legal norms.It has been determined that the awareness of the essence of the modern state in the domestic science of Public Law correspondsto the model of traditional (industrial) state-legal relations, while domestic Legal science and practice of Public Law requires changesin existing fundamental beliefs that would reflect the essence of post-industrial (information) state.