Abstract. Accurate measurement of black carbon (BC) mass concentrations in snow and ice is crucial for the assessment of climatic impacts. However, it is difficult to compare methods used to assess BC levels in the literature as they are not the same. The single particle soot photometer (SP2) method appears to be one of the most suitable to measure low concentrations of BC in snow and ice. However, deriving BC concentrations with SP2 is not straightforward and different measurement options may lead to different results. In this paper, we propose an optimized method for the quantification of refractory BC (rBC) in snow and ice samples using SP2. The paper reviews all the steps of rBC determination including SP2 calibration, correction for rBC particle aerosolization, and treatment of the samples. In addition, we compare the SP2 method and the thermal-optical method (Sunset organic carbon (OC)-elemental carbon (EC) aerosol analyzer with EUSAAR-2 protocol), using snow and firn samples with different characteristics from the Greenland Summit, the French Alps, the Caucasus, and the Himalayas. The EC : rBC ratio was 1.8 ± 1.2 for the Greenland site, 0.4 ± 0.2 for the Alpine site, 0.9 ± 0.3 for the Caucasus site, and 3.0 ± 1.2 for the Himalayan site. Careful investigation was undertaken of analytical uncertainties in both methods, concerning the analytical range of detection of BC, aerosolization correction for rBC, filtration efficiency of quartz fiber filter before EC analysis, the impact of dust, and pyrolyzed organic carbon artifacts during EC analysis. We conclude that the complexity of artifacts can lead to inaccurate rBC or EC determination. In particular, we observed significant under-estimation of EC due to incomplete filtration together with positive artifacts caused by OC. These results underline the need for careful assessment of the analytical technique and procedure for correct data interpretation.