The pioneer factor hypothesis is not necessary to explain ectopic liver gene activation

The Pioneer Factor Hypothesis (PFH) states that pioneer factors (PFs) are a subclass of transcription factors (TFs) that bind to and open inaccessible sites and then recruit non-pioneer factors (nonPFs) that activate batteries of silent genes. The PFH predicts that ectopic gene activation requires the sequential activity of qualitatively different TFs. We tested the PFH by expressing the endodermal PF FOXA1 and nonPF HNF4A in K562 lymphoblast cells. While co-expression of FOXA1 and HNF4A activated a burst of endoderm-specific gene expression, we found no evidence for a functional distinction between these two TFs. When expressed independently, both TFs bound and opened inaccessible sites, activated endodermal genes, and 'pioneered' for each other, although FOXA1 required fewer copies of its motif for binding. A subset of targets required both TFs, but the predominant mode of action at these targets did not conform to the sequential activity predicted by the PFH. From these results we hypothesize an alternative to the PFH where 'pioneer activity' depends not on categorically different TFs but rather on the affinity of interaction between TF and DNA.

TFAP2 paralogs pioneer chromatin access for MITF and directly inhibit genes associated with cell migration

Transcription factors in the Activating-enhancer-binding Protein 2 (TFAP2) family redundantly regulate gene expression in melanocytes and melanoma. Previous ChIP-seq experiments indicate that TFAP2A and Microphthalmia-associated Transcription Factor (MITF), a master regulator in these cell types, co-activate enhancers of genes promoting pigmentation. Evidence that TFAP2 paralogs can serve as pioneer factors supports the possibility that TFAP2 facilitates MITF binding at co-bound enhancers, although this model has not been tested. In addition, while MITF and TFAP2 paralogs both appear to repress genes that promote invasion, whether they do so by co-repressing enhancers is unknown. To address these questions we evaluated gene expression, chromatin accessibility, TFAP2A and MITF binding, and chromatin marks characteristic of active enhancers in SK-MEL-28 melanoma cells that were wild-type or deleted of the two TFAP2 paralogs with highest expression, TFAP2A and TFAP2C (i.e., TFAP2-KO cells). Integrated analyses revealed distinct subsets of enhancers bound by TFAP2A in WT cells that are inactivated and activated, respectively, in TFAP2-KO cells. At enhancers bound by both MITF and TFAP2A, MITF is generally lost in TFAP2A/TFAP2C double mutants, but not vice versa, implying TFAP2 pioneers chromatin access for MITF. There is a strong correlation between the sets of genes inhibited by MITF and TFAP2, although we did not find evidence that TFAP2 and MITF inhibit enhancers cooperatively. The findings imply that MITF and TFAP2 paralogs cooperatively affect the melanoma phenotype.

Sequence logic at enhancers governs a dual mechanism of endodermal organ fate induction by FOXA pioneer factors

FOXA pioneer transcription factors (TFs) associate with primed enhancers in endodermal organ precursors. Using a human stem cell model of pancreas differentiation, we here discover that only a subset of pancreatic enhancers is FOXA-primed, whereas the majority is unprimed and engages FOXA upon lineage induction. Primed enhancers are enriched for signal-dependent TF motifs and harbor abundant and strong FOXA motifs. Unprimed enhancers harbor fewer, more degenerate FOXA motifs, and FOXA recruitment to unprimed but not primed enhancers requires pancreatic TFs. Strengthening FOXA motifs at an unprimed enhancer near NKX6.1 renders FOXA recruitment pancreatic TF-independent, induces priming, and broadens the NKX6.1 expression domain. We make analogous observations about FOXA binding during hepatic and lung development. Our findings suggest a dual role for FOXA in endodermal organ development: first, FOXA facilitates signal-dependent lineage initiation via enhancer priming, and second, FOXA enforces organ cell type-specific gene expression via indirect recruitment by lineage-specific TFs.

A Test of the Pioneer Factor Hypothesis

The Pioneer Factor Hypothesis (PFH) states that pioneer factors (PFs) are a subclass of transcription factors (TFs) that bind to and open inaccessible sites and then recruit non-pioneer factors (nonPFs) that activate batteries of silent genes. We tested the PFH by expressing the endodermal PF FoxA1 and nonPF Hnf4a in K562 lymphoblast cells. While co-expression of FoxA1 and Hnf4a activated a burst of endoderm-specific gene expression, we found no evidence for functional distinction between these two TFs. When expressed independently, both TFs bound and opened inaccessible sites, activated endodermal genes, and “pioneered” for each other, although FoxA1 required fewer copies of its motif to bind at inaccessible sites. A subset of targets required both TFs, but the mode of action at these targets did not conform to the sequential activity predicted by the PFH. From these results we propose an alternative to the PFH where “pioneer activity” depends not on the existence of discrete TF subclasses, but on TF binding affinity and genomic context.

Transcription Control of Liver Development

During liver organogenesis, cellular transcriptional profiles are constantly reshaped by the action of hepatic transcriptional regulators, including FoxA1-3, GATA4/6, HNF1α/β, HNF4α, HNF6, OC-2, C/EBPα/β, Hex, and Prox1. These factors are crucial for the activation of hepatic genes that, in the context of compact chromatin, cannot access their targets. The initial opening of highly condensed chromatin is executed by a special class of transcription factors known as pioneer factors. They bind and destabilize highly condensed chromatin and facilitate access to other “non-pioneer” factors. The association of target genes with pioneer and non-pioneer transcription factors takes place long before gene activation. In this way, the underlying gene regulatory regions are marked for future activation. The process is called “bookmarking”, which confers transcriptional competence on target genes. Developmental bookmarking is accompanied by a dynamic maturation process, which prepares the genomic loci for stable and efficient transcription. Stable hepatic expression profiles are maintained during development and adulthood by the constant availability of the main regulators. This is achieved by a self-sustaining regulatory network that is established by complex cross-regulatory interactions between the major regulators. This network gradually grows during liver development and provides an epigenetic memory mechanism for safeguarding the optimal expression of the regulators.

LEAFY, a Pioneer Transcription Factor in Plants: A Mini-Review

A subset of eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) possess the ability to reprogram one cell type into another. Genes important for cellular reprograming are typically located in closed chromatin, which is covered by nucleosomes. Pioneer factors are a special class of TFs that can initially engage their target sites in closed chromatin prior to the engagement with, opening of, or modification of the sites by other factors. Although many pioneer factors are known in animals, a few have been characterized in plants. The TF LEAFY (LFY) acts as a pioneer factor specifying floral fate in Arabidopsis. In response to endogenous and environmental cues, plants produce appropriate floral inducers (florigens). During the vegetative phase, LFY is repressed by the TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1)–FD complex, which functions as a floral inhibitor, or anti-florigen. The florigen FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) competes with TFL1 to prevent the binding of the FD TF to the LFY locus. The resulting FT–FD complex functions as a transient stimulus to activate its targets. Once LFY has been transcribed in the appropriate spatiotemporal manner, LFY binds to nucleosomes in closed chromatin regions. Subsequently, LFY opens the chromatin by displacing H1 linker histones and recruiting the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex. Such local changes permit the binding of other TFs, leading to the expression of the floral meristem identity gene APETALA1. This mini-review describes the latest advances in our understanding of the pioneer TF LFY, providing insight into the establishment of gene expression competence through the shaping of the plant epigenetic landscape.

Glucocorticoid receptor collaborates with pioneer factors and AP-1 to execute genome-wide regulation

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) regulates transcription through binding to specific DNA motifs, particularly at enhancers. While the motif to which it binds is constant across cell types, GR has cell type-specific binding at genomic loci, resulting in regulation of different genes. The presence of other bound transcription factors (TFs) is hypothesized to strongly influence where GR binds. Here, we addressed the roles of other TFs in the glucocorticoid response by comparing changes in GR binding and nascent transcription at promoters and distal candidate cis-regulatory elements (CCREs) in two distinct human cancer cell types. We found that after glucocorticoid treatment, GR binds to thousands of genomic loci that are primarily outside of promoter regions and are potentially enhancers. The majority of these GR binding sites are cell-type specific, and they are associated with pioneer factor binding. A small fraction of GR occupied regions (GORs) displayed increased bidirectional nascent transcription, which is a characteristic of many active enhancers, after glucocorticoid treatment. Non-promoter GORs with increased transcription were specifically enriched for AP-1 binding prior to glucocorticoid treatment. These results support a model of transcriptional regulation in which multiple classes of TFs are required. The pioneer factors increase chromatin accessibility, facilitating the binding of GR and additional factors. AP-1 binding poises a fraction of accessible sites to be rapidly transcribed upon glucocorticoid-induced GR binding. The coordinated activity of multiple TFs then results in cell type-specific changes in gene expression. We anticipate that many models of inducible gene expression also require multiple distinct TFs that act at multiple steps of transcriptional regulation.

OCT4 interprets and enhances nucleosome flexibility

Pioneer transcription factors induce cellular identity transitions by binding to sites on inaccessible DNA wrapped in nuclear chromatin. They contribute to chromatin opening and recruit other factors to regulatory DNA sites. The structural basis of their interaction with the chromatin structural unit, the nucleosome, is still unresolved. From a combination of experiments and molecular simulations we reveal here how Oct4, the master regulator and inducer of cellular pluripotency, interprets and enhances nucleosome structural flexibility. The magnitude of Oct4 impact on nucleosome dynamics depends on the binding site position and the mobility of unstructured tails of nucleosomal histone proteins. Oct4 propagates and stabilizes open nucleosome conformations by specific sequence recognition and unspecific DNA exploration. Our findings provide a structural basis for the versatility of transcription factors in engaging with nucleosomes and have implications for understanding how pioneer factors induce chromatin dynamics.

GAF is essential for zygotic genome activation and chromatin accessibility in the early Drosophila embryo

Following fertilization, the genomes of the germ cells are reprogrammed to form the totipotent embryo. Pioneer transcription factors are essential for remodeling the chromatin and driving the initial wave of zygotic gene expression. In Drosophila melanogaster, the pioneer factor Zelda is essential for development through this dramatic period of reprogramming, known as the maternal-to-zygotic transition (MZT). However, it was unknown whether additional pioneer factors were required for this transition. We identified an additional maternally encoded factor required for development through the MZT, GAGA Factor (GAF). GAF is necessary to activate widespread zygotic transcription and to remodel the chromatin accessibility landscape. We demonstrated that Zelda preferentially controls expression of the earliest transcribed genes, while genes expressed during widespread activation are predominantly dependent on GAF. Thus, progression through the MZT requires coordination of multiple pioneer-like factors, and we propose that as development proceeds control is gradually transferred from Zelda to GAF.