Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring Wawasan Kebangsaan

[EFFECTIVENESS OF NATIONAL INSIGHTS ONLINE LEARNING]. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of national insight online learning in Basic Training for Civil Servant Candidate Group II 2020 at Apparatus Training Center of Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. This study was a quasi experimental research with a quantitative approach. The data was collected using an assignment sheet, questionnaire, and interview. The learning effectiveness indicator was all participants get a minimum post test score of 80 and at least 80%. The research sample was all participants of Basic Training for Civil Servants Group II 2020 with the total number of 16 people. The result shows that the pre-test mean score is 84.5 and the post-test mean score is 97.5, indicating an increase of 15.4%. Based on the questionnaire result, it is found that the online learning method of Public Ethics is effective in achieving the learning objectives. National insight online learning of Basic Training for Civil Servants Candidates with all its strengths and weaknesses is considered effective in achieving learning objective, therefore, it can be continued in both new normal and normal condition

Building a New Humanism for a Globalised World: The Contribution of Religion

Humanity's challenges have become more acute in recent decades. The international environment has been characterised by rapid change, uncertainty, increased complexity and new trends. Despite the seeming unanimity of the international community in accepting human dignity and human rights as the foundation of a just society, the gap between systems and reality is widening around the world, exacerbated at the same time by globalisation and a liberal, individualistic and consumerist model of democracy. This article seeks to identify a new humanism that can be seen in UNESCO's work in the multifaceted field of culture, with culture as an enabler of sustainable development, peace and economic progress. On the one hand, it examines the confrontation between the politics of recognition and the politics of resentment in dealing with the management of diversity in increasingly complex societies. On the other hand, it analyses the relevance of religion, and particularly the work of the Holy See and successive popes, in culture, public ethics and social cohesion.

The Challenge against Economic Regulation Ethics under the COVID-19 Epidemic: An Analysis of Unethical Behavior of Convenience

Purpose: Under the COVID 19 epidemic, public interest should be treated as a kind of public ethics. From the perspective of economic regulation, this study regards unethical behavior arising from the pursuit of convenience as a challenge against the public interest. It attempts to analyze the relationship between convenience and moral behavior from the perspectives of moral philosophy and psychology, reveal the factors influencing occurrence of unethical behavior of convenience, and express opinions on the construction of citizen morality under the epidemic. Method: By combining literature research and life cases, analysis is made on unethical behavior of convenience in life. Results: Convenience is a need in human moral life, and people may have unethical behaviors in the pursuit of convenience. The degree of convenience in the context of moral life, the clarity of moral clues, whether moral evasion is successful, and the tolerance of moral hazards are factors that affect whether individuals commit unethical behaviors in the pursuit of convenience. Conclusion: Respect for individual convenience is also respect for individual human rights, and overall convenience is the inherent requirement of social moral life. The epidemic has significantly impacted individual lives and public lifestyles. It is undoubtedly an important means to prevent and control the COVID-19 epidemic by regarding public interests as public ethics. For the need to jointly prevent and control the epidemic, it is recommended that schools incorporate convenience-related moral education content in light of the epidemic situation.

Analysis of Critical Success Factors to Design E-waste Collection Policy in India: A Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach

The design of an e-waste collection policy is challenging, especially for a country like India, where the economy is developing state, and there is a large diversity in socio-economic factors. The e-waste collection policy has an impact on the various stakeholders such as the manufacturer, the raw material producers, the assemblers, the retailers, the generator (households and bulk consumers), the scrap dealers, the smelters and the recyclers as well as the regulators. The design of an e-waste collection policy needs to consider the appropriate set of Critical Success Factors (CSFs) which will maximize the e-waste collection providing business sustainability to the stakeholders at the same time satisfying the environmental regulations in the operating locations. Twenty-three CSFs identified along with six implication factors for e-waste collection policy framework based on a literature survey and experts view. The fuzzy DEMATEL approach is employed to analyze the CSFs to design an e-waste collection policy in India from a wide perspective. Cause and effect interrelationship is established among the CSFs, and also their impacts are evaluated to segregate the CSFs into cause group (prominent influencing and independent) and effect group (influenced and dependent). The CSFs such as technology involvement, green practices, environmental program, certification and licensing, public ethics and stakeholder’s awareness for circular economy are prominent influencing CSFs for e-waste collection policy in India. The current study is expected to provide a platform for policymakers to design the e-waste collection policy.

Penguatan Peran dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Membangun Etika Politik (Studi pada perwakilan Organisasi Masyarakat, Keagamaan, Mahasiswa dan Karang Taruna Kabupaten dan Kota Probolinggo)

Abstrak Sejatinya politik sangatlah mulia, namun karena praktik yang saling menguntungkan antara oknum dengan masyarakat telah berkepanjangan sedemikian rupa, membuat politik semakin terjerembab pada konotasi yang negatif. Tak ayal, politik kian legam termakna secara kotor, culas, menghalalkan segala cara, penuh politik uang, transaksional, dinasti, hingga urusan yang semata merebut kekuasaan. Cerminan demikian jelas berkaitan dengan etika kesemuanya, baik masyarakat, politisi, pemerintah, yang mengatur dan yang diatur, yang dipilih dan yang memilih, dan seterusnya. Karenanya memotong salah satu mata rantai dari berlangsungnya praktik demikian merupakan sebuah keniscayaan. Hal inilah yang dilakukan oleh Badan Kesejahteraan Bangsa dan Politik Provinsi Jawa Timur dengan menghelat estafet kegiatan yang bertujuan melakukan penguatan peran dan partisipasi masyarakat dalam membangun etika politik, khususnya pada perwakilan organisasi masyarakat, keagamaan, mahasiswa dan karang taruna Kabupaten dan Kota Probolinggo. Kegiatan selama dua hari di Kecamatan Sukapura tersebut bersinergi dengan beberapa pihak, seperti anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah provinsi Jawa Timur, Kepolisian Daerah Jawa Timur dan akademisi lokal; FISIP Universitas Panca Marga Probolinggo. Bagi kami, kegiatan pengabdian ini seyogyanya terukur tingkat keberhasilannya. Evaluasi pra dan pasca kegiatan harus dapat diketahui adanya tambahan pengetahuan dan pencerahan pemahaman terhadap para audiens. Metode yang dipakai melalui sebaran angket berisi beberapa pertanyaan dengan ketegasan dua pilihan jawaban. Hasilnya secara nyata terdapat penambahan pemahaman terhadap para peserta sosialisasi yang harapannya mereka bisa menjadi garda depan dalam mengimplementasikan serta mensosialisasikan materi yang didapat kepada khalayak yang lebih luas, yang kemudian dapat berimbas pada peningkatan etika masyarakat baik secara umum dan etika secara politik. Kata kunci: penguatan peran dan partisipasi, etika politik. Abstract In fact, politics is very noble, but because the practice of mutual benefit between unsrupulous and society has been prolonged in such a way, making politics increasingly stuck to negative connotations. Inevitably, politics is increasingly dirty, culpable, justimate all means, full of money politics, transactional, dynastic, to affairs that merely seize the power. Such reflections are clearly related to the ethics of all, whether society, politicians, government, who govern and governed, who elected and chooses, and so on. Thus cutting one of the links from the practice is an inevitability. This is what Badan Kesejahteraan Bangsa dan Politik of East Java Province did by conducting a relay of activities aimed at strengthening the role and participation of the sosiety in building political ethics, especially in representatives of social, religious, students and cadet reefs organizations of Probolinggo Regency and City. The two-day activity in Sukapura subdistrict synergized with several elements, such as the East Java Provincial People's Representative Council member, East Java Regional Police and local academics; FISIP University of Panca Marga Probolinggo. For us, this devotional activity should be measured. Pre and post-activity evaluation should be known for additional knowledge and enlightenment of understanding of the audience. The method used through the distribution of questionnaires contains several questions with the firmness of two choices of answers. The result is a real increase in understanding of the socialization participants with hope that they can be the vanguard in implementing and disseminating the material obtained to a wider audience, which can have an impact on improving public ethics both in general and political ethics. Keywords: strengthening roles and participation, political ethics.

Conclusion

The chapter summarizes the three main innovations presented in this book. First, contrary to institutionalist theories, this book shows how to understand the main threats political corruption poses to the well-functioning of public institutions, one must look inside of those institutions, at the officeholders’ interrelated conduct. Second, contrary to consequentialist theories, by making political corruption itself—not just its consequences—an object of public ethics, the book brings out the constitutive dimension of the wrongness of political corruption as a kind of interactive injustice for which all officeholders are responsible in their interrelatedness. Third, contrary to legalistic and regulatory approaches to anticorruption, this book argues for the importance of internalizing answerability institutional practices as the components of a public ethics of office accountability capable of giving officeholders practical guidance for their institutional action.

What political corruption is

This chapter describes political corruption as a deficit of office accountability in the institutional conduct of officeholders. Office accountability is the basic component of a public ethics of office. It is realized when officeholders act in their institutional capacity on an agenda whose rationale may be vindicated as coherent with the terms of their power mandate. Office accountability differs from the idea that officeholders must respond ex post for their conduct. The idea of office accountability has an action-guiding and regulative function for officeholders as they conduct their institutional duties. This idea points to the interrelatedness between the occupants of institutional roles and their mutual duties. Political corruption is a deficit of office accountability that concerns officeholders’ interrelated actions; in this sense, it is a matter of a public ethics of office.

Political Corruption

This book discusses political corruption and anticorruption as a matter of a public ethics of office. It shows how political corruption is the Trojan horse that undermines public institutions from within via the interrelated action of the officeholders. Even well-designed institutions may go off track if the officeholders fail to uphold by their conduct a public ethics of office accountability. Most current discussions of political corruption and of why it is wrong have concentrated either on explaining and assessing it in terms of an individual’s corrupt character and motives or a dysfunction of institutional procedures. This book brings out the common normative root of these two manifestations of political corruption. It discusses them as instances of the same relationally wrongful practice that consists in an unaccountable use of the power of office by officeholders in public institutions. From this perspective, political corruption is an internal enemy of public institutions that can only be opposed by mobilizing officeholders to engage in answerability practices. In this way, officeholders are responsible for working together to maintain an interactively just institutional system.