muc4 gene
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

16
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Yang ◽  
Erhu Fang ◽  
Jiajun Luo ◽  
Hongxue Wu ◽  
Yue Jiang ◽  
...  

Background. Metastasis and invasion are the main causes of mortality in gastric cancer. To improve the treatment of gastric cancer, the development of effective and innovative antitumor agents toward invasion and proliferation is needed. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA), a naturally occurring thiol antioxidant, showed antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects on several cancers. So it is feasible to explore whether ALA can be used to inhibit proliferation and invasion in human gastric cancer. Methods. The expression of MUC4 in human gastric cancer tissues was assayed by immunohistochemistry. Then, we performed in vitro cell proliferation and invasion analysis to explore the antitumor effect of ALA using AGS, BGC-823, and MKN-28 cells. To further explore the mechanism of ALA-mediated downregulation of MUC4, we cotransfected human gastric cancer cells with STAT3 siRNA and STAT3 overexpression construct. ChIP assays were carried out to find the relationship between MUC4 and STAT3. Results. We found that the MUC4 gene was strongly expressed in human gastric cancer tissues. Meanwhile, ALA reduced proliferation and invasion of human gastric cancer cells by suppressing MUC4 expression. We also found that STAT3 was involved in the inhibition of MUC4 by ALA. Mechanistically, ALA suppressed MUC4 expression by inhibiting STAT3 binding to the MUC4 promoter region. Conclusion. ALA inhibits both proliferation and invasion of gastric cancer cells by suppression of STAT3-mediated MUC4 gene expression.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fariba Nabatchian ◽  
Mahdis Rahimi Naiini ◽  
Afshin Moradi ◽  
Hossein Tabatabaeian ◽  
Negin Hoghoughi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 200-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Rudoman ◽  
V. Balatskyi ◽  
V. Nor

Nowadays one of the most common and critical problem in pig breeding is colibacteriosis. This infectious disease has acute course and it is caused by enteropathogenic strains of bacteria Escherichia coli. One of the recent and effective approaches to prevent colibacteriosis is using markers of selection; it involves pig genotyping by genome loci. The chosen loci are associated with animal sensitivity to the disease and selection of animals with increased resistance by the results of genotyping. According to several researches, one of such loci is Mucin 4 (MUC4) gene. MUC4 gene is located in the13-th chromosome (SSC13q41). Mucins (MUC) are macromolecular glycoproteins synthesized by goblet enterocytes and play main role in protecting the intestinal epithelium from pathogens, including adhesive strains of Escherichia coli. As a result of spot replacement g.1849 G>С in intron 7, structure of mucin protein encoded by gene is changing which leads to changes in the sensitivity of the intestinal mucosa to pathogenic Escherichia coli. G allele and respectively GG genotype determine the resistance of animals to colibacteriosis, while СС і GС genotypes are susceptible to this disease. In Ukraine, the studies of polymorphism MUC4 g.1849 G> C were held fragmentally and only at certain populations of Ukrainian Meat and Large White. The aim of the work was to determine the genetic structure of pig breeds of domestic and foreign selection for MUC4 gene and to establish the possibility of organizing marker associated selection for genetic improvement of resistance to colibacteriosis. For research the samples of blood and hair were used from the animals of Large White of English selection, Large White of Ukrainian selection Type 1 and Type 3, Red White-Belt, Mirgorod, Poltava Meat and Landrace breeds. DNA isolation from the samples of biomaterial were carried out using ion exchange resin Chelex-100. Genotyping was performed by PCR-RFLP by Jorgensen methods (2006) with own modifications, concerning the selection of primer annealing temperature and optimum concentration of the gel to separate the restriction fragments. Genetic structure was determined using DNA analysis of MUC4 locus at seven breeds and intrabreed types. Predominance of potentially beneficial G allele frequency over undesirable C allele was established in all the populations of the studied pigs. The highest frequencies of G allele were characterized for Mirgorod (0.795), Poltava Meat (0.740) and Red White-Belt (0.820) breeds. Analysis of the distribution of genotypes showed domination of genotypes GG and GC in all analysed populations. Positive Wright fixation index and predominance of expected heterozygosity (0.484) over actual one (0.460) for Large White of Ukrainian selection Type 3 indicate the existence of moderate inbreeding and selective pressure in this herd. Other populations were characterized by a negative value of fixation index, which is indicative of an excess of heterozygotes, these breeds are in outbreeding depression. Statically significant deviation of actual frequencies of genotypes from expected ones was identified using Hardy-Weinberg criterion for pig population of Large White of English selection and Large White of Ukrainian selection Type 1. This may indicate that these populations aren’t in condition of equilibrium and about inclusion of the chosen gene to the selection process. The valuation was performed by calculating the PIC (polymorphic information content) of the marker. Based on the calculated PIC index MUC4 locus could be perspective to be used in marker associated selection with improving genetic resistance to colibacteriosis. The data of Mucin 4 gene polymorphism at Ukrainian pig populations of different origins and productive direction show the possibility of marker selection to improve the genetic resistance of animals to colibacteriosis regardless of their belonging to breed. This creates prerequisites for the establishment and implementation of the early molecular diagnosis of carriers of harmful C allele in MUC4 gene in pig breeding.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 3449-3455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Li ◽  
Changqiang Wu ◽  
Tianwu Chen ◽  
Juanjuan Zhang ◽  
Gang Liu ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e77723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zili Zhang ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Jianxing He ◽  
Zeguang Zheng ◽  
Xiansheng Zeng ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 4913-4920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-Jing Zhang ◽  
Yi Zhu ◽  
Xiong-Fei Zhang ◽  
Wen-Biao Liang ◽  
Kun-Ling Xie ◽  
...  

BMC Genetics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Yang ◽  
Bin Yang ◽  
Xueming Yan ◽  
Jing Ouyang ◽  
Weihong Zeng ◽  
...  

BMC Genetics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Balcells ◽  
Anna Castelló ◽  
Anna Mercadé ◽  
José L Noguera ◽  
Amanda Fernández-Rodríguez ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (S1) ◽  
pp. 175-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Zhu ◽  
Jing-jing Zhang ◽  
Rong Zhu ◽  
Yan Zhu ◽  
Wen-biao Liang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document