Objectively-Verified Parental Non-Hip Major Osteoporotic Fractures and Offspring Osteoporotic Fracture Risk: A Population-Based Familial Linkage Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 716-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuman Yang ◽  
William D Leslie ◽  
Randy Walld ◽  
Leslie L Roos ◽  
Suzanne N Morin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Linkage Study ◽  
Major Osteoporotic Fractures

scholarly journals Ukrainian FRAX version in the male osteoporosis management

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-61
Author(s):  
V.V. Povoroznyuk ◽  
H. Johansson ◽  
N.V. Grygorieva ◽  
J.A. Kanis ◽  
А.S. Musiіenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
High Fracture ◽  
General Group ◽  
Major Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
History Of

Background. At present, FRAX is a well-known and widely-used risk assessment tool for major osteoporotic fractures. The Ukrainian version of the FRAX algorithm was presented in 2016; with the “intervention threshold” for additional DXA exa­mination and antiosteoporotic treatment of the Ukrainian women published in 2019. However, the data on its possible uses in men are limited. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the possibilities of using the previously developed criteria of the Ukrainian FRAX algorithm in Ukrainian men. Materials and me­thods. We exa­mined 653 outpatients aged 40–88 years (mean age (M ± SD) — 60.5 ± 11.8 years). We analyzed the results both in the general group and in the age subgroups; in particular, with an account of low-trauma fractures, included in the FRAX calculation, and compared them with the corresponding indices of the Ukrainian wo­men. Results. The most frequent (26.6 %) risk factor for osteoporo­tic fractures in the group of Ukrainian men was a history of low-trauma fracture (the corresponding index in women was 51.3 %), its presence being the reason for antiosteoporotic treatment initia­ting. Following upon the risk of major osteoporotic fractures calculated by FRAX, only 6.7 % of men without previous fractures were found to require additional DXA examination in order to re-evaluate the osteoporotic fracture risk, and none had a high fracture risk. 73 % of men without fractures did not have any risk factor inclu­ded in the FRAX algorithm. Conclusions. This study showed a grea­ter need for both antiosteoporotic treatment without DXA assessment and additional densitometric examination for the osteoporotic fracture risk assessment for the Ukrainian women rather than men, along with a special attention to the presence of previous fractures in men, and consideration of other risk factors for osteoporosis, even those not included in this FRAX algorithm.

Tamoxifen Use and Osteoporotic Fracture Risk: A Population-Based Analysis

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (32) ◽  
pp. 5227-5232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Cooke ◽  
Colleen Metge ◽  
Lisa Lix ◽  
Heather J. Prior ◽  
William D. Leslie
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Medical Diagnoses ◽  
Control Study

Purpose Although tamoxifen has been shown to increase bone mineral density in clinical trials, it is less clear whether this significantly affects fracture rates. Even fewer data are available on skeletal outcomes when tamoxifen is used outside of the context of a clinical trial. A population-based case-control study was undertaken to determine whether tamoxifen use is associated with osteoporotic fractures in routine clinical practice. Patients and Methods Population-based administrative data for the Province of Manitoba, Canada, were examined for tamoxifen use and nontraumatic fracture codes in women 50 years of age or older. Women with osteoporotic fractures (vertebral, wrist or hip; n = 11,096) from 1996 to 2004 were each compared with three controls without fracture, matched for age, ethnicity, and comorbidity (n = 33,209). Tamoxifen use was classified as never, past use, or current use. Results Lower osteoporotic fracture rates were associated with current tamoxifen use (univariate odds ratio [OR] = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.84). After controlling for demographic and medical diagnoses known to affect fracture risk, current use was associated with a significantly reduced overall osteoporotic fracture risk (adjusted OR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88) and of hip fractures (adjusted OR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.77). Neither recent nor remote past tamoxifen use was associated with reduced osteoporotic fracture risk. Breast cancer was not independently associated with osteoporotic fractures (adjusted OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.12). Conclusion In a population-based case-control study, current tamoxifen use was associated with a substantial reduction in osteoporotic fractures.

scholarly journals POS0131 10-YEAR PROBABILITY OF A MAJOR OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES IN WOMEN WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE JOINT

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 277.2-277
Author(s):  
E. Usova ◽  
O. Malyshenko ◽  
M. Letaeva ◽  
J. Averkieva ◽  
M. Koroleva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Major Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Fracture Risk Assessment Tool ◽  
Clinically Significant

Background:The relationship between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis (OA) is complex and contradictory. Some studies suggest a protective effect of OA in osteoporosis [1-2]. However, other studies show that increased bone mineral density (BMD) in OA not only does not reduce the risk of fractures, but can also increase it [3-4].Objectives:To assess the 10-year probability of osteoporotic fractures using the FRAX calculator in women with OA of the knee joint.Methods:The study included 22 women (average age 63.7±1.01 years) diagnosed with ACP of the knee joint according to the ACR criteria (1991). The Control Group included 24 conditionally healthy women without OA knee joint, with an average age of 63.6±1.37 years.The BMD (g/cm2) and the T-criterion (standard deviation, SD) of the neck of the femur and lumbar spine (LI-LIV) were evaluated by the method of two-power X-ray absorption (DXA) (apparatus «Lunar Prodigy Primo», USA). 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures (clinically significant fracture of the spine, distal fracture of the forearm, fracture of the proximal femur, or fracture of the shoulder) and fracture of the proximal thigh with the FRAX calculator (version 3.5 for Russian population).Results:An osteopenic syndrome in the cohort under investigation was found in 42 (91.3%) patients, of whom osteopenia in 24 (52.2%) women and osteoporosis in 18 (39.1%). A normal BMD is registered in 4 (8.7%) patients.In the group of patients with knee joint OA, only 2 (9.1%) of women had a normal BMD, 11 (50.0%) of osteoporosis, and 9 (40.9%). Osteopenic syndrome is generally found in 20 (90,9%) patients.In the control group, osteopenic syndrome has been diagnosed in 22 (91,7%) of whom: osteopenia in 13 (54.2%), osteoporosis in 9 (37.5%) patients. Two (8.3%) women had a normal BMD. There were no statistically significant differences in the structure of the osteopenic syndrome among the studied groups (p=0.961).An analysis of the 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures found that women with OA knee joint had the above probability of 12.3±0.91, and in the control group 14.2±1.06 (p=0.085).The 10-year probability of fracture of the proximal femur in women with OA was statistically less significant than in the control group: 1.55 (0.70;1.98) and 2.10 (1.20;2.95), (p=0.031), respectively.Conclusion:The total incidence of the osteopenic syndrome in the cohort under investigation was 91.3% (90.9% in women with OA, 91.7% in the control group). The frequency of registration of osteopenia and osteoporosis in women with OA did not differ statistically significantly from the control group. The probability of major osteoporotic fractures within 10 years was comparable in these groups. The probability of a proximal femur fracture in women with OA was statistically significant, but not clinically significant, compared to the control group.References:[1]Yamamoto Y, Turkiewicz A, Wingstrand H, et al. Fragility Fractures in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis Compared with the General Population. J Rheumatol. 2015 Nov;42(11):2055-8.[2]Vala CH, Kärrholm J, Kanis JA, et al. Risk for hip fracture before and after total knee replacement in Sweden. Osteoporos Int. 2020 May;31(5):887-895.[3]Kim BY, Kim HA, Jung JY, et al. Clinical Impact of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool on the Treatment Decision for Osteoporosis in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Comparative Study of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and World Health Organization Criteria. J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 26;8(7):918.[4]Soh SE, Barker AL, Morello RT, et al. Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework to determine the predictors of falls and fractures in people with osteoarthritis or at high risk of developing osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 29;21(1):138.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Heart Failure Is a Clinically and Densitometrically Independent Risk Factor for Osteoporotic Fractures: Population-Based Cohort Study of 45,509 Subjects

2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 1179-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumit R. Majumdar ◽  
Justin A. Ezekowitz ◽  
Lisa M. Lix ◽  
William D. Leslie
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Recent Onset ◽  
Major Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Hip Bmd ◽  
Osteoporosis Risk Factors ◽  
Osteoporosis Risk

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine whether heart failure is associated with an increased risk of major osteoporotic fractures that is independent of bone mineral density (BMD). Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study in Manitoba, Canada, by linking a clinical registry of all adults 50 yr of age and older who underwent initial BMD testing from 1998–2009 with administrative databases. We collected osteoporosis risk factors, comorbidities, medications, and BMD results. Validated algorithms identified recent-onset heart failure before the BMD test and new fractures after. The main outcome was time to major osteoporotic fractures (i.e. clinical vertebrae, distal forearm, humerus, and hip), and multivariable proportional hazards models were used for analyses. Results: The cohort consisted of 45,509 adults; 1,841 (4%) had recent-onset heart failure. Subjects with heart failure were significantly (P < 0.001) older (74 vs. 66 yr) and had more previous fractures (21 vs. 13%) and lower total hip BMD [T-score, −1.3 (sd 1.3) vs. −0.9 (sd 1.2)] than those without. There were 2703 incident fractures over the 5-yr observation. Overall, 10% of heart failure subjects had incident major fractures compared with 5% of those without [unadjusted hazard ratio (HR), 2.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.11–2.85]. Adjustment for osteoporosis risk factors, comorbidities, and medications attenuated but did not eliminate this association (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.11–1.60), nor did further adjustment for total hip BMD (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.06–1.53). Conclusions: Heart failure is associated with a 30% increase in major fractures that is independent of traditional risk factors and BMD, and it also identifies a high-risk population that may benefit from increased screening and treatment for osteoporosis.

scholarly journals Recent advances in the genetic association between osteoporotic fracture and sarcopenia

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 02-09
Author(s):  
Qiaocong Chen ◽  
◽  
Huiling Lou ◽  
Cheng Peng
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Musculoskeletal Diseases ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Genome Wide Association ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Genetic Determinants ◽  
Genome Wide

The risk of osteoporotic fracture can be viewed as a function of loading conditions and the ability of the bone to withstand the load. Skeletal loads are dominated by muscle action. Recently, it has become clear that bone and muscle share genetic determinants. Involvement of the musculoskeletal system manifests as bone loss (osteoporosis) and muscle wasting (sarcopenia). There is clinical evidence that osteoporotic fractures are significantly associated with sarcopenia, and sarcopenia may be a potential predictive factor for fracture risk, which suggests that there may be shared genetic determinants between sarcopenia and osteoporotic fracture. In recent years, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) studies have found that both lean mass and hand grip strength are associated with fracture risk, which may provide a possible endophenotype for elucidating the potential genetic study of fracture risk. Our effort to understand the clinical and genetic correlations between osteoporotic fracture and sarcopenia is helpful to understand the interaction between muscle and bone, and to study the etiology of complex musculoskeletal diseases. Identifying potentially important genetic variations in bone and muscle, measuring these variations using state-of-the-art technology, and replicating these experiments in humans and large animals will provide potential drug or intervention targets for osteoporotic fracture valuable in the future. Keywords: Genetics, osteoporosis, fracture, sarcopenia, genome-wide association studies, single nucleotide polymorphism

scholarly journals AB0613 FREQUENCY AND RISK OF FRAGILITY FRACTURES IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1342.1-1342
Author(s):  
A. Efremova ◽  
O. Nikitinskaya ◽  
N. Toroptsova ◽  
O. Dobrovolskaya ◽  
N. Demin
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Fragility Fractures ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Major Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Fracture Risk Assessment Tool ◽  
History Of ◽  
Very High

Background:Objectives:To assess the frequency of fragility fractures and the 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) tool in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).Methods:The study included 136 patients with SSc who met the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria: 110 (80.9%) postmenopausal women and 26 (19.1%) men over 50 years of age, mean age 59,3 + 7.5 years. The duration of the disease was 10,0 [6.0; 15.0] years in women and 6,0 [3.5; 9.0] years in men. A questionnaire was conducted and the risk of major osteoporotic fractures was calculated according to FRAX tool, as a result of which patients were divided into groups of low, moderate or high risk. Individuals at moderate risk underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the proximal femur, followed by a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures recalculation with the inclusion of the femoral neck T-score. According to the obtained fracture risk assessment tool value, patients were assigned as having a low, high or very high risk.Results:Fragility fractures of various localization were found in 50 (36,7%) people: 41 (37,3%) women and 9 (34.6%) men. Vertebral and peripheral bone fractures occurred with the same frequency (19,8%) without significant differences depending on the patient’s gender. Only 1 (3,8%) male had a history of proximal femoral fracture. Fractures of both the vertebra and the peripheral bone occurred in 4 (2,9%) people: 3 (2,7%) women and 1 (3,8%) man.9 (8,2%) women and 16 (61,5%) men had a low risk of major osteoporotic fractures according to FRAX, 60 (54,5%) and 10 (38,5%) - a moderate risk, respectively, while 41 (37,3%) women were at high risk. Among 86 patients without a history of low-energy fractures (69 women and 17 men), 8 (11,6%) women and 16 (94,1%) men were at low risk of major osteoporotic fractures, and 57 (82,6%) and 1 (5,9%), respectively, were at moderate risk. Only 4 (5,8%) women were assigned to the high-risk group. After recalculation of the fracture risk assessment tool with inclusion of the femoral neck T-score in persons with moderate risk without a history of fragility fractures, 9 (13,0%) women and 1 (5,9%) man were found to be at high risk, 14 (20,3%) women - at very high risk and 34 (49,3%) women - at low risk.Among moderate-risk patients with prior fractures after FRAX recalculation 3 (7,3%) women and 7 (77,8%) men became at low risk, 1 (11,1%) male - at high and 1(11,1%) male – at very high risk. Thus, 55 (50,0%) women and 1 (3,8%) man were at very high, 12 (10,9%) and 2 (7,7%), respectively, - at high, and 43 (39,1%) and 23 (88,5%), respectively, - at low risk of major osteoporotic fractures.Conclusion:In the examined cohort of patients with SSc, the frequency of fragility fractures was 37,3% in women and 34,6% in men. A high and very high risk of major osteoporotic fractures was found in 60,9% of women and 11,5% of men. 3 (2,7%) women and 6 (23,1%) men with a history of previous fractures were in the low-risk group by FRAX, but they need to consider the appointment of anti-osteoporotic therapy as for patients at high and very high risk.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

scholarly journals SAT0473 COMPARSION OF THE FRACTURE RISK IN WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT SCOLIOSIS THROUGH DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1193.2-1194
Author(s):  
N. Kirilov ◽  
S. Todorov ◽  
N. Nikolov ◽  
M. Nikolov
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Fragility Fractures ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
X Ray ◽  
T Score ◽  
Major Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Cobb’S Angle ◽  
The Mean

Background:Osteoporosis is known to be a risk factor for fragility fractures [4, 5]. On one hand, vertebral body fragility fractures often lead to additional spine deformity [2]. On the other hand, it was found that with the progression of the spinal curvature in osteoporotic patients, the fragility fractures develop more frequently. The increased incidence of these fractures could be explained with a predominance of the mechanical forces on the one side of the already weakened osteoporotic vertebrae [3].Objectives:The aim of this study is to compare the fracture risk (FRAX) for major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and for hip fractures (HF) in women with and without scoliosis through dual-energy X-ray absorptiomentry (DXA)Methods:In the current study, 59 women underwent DXA scans. Scoliosis was defined as Cobb’s angle ≥ 5◦ according to the Chaklin’s classification [6, 7]. Cobb’s angle was measured from DXA images with DICOM software. We evaluated the following risk factors: previous fractures, parental hip fractures, secondary osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, use of corticosteroids, current smoking and alcohol consumption more than 3 units daily. We estimated FRAX MOF and FRAX HF on the basis of these risk factors and on the basis of the femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). The calculations were done through FRAX tool published on the website of the University of Sheffield [1].Results:The mean age of the women was 63 years (yrs.) ± 10 yrs. (range 43 yrs. – 89 yrs.). Subjects with scoliosis were significantly older (67 yrs.) than those without scoliosis (59 yrs.), (p = 0.004). Mean weight and height didn’t differ between the groups with- and without scoliosis. Mean lumbar spine BMD and T-score differed significantly between the groups, (p = 0.02). Women with scoliosis had lower mean BMD (0.786 g/cm2) and lower mean T-score (-2.1 standard deviations (SDs)) compared to those without scoliosis (mean BMD: 0.912 g/cm2 and mean T-score: 0.9 SDs). The mean FRAX MOF (19.3%) and FRAX HF (5.9%) of the subjects with scoliosis were significantly higher than those of the women without scoliosis (FRAX MOF: 14.9% and FRAX HF: 3.1%), (p = 0.004 for FRAX MOF and p = 0.010 for FRAX HF).Conclusion:Women with scoliosis showed significantly higher fracture risk for major osteoporotic fractures and for hip fractures compared to those without scoliosis.References:[1]https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/FRAX/index.aspx[2]Mao YF, Zhang Y, Li K, et al. Discrimination of vertebral fragility fracture with lumbar spine bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography. J Orthop Translat. 2018;16:33–39. Published 2018 Oct 10. doi:10.1016/j.jot.2018.08.007.[3]Sabo A, Hatgis J, Granville M, Jacobson RE. Multilevel Contiguous Osteoporotic Lumbar Compression Fractures: The Relationship of Scoliosis to the Development of Cascading Fractures. Cureus. 2017;9(12):e1962. Published 2017 Dec 19. doi:10.7759/cureus.1962.[4]Kirilova E, Cherkezov D, Gonchev B, Zheleva Z. OSIRIS Index for the assessment of the risk for osteoporosis in menopausal women, National conference with international participation, 6-7 october 2019, Kardzhali “Science and society 2019”, RKR print OOD ISSN 1314-3425[5]Madzharova R, Kirilova E, Petranova T, Nikolova M. Assessment of the activity for self care in women with osteoporosis, Science and TechnologieVolume VIII, 2018, Number 1: MEDICAL BIOLOGY STUDIES, CLINICAL STUDIES, SOCIAL MEDICINE AND HEALTH CARE,1-6.[6]Chaklin VD, Orthopedy - Moscow: Medgiz – 1965 – C. 209[7]Chaklin VD. Pathology, clinical manifestation and treatment of the scoliosis, 1stcongress of the union of the orthopedists and traumatologists, Moscow: Medgiz, 1957 – T.2. – p 798Disclosure of Interests:None declared

SAT0452 DIFFERENT PROFILE OF RISK OF FRACTURE IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH ANTI-OSTEOPOROTIC DRUGS IN ITALY USING A NEW ALGORITHM

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1183-1183
Author(s):  
G. Adami ◽  
A. Fassio ◽  
A. Giollo ◽  
G. Orsolini ◽  
O. Viapiana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Similar Treatment ◽  
Risk Of Fracture ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Very High

Background:A new algorithm for management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures has been recently proposed, has been also recommended treating those patients at very high risk of fracture with bone anabolics (1). A similar treatment algorithm has been applied in Italy since 2015, when the “Nota 79”, that regulates the reimbursability for osteoporosis medications, has been developed by the Italian Agency for Drugs (AIFA) (2).Objectives:In the present study, using a new mathematical and computerized algorithm, we seek to investigate the profile of risk of fracture of patients starting treatment with different anti-osteoporotic medications in Italy.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture calculated with the DeFRAcalc79 tool in postmenopausal women aged over 50 years that were initiating an anti-osteoporotic treatment (fully reimbursed according to the Nota 79). DeFRAcalc79 is a new web-based fracture risk-assessment tool (https://defra-osteoporosi.it) that arithmetically adjusts the risk based on the integration of multiple risk factors contemplated by the AIFA’s Nota 79, including: demographic and anthropometric data, femoral and/or lumbar spine BMD T-score, family history of femoral or vertebral fractures, number and site of previous osteoporotic fracture (including vertebral, femoral, and nonvertebral nonfemoral fractures), glucocorticoid treatment (> 3 or > 12 months, ≥5 mg prednisone or equivalent), adjuvant hormone therapy for breast or prostate cancer, and comorbidities that increase the risk (rheumatoid arthritis and other connective tissue diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, inflammatory bowel diseases, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, HIV infection, diabetes, or severe physical handicap).Results:We retrieved data for 10,235 women prescribed with an anti-osteoporotic treatment.Figure 1shows the mean 10-year fracture risk estimated with DeFRAcalc79 tool at the time of the treatment initiation. Teriparatide users had the highest 10-year risk of fracture (67.4% Standard Deviation [SD] 21.5%). We found that in 2,231 patients starting denosumab, the 10-year baseline risk of fracture was 38.5%, SD 22.8%. In 5,759 patients initiating alendronate was 25.7%, SD 15.3% and in patients initiating risedronate was 27.9%, SD 26.9%. Patients prescribed with zoledronic acid had a mean 10-year risk of fracture of 35.6%, SD 21.6. P values between means were all <0.01.Figure 1.Mean 10-year risk of fracture estimated with DeFRAcalc79 tool at the time of treatment initiation, p< 0.01 between all means.Conclusion:The risk of fracture of Italian post-menopausal women initiating different anti-osteoporotic medications varies significantly. Teriparatide is prescribed to patients with greater risk of fracture. The Nota 79 correctly individuates patients at very high risk of fracture that merit treatment with a bone anabolic. Denosumab and zoledronic acid are prescribed to patients with a greater risk of fracture compared to oral bisphosphonates.DeFRAcalc79 is a useful and practical tool for the integrated evaluation of the profile of risk of fracture.References:[1]Kanis JA et al. Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2019 31:1–12.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-05176-3[2]Adami G et al. Comments on Kanis et al.: Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high, and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2020. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05302-6. [Epub ahead of print]Disclosure of Interests:Giovanni Adami: None declared, Angelo Fassio Speakers bureau: Angelo Fassio reports personal fees from: Abiogen and Novartis, outside the submitted work., Alessandro Giollo: None declared, Giovanni Orsolini: None declared, Ombretta Viapiana: None declared, Davide Gatti Speakers bureau: Davide Gatti reports personal fees from Abiogen, Amgen, Janssen-Cilag, Mundipharma, outside the submitted work., Maurizio Rossini Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Abiogen, Amgen, BMS, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sandoz and UCB

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document