scholarly journals A Scoping Review of Arts-Based Mindfulness Interventions for Children and Youth

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 511-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Coholic ◽  
Nicholas Schwabe ◽  
Kenneth Lander
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Children And Youth ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Building Resilience ◽  
Specific Focus ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Mindfulness Interventions

Abstract Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs) hold promise for building resilience in children/youth. We were interested in understanding why some MBIs incorporate arts-based methods, and what key findings were identified from the study of these MBIs. We used a scoping review to address our research questions. Scoping reviews can help us better understand how different types of evidence can inform practice, policy, and research. Steps include identifying research questions and relevant studies, selecting studies for analysis, charting data, and summarizing results. We identified 27 research articles for analysis. MBIs included the use of drawing, painting, sculpting, drama, music, poetry, and karate. Rationales included both the characteristics of children/youth, and the benefits of the methods. Arts-based MBIs may be more relevant and engaging especially for youth with serious challenges. Specific focus should be paid to better understanding the development and benefits of these MBIs.

scholarly journals Impacts of Participation in Community-Based Physical Activity Programs on Cognitive Functions of Children and Youth with Neurodevelopmental Disabilities: A Scoping Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Mojgan Gitimoghaddam ◽  
Leigh M. Vanderloo ◽  
Rebecca Hung ◽  
Andrea Ryce ◽  
William McKellin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Cognitive Process ◽  
Cognitive Outcomes ◽  
Self Control ◽  
Children And Youth ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Physical Activity Interventions ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Research Questions

This review paper aimed to undertake an extensive exploration of the extent, range, and nature of research activities regarding the effect and emerging evidence in the field of physical activity interventions on cognitive development among children and youth (0–17.99 years) with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), and to help identify key gaps in research and determine precise research questions for future investigations. To carry out this scoping review, five electronic databases were searched. A total of 12,097 articles were retrieved via search efforts with an additional 93 articles identified from the identified review papers. Sixty articles were eligible for inclusion. The results of this scoping review revealed many positive key cognitive outcomes related to physical activity including, but not limited to: focus, attention, self-control, cognitive process, and alertness. No studies reported a negative association between physical activity and cognitive outcomes. Based on the findings from this scoping review, physical activity appears to have a favorable impact on the cognitive outcomes of children and youth with NDD.

scholarly journals What you need to know about scoping reviews

Medwave ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
pp. e8144-e8144
Author(s):  
Catalina Verdejo ◽  
Luis Tapia-Benavente ◽  
Bastián Schuller-Martínez ◽  
Laura Vergara-Merino ◽  
Manuel Vargas-Peirano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Clinical Epidemiology ◽  
Recent Model ◽  
Reporting Guideline ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Literature Reviews ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Reproducible Method ◽  
Meta Analyses

The increasing amount of evidence has caused an increasing amount of literature reviews. There are different types of reviews —systematic reviews are the best known—, and every type of review has different purposes. The scoping review is a recent model that aims to answer broad questions and identify and expose the available evidence for a broader question, using a rigorous and reproducible method. In the last two decades, researchers have discussed the most appropriate method to carry out scoping reviews, and recently the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses’ for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guideline was published. This is the fifth article of a methodological collaborative series of narrative reviews about general topics on biostatistics and clinical epidemiology. This review aims to describe what scoping reviews are, identify their objectives, differentiate them from other types of reviews, and provide considerations on how to carry them out.

scholarly journals Chronic heart failure patients’ experiences of German healthcare services: a protocol for a scoping review

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e025685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjam Dieckelmann ◽  
Felix Reinhardt ◽  
Klaus Jeitler ◽  
Thomas Semlitsch ◽  
Jasper Plath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Subjective Expectations ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Holistic Understanding ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Research Questions

IntroductionChronic heart failure (CHF) is a heterogeneous condition requiring complex treatment from diverse healthcare services. An increasingly holistic understanding of healthcare has resulted in contextual factors such as perceived quality of care, as well as patients’ acceptance, preferences and subjective expectations of health services, all gaining in importance. How patients with CHF experience the use of healthcare services has not been studied within the scope of a systematic review in a German healthcare context. The aim of this scoping review is therefore to review systematically the experiences of patients affected by CHF with healthcare services in Germany in the literature and to map the research foci. Further objectives are to identify gaps in evidence, develop further research questions and to inform decision makers concerned with improving healthcare of patients living with CHF.Methods and analysisThis scoping review will be based on a broad search strategy involving systematic and comprehensive electronic database searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, CINAHL and Cochrane’s Database of Systematic Reviews, grey literature searches, as well as hand searches through reference lists and non-indexed key journals. The methodological procedure will be based on an established six-stage framework for conducting scoping reviews that includes two independent reviewers. Data will be systematically extracted, qualitatively and quantitatively analysed and summarised both narratively and visually. To ensure the research questions and extracted information are meaningful, a patient representative will be involved.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval will not be required to conduct this review. Results will be disseminated through a clearly illustrated report that will be part of a wider research project. Furthermore, it is intended that the review’s findings should be made available to relevant stakeholders through conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals (knowledge transfer). Protocol registration in PROSPERO is not applicable for scoping reviews.

scholarly journals Programmes to support transitions in care for children and youth with complex care needs and their families: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e033978
Author(s):  
Shelley Doucet ◽  
Janet A Curran ◽  
Sydney Breneol ◽  
Alison Luke ◽  
Emilie Dionne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Research Policy ◽  
Children And Youth ◽  
Advisory Council ◽  
Complex Care ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Transitions In Care ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Complex Care Needs

IntroductionChildren and youth with complex care needs (CCNs) and their families experience many care transitions over their lifespan and are consequently vulnerable to the discontinuity or gaps in care that can occur during these transitions. Transitional care programmes, broadly defined as one or more intervention(s) or service(s) that aim to improve continuity of care, are increasingly being developed to address transitions in care for children and youth with CCNs. However, this literature has not yet been systematically examined at a comprehensive level. The purpose of this scoping review is to map the range of programmes that support transitions in care for children and youth with CCNs and their families during two phases of their lifespan: (1) up to the age of 19 years (not including their transition to adult healthcare) and (2) when transitioning from paediatric to adult healthcare.Methods and analysisThe Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews (ScR) will be used for the proposed scoping review. ScR are a type of knowledge synthesis that are useful for addressing exploratory research questions that aim to map key concepts and types of evidence on a topic and can be used to organise what is known about the phenomena. A preliminary search of PubMed was conducted in December 2018.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required where this study is a review of the published and publicly reported literature. The research team’s advisory council will develop a research dissemination strategy with goals, target audiences, expertise/leadership, resources and deadlines to maximise project outputs. The end-of-grant activities will be used to raise awareness, promote action and inform future research, policy and practice on this topic.

scholarly journals Implementation of evidence-based parenting programs under real-world conditions: Protocol for a scoping review

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0256392
Author(s):  
Rita Pinto ◽  
Catarina Canário ◽  
Orlanda Cruz ◽  
Maria José Rodrigo
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Parenting Programs ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Evidence Based Programs

Protecting children is recognized as a public health priority and supporting parents through the implementation of evidence-based programs is a well-known strategy to achieve this. However, researchers highlight that these programs remain insufficiently implemented in real-world contexts. A knowledge gap exists between the intended implementation of evidence-based parenting programs and their actual implementation on real-world dynamics. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how evidence-based parenting programs have been implemented under real-world conditions by providing a map of available evidence and identifying knowledge gaps. The overall research question is: "How have evidence-based parenting programs been implemented under real-world conditions?". The proposed scoping review follows the framework originally described by Arksey and O’Malley, Levac and colleagues, and the Joanna Briggs Institute: (1) identifying the research questions; (2) identifying the relevant studies; (3) study selection; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results; (6) consultation. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will inform the search strategy. The results will be described in relation to the research questions and in the context of the purpose of the review. This scoping review will help to bridge the implementation gap between research evidence and its translation into practice.

scholarly journals Explicit and implicit experience of own’s body in painful musculoskeletal disorders and rheumatic diseases: A scoping review protocol of available quantitative and qualitative evidence

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205031211882002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonello Viceconti ◽  
Eleonora Maria Camerone ◽  
Deborah Luzzi ◽  
Matteo Pardini ◽  
Diego Ristori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Clinical Role ◽  
Body Experience ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Population Concept

Introduction: Our body experience is organized at twofold levels: perceptual and cognitive-emotional. These higher-order processes are clearly different from the primary sensory processing of somatic stimuli (somatosensation). However, most of the available studies have mainly investigated the mechanisms of somatosensation. Moreover, disturbances of our body experience have been documented in some pathological conditions of interest for rehabilitative interventions, but their clinical role and relevance is yet to be clarified. Because in this field we have limited knowledge on perceptual and cognitive body experience, there emerges a need to better clarify this matter. The aim of the present scoping review is to systematically map this topic and to examine the magnitude and the nature of the available evidences. Materials and Methods: The scoping review will be performed following the six-stage methodology suggested by Arksey and O’Malley. Ten electronic databases will be investigated since their inception. The search strategy will be peer reviewed by PRESS 2015 Evidence-Based Checklist as a quality assurance step. All records retrieved will be screened by two independent reviewers. The Population, Concept, and Context method will be adopted for eligibility criteria and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses will be used for results reporting. Two reviewers with different background will perform the search process independently. One author will extract data, checked by a second reviewer checking the matching with the research questions and goals. Any disagreements will be solved by a third reviewer. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for scoping reviews. Dissemination will include submission to peer-reviewed journal and presentations in conferences in the area of rehabilitation.

scholarly journals Mapping evidence of Universal Health Coverage in the world: a protocol for a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aklilu Endalamaw ◽  
Charles F Gilks ◽  
Fentie Ambaw ◽  
Yibeltal Assefa
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Universal Health Coverage ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
World Health ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
The World ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Universal Health

Abstract Background Universal health coverage (UHC) is critical for improving global health and socioeconomic development. Monitoring and evaluating UHC's progress has also been suggested as an additional intervention to improve its road map. Globally, the concept of UHC is being desperately used by health care delivery systems and research institutions using a variety of indicators. More evidence is required to know what is known and the gaps are in the UHC literature that helps to identify research problems. The review will map the available researches of UHC from around the world. Methods The scoping review will be reported using the checklist The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). For studies reporting data on UHC and its dimensions, systematic searches will be conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the United Nations, World Health Organization, and World Bank repositories. To present the review findings, a narrative synthesis will be performed. Discussion UHC is a cornerstone to achieve the health goal of UN’s by the end of 2030. The mapping of available literature towards UHC will provide evidence that will help in the designing and implementation of health policy, health research and health care services. Conclusions A protocol for a global scoping review of UHC research is described. This scoping review will add to the body of knowledge about UHC research. The review will identify UHC research questions for which primary research or a systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted. This is the first review of UHC to be conducted. This review will prioritize UHC research questions in relation to the sustainable development goals.

scholarly journals Scoping Review on Menstrual Suppression Among U.S. Military Service Members

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela K Phillips ◽  
Amy B Lynn
Keyword(s):  
Health Policy ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Military Service ◽  
Service Members ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Military Health ◽  
Provider Practices ◽  
Menstrual Suppression ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Military Service Members

ABSTRACT Introduction The purpose of this scoping review was to systematically evaluate literature addressing menstrual suppression in the military population and to identify gaps in the literature. Materials and Methods A scoping review of the literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines was completed. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Evidence Level and Quality Guide. Results Thirteen research articles and nine non-research articles were included. The themes identified were methods for menstrual suppression, barriers to menstrual suppression, and educational recommendations. Conclusions Six gaps were identified: (1) readiness, (2) single branch of service, (3) options for suppression, (4) hesitance to suppress, (5) provider practices, and (6) stagnant research. Recommendations for future research, practice, and military health policy are provided. Expanding research on menstrual suppression in U.S. military service members will enhance the health of military service members, provider practices, and military health policy to promote military readiness.

scholarly journals Reviewing the animal literature: how to describe and choose between different types of literature reviews

2020 ◽  
pp. 002367722096859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathalijn Leenaars ◽  
Katya Tsaioun ◽  
Frans Stafleu ◽  
Kieron Rooney ◽  
Franck Meijboom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Question ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Ethical Perspective ◽  
Risks And Benefits ◽  
Quality Literature ◽  
Rapid Reviews ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Literature Reviews ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Research Questions

Before starting any (animal) research project, review of the existing literature is good practice. From both the scientific and the ethical perspective, high-quality literature reviews are essential. Literature reviews have many potential advantages besides synthesising the evidence for a research question. First, they can show if a proposed study has already been performed, preventing redundant research. Second, when planning new experiments, reviews can inform the experimental design, thereby increasing the reliability, relevance and efficiency of the study. Third, reviews may even answer research questions using already available data. Multiple definitions of the term literature review co-exist. In this paper, we describe the different steps in the review process, and the risks and benefits of using various methodologies in each step. We then suggest common terminology for different review types: narrative reviews, mapping reviews, scoping reviews, rapid reviews, systematic reviews and umbrella reviews. We recommend which review to select, depending on the research question and available resources. We believe that improved understanding of review methods and terminology will prevent ambiguity and increase appropriate interpretation of the conclusions of reviews.

scholarly journals Experienced fatigue in people with rare disorders: a scoping review on characteristics of existing research

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trine Bathen ◽  
Heidi Johansen ◽  
Hilde Strømme ◽  
Gry Velvin
Keyword(s):  
Rare Diseases ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Genetic Diseases ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Rare Genetic Diseases ◽  
Experienced Fatigue ◽  
Research Questions

Abstract Background Experienced fatigue is an under-recognized and under-researched feature in persons with many different rare diseases. A better overview of the characteristics of existing research on experienced fatigue in children and adults with rare diseases is needed. The purpose of this review was to map and describe characteristics of existing research on experienced fatigue in a selection of rare diseases in rare developmental defects or anomalies during embryogenesis and rare genetic diseases. Furthermore, to identify research gaps and point to research agendas. Methods We applied a scoping review methodology, and performed a systematic search in March 2020 in bibliographic databases. References were sorted and evaluated for inclusion using EndNote and Rayyan. Data were extracted on the main research questions concerning characteristics of research on experienced fatigue (definition and focus on fatigue, study populations, research questions investigated and methods used). Results This review included 215 articles on ten different rare developmental defects/anomalies during embryogenesis and 35 rare genetic diseases. Of the 215 articles, 82 had investigation of experienced fatigue as primary aim or outcome. Included were 9 secondary research articles (reviews) and 206 primary research articles. A minority of articles included children. There were large differences in the number of studies in different diseases. Only 29 of 215 articles gave a description of how they defined the concept of experienced fatigue. The most common research-question reported on was prevalence and/ -or associations to fatigue. The least common was diagnostics (development or validation of fatigue assessment methods for a specific patient group). A large variety of methods were used to investigate experienced fatigue, impeding comparisons both within and across diagnoses. Conclusion This scoping review on the characteristics of fatigue research in rare diseases found a large variety of research on experienced fatigue. However, the minority of studies had investigation of experienced fatigue as a primary aim. There was large variation in how experienced fatigue was defined and also in how it was measured, both within and across diagnoses. More research on experienced fatigue is needed, both in children and adults with rare diseases. This review offers a basis for further research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document