scholarly journals Employment Sustainability for People with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Taubner ◽  
Magnus Tideman ◽  
Carin Staland Nyman
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Analytical Tool ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers ◽  
Definition Of

AbstractPurpose Previous reviews about employment for people with intellectual disability (ID) have left questions about employment sustainability unanswered. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to identify and analyse research regarding employment sustainability for people with ID. The research questions were: What research about employment sustainability for people with ID has been published internationally between 2010 and 2020? In the identified studies, how is employment sustainability defined and measured and what are the main findings regarding employment sustainability? Methods A systematic review was conducted using eight databases from various disciplines including medical, health, and social sciences. After a selection process, 10 articles remained, and a framework matrix was created to analyse them. An employment sustainability definition was used as an analytical tool. Results Ten articles were identified as being about employment sustainability for people with ID. Five of them used qualitative designs and five used quantitative designs. Only four out of ten contained a definition of employment sustainability, and there was an inconsistency in measurement methods. The reported findings in the studied articles were categorised into three types: proportions of long-term employed individuals within the studied population, facilitators and barriers to long-term employment. Conclusions There is only a limited amount of research about employment sustainability for people with ID. Nevertheless, a few facilitators and barriers could be identified. There is no consensus about how to define or measure employment sustainability, making comparisons difficult.

scholarly journals Promotion of Resilience in Migrants: A Systematic Review of Study and Psychosocial Intervention

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Ciaramella ◽  
Nadia Monacelli ◽  
Livia Concetta Eugenia Cocimano
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Psychosocial Intervention ◽  
Life Experiences ◽  
Psychosocial Interventions ◽  
Migrant Population ◽  
Methodological Choices ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Selection Of

AbstractThis systematic review aimed to contribute to a better and more focused understanding of the link between the concept of resilience and psychosocial interventions in the migrant population. The research questions concerned the type of population involved, definition of resilience, methodological choices and which intervention programmes were targeted at migrants. In the 90 articles included, an heterogeneity in defining resilience or not well specified definition resulted. Different migratory experiences were not adequately considered in the selection of participants. Few resilience interventions on migrants were resulted. A lack of procedure’s descriptions that keep in account specific migrants’ life-experiences and efficacy’s measures were highlighted.

scholarly journals Factors Influencing Intention to Work while Ill: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1016-1030
Author(s):  
Hanizah Mohd Yusoff ◽  
Hanani Nabilah Mohd Sobri ◽  
Vevya Sundaram
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Behavioral Control ◽  
Subjective Norms ◽  
Perceived Behavioral Control ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers ◽  
Initial Knowledge

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to identify factors influencing workers' intention to work while ill, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a theoretical framework. Methods: A systematic search of articles was carried out from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Eligibility of each article was assessed using PRISMA guidelines. Overall, 22 articles met the inclusion criteria after the selection process and were included in this review. Results: The factors fit into 3 constructs: (1) attitude (good and bad consequences of working while ill), (2) subjective norms (descriptive and injunctive norms on working while ill), and (3) perceived behavioral control (facilitators and barriers of working while ill). Conclusions: The TPB is a practical theory to conceptualize and understand the factors influencing workers' intention to work while ill. These findings provide initial knowledge on the development of a framework to measure workers' intention to work while ill and to propose appropriate interventions for workers with chronic illness.

scholarly journals Sedentary behaviour levels in adults with an intellectual disability: a systematic review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Louise Lynch ◽  
Mary McCarron ◽  
Philip McCallion ◽  
Eilish Burke
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Sedentary Behaviour ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Rapid Assessment ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Background: Sedentary behaviour contributes to non-communicable diseases, which account for almost 71% of world deaths. Of these, cardiovascular disease is one of the largest causes of preventable death. It is not yet fully understood what level of sedentary behaviour is safe. People with an intellectual disability have poorer health than the general population with higher rates of multi-morbidity, obesity and inactivity. There is a paucity of evidence on whether this poorer health is due to sedentary behaviour or physical inactivity. This systematic review will investigate the sedentary behaviour levels of adults with an intellectual disability. Method: The PRISMA-P framework will be applied to achieve high-quality articles. An extensive search will be conducted in Medline, Embase, psycINFO and Cinahl and grey literature sources. All articles will be independently reviewed by two reviewers and a third to resolve disputes. Initially, the articles will be reviewed by title and abstract and then the full article will be reviewed using stringent inclusion criteria. All article data will be summarised in a standardised tabular format. The National Institute of Health’s quality assessment tool will be used to assess article quality. GRADE will be used to assess the quality of the evidence. The primary outcome of interest is the prevalence of sedentary behaviour levels for people with an intellectual disability. The definition of sedentary behaviour to be used for the purposes of this study is: ‘low physical activity as identified by metabolic equivalent (MET) or step levels or as measured by the Rapid Assessment of Physical activity questionnaire (RAPA) or the International Physical Activity questionnaire (IPAQ) or sitting for more than 3 hours per day’. Conclusion: This systematic review will provide a critical insight into the prevalence of sedentary behaviour in adults with an intellectual disability.

scholarly journals Repeated exposure and conditioning strategies for increasing vegetable liking and intake: systematic review and meta-analyses of the published literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 842-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M Appleton ◽  
Ann Hemingway ◽  
Jessica Rajska ◽  
Heather Hartwell
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Repeated Exposure ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Limited Evidence ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Vegetable intakes are typically lower than recommended for health. Although repeated exposure has been advocated to increase vegetable liking and consumption, no combination of the evidence yet provides a measure of benefit from repeated exposure or alternative conditioning strategies. Objective This work aimed to identify and synthesize the current evidence for the use of repeated exposure and conditioning strategies for increasing vegetable liking and consumption. Design Three academic databases were searched over all years of records using prespecified search terms. Published data from all suitable articles were tabulated in relation to 3 research questions and combined via meta-analyses. Results Forty-three articles detailing 117 comparisons investigating the use of repeated exposure and conditioning strategies for increasing liking and intakes of vegetables were found. Our analyses demonstrate: 1) increased liking and intakes of the exposed vegetable after repeated exposure compared with no exposure; 2) increased liking for the exposed vegetable after conditioning compared with repeated exposure, increased intakes after the use of rewards, and some suggestion of decreased intakes after flavor-nutrient conditioning; and 3) increased liking and intakes of a novel vegetable after repeated exposure to a variety of other vegetables compared with no exposure or repeated exposure to one other vegetable. Effect sizes, however, are small, and limited evidence suggests long-term benefits. Our analyses, furthermore, are limited by limitations in study design, compliance, and/or reporting. Conclusions Based on our findings, we recommend the use of repeated exposure to one and a variety of vegetables, and the use of rewards, for increasing vegetable liking and consumption. Confirmation from further large, well-conducted studies that use realistic scenarios, however, is also required. This study was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42017056919.

scholarly journals Long-term condition management in adults with intellectual disability in primary care: a systematic review

BJGP Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. bjgpopen18X101445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hanlon ◽  
Sara MacDonald ◽  
Karen Wood ◽  
Linda Allan ◽  
Sally-Ann Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
General Population ◽  
Intellectual Disabilities ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Health Checks ◽  
Adults With Intellectual Disabilities

BackgroundAdults with intellectual disabilities have higher morbidity and earlier mortality than the general population. Access to primary health care is lower, despite a higher prevalence of many long-term conditions.AimTo synthesise the evidence for the management of long-term conditions in adults with intellectual disabilities and identify barriers and facilitators to management in primary care.Design & settingMixed-methods systematic review.MethodSeven electronic databases were searched to identify both quantitative and qualitative studies concerning identification and management of long-term conditions in adults with intellectual disability in primary care. Both the screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts, and the quality assessment were carried out in duplicate. Findings were combined in a narrative synthesis.ResultsFifty-two studies were identified. Adults with intellectual disabilities are less likely than the general population to receive screening and health promotion interventions. Annual health checks may improve screening, identification of health needs, and management of long-term conditions. Health checks have been implemented in various primary care contexts, but the long-term impact on outcomes has not been investigated. Qualitative findings highlighted barriers and facilitators to primary care access, communication, and disease management. Accounts of experiences of adults with intellectual disabilities reveal a dilemma between promoting self-care and ensuring access to services, while avoiding paternalistic care.ConclusionAdults with intellectual disabilities face numerous barriers to managing long-term conditions. Reasonable adjustments, based on the experience of adults with intellectual disability, in addition to intervention such as health checks, may improve access and management, but longer-term evaluation of their effectiveness is required.

scholarly journals Facilitators and Barriers Surrounding the Role of Administration in Employee Job Satisfaction in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review

Healthcare ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 360
Author(s):  
Kimberly Lee ◽  
Michael Mileski ◽  
Joanna Fohn ◽  
Leah Frye ◽  
Lisa Brooks
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Management Style ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Environment ◽  
Employee Job Satisfaction ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Previous literature has shown how associate engagement has positively impacted on productivity, job satisfaction, safety, retention, consumer sentiment, and financial performance in hospitals and healthcare systems. However, a lack of research showing the relationship between associate engagement and job satisfaction within the long-term care environment has existed. Our objective was to investigate characteristics within the long-term care environment that promote and detract from associate job satisfaction and extrapolate the best practices in maintaining job satisfaction and engagement. This systematic review queried CINAHL, PubMed (MEDLINE), and Academic Search Ultimate databases for peer-reviewed publications for facilitators and barriers commensurate with employee job satisfaction in long-term care facilities using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and the Kruse Protocols. The authors identified 11 facilitators for job satisfaction and 18 barriers to job satisfaction in the 60 selected articles. The top four facilitators were Supportive Leadership, Capable and Motivated Employees, Positive Organizational Values, and Social Support Mechanisms. The top four barriers were condescending management style, high job demands, lack of self-care, and lack of training with medically complex patients. The systematic review revealed the importance of maintaining satisfied employees in the long-term care workplace through am emphasis leadership and on the facilitators identified to best serve their associates and improve care for residents.

scholarly journals Uma Revisão Sistemática da Literatura para Identificação de Lacunas de Pesquisa Relacionadas a Mineração de Processos Educacionais

RENOTE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucielton Manoel da Silva ◽  
Rodrigo Lins Rodrigues ◽  
João Carlos Sedraz Silva ◽  
Gibran Medeiros Chaves de Vasconcelos Medeiros Chaves de Vasconcelos ◽  
Jorge Luis Cavalcanti Ramos
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Process Mining ◽  
Learning Management Systems ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Current State ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
State Of Art

This paper has as objective present the state of art of Educational Process Mining(EPM) and the application of yours results in Learning Management Systems (LMS), to do this was made a systematic review of literature(SRL), where through a well defined and objective process was selected articles to serve as base to the SRL. After the definition of the protocol and the realization of the methodological process we got nine articles that contributed satisfactorily to the responses of research questions related with the studied phenomenon, where was analisade many aspects of them to get informations about the current state of arte of EPM.

scholarly journals Questionnaires to Assess Facilitators and Barriers of Early Mobilization in Critically Ill Patients; Which One to Choose? A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
pp. 105477382094826
Author(s):  
Yvonne. Dikkema ◽  
Marianne. K. Nieuwenhuis ◽  
Cees. P. van der Schans ◽  
Leonora. J. Mouton
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Complex Process ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers ◽  
Definition Of

Implementing and performing early mobilization is a complex process requiring multidisciplinary input and cooperation. To gain insight in its facilitators and barriers, various surveys have been developed. A systematic review was conducted, to identify the psychometric properties, feasibility and suitability of questionnaires to assess facilitators and barriers of early mobilization in critically ill patients. Data were extracted regarding a.o. definition of early mobilization, development, psychometric properties, content and themes, question format. The search identified 537 publications of which 13 unique questionnaires were included. The questionnaires showed wide variation in extensiveness of development. Only six questionnaires actually assessed validity and reliability. Which questionnaire to choose depends on the aim of its use, required level of detail and specifics of the ICU, though three questionnaires were recommended as their definition of early mobilization covered a broad range of activities, including nursing related mobility activities. International consensus on what constitutes early mobilization is desirable.

scholarly journals Sedentary behaviour levels in adults with an intellectual disability: a systematic review protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Louise Lynch ◽  
Mary McCarron ◽  
Philip McCallion ◽  
Eilish Burke
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Sedentary Behaviour ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Rapid Assessment ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Background: Sedentary behaviour contributes to non-communicable diseases, which account for almost 71% of world deaths. Of these, cardiovascular disease is one of the largest causes of preventable death. It is not yet fully understood what level of sedentary behaviour is safe. People with an intellectual disability have poorer health than the general population with higher rates of multi-morbidity, obesity and inactivity. There is a paucity of evidence on whether this poorer health is due to sedentary behaviour or physical inactivity. This systematic review will investigate the sedentary behaviour levels of adults with an intellectual disability. Method: The PRISMA-P framework will be applied to achieve high-quality articles. An extensive search will be conducted in Medline, Embase, psycINFO and Cinahl and grey literature sources. All articles will be independently reviewed by two reviewers and a third to resolve disputes. Initially, the articles will be reviewed by title and abstract and then the full article will be reviewed using stringent inclusion criteria. All article data will be summarised in a standardised tabular format. The National Institute of Health’s quality assessment tool will be used to assess article quality. GRADE will be used to assess the quality of the evidence. The primary outcome of interest is the prevalence of sedentary behaviour levels for people with an intellectual disability. The definition of sedentary behaviour to be used for the purposes of this study is: ‘low physical activity as identified by metabolic equivalent (MET) or step levels or as measured by the Rapid Assessment of Physical activity questionnaire (RAPA) or the International Physical Activity questionnaire (IPAQ) or sitting for more than 3 hours per day’. Conclusion: This systematic review will provide a critical insight into the prevalence of sedentary behaviour in adults with an intellectual disability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document