Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients Referred to the American University of Beirut—Medical Center Secondary to Deep Vein Thrombosis; Occurrence and Risk Factors

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wissam H. Sleiman ◽  
Zade Asfahani ◽  
Ali. T. Taher ◽  
Denize. Al Rahawi ◽  
Ismail Khalil
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
American University ◽  
American University Of Beirut ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

scholarly journals Risk Factor of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Gynecologic Cancer Patients at Rajavithi Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Nawapas Pookcharoen ◽  
Putsarat Insin ◽  
Suvanna Asavapiriyanon
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Advanced Stage Cancer ◽  
Deep Vein

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), that includes both deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), represents a significant complication after major pelvic surgery and potentially lethal disease in gynecologic cancer patients. However, its incidence and associated risk factors have not been well established.Objectives: To evaluate risk factors that may be associated with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in gynecologic cancer patients.Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study included patients who diagnosed as gynecologic cancer with or without DVT between January 2002 and December 2016 at Rajavithi Hospital. The presence of DVT was confirmed by either color doppler ultrasonography or computed tomography scan. Patient's demographic data, type and stage of cancer, including treatment modalities were compared. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were analyzed to calculate odds ratios (OR) and determine independent risk factors for DVT.Results: Over 14 years periods, 242 patients with DVT were identified in a total 8476 gynecologic cancer patients. The incidence of DVT was 2.85% in this patient setting. Complete data were available in 468 patients, 156 (33.3%) cases with DVT diagnosed were compared with 312 (66.7%) controls without DVT. Among patients with DVT, the median time to DVT diagnosis was 4 months (IQR 2-12 months) after diagnosis of cancer, most of cases (89.5%) were symptomatic DVT, and a half of them (49%) were detected in ovarian cancer. In a multivariate analysis, 3 significant predictors of developing DVT were identified: advanced-stage cancer (OR 7.22; 95%CI 4.62-11.28, p<0.001), patient undergoing lymphadenectomy (OR 1.90; 95%CI 1.21-2.98, p=0.005), and patient with massive operative blood loss (≥1500 ml; OR 2.09; 95%CI 1.12-3.91, p=0.021).Conclusions: Awareness of DVT is the best way to prevent the venous thromboembolism. Therefore, an appropriate prophylaxis and closed monitoring of gynecologic cancer patients with advanced-stage cancer, undergoing lymphadenectomy, and massive operative blood loss should be mandatory to against thromboembolism complications.

Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis - Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management. The Worcester Venous Thromboembolism Study.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 584-584
Author(s):  
Frederick A. Spencer3 ◽  
Robert J. Goldberg ◽  
Darleen Lessard ◽  
Cathy Emery ◽  
Apar Bains ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background: Recent observations suggest that upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has become more common over the last few decades. However the prevalence of this disorder within the community has not been established. The purpose of this study was to compare the occurrence rate, risk factor profile, management strategies, and hospital outcomes in patients with upper versus lower extremity DVT in a cohort of all Worcester residents diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 1999. Methods: The medical records of all residents from the Worcester, MA statistical metropolitan area (2000 census=478,000) diagnosed with ICD-9 codes consistent with possible DVT and/or pulmonary embolism at all 11 Worcester hospitals during the years 1999, 2001, and 2003 are being reviewed by trained data abstractors. Validation of each case of VTE is performed using prespecified criteria. Results: A total of 483 cases have been validated as acute DVT events - this represents all cases of DVT occurring in residents of the Worcester SMSA in 1999. For purposes of this analysis we have excluded 4 patients with both upper and lower extremity DVT. Upper extremity DVT was diagnosed in 68 (14.2%) of patients versus 411 (85.8%) cases of lower extremity DVT. Patients with upper extremity DVT were younger, more likely to be Hispanic, more likely to have renal disease and more likely to have had a recent central venous catheter, infection, surgery, ICU stay, or chemotherapy than patients with lower extremity DVT. They were less likely to have had a prior DVT or to have developed their current DVT as an outpatient. Although less likely to be treated with heparin, LMWH, or warfarin they were more likely to suffer major bleeding complications. Recurrence rates of VTE during hospitalization were very low in both groups. Conclusions: Patients with upper extremity DVT comprise a small but clinically important proportion of all patients with DVT in the community setting. Their risk profiles differs from patients with lower extremity DVT suggesting strategies for DVT prophylaxis and treatment for this group may need to be tailored. Characteristics of Patients with Upper versus Lower Extremity DVT Upper extremity (n=68) Lower extremity (n=417) P value *Recent = < 3 months Demographics Mean Age, yrs 59.3 66.5 <0.001 Male (%) 51.5 45 NS Race (%) <0.05 White 86.6 91.6 Black 1.5 3.2 Hispanic 9.0 2.0 VTE Setting (%) <0.001 Community 53.8 76.2 Hospital Acquired 46.2 23.8 Risk Factors (%) Recent Central Venous Catheter 61.8 11.9 <0.001 Recent Infection 48.5 32.4 <0.01 Recent Surgery 47.8 28.1 <0.001 Cancer 44.1 32.6 0.06 Recent Immobility 38.2 47.0 NS Recent chemotherapy 25 9.5 <0.001 Renal disease 23.5 1.7 <0.0001 Recent ICU discharge 23.5 15.1 0.07 Recent CHF 19.1 16.6 NS Previous DVT 3.0 18.7 <0.01 Anticoagulant prophylaxis (%) During hospital admission (n=125) 76.7 71.6 NS During recent prior hospital admission (n=188) 73.7 54.7 <0.05 During recent surgery (n=146) 62.5 55.3 NS Hospital therapy - treatment doses (%) Any heparin/LMWH 66.2 82 <0.01 Warfarin at discharge 53.1 71.2 <0.01 Hospital Outcomes (%) Length of stay (mean, d) 11.2 6.8 <0.01 Major bleeding 11.8 4.9 <0.05 Recurrent DVT 1.5 1.0 NS Recurrent PE 0 0.2 NS Hospital Mortality 4.5 4.1 NS

scholarly journals Factors affecting the recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism: A retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-390
Author(s):  
Yasemin Ateş ◽  
Züleyha Bingöl ◽  
Gülfer Okumuş ◽  
Orhan Arseven
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Pulmonary Thromboembolism ◽  
First Year ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Hereditary Risk ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of recurrence and the risk factors for recurrence in patients who were diagnosed with venous thromboembolism. Methods: Between January 2005 and January 2015, a total of 412 venous thromboembolism patients (164 males, 248 females; mean age: 53.5±16.6 years; range: 19 to 95 years) were retrospectively analyzed. The demographics, underlying risk factors, comorbidities, imaging findings, and treatment data of the patients were recorded. Results: At least one transient/permanent risk factor was found in 341 (82.7%) of the index events, and the other 71 (17.2%) were idiopathic. Recurrence developed in 76 (18.4%) of the patients. The duration of the treatment in the first event was significantly longer in recurrent cases (p=0.007). The recurrence rate in patients diagnosed with only deep vein thrombosis or patients diagnosed with pulmonary thromboembolism + deep vein thrombosis was significantly higher than the patients diagnosed with only pulmonary thromboembolism (24% vs. 14.2%, respectively; p=0.007). The rate of idiopathic venous thromboembolism was higher in recurrent cases than in non-recurrent cases (26.3% vs. 15.2%, respectively; p=0.028). At the end of the first year, the mean D-dimer levels were higher in recurrent cases (p=0.034). Hereditary risk factors were also higher in recurrent cases (39.5% vs. 19.3%, respectively; p=0.031). There was no significant correlation between recurrence and mortality. Conclusion: The presence of deep vein thrombosis, idiopathic events, high D-dimer levels at the end of the first year and hereditary risk factors seem to be associated with recurrence.

scholarly journals Von Willebrand Factor:Antigen And Adamts-13 Level, But Not Soluble P-Selectin, Are Risk Factors For The First Asymptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis In Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Budi Setiawan ◽  
Cecilia Oktaria Permatadewi ◽  
Baringin de Samakto ◽  
Ashar Bugis ◽  
Ridho M. Naibaho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Blood Type ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Soluble P ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract BackgroundThere is a high incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-induced vascular endothelial cell activation (VECA) is characterized by increased plasma levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin), leading to the activation of endothelial cells and signaling cascades. The biological role of a disintegrin-like and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS-13) is to control the activity of vWF and consequently the risk of thrombosis. The objective of this study was to investigate the roles of sP-selectin, vWF, and ADAMTS-13 as risk factors for the first episode of DVT in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.MethodsThis prospective cohort study was conducted at Dr. Kariadi Hospital, Indonesia, on 40 cancer patients. Prechemotherapy (baseline) and postchemotherapy sP-selectin, vWF antigen (vWF:Ag), and ADAMTS-13 plasma levels were determined with ELISAs before and 3 months after chemotherapy. The clinical characteristics of the patients, cancer type, cancer stage, chemotherapy regimen, ABO blood type, D-dimer level and Khorana risk score were also analyzed using logistic regression. Patients were observed for the possibility of developing DVT during chemotherapy.ResultsDVT was confirmed in 5 patients (12.5%) after a period of 3 months. In patients with DVT, sP-selectin and vWF were significantly higher while ADAMTS-13 was lower than in their counterparts. The levels of baseline vWF:Ag and ADAMTS-13, with cut-off points ≥ 2.35 IU/mL and ≤ 1.03 IU/mL, respectively, were found to independently predict the incidence of DVT. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the relative risk (RR) for DVT in patients with high vWF:Ag was 3.80 (95% CI 1.15-12.48, p=0.028), and that for patients with low ADAMTS-13 was 2.67 (95% CI 1.22-23.82, p=0.005). The vWF:Ag/ADAMTS-13 ratio and both vWF:Ag and ADAMTS-13 dynamics during treatment were also able to differentiate those with prospective DVT. However, sP-selectin and other covariates showed no statistical significance. ConclusionPrechemotherapy plasma levels of vWF:Ag ≥ 2.35 IU/mL and ADAMTS-13 ≤ 1.03 IU/mL are independent risk factors for DVT incidence.

Stratification of Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Ovarian Cancer Patients During Chemotherapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana Mereu ◽  
Saverio Tateo ◽  
Catherine Klersy ◽  
Eva Martinotti Gabellotti ◽  
Franco Polatti
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
First Line ◽  
Susceptible Population ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Multivariable Regression ◽  
Deep Vein

Background:The prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ovarian cancer during first-line chemotherapy (CHT) ranges between 6.4% and 10.6%. Identification of the susceptible population is crucial for effective thromboprophylaxis.Methods:We performed a retrospective study of all our patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent ambulatory first-line CHT between 1990 and 2004. Data were collected regarding age, body mass index (BMI), previous deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), menopause status, FIGO stage, grade, histology, type of surgery, residual disease, and CHT. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess independent prognostic factors for VTE/PE to calculate a prognostic index (PI).Results:Of 203 patients, 16 (7.8%) had symptomatic VTE: 15 deep vein thrombosis and 1 PE. Multivariable regression analysis found that age (P = 0.01), BMI (P = 0.01), and stage (P = 0.05) were independent prognostic factors for VTE. Age, BMI, and stage were used to calculate the PI: 0.285 × age + 0.555 × BMI + 1.110 × stage. The PI was dichotomized according to its median cutoff (5.8) to define a low (3.8% at 6 months) and a high (11.3%) VTE incidence group.Conclusions:Age, BMI, and stage permit to identify ovarian cancer patients with a high risk in developing symptomatic VTE during CHT.

D-Dimer Level Significance for Deep Vein Thrombosis Screening in The Third Trimester : A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Miyamoto ◽  
Hiroaki Komatsu ◽  
Masayo Okawa ◽  
Yuki Iida ◽  
Daiken Osaku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
The Third ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
Compression Ultrasonography

Abstract BackgroundVenous thromboembolism often develops after surgery and childbirth, resulting in death in some cases. Although early deep vein thrombosis (DVT) detection can predict pulmonary thromboembolism, there is no early screening method for DVT in pregnant women. Lack of consensus regarding significance or setting and cut-off value interpretation of D-dimer levels further impedes venous thromboembolism screening in pregnant women.This study aimed to examine the utility of third-trimester serum D-dimer levels for screening test for DVT during pregnancy.to determine the frequency of asymptomatic DVT using lower-limb compression ultrasonography.MethodsThis single-center retrospective study included 497 pregnant women who underwent elective cesarean section at term in our hospital between January 2013 and December 2019. Serum D-dimer levels were preoperatively measured at 32–37 gestation weeks. The presence or absence of DVT in patients with serum D-dimer levels ≥ 3.0 µg/ml, the cut-off value, was examined using compression ultrasonography. In all patients, the presence or absence of clinical venous thrombosis (symptoms such as lower-limb pain, swelling, and heat sensation) was examined within 4 postoperative weeks.The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Guideline 2015 was referred to determine risk factors for the onset of venous thrombosis during pregnancy. Among those, we examined the risk factors for DVT that result in high D-dimer levels during pregnancy.ResultsThe median age and body mass index were 35 (20–47) years and 21.2 (16.4–41.1) kg/m2, respectively. Further, the median gestational age and D-dimer levels were 37 weeks and 2.1 (0.2–16.0) µg/ml, respectively. Compression ultrasonography was performed on 135 (26.5%) patients with a D-dimer level ≥3.0 µg/ml, with none of the patients showing DVT. All patients were followed up for 4 postoperative weeks, with none presenting with venous thromboembolism. Multivariate analysis showed that hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism that causes high D-dimer levels (odds ratio: 2.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.05–6.50, P=0.04).ConclusionThere may be low utility in screening for DVT using D-dimer levels in the third trimester. Further, prepartum asymptomatic DVT has a low frequency, indicating the low utility of compression ultrasonography.Trial registrationInstitutional Review Board of Tottori University Hospital (IRB no. 20A149).

scholarly journals Strategies for Diagnosis and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism during Pregnancy

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalini Jain Bagaria ◽  
V. B. Bagaria
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Postpartum Period ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Altered Physiology ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
In Pregnancy

Pregnancy and the postpartum period have an increased incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The condition is unique during this period for several reasons. Primarily, because there is complexity in diagnosing this condition in view of altered physiology and preexisting edema in pregnancy and also because there are restrictions on the use of certain drugs and a need for vigilant monitoring of anticoagulant activities of drugs during the period. The problem is compounded and assumes the highest order of significance since two lives are involved and all the investigations and management done should also take into account the potential adverse effects on the foetus. In order to prevent the development of VTE during pregnancy, sound clinical evaluation for risk factors, risk stratification, and optimal use of resource both mechanical and pharmacological is necessary. This paper details strategies in preventing development of deep vein thrombosis and treatment of VTEs.

scholarly journals Which patients are at high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism)?

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (21) ◽  
pp. 5595-5606
Author(s):  
Fionnuala Ní Áinle ◽  
Barry Kevane
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Clinical Conditions ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE, or deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) is associated with mortality and long-term morbidity. The circumstances in which an index VTE event occurred are crucial when personalized VTE recurrence risk is assessed. Patients who experience a VTE event in the setting of a transient major risk factor (such as surgery associated with general anesthesia for &gt;30 minutes) are predicted to have a low VTE recurrence risk following discontinuation of anticoagulation, and limited-duration anticoagulation is generally recommended. In contrast, those patients whose VTE event occurred in the absence of risk factors or who have persistent risk factors have a higher VTE recurrence risk. Here, we review the literature surrounding VTE recurrence risk in a range of clinical conditions. We describe gender-specific risks, including VTE recurrence risk following hormone- and pregnancy-associated VTE events. Finally, we discuss how the competing impacts of VTE recurrence and bleeding have shaped international guideline recommendations.

Comparative study on risk factors and early outcome of symptomatic distal versus proximal deep vein thrombosis: Results from the OPTIMEV study

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (09) ◽  
pp. 493-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Antoinette Sevestre-Pietri ◽  
Jean-Luc Bosson ◽  
Jean-Pieere Laroche ◽  
Marc Righini ◽  
Dominique Brisot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Early Outcome ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Active Cancer

SummaryThere is a lack of consensus on the value of detecting and treating symptomatic isolated distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs. In our study, we compared the risk factors and outcomes in patients with isolated symptomatic distal DVT with those with proximal symptomatic DVT. We analysed the data of patients with objectively confirmed symptomatic isolated DVT enrolled in the national (France), multicenter, prospective OPTIMEV study.This sub-study outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding and death at three months. Among the 6141 patients with suspicion of isolated DVT included between November 2004 and January 2006, DVT was confirmed in 1643 patients (26.8%). Isolated distal DVT was more frequent than proximal DVT (56.8% vs. 43.2%, respectively; p=0.01). Isolated distal DVT was significantly more often associated with transient risk factors (recent surgery, recent plaster immobilisation, recent travel), whereas proximal DVT was significantly more associated with more chronic states (active cancer, congestive heart failure or respiratory insufficiency, age >75 years). Most patients (96.8%) with isolated distal DVT received anticoagulant therapies.There was no difference in the percentage of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in patients with proximal DVT and isolated distal DVT. However, the mortality rate was significantly higher (p<0.01) in patients with proximal DVT (8.0%) than in those with isolated distal DVT (4.4%). Symptomatic isolated distal DVT differs from symptomatic proximal DVT both in terms of risk factors and clinical outcome. Whether these differences should influence the clinical management of these two events remains to be determined.

scholarly journals Venous Thromboembolism in Patents With Lung Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 107602962097791
Author(s):  
Takahito Suzuki ◽  
Susumu Fujino ◽  
Shouta Inaba ◽  
Ryo Yamamura ◽  
Hiromasa Katoh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Clinicopathological Characteristics ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Deep Vein

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer in Japan. Studies in other countries have reported a venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate of 4%–20% in cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence of VTE in lung cancer patients in Japan and compared the characteristics of patients with and without VTE. In this retrospective cohort study, the clinicopathological characteristics of study patients with and without concomitant VTE were compared. Patients with lung cancer treated at Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Japan from 2008 to 2017. Of the 1471 patients with lung cancer studied, 28 developed VTE. Five patients developed pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) alone, 9 PTE with concomitant deep vein thrombosis, and 14 deep vein thrombosis alone. Compared with patients in the non-VTE group, the VTE group was significantly younger (mean value ± SD 66.3 ± 10.1 vs. 73.0 ± 10.6 years, p = 0.001), contained significantly more patients with stage IIIb–IV disease (p = 0.002), and had a significantly higher rate of chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and radiation therapy (p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in median survival time from lung cancer diagnosis between the VTE and non-VTE groups. The 1-year mortality rate after VTE diagnosis was 60.7%. Lung cancer was the most frequent cause of death, followed by infection and VTE. Several baseline characteristics differed between patients with and without VTE. The prognosis may worsen after development of VTE, suggesting that lung cancer patients should be carefully monitored for it.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document