Hypothetico-deductive Research

Author(s):  
Thomas W. Edgar ◽  
David O. Manz
Keyword(s):  
Arsitektura ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Ifni Farida ◽  
Galing Yudana ◽  
Erma Fitria Rini

<div align="center"><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="518"><p><strong><em>Abstract:</em></strong><em> Development of the urban population in Indonesia that growing rapidly these days, of course will cause impacts for the city itself, including in terms of environmental degradation. Therefore, society needs of a comfortable and livable city is getting higher, which is known as the concept of livable city. One of the key principles of the concept of livable city is the availability of public space as a place to socialize and interact. Surakarta, within 5 (five) years, being actively promote provision of public green space, as one of the public space, as evidenced by the increase of public green space area 23,16% in 2016. In a study titled Indonesia Most Livable City Index, Surakarta has a livable city index reached 69,38% above the national average. The problem in this research is how the level of conformity of the public space in Surakarta with the concept of livable city? This study aims to determine the level of conformity of the public space in Surakarta with the concept of livable city, which covers several aspects, including: availability, coverage, accessibility, comfort, amenity, and supporting activity. The method in this study using deductive research approach and scoring analysis technique. Based on the analysis, it can be seen that the level of conformity of the public space in Surakarta with the concept of livable city included into the category of medium-level conformity. Nonetheless, it needs improvement in some aspects of public space in Surakarta whose value is still low, in order to realize the public space in Surakarta according to the concept of livable city.</em></p></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="518"><p><strong><em> </em></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="518"><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>level of conformity, public space, livable city, scoring analysis</em></p></td></tr></tbody></table></div>


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelesh Dhanpat ◽  
Chris Schachtebeck

Orientation: This research study focuses on establishing a link between job crafting and landmark studies on intrapreneurship.Research purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide a theoretical overview of intrapreneurship, intrapreneurial orientation and job crafting, and to explore theoretical linkages between these areas of enquiry.Motivation for the study: There is currently a dearth of research studies that explore the link between job crafting and intrapreneurial behaviours in existing organisations in the form of intrapreneurial orientation.Research design, approach and method: The study is presented as a conceptual paper in the form of a qualitative, theoretical study, employing a model-building approach. A deductive research approach is followed, and a narrative review methodology is employed.Main findings: The findings of this study from a literature search acknowledge the contributions of job crafting and intrapreneurial research within the management sciences, and we remain cognisant of the organisational implications of each, which have, to date, focused on the organisation, rather than the individual. With this in mind, we suggest that job crafting and intrapreneurial behaviours are empirically researched to validate the recommendations made.Practical/managerial implications: This study will help to establish the type of job-crafting interventions and job-crafting strategies needed to promote intrapreneurial behaviours in practice.Contribution/value-add: This study provides noteworthy insights, which include the suggestion that employees with a forward-looking disposition will engage in job crafting, with a focus on intrapreneurial behaviour. Furthermore, the study fills a void left in the current body of knowledge.


Arsitektura ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Isandi Nurul Hasanah ◽  
Murtanti Jani Rahayu ◽  
Rufia Andisetyana Putri

<div><p><em>Construction of the rented simple flats is the option of government’s policy to meet the needs of adequate housing for low-income. The rented simple flats in Sukoharjo already inhabited 3 blocks of 6 blocks. The degree of occupancy will indirectly reflect quality the construction of flats. The problem in this study is whether development the rented simple flats in Sukoharjo complies with the standar of ideal housing. The purpose of research is the degree of conformity the rented simple flats in Sukoharjo as the standar of ideal housing. The method is used the deductive research methods with quantitative research. The analysis technique is used the analysis of scoring on any variable of the standards of ideal housing. The conclusions from this research is that there are nine variables known as the factors that influence the development of the rented simple flats in Sukoharjo as the ideal flats. The variables that have been suitable with the standar of ideal housing are the policy, the price of rent and accessibily</em><em>. However, some variables that have not been optimal like</em><em> the </em><em>infrastructures, material contruction and the others</em><em>. Consequently, Sukoharjo’s District Government and some of the parties concerned to repair deficiency and accommodate the needs of the community to achieve development the ideal flats.</em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>: Contruction of rented simple flats, standards of ideal housing, scoring analysis</em></p></div>


2010 ◽  
pp. 19-34
Author(s):  
Graham Scambler

This paper starts by characterizing conventional notions of quantitative ‘versus' qualitative research and considers their potential displacement by ‘mixed-methods' research. The claim that mixed-methods research is necessarily an advance on its predecessors is critiqued. Using a critical realist approach favouring retroductive and abductive rather than inductive and deductive research strategies, it is suggested that the theoretical dimension implicit in all research is too often neglected. It is further contended that ‘making a case' empirically amounts to much the same things as ‘making a case' theoretically. More ‘metareflection' is commended. Brief references is made to the literature on health inequalities to add some flesh to the bones of the argument.


In this chapter, the juxtaposition and interconnection of deductive and inductive research methods are explored. Qualitative, inductive empirical tools are discussed in depth, specifically in-depth interviews, focus groups, and field observation. Students will learn how these methods are used to generate hypotheses, which can ultimately be tested using deductive research methods. The structure of inductive research questions, and how they differ from deductive research questions, is further addressed, as is how a researcher “makes sense” of qualitative data.


In this chapter, students will learn how to identify the unit of analysis of a deductive research question. In addition, the concept of variables is discussed. Three different types of variables are presented. By the end of this chapter, students will be able to identify and define the dependent, independent, and extraneous variables related to a given research question. Numerous examples are presented throughout.


In this chapter, students will learn the process of developing a deductive research question. The social science process, and by virtue the methods that are employed as part of a research study, stem from the structure and nature of the research question. This chapter provides a step-by-step account of how to generate a scientifically valid deductive question. The concept and structuring of a hypothesis that is linked to a research question is also discussed. The second portion of the chapter is devoted to explaining how to complete a literature review that is relevant to your research question and hypothesis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 743-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy Charmaz ◽  
Linda Liska Belgrave

This article examines qualitative data in an era of neoliberalism and focuses on the place of data in grounded theory studies. Neoliberal values of individual responsibility, self-sufficiency, competition, efficiency, and profit have entered the conduct of research. Neoliberalism fosters (a) reifying quantitative logical-deductive research, (b) imposing surveillance of types and sources of data, (c) marginalizing inductive qualitative research, and (d) limiting access to data in grounded theory studies. Grounded theory relies on data and resists current efforts to abandon data. The method resides in the space between reifying and rejecting data. Data allow us to learn from the stories of those left out and permits research participants to break silences. Data can help us look underneath and beyond our privileges, and alter our views. Grounded theory is predicated on data, but how researchers regard and render data depends on which version of the method they adopt. We propose developing a strong methodological self-consciousness to learn how we affect the research process and to counter the subtle effects of neoliberalism.


2020 ◽  
pp. 147612702096818
Author(s):  
Kevin Corley ◽  
Pratima (Tima) Bansal ◽  
Haitao Yu

As inductive research has moved from the fringe to the mainstream, it not only has come to look more like deductive research, but has started to look more formulaic as well (i.e. standards, templates, checklists). The very thing that makes inductive research unique is its ability to challenge what is known and to do so creatively. The question, thus, needs to be asked: why does inductive research continue to become more formulaic when many inductive editors, reviewers, and authors celebrate novelty and creativity? We believe it is because reviewers and editors find it difficult to judge “quality” when there is no guidebook. The quality of science-based research is easier to judge than creative inductive research, which is often assumed to be in the “eye of the beholder.” From our SO!apbox, we tackle this challenge head-on by asking: what is “quality inductive research” when we loosen the science-based methodological straightjacket so as to deliver the novelty and creativity promised by inductive methods? In this editorial, we explore how editors can judge quality inductive research and offer innovative editorial practices that can help to foster creative inductive research.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (76) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Ivars Kronis

The study “Creditor claims in the insolvency proceedings of a legal entity” contains analysis of the legal norms that prescribe the filing and verification of creditor claims, decisions adopted by administrator concerning creditor claims, as well as the procedure for filing of creditor claims and complaints related to the acknowledging, waiver or partial acknowledging of creditor claims. The issue of creditor claims in the insolvency proceedings of legal entities is studied in details on the basis of the legal regulations and conclusions of application theory and practice. The study contains no analysis of the regulations applicable to the insolvency of the participants of finance and capital market whereas they are supervised in accordance with the requirements of regulatory acts by the Financial and Capital Market Commission and their activities are governed by special legal norms. Even though the issue of creditor claims has been earlier discussed in the insolvency law science of Latvia, authors of the relevant studies have discussed them in brief. This leads to conclusion that the issue of creditor claims is topical and that theoretical and practical study thereof is significant for insolvency law of the present day. Empiric base of the study comprises scientist works and article collection materials, periodical materials and sources, legal acts, Internet resources and other publicly available information. The approaches used in exploring the study include analytical, comparative and deductive research methods. The study is developed with the following structure (the questions of study also represent parts of this work): 1) General description of filing creditor claims; Formal legal requirements applicable to creditor claims; 3) Status of creditor and complaints concerning claims.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document