Rescission and its Effect on Restitution

1984 ◽  
Vol 19 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 388-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinai Deutch
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Specific Performance ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Rescission is one of the most important activities in the law of contract. The right or the possibility to rescind is no less important than the right to specific performance or damages. Indeed, in many cases, when specific performance is either undesired or impossible, and no harm entitling damages has been caused, it will be the major right.Despite this importance, Israeli contract laws have left many questions regarding rescission open (e.g. the character of the rescission, its range, contents and results regarding both contracting parties and third parties). The silence of the Israeli legislature in these matters is typical of Israeli civil law legislation in which major areas of law are condensed into a few laconic provisions. This attitude leaves much room for construction of the statute and for judicial legislation.

Formation of Contract and Third Parties in Cambodia

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ly Tayseng
Keyword(s):  
Academic Writing ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Third Party ◽  
The Third ◽  
Contract Formation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Formal Requirements

This chapter gives an overview of the law on contract formation and third party beneficiaries in Cambodia. Much of the discussion is tentative since the new Cambodian Civil Code only entered into force from 21 December 2011 and there is little case law and academic writing fleshing out its provisions. The Code owes much to the Japanese Civil Code of 1898 and, like the latter, does not have a requirement of consideration and seldom imposes formal requirements but there are a few statutory exceptions from the principle of freedom from form. For a binding contract, the agreement of the parties is required and the offer must be made with the intention to create a legally binding obligation and becomes effective once it reaches the offeree. The new Code explicitly provides that the parties to the contract may agree to confer a right arising under the contract upon a third party. This right accrues directly from their agreement; it is not required that the third party declare its intention to accept the right.

scholarly journals Issues of Protection of Personal Rights After the Death of the Victim in Civil Law

Law and World ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 124-144
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Property Damage ◽  
Personal Rights ◽  
Moral Damage ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The protection of personal human rights is especially important after the death of the victim. First of all, it is necessary to determine what is meant by the personal rights of a person, what personal rights can be protected after the death of the victim, in order to determine what is meant by the protection of the personal rights of the deceased. Then it is necessary to find out what the characteristics of a person are, by whom, how and in what form these rights are protected, and what harm can be caused by the violation of personal rights. It is true that the violation of personal rights is not allowed by law, but, nevertheless, there are many facts around us when the personal rights of the deceased and the living are violated. It is also desirable to protect personal rights acquired at birth from being violated by others both during the life and after the death of the victim. It is true that a person with personal rights protects his life and can claim compensation for property and / or non-property damage, but after the death of the victim, the law prohibits relatives or friends of the deceased from claiming compensation. for moral damage in violation of these rights. However, if a person was rehabilitated after his / her death, but the unlawful condemnation of the victim or other illegal legal actions damaged both the name and reputation of the heir, it is recommended to give the victim’s heir the right to claim compensation for the damage directly caused to him.

scholarly journals The partial waiver of the rights and partial invalidation of rights to the invention

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-59
Author(s):  
Petro Borovyk
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Utility Model ◽  
Patent Owner ◽  
The Third ◽  
Utility Models ◽  
The Law ◽  
State Registration ◽  
The Right

Borovyk P. The partial waiver of the rights and partial invalidation of rights to the invention. In view of changes in the Law of Ukraine «About protection of rights for inventions and utility models» introduced according to the Law No. 816-IX as of 21.07.2020, it is implied that a patent owner can waive rights provided by a state registration of an invention (utility model) fully or partially, and a court can render the rights for the invention (utility model) invalid fully or partially. The partial waiver of the rights or rendering the rights invalid causes a number of issues on a rather frequent basis, in particular, regarding a certain procedure of defining the entire scope of rights according to the patent and a portion of these rights. Since the scope of rights is defined by claims, the partial waiver of the rights or the partial rendering the rights invalid substantially represents a change of the scope of rights, which are defined by the claims as published. The patent may be granted for a group of inventions. In such case, the scope of rights shall be defined by the claims that comprise several independent claims. Here, the partial waiver of the rights for the invention may be carried out by waiving one or several independent claims at the discretion of the patent owner or by rendering one or several independent claims invalid by the court. Therewith, the scope of rights that is defined during conduction of an examination for another invention of the group of inventions, which are mentioned in a single protection document (patent), is not changed. The partial waiver or the partial rendering the rights for the invention invalid for the claims having one independent claim is a more problematic case. A key aspect of this problem is an influence of the proposed amendments of the claims onto the scope of rights for the invention and its correspondence with the requirements for granting a legal protection. More specifically, it is an establishment of a fact of reduction of the scope of rights when introducing the proposed amendments into the independent claim and examination of a new version of the independent claim for compliance with the requirements of patentability. An important aspect also lies in establishment of a balance of interests of the patent owner and third parties. The patent owner will receive a mechanism of implementation of the right for protection of allowable embodiments of the invention, while the third parties will receive a right for a legal certainty by means of an analysis of the scope of rights of the new version of the claims. The article discloses grounds for waiving the rights for the invention and the mechanism for implementation of the waiver under the legislation in force both for the case of the group of inventions and for the partial waiver or the partial rendering the rights for the invention invalid with the claims having one independent claim. Keywords: scope of rights, independent and dependent claims, amendment to claims, proceedings

20. Freehold Covenants

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Bogusz ◽  
Roger Sexton
Keyword(s):  
Third Parties ◽  
Restrictive Covenants ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Explanatory Text ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Concept Building ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Primary Materials

Titles in the Complete series combine extracts from a wide range of primary materials with clear explanatory text to provide readers with a complete introductory resource. This chapter discusses the difference between restrictive and positive covenants; the rules which govern the running of the burden of covenants; the rules regulating who initially has the right to enforce a covenant; the significance of s56 of the Law of Property Act 1925, and the impact of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999; the rules regarding assignment of restrictive covenants; the concept ‘building scheme’; and whether a positive or restrictive covenant will pass to successors in title.

Confidentiality and Patients’ Records: Balancing the Interests of Society and the Individual

1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-70
Author(s):  
Robert E. Paul
Keyword(s):  
Third Parties ◽  
Legal Cases ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Right ◽  
Privileged Communications ◽  
Physician Patient ◽  
Do So

This article defines and describes the interrelated but conceptually distinct terms “confidentiality,” “privilege,” “privileged communications,” “privacy,” and “records.” It reviews the parameters of these words, discusses the variance between the extent of the physician-patient and that of the much broader licensed psychologist-patient privilege in Pennsylvania and, in particular, reviews the situations in which assertions of confidentiality and privilege cannot prevent third parties from gaining access to records and the information contained in them and the legal cases which set out the law in these areas. Finally, it reviews the demands to see records by patients and the increasing willingness of courts, legislators, and regulators to grant not only access but also the right to correct, add to, or destroy such records if the patient wishes to do so.

24. Mortgages and charges

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith-Anne MacKenzie
Keyword(s):  
Third Parties ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Course-focused and comprehensive, the Textbook on series provide an accessible overview of the key areas on the law curriculum. This chapter examines the types of mortgages or charges of land and interests in land which may be created. It also considers the rules regarding their administration and their protection against later acquirers of interests in the land. The discussions cover legal mortgages and charges; equitable mortgages; the rights of the mortgagor; the rights of the mortgagee; mortgagee’s remedies; the right of certain third parties to redeem; the liability of mortgagees, receivers, and valuers for fraud or negligence; the end of a mortgage

scholarly journals KEABSAHAN SERTIFIKAT JAMINAN FIDUSIA ATAS BARANG MILIK PIHAK KETIGA YANG DIJAMINKAN SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Anita Kamilah
Keyword(s):  
National Development ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Community Effort ◽  
The Law ◽  
Fiduciary Relationships ◽  
The Government ◽  
To Come ◽  
The Right

Sustainability of national development is the increase in the life of the community effort that is supported through the granting of credit facilities or loans, as the provision of money or bills that can be equated with that loan agreement borrow the returns are made on a period of time to come. In order to provide protection and reassurance against creditors in obtaining her credit refund, the Government ratified the Act No. 42 Year 1999 About the Fiduciary Guarantee gives the right to the lender through fiduciary certificates as material warranties that are submitted on the basis of trust, where the owner can still use his guarantee for economic activities. The ease, often abused the debtor not good intentioned one through the securing of objects belonging to third parties fiduciary are against the law to the detriment of creditors because it resulted in no fiduciary guarantee legitimately so the lender no longer has the right to obtain payment preferent precedence if the debtor tort in fulfilling the obligation payment of his credit. In addition, the owners of goods that harms his ownership was made the object of a fiduciary guarantee. Legal protection for owners of goods due to the securing of objects that are against the law of fiduciary relationships can do the prosecution indemnity as well as requesting removal of the disturbances a pleasure over the right material.Keywords: Fiduciary Certificates, Credit, Against The Law, Torts.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NOTARIS PENGGANTI YANG AKTANYA BERMASALAH DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2004 JUNCTO UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG JABATAN NOTARIS

Jurnal MINUTA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-27
Author(s):  
Arif Hidayat
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Actual Reality ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Notary in making an authentic deed must be able to account for the deed if it turns out that in the future problems arise from the authentic deed both in terms of criminal law, civil law or State administration. The problems arising from the deed made by the Notary need to be questioned whether it is the result of an error from the Notary or the error of the viewer who does not provide information in accordance with the actual reality to the Notary. Such negligence or error can occur because the Notary in question is lacking or does not understand the construction or legal actions desired by the viewer so that the deed made is contrary to the provisions of the law. Such negligence or error can also be deliberately carried out by the concerned Notary. This study focuses on Law Number 30 Year 2004 as amended by Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Position wherein this study discusses the Notary who is unable to carry out his position so he has the right to submit written leave request and at the same time accompanied by the appointment of a substitute notary. After a while, a lawsuit from a party that feels aggrieved results from the deed made by Si X as a Substitute Notary. The results of this study concluded that a notary who leaves as a substituted notary has responsibility for the deed made by his successor notary even though he is on leave from his position where the responsibility is in the form of civil liability, if the substitute notary commits an error within the scope of authority given by a notary to a substitute notary. So in that case the notary is also liable for losses suffered by the parties due to the deed made by the substitute notary. Because the notary who is replaced is the owner of the office, if the notary of origin will file leave then he will appoint an employee from his own office as a substitute notary. Criminal responsibility, in the case of a criminal offense, a notary who is replaced is not responsible, for example in the case of tax evasion. Criminal liability can only be imposed on a substitute notary if he makes a mistake outside his authority as a substitute notary. Then the notary whose leave cannot be held accountable. The substitute notary is also entitled to get the same protection and legal guarantees because every citizen has the same rights before the law.

scholarly journals To the Definition of Preferential Right in Civil Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-53
Author(s):  
A. V. Pikalov
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Legal Obligation ◽  
Specific Group ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Single Idea ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship

The essential features of the preferential right are revealed and the main approaches to understanding its legal nature are considered. According to the first approach, preferential rights are defined as cases when, under all equal conditions, the advantage is granted by law to a specific group of persons with some special characteristics. The second approach does not have a single idea: the authors focus on a certain aspect of preferential rights and propose to understand other preferential rights in the same way. The place of “preferential rights” among other exceptions in the law is determined, the relationship and difference from related legal categories are shown. Based on the results of carried out research, the author's definition of a preferential right is developed as an additional possibility based on the property (corporate) interest of its owner, established by law or contract, to demand from the subject-accomplice in the right or the party in respect of proper behavior in the form of providing advantages over third parties. This right is proposed to be considered an independent subjective right due to the obvious independence of its existence in objective law as a measure of possible behavior defined by law (by contract, constituent document), the presence of a construction corresponding to it of a legal obligation, its own mechanism for the implementation of this right, and for a number of other reasons set out in the work.

scholarly journals Registration Procedures In The Mechanism Of Water Bodies Transfer For Use Under Lease

2020 ◽  
pp. 89-100
Author(s):  
L.R. Miskevych
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Natural Resources ◽  
Water Body ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Land Plot ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
State Registration ◽  
The Right

The scientific article is devoted to the study of problematic issues of acquiring the right to use water facilities under lease. It is noted that in the field of land, water, environmental relations, the water body and the land under it are separate objects, but in the field of property relations, which are governed by civil law, such objects are one whole both in the spectrum of regulation of property rights and contractual relations. However, the different sectoral affiliation of the water body and the corresponding land plot of the water fund inevitably affect the content of civil legal relations, supplementing the civil rights and obligations of the subjects of these legal relations with statutory requirements for the use of these natural resources. The significance of registration actions for the water body and the land plot of the water fund, which is transferred for use in the complex with the water body, is analyzed. The commission of such actions is aimed at establishing their identifying criteria and state recognition of these natural resources as objects of water and land relations, respectively. However, in the property turnover the public value is not the land plot of the water fund or the water object taken separately, but their tandem, which is perceived as an object of civil legal relations and, accordingly, the subject of the lease agreement. Given that the interests of the tenant are satisfied by the use of water space, the law states that the use of the contract provides a water body in a complex with a plot of land. However, such a legislative approach made it difficult to decide when the tenant acquired the right to use, as the law does not define a water body as property in respect of which the state registration of rights is carried out. Based on the analysis of the normatively established identifying criteria of a water body, it is concluded that the water body can be considered in the status of real estate in view of its legislative definition. Thus, when determining the moment of acquisition of the right to use water facilities under lease, it will be justified to apply the provisions of civil law. The novelty of the legislation is the priority of the land plot in the complex with which the water body is transferred and the automatic extension of the right to lease the land plot under the water body to such water body.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document