Uptake and Translocation of Diallate in Wheat, Barley, Flax, and Wild Oat

Weed Science ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Nalewaja
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Hordeum Vulgare ◽  
Linum Usitatissimum ◽  
Avena Fatua ◽  
Wild Oat ◽  
Per Se

Uptake and translocation of 14C label from S-2,3-dichloroallyl N,N-diisopropylthiolcarbamate (diallate) by roots and coleoptiles of wild oat (Avena fatua L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L., var. Selkirk), barley (Hordeum vulgare L., var. Traill), and flax (Linum usitatissimum L., var. Bolley) were compared. The pattern of 14C label uptake and movement was similar in wild oat, barley, and wheat. However, translocation of the 14C label to the roots of wild oat was less than for barley. Although differential uptake and translocation per se did not appear to account for the selectivity of diallate for wild oat, some differences in translocation may have beep the result of metabolic breakdown products.

Selectivity of Dichlofop Methyl Among Wheat, Barley, Wild Oat (Arena fatua) and Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis)

Weed Science ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 382-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.G. Todd ◽  
E.H. Stobbe
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Hordeum Vulgare ◽  
Plant Material ◽  
Avena Fatua ◽  
Wild Oat ◽  
Setaria Viridis ◽  
Species Sensitivity ◽  
Methyl Propionate ◽  
Leaf Stage ◽  
Green Foxtail

The selectivity of {2-[4-(2′,4′-dichlorophenoxy) phenoxy] methyl propionate}, (hereinafter referred to as dichlofop methyl), among wheat (Triticum aestivumL. ‘Neepawa’), barley (Hordeum vulgareL. ‘Bonanza’), wild oat (Avena fatuaL.), and green foxtail (Setaria viridis(L.) Beauv.) was investigated. On an ED50basis, barley, wild oat, and green foxtail were 2, 190, and 1,090 times more sensitive, respectively, to foliar-applied dichlofop methyl at the two-leaf stage than was wheat. Selectivity decreased with increasing maturity of the plant material with the ratio of selectivity between barley and wild oat decreasing from 55 at the two-leaf stage to three at the four-leaf-plus-one-tiller stage. Greater spray retention and more rapid penetration of dichlofop methyl partially explained the susceptibility of green foxtail, but did not explain selectivity between wheat, wild oat, and barley. Root uptake of14C-dichlofop methyl by the four species was proportional to the amount of solution absorbed during the treatment period and to the concentration of dichlofop methyl in the treatment solution but was not related to species sensitivity to this herbicide.

Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Control in Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Barley (Hordeum vulgare) with Reduced Rates of Postemergence Herbicides

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 591-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Spandl ◽  
Beverly R. Durgan ◽  
Douglas W. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Hordeum Vulgare ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Avena Fatua ◽  
Wild Oat ◽  
Economic Return ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
Oat Biomass ◽  
Postemergence Herbicides

Rates and application timings of postemergence herbicides for wild oat control in spring wheat and barley were evaluated at Crookston, MN, from 1994 to 1996. Diclofop, imazamethabenz, and fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron were applied to one- to three-leaf wild oat; and difenzoquat, imazamethabenz, fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron, and fenoxaprop plus 2,4-D plus MCPA were applied to four- to five-leaf wild oat at 1/2 ×, 3/4 ×, and 1 × rates. Wild oat response to herbicide rate and timing was similar in wheat and barley. Wild oat control with 1/2 × rates generally was less than that with 3/4 × rates, which was lower than or similar to that with 1 × rates. Wild oat biomass was often reduced less with 1/2 × rates than 1 × rates. However, reducing herbicide rates generally did not influence grain yields or net economic return. Grain yields and net economic return were generally greater in herbicide-treated plots than in the nontreated control.

Herbicide Mixtures Containing BAS 9052 for Weed Control in Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

Weed Science ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul N.P. Chow
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Linum Usitatissimum ◽  
Trichloroacetic Acid ◽  
Antagonistic Effect ◽  
Avena Fatua ◽  
Wild Oat ◽  
Flax Seed ◽  
Herbicide Mixtures ◽  
Excellent Control ◽  
Seed Yields

There was no antagonism between dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid) or TCA (trichloroacetic acid) and BAS 9052 {2 - [1 -(ethoxyimino)butyl] - 5 - [2 -(ethylthio) -propyl] -3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} at 0.3 kg/ha for control of volunteer barley (Hordeum vulgareL. ‘Bonanza’) and wheat (Triticum aestivumL. ‘Neepawa’) in flax (Linum usitatissimumL. ‘Dufferin’). However, MCPA {[(4-chloro-o- tolyl)oxy] acetic acid} amine at 0.2 to 0.6 kg/ha had an antagonistic effect on BAS 9052, especially at 0.1 kg/ha, for control of wild oat (Avena fatuaL.). BAS 9052 at 0.3 kg/ha overcame this antagonistic effect of MCPA. Field results confirmed that wild oat control with BAS 9052 at 0.3 kg/ha was not reduced by the mixtures with each of four broadleaf weed herbicides at 0.6 kg/ha. The mixtures gave excellent control of grass and broadleaf weeds. Flax seed yields were five times that of the unsprayed check and were equal to the yield of the handweeded treatment.

Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Control by Flufenprop-methyl

Weed Science ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Miller ◽  
J. D. Nalewaja ◽  
W. A. Olson
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Hordeum Vulgare ◽  
Durum Wheat ◽  
Triticum Durum ◽  
Avena Fatua ◽  
Wild Oat ◽  
Simulated Rainfall ◽  
Wheat Cultivars ◽  
Leaf Stage ◽  
Barley Cultivars

Postemergence applications of flufenprop-methyl [methyl-N-benzoyl-N(3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-2-amino-propionate] for wild oat (Avena fatuaL.) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivumL.), durum wheat (Triticum durumL.), and barley (Hordeum vulgareL.) were evaluated in the field, greenhouse, and controlled environmental chambers. Wild oat control with flufenprop-methyl was greater at the five-leaf stage than three and one-half or two-leaf stage of growth. Wild oat control was not reduced when flufenprop-methyl was tank-mixed with bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-(4) 3H-one, 2,2-dioxide]. Tolerance of spring and durum wheat cultivars to flufenprop-methyl was acceptable; however, tolerance of barley cultivars was considerably more variable. Air temperature after treatment, soil fertility, and moisture did not influence wild oat control with flufenprop-methyl; however, a simulated rainfall of 1 mm within 1/2 h or 4 mm within 4 h after application reduced wild oat control.

Competition of Wild Oat in Wheat and Barley

Weed Science ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allyn R. Bell ◽  
John D. Nalewaja
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Hordeum Vulgare ◽  
Yield Loss ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Avena Fatua ◽  
Yield Reduction ◽  
Wild Oat ◽  
Phosphorus Fertilizer ◽  
Nitrogen And Phosphorus ◽  
Percent Protein

Wild oat (Avena fatua L.) competition increased the losses in yield of both wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) with increased densities of seedlings. At Fargo in 1965, wild oat densities of 70 and 160 seedlings/sq yd reduced the wheat yield 22.1% and 39.1%, respectively, compared to the wild oat-free check. Similar wild oat densities reduced the barley yield 6.5% and 25.9%, respectively. The addition of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer reduced the yield loss caused by wild oat 2 out of 3 years of the experiment. Although a considerable yield reduction occurred in barley and wheat, percent protein and seed size were not influenced noticeably.

Influence of the Relative Time of Emergence of Wild Oat (Avena fatua) on Yield Loss of Barley (Hordeum vulgare) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Weed Science ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. O'Donovan ◽  
E. Ann De St. Remy ◽  
P. Ashely O'Sullivan ◽  
Don A. Dew ◽  
Arvind K. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Hordeum Vulgare ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Yield Loss ◽  
Avena Fatua ◽  
Regression Equations ◽  
Wild Oat ◽  
Relative Time

Multiple regression analysis of data from field experiments conducted in Alberta at two locations between 1972 and 1983 indicated that there was a significant relationship between yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgareL.) and wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) and relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatuaL. ♯ AVEFA). At a given wild oat density, percent yield loss increased the earlier wild oat emerged relative to the crops and gradually diminished the later it emerged. However, the magnitude of the yield loss for both species varied with the year. Regression equations based on data pooled over years and locations were developed to provide an estimate of yield loss of barley and wheat due to relative time of wild oat emergence and wild oat density. The information should be considered when barley and wheat losses due to wild oat are being assessed.

Temperature Effect on Difenzoquat Phytotoxicity

Weed Science ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D. Miller ◽  
John D. Nalewaja ◽  
Adam Dobranski
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Hordeum Vulgare ◽  
Temperature Effect ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Avena Fatua ◽  
Controlled Environment ◽  
Wild Oat ◽  
Night Temperature ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Temperature Environment

The phytotoxicity of difenzoquat (1,2-dimethyl-3,5-diphenyl-1H-pyrazolium) applied to the three-leaf stages of hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivumL. ‘Waldron’ and ‘Era’), barley (Hordeum vulgareL. ‘Beacon’) and wild oat (Avena fatuaL. ♯ AVEFA) grown under constant, fluctuating, or alternating day-night temperatures was determined in controlled environment chambers. Difenzoquat injury to wild oat and Era wheat was greater at a constant 20 or 30 than at 10 C; however, injury to Waldron wheat was similar at 10, 20, and 30 C. Difenzoquat caused only slight injury to barley, and injury was similar at all temperatures. In Era wheat, selectivity of difenzoquat for wild oat was maximum with a 10-C night temperature in an otherwise 30-C-temperature environment; in Beacon barley selectivity was maximum with 3 or more days of 20- or 30-C posttreatment temperature; and in Waldron wheat selectivity was not adequate at any of the temperatures studied.

Barban Selectivity for Wild Oat in Wheat

Weed Science ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 476-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Neidermyer ◽  
John D. Nalewaja
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Air Temperature ◽  
Leaf Blade ◽  
Plant Morphology ◽  
Treatment Temperature ◽  
Avena Fatua ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Wild Oat ◽  
Wheat Growth ◽  
Wild Oats

The response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and wild oat (Avena fatua L.) to barban (4-chloro-2-butynyl-m-chlorocarbanilate) was studied as influenced by plant morphology and air temperature after application. Growth of wheat and wild oat seedlings was reduced by barban at 0.3 μg and 0.6 μg applied to the first node, respectively. Barban application to the base and midpoint of the first leaf blade required a lower dose to reduce wild oat growth than wheat growth. Increased tillering occurred from barban injury to the main culm in wheat. Wheat and wild oat susceptibility to barban increased as the post-treatment temperature decreased from 32 to 10 C. Barban selectivity for wild oats in wheat was greater at 27 and 21 C than at 16 and 10 C.

Effects of Difenzoquat on Photoreactions and Respiration in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Wild Oat (Avena fatua)

Weed Science ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 693-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blaik P. Halling ◽  
Richard Behrens
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Electron Transport ◽  
Electron Acceptor ◽  
Photosynthetic Electron Transport ◽  
Significant Inhibition ◽  
Avena Fatua ◽  
Wild Oat ◽  
Leaf Chlorosis ◽  
Acceptor Activity ◽  
Proton Uptake

Experiments were conducted with isolated protoplasts of wild oat (Avena fatuaL. # AVEFA) and isolated chloroplasts of wild oat and wheat (Triticum aestivumL.), to determine if the methyl sulfate salt of difenzoquat (1,2-dimethyl-3,5-diphenyl-1H-pyrazolium) might influence photoreactions in these species. Difenzoquat did not affect CO2fixation, uncoupled electron transport, or proton uptake. At concentrations of 0.5 mM and 1 mM, difenzoquat caused a slight, but statistically significant, inhibition of photophosphorylation. Experiments assaying coupled electron transport indicated that inhibition of photophosphorylation occurred not through uncoupling, but by an energy-transfer inhibition. This same effect was observed in isolated mitocondria of both species, with about 50% inhibition of state 3 respiration rates occurring with 10 μM difenzoquat. However, no important differentials were observed in the relative susceptibilities of wheat and wild oat mitochondria. Difenzoquat also functioned as a weak autooxidizing electron acceptor in photosynthetic electron transport. Therefore, difenzoquat-induced leaf chlorosis and necrosis may result from a bipyridilium-type electron acceptor activity if sufficient herbicide is absorbed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document