scholarly journals The supergranular pattern and the stable stages of sunspot groups

1968 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 174-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Dmitrieva ◽  
M. Kopecký ◽  
G. V. Kuklin

Assuming the sunspot area to evolve smoothly and the sunspot-group lifetime distribution to be a monotonous decreasing function one can easily conclude that the function N(S), determining the number of sunspot groups having the area S at this moment, must increase monotonously and smoothly with decreasing area S.

2020 ◽  
Vol 636 ◽  
pp. A11
Author(s):  
Jouni Takalo ◽  
Kalevi Mursula

Aims. We study the difference in the shape of solar cycles for even and odd cycles using the Wolf sunspot numbers and group sunspot numbers of solar cycles 1−23. We furthermore analyse the data of sunspot area sizes for even and odd cycles SC12−SC23 and sunspot group data for even and odd cycles SC8−SC23 to compare the temporal evolution of even and odd cycles. Methods. We applied the principal component analysis (PCA) to sunspot cycle data and studied the first two components, which describe the average cycle shape and cycle asymmetry. We used a distribution analysis to analyse the temporal evolution of the even and odd cycles and determined the skewness and kurtosis for even and odd cycles of sunspot group data. Results. The PCA confirms the existence of the Gnevyshev gap (GG) for solar cycles at about 40% from the start of the cycle. The temporal evolution of sunspot area data for even cycles shows that the GG exists at least at the 95% confidence level for all sizes of sunspots. On the other hand, the GG is shorter and statistically insignificant for the odd cycles of aerial sunspot data. Furthermore, the analysis of sunspot area sizes for even and odd cycles of SC12−SC23 shows that the greatest difference is at 4.2−4.6 years, where even cycles have a far smaller total area than odd cycles. The average area of the individual sunspots of even cycles is also smaller in this interval. The statistical analysis of the temporal evolution shows that northern sunspot groups maximise earlier than southern groups for even cycles, but are concurrent for odd cycles. Furthermore, the temporal distributions of odd cycles are slightly more leptokurtic than distributions of even cycles. The skewnesses are 0.37 and 0.49 and the kurtoses 2.79 and 2.94 for even and odd cycles, respectively. The correlation coefficient between skewness and kurtosis for even cycles is 0.69, and for odd cycles, it is 0.90. Conclusions. The separate PCAs for even and odd sunspot cycles show that odd cycles are more inhomogeneous than even cycles, especially in GSN data. Even cycles, however, have two anomalous cycles: SC4 and SC6. The variation in the shape of the early sunspot cycles suggests that there are too few and/or inaccurate measurements before SC8. According to the analysis of the sunspot area size data, the GG is more distinct in even than odd cycles. This may be partly due to sunspot groups maximizing earlier in the northern than in the southern hemisphere for even cycles. We also present another Waldmeier-type rule, that is, we find a correlation between skewness and kurtosis of the sunspot group cycles.


2021 ◽  
Vol 922 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
V. M. S. Carrasco

Abstract Cornelis Tevel made sunspot observations during the period 1816–1836, including the Dalton Minimum. In this work, the first revision of these observations since Wolf incorporated them into his database is presented. On the one hand, the number of individual sunspots from Tevel’s drawings was counted. This is of special interest for the sunspot number reconstruction because this kind of information is not as common in historical sunspot records as the number of groups. Thus, Tevel could be considered for the future reconstruction of the sunspot number index. On the other hand, the number of groups counted according to modern sunspot group classifications finding significant misinterpretations with the number of groups assigned to Tevel in the existing databases. Tevel was a relevant sunspot observer in the Dalton Minimum. In fact, he was the observer with the highest number of groups observed in Solar Cycles 6 and 7 according to the existing sunspot group number databases. According to the raw group number recount in this work, the maximum amplitudes for Solar Cycles 6 and 7 are, respectively, 27% and 7% lower than those previously determined. Moreover, Solar Cycle 6 is the weakest solar cycle since the Maunder Minimum after applying these new counts. Group counts from Tevel’s observations were compared with those from relevant contemporary astronomers, demonstrating that Schwabe and Tevel systematically recorded a higher number of groups than Flaugergues and Derfflinger. In addition, sunspot areas and positions recorded by Tevel should be used with caution for scientific purposes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (S273) ◽  
pp. 221-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laure Lefèvre ◽  
Frédéric Clette ◽  
Tunde Baranyi

AbstractWhen consulting detailed photospheric catalogs for solar activity studies spanning long time intervals, solar physicists face multiple limitations in the existing catalogs: finite or fragmented time coverage, limited time overlap between catalogs and even more importantly, a mismatch in contents and conventions. In view of a study of new sunspot-based activity indices, we have conducted a comprehensive survey of existing catalogs.In a first approach, we illustrate how the information from parallel catalogs can be merged to form a much more comprehensive record of sunspot groups. For this, we use the unique Debrecen Photoheliographic Data (DPD), which is already a composite of several ground observatories and SOHO data, and the USAF/Mount Wilson catalog from the Solar Optical Observing Network (SOON). We also describe our semi-interactive cross-identification method, which was needed to match the non-overlapping solar active region nomenclature, the most critical and subtle step when working with multiple catalogs. This effort, focused here first on the last two solar cycles, should lead to a better central database collecting all available sunspot group parameters to address future solar cycle studies beyond the traditional sunspot index time series Ri.


1993 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 123-126
Author(s):  
K. Petrovay

AbstractTwo simple examples are presented to show that concepts about the physical nature of sunspot groups may significantly influence the statistical data analysis process. In particular, the second example shows that the well-known difference in the decay rates of preceding (p-) and following (f-) polarity parts of sunspot groups may lead to a fake proper motion effect when area-weighted group positions are used. This effect may be responsible for some recent contradictory findings concerning the motions of sunspot groups. It is therefore argued that while area-weighting is adequate when calculating the mean positions of p- and f-parts of a sunspot group separately, defining the position of the group as a whole by the unweighted average of the mean positions of the p- and f-parts is more satisfactory from the theoretical point of view (whenever it is possible to distinguish between spots of different polarities). Similarly, it is best not to “correct” sunspot proper motions for internal differential rotation within groups.


1968 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 570-574
Author(s):  
A. Böhme

It has been shown that moving type-IV bursts at decameter waves are infrequent events compared with the moving type-IV bursts at meter waves. They belong preferably to sunspot groups of relatively homogeneous magnetic structure. Moving type-IV bursts at decameter waves have a very low tendency to repeat. This statement indicates that the magnetic structures producing them have only a short lifetime. The short duration of these bursts cannot be interpreted by radiation damping of high energetic electrons. Furthermore it can be shown that the storm continuum at decameter waves is related preferably to sunspot groups of complex magnetic structure. Probably stationary type-IV bursts at decameter waves are more representative for the acceleration of high-energetic particles than the moving type-IV bursts at decameter waves.


2000 ◽  
Vol 179 ◽  
pp. 119-125
Author(s):  
Robert F. Howard

AbstractThe tilt angles of sunspot groups are defined, using the Mount Wilson data set. It is shown that groups with tilt angles greater than or less than the average value (≈5 deg) show different latitude dependences. This effect is also seen in synoptic magnetic field data defining plages. The fraction of the total sunspot group area that is found in the leading spots is discussed as a parameter that can be useful in studying the dynamics of sunspot groups. This parameter is larger for low tilt angles, and small for extreme tilt angles in either direction. The daily variations of sunspot group tilt angles are discussed. The result that sunspot tilt angles tend to rotate toward the average value is reviewed. It is suggested that at some depth, perhaps 50 Mm, there is a flow relative to the surface that results from a rotation rate faster than the surface rate by about 60 m/sec and a meridional drift that is slower than the surface rate by about 5 m/sec. This results in a slanted relative flow at that depth that is in the direction of the average tilt angle and may be responsible for the tendency for sunspot groups (and plages) to rotate their magnetic axes in the direction of the average tilt angle.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (S340) ◽  
pp. 133-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Işık ◽  
Seda Işık ◽  
Bahar B. Kabasakal

AbstractThe tilt angle of a sunspot group is a critical quantity in the surface transport of magnetic flux and the solar dynamo. To contribute long-term databases of the tilt angle, we developed an IDL routine, which allows the user to interactively select and measure sunspot positions and areas on the solar disc. We measured the tilt angles of sunspot groups for solar cycles 19-24 (1954.6-2017.8), using the sunspot drawing database of Kandilli Observatory. The method is similar to that used in the discontinued Mt. Wilson and Kodaikanal databases, with the exception that sunspot groups were identified manually, which has improved the accuracy of the resulting tilt angles. We obtained cycle averages of the tilt angle and compared them with the values from other datasets, keeping the same group selection criteria. We conclude that the previously reported anti-correlation with the cycle strength needs further investigation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (S294) ◽  
pp. 551-552
Author(s):  
Juan Guo

AbstractWe surveyed 28 year of Solar X-ray flares and sunspot group records supplied by the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) to study the dependence of different class Xray flares on the magnetic structure of sunspot groups statistically. It is found that 82.5% X-class flare, 51.4% M-class flare, 26.3% C-class flare, and 10.1% B-class flare occurred in the sunspot group with βγδ structure. There are 6.6% X-class flares, 17.5% M-class flare, 39.1% C-class flare, and 60.4% B-class flare occurred out of sunspot group.


Author(s):  
Hisashi Hayakawa ◽  
Tomoya Iju ◽  
Shoma Uneme ◽  
Bruno P Besser ◽  
Shunsuke Kosaka ◽  
...  

Abstract The solar activity during the Maunder Minimum (MM; 1645–1715) has been considered significantly different from the one captured in modern observations, in terms of sunspot group number and sunspot positions, whereas its actual amplitudes and distributions is still under active discussions. In its core period (1650/1660–1700), Martin Fogelius and Henrich Siverus have formed significant long-term series in the existing databases with numerous spotless days, as the 13th and 7th most active observers before the end of the MM. In this study, we have analysed their original archival records, revised their data, have removed significant contaminations of the apparent ‘spotless days’ in the existing databases, and cast caveats on the potential underestimation of the solar-cycle amplitude in the core MM. Still, they reported at best one sunspot group throughout their observational period and confirm the significant suppressed the solar cycles during the MM, which is also supported from the contemporary observations of Hook and Willoughby. Based on the revised data, we have also derived positions of notable sunspot groups, which Siverus recorded in 1671 (≈ N7.5° ± 2.5°), in comparison with those of Cassini's drawings (≈ N10° ± 1°). Their coincidence in position and chronology in corrected dates indicates these sunspot groups were probably the same recurrent active region (AR) and its significantly long lifespan (≥ 35 days) even during the MM.


2020 ◽  
Vol 496 (2) ◽  
pp. 2482-2492
Author(s):  
V M S Carrasco ◽  
M C Gallego ◽  
J M Vaquero

ABSTRACT We revise the sunspot observations made by Galileo Galilei and Christoph Scheiner in the context of their controversy regarding the nature of sunspots. Those of their sunspot records not included in the current sunspot group database, used as a basis to calculate the sunspot group number, are analysed. Within the documentary sources consulted in this work, we can highlight the sunspot observations by Scheiner included in the letters sent under the pseudonym Apelles to Marcus Welser and the first sunspot observations made by Galileo, which can be consulted in Le opere di Galileo Galilei. These sunspot observations would extend the temporal coverage for these two observers and fill some gaps in the current group database in the earliest period, where the data available are sparse. Moreover, we have detected changes in the quality of the sunspot drawings made by Galileo and Scheiner in their observation series, affecting the number of groups recorded by the two observers. We also compare these records with sunspot observations made by other astronomers of that time. According to this comparison and regarding the same observation days, Scheiner was generally the astronomer who reported more sunspot groups, while Harriot, Cigoli and Galileo recorded a similar number of groups. We conclude that these differences are mainly because of the observational methods used by the observers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document