Auch im Präsenzunterricht digitale Tools nutzen

PADUA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 255-261
Author(s):  
Valeska Stephanow ◽  
Claudia Schepers ◽  
Ingrid Darmann-Finck

Zusammenfassung. Im Rahmen des CARO-Projekts wurde erstmalig ein cloudbasiertes Classroom Learning Interaction System entwickelt, das zahlreiche Anforderungen der pflegerischen Aus-, Fort- und Weiterbildung adressiert. Wir erklären die Bestandteile des Systems, zeigen Einsatzmöglichkeiten auf, und beleuchten die Abstimmung der technischen und inhaltlich-didaktischen Features.

Author(s):  
Ingrid Darmann-Finck ◽  
Karsten D. Wolf ◽  
Claudia Schepers ◽  
Jan Küster

Die tiefgreifende Mediatisierung (Reichertz und Bettmann 2018) schliesst nahezu alle gesellschaftlichen Bereiche ein, so auch das Gesundheitswesen. In der Pflegeausbildung ist das Potential des Einsatzes digitaler Medien noch nicht vollumfänglich ausgeschöpft. Zwar werden punktuell digitale Medien, wie etwa Lernplattformen (Moodle), Programme (PowerPoint) oder einzelne Methoden (flinga) in die Lehre integriert. Dennoch erfolgt der Einsatz selten pflegedidaktisch fundiert (Darmann-Finck 2010). Mediendidaktische Ansätze, anhand derer das digital unterstütze Lernen gestaltet werden kann (Kerres 2018; Jahnke 2015), adressieren die Anforderungen des Unterrichtsgegenstandes «Pflege» nicht ausreichend. Im Projekt CARO (Laufzeit 2016 bis 2019) wurde daher ein sog. Classroom-Learning-Interaction-System (CARO CLIS) zur Unterstützung von Live-Interaktionen im Klassenraum entwickelt und evaluiert. Das CARO CLIS unterstützt komplexe Lern-, Interaktions- und Reflexionsprozesse pflege- und mediendidaktisch fundiert. Im folgenden Beitrag wird sowohl die Entwicklung und Evaluation der Software als auch der Unterrichtsinhalte auf Basis des Design-based Research Ansatzes (Koppel 2016) aufgezeigt. Darüber hinaus wird exemplarisch dargestellt, wie mit dem CARO CLIS pflegedidaktisch fundierte komplexe Bildungsziele mit Hilfe mediendidaktischer Interaktionsformate im Unterricht umgesetzt werden können.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Didi C. Chalil

One indicator of the success ofeducation in the level of classroom learning is when a lecturer is able to build student learning achievement and will be more successful if this achievement can be increased if their attendance is above 80% (minimum 10 times attendance from 12 meetings). If the students can be grown discipline and provided a decent campus facilities, then as difficult as any lecture material or learning process that followed by they undoubtedly will live with feelings of joy, even they will feel sad if that day lecturer could not come because there is a need outside campus.There are four stages of appraisal that apply to each student for each course taken include (1) attendance of 10% (2) Task 20% (3) 30% Semester Exam (UTS) and (4) Final Exam Semester. (UAS) 40%. The writer as a lecturer tries to cultivate motivation to learn from the beginning, in addition to always communicate actively with students who follow the lecture also monitor attendance and assignment, each completed college is always given the practice / tasks are directly given the value, usually given the task quite easily so they can get a value of 100, even if there is a miscalculation, they are still given the opportunity to fix the error so that eventually get a value of 100. With the value of this 100, their motivation to grow and even grow in such a way that spur them to diligent lectures.The difficulty level of the task is balanced with the lecture, the longer it is raised so as to reach the maximum average level of student ability at the end of the lecture meeting...This research reveals that there is no a significant correlation between student achievement to discipline presence of student/mahasiswa with campus facilities. The analyzing was taken from an answer of 55 students who were randomly selected as respondents by filling out the Questionaire that was distributed to them. Key words : achievement, attendance, discipline, campus facility


Author(s):  
Lea Christy Restu Kinasih ◽  
Dewi Fatimah ◽  
Veranica Julianti

The selection and determination of appropriate learning strategies can improve the results to be obtained from the application of classroom learning models. This writing aims to discipline students to develop individual abilities of students to be more active in the learning process and improve the quality of learning. The learning process in Indonesia in general only uses conventional learning models that make students passive and undeveloped. In order for the quality of learning to increase, the Team Assisted Individualization learning model is combined with the task learning and forced strategies. The Team Assisted Individualization cooperative learning model is one of the cooperative learning models that combines learning individually and in groups. Meanwhile, task and forced learning strategies are strategies that focus on giving assignments that require students to complete them on time so that the learning process can run effectively. Students are required to do assignments according to the given deadline. This makes students become familiar with the tasks given by the teacher. Combining or modifying the learning model of the assisted individualization team with forced and forced learning strategies is expected to be able to make students more active, disciplined, independent, creative in learning and responsible for the tasks assigned. Therefore this method of incorporation is very necessary in the learning process and can be applied to improve the quality of learning in schools.


Author(s):  
Igor Yurievich Rodchenko

The problematic issues of the development of self-ordering mechanisms in the public administration system are determined, with observance of their division into institutional, functional and evolutionary parts. The institutional part includes self-regulation mechanisms implemented in the models of subject-subject interaction at the levels of higher, central and local government bodies, as well as in models of object-object interaction between them. The most important in the institutional part of self-governing mechanisms are those that ensure: the separation of powers between branches of government; administrative reform of the government structure; separation of public spheres of government between central government bodies; administrative reform of the structure of central executive bodies; delimitation of territorial spheres of government between local authorities; administrative-territorial reform; formation and implementation of the structure of the power hierarchy; administrative reform of the structure of the power hierarchy. The functional part includes the mechanisms of self-regulation, realized in the model of object-object interaction “system of state power — social sphere, industry and relations”. The most important parts of the mechanisms of self-regulation are those that ensure: the formation and implementation of state policies in various spheres of society; formation and implementation of national projects; formation and implementation of state target programs; state budgeting. The evolutionary part includes the mechanisms of self-regulation, realized in the model of object-object interaction “system of state power — the creation of conditions for social development”. The most important parts of the evolutionary part of self-governing mechanisms are those that provide: strategic management and planning; realization of state programs of social and economic development; conducting constant economic and social reforms and transformations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document