IDENTIFY PROBLEM ISSUES OF SELF-ORDERED DEVELOPMENT MECHANISMS IN THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 250-259
Author(s):  
Igor Yurievich Rodchenko
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
State Power ◽  
Administrative Reform ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Object Interaction ◽  
Interaction System ◽  
Power Hierarchy

The problematic issues of the development of self-ordering mechanisms in the public administration system are determined, with observance of their division into institutional, functional and evolutionary parts. The institutional part includes self-regulation mechanisms implemented in the models of subject-subject interaction at the levels of higher, central and local government bodies, as well as in models of object-object interaction between them. The most important in the institutional part of self-governing mechanisms are those that ensure: the separation of powers between branches of government; administrative reform of the government structure; separation of public spheres of government between central government bodies; administrative reform of the structure of central executive bodies; delimitation of territorial spheres of government between local authorities; administrative-territorial reform; formation and implementation of the structure of the power hierarchy; administrative reform of the structure of the power hierarchy. The functional part includes the mechanisms of self-regulation, realized in the model of object-object interaction “system of state power — social sphere, industry and relations”. The most important parts of the mechanisms of self-regulation are those that ensure: the formation and implementation of state policies in various spheres of society; formation and implementation of national projects; formation and implementation of state target programs; state budgeting. The evolutionary part includes the mechanisms of self-regulation, realized in the model of object-object interaction “system of state power — the creation of conditions for social development”. The most important parts of the evolutionary part of self-governing mechanisms are those that provide: strategic management and planning; realization of state programs of social and economic development; conducting constant economic and social reforms and transformations.

IDENTIFY PROBLEM ISSUES OF SELF-ORDERED DEVELOPMENT MECHANISMS IN THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 250-259
Author(s):  
Igor Yurievich Rodchenko
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
State Power ◽  
Administrative Reform ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Object Interaction ◽  
Interaction System ◽  
Power Hierarchy

The problematic issues of the development of self-ordering mecha- nisms in the public administration system are determined, with observance of their division into institutional, functional and evolutionary parts.The institutional part includes self-regulation mechanisms implemented in the models of subject-subject interaction at the levels of higher, central and lo- cal government bodies, as well as in models of object-object interaction between them. The most important in the institutional part of self-governing mechanisms are those that ensure: the separation of powers between branches of government; administrative reform of the government structure; separation of public spheres of government between central government bodies; administrative reform of the structure of central executive bodies; delimitation of territorial spheres of go- vernment between local authorities; administrative-territorial reform; formation and implementation of the structure of the power hierarchy; administrative re- form of the structure of the power hierarchy. The functional part includes the mechanisms of self-regulation, realized in the model of object-object interaction “system of state power — social sphere, indus- try and relations”. The most important parts of the mechanisms of self-regulation are those that ensure: the formation and implementation of state policies in vari- ous spheres of society; formation and implementation of national projects; forma- tion and implementation of state target programs; state budgeting.The evolutionary part includes the mechanisms of self-regulation, realized in the model of object-object interaction “system of state power — the creation of conditions for social development”. The most important parts of the evolutionary part of self-governing mechanisms are those that provide: strategic management and planning; realization of state programs of social and economic development; conducting constant economic and social reforms and transformations.

scholarly journals Problems of realization of political and administrative reformation of public administration management system

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 22-30
Author(s):  
Ю. А. Сак
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Administrative Reform ◽  
Political Support ◽  
The Political ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Administration System ◽  
Information Campaigns ◽  
The Public ◽  
Lack Of Information

Political and administrative reform of the public administration system is the implementation of a setof public administration mechanisms aimed at modernizing and developing the public administrationsystem, optimizing public authorities and local self-government, changing communication between publicauthorities, forming an innovative model of public administration, and professionalizing the system of publicadministration directed on the formation of an efficient and effective system of public administration.The main problems of the implementation of the political and administrative reform of the publicadministration system should include the following:firstly, the absence of a substantiated and systematic Concept for the implementation of political andadministrative reform of the public administration system;secondly, the lack of specially trained personnel in the public administration system that are able to formulate and implement government-management decisions;thirdly, there are no systemic and optimal mechanisms for implementing the political and administrativereform of the public administration system;fourth, the lack of continuity in the implementation of reforms in society and their validity;fifth, the lack of scientifically substantiated models of the optimal system of public administration that canbe implemented in Ukraine;sixthly, the lack of a system for evaluating reforms in the public administration system;seventh, the slow struggle against corruption, affecting the quality of not only socio-economic reforms,but also reforming the system of public administration. Corruption not only impedes the development of theeconomy and civil society but also threatens modern reforms in Ukraine;eighth, the lack of political support for systemic reforms as the basis for the quality of such processes;ninth, lack of rationalization of the activities of state authorities and local self-government through therestructuring of the authorities and their optimization;tenth, the lack of information campaigns on the introduction of certain reforms, which negatively affectstheir perception by the population.

scholarly journals The Image of the Revolution in Russian Political Thought in 1905

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 799-833
Author(s):  
Sergei S. Novosel'skii
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Political Thought ◽  
General Public ◽  
State Power ◽  
Overwhelming Majority ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Political Modernization ◽  
Legitimate State ◽  
The Revolution

The article covers the analysis of the transformation of the concept revolution in Russian political thought in 1905. It shows that in Russia as well as in Europe, there were two interpretations of this term. Some contemporaries referred to the process of political modernization as a revolution and evaluated this phenomenon positively, while their opponents regarded it as a violent attempt on the legitimate state power and were antagonistic to such actions. These attitudes determined the views of contemporaries on the events of 1905 in Russia. Speaking of the revolution in Russia, the overwhelming majority of the top bureaucracy and general public had in mind the armed anti-government actions of the late 1905 – early 1906. Their suppression meant the ending of the revolution. However, the decisions on a radical reorganization of the public administration system, which had been made earlier against the background of the events that contemporaries did not consider as a revolution at all, inspired hope in many people that the revolution as reorganization in Russia would continue and the country would follow the path of systemic political reforms.

Evolution of the public administration system. The Republic of Estonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 82-118
Author(s):  
YANA TOOM ◽  
◽  
VALENTINA V. KOMLEVA ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Reforms ◽  
Social Sphere ◽  
External Threats ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Republic

The article studies the main stages and features of the evolution of the public administration system in the Republic of Estonia after 1992. This paper presents brief geographical and socio-economic characteristics that largely determine the development of the country’s public administration. The evolution of the institution of the presidency, executive, and legislative powers are considered. The role of parliament and mechanisms for coordinating the interests of different groups of the population for the development of the country is especially emphasized. The authors analyze the state and administrative reforms of recent years, which were aimed at improving the quality of services provided to the population, increasing the competitiveness of different parts of Estonia, as well as optimizing public spending and management structure. The introduction of digital technologies into the sphere of public administration, healthcare, education, and the social sphere is of a notable place. Such phenomena as e-residency, e-federation, and other digital projects are considered. The development of a digital system of interstate interaction between Estonia and Finland made it possible to create the world’s first e-federation, and the digitization of all strategically important information and its transfer to cloud storage speaks of the creation of the world’s first e-residency, a special residence of data outside the country’s borders to ensure digital continuity and statehood in the event of critical malfunctions or external threats.

Updated "state-society contract" as a way to rationalization of national projects in Russia

2021 ◽  
pp. 7-14
Author(s):  
T.I. Grabelnykh ◽  
◽  
N.A. Sablina ◽  
A.N. Parkhomenko
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Russian Society ◽  
Administration System ◽  
Public Control ◽  
The Public ◽  
State And Society ◽  
Conceptual Foundations ◽  
The Relationship

Researched are systemic aspects of the process of implementing national projects in Russia. Attention is focused on effectiveness of solving key problems of development of the public administration system in the context of the relationship between the state and society under modern conditions. The institution of public control in Russia is characterized through prerequisites of formation, organizational and legal status and main functions. The work defines the place and role of the institution of public opinion in the system of public administration and public control, substantiates its regulatory mechanisms, factors and agents of influence. In the aspect of systemic relationship between public administration and public control, the specificity of implementation of national projects in the transforming Russian society is revealed. A sociological vision of the “reset” of conceptual foundations of interrelationships between the public administration system and the institution of public control both at the stage of “entering” the space of national projects and in the process of their implementation is presented. It has been proved, that at the present stage the main integrating factor is consolidation of society through an updated "state-society contract". The analysis of historical and modern practices of public participation made it possible to draw a conclusion about the increase in the function of “co-management” of public control bodies in the interaction of state and public structures.

scholarly journals New challenges the establishment of district governmental offices and the regional public transport organising in Hajdú-Bihar county

2013 ◽  
pp. 87-91
Author(s):  
Loránd Bói
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Public Transport ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Central Cities ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Historical District ◽  
District Government ◽  
New Challenges

The re-establishment of historical district government offices in the Hungarian public administration system will ensure the availability of the provided public services on an integrated, citizen-friendly level. Reorganising of district borders and changing the district centres as well the settlement new administration services in the central cities will predictable restructure the citizens public transport attitudes. This study deals with the motivation, quantity and direction of the possible modifications on the public transport demand in Hajdú-Bihar County. The study goals to present the possible public transport organising interventions, and to find a balance between the changing demand and the regulation provided public transport instruments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document