Cognitive Ability and Self-Reported Efficacy of Self-Presentation Predict Faking on Personality Measures

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 194-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia A. Pauls ◽  
Nicolas W. Crost

Abstract. The main aim of the present study was to investigate whether faking on personality measures is predicted by cognitive ability and self-reported efficacy of positive self-presentation (ESP) assessed under honest conditions. 123 participants completed the NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and the self-deceptive enhancement (SDE) and impression management (IM) scales of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Version 7 (BIDR) under four instructional sets: honest, fake bad, fake good, and two specifically formulated applicant instructions. In line with the assumption that personality measures lose their original meaning under the instruction to fake, it could be shown that the relationship between honest and faked NEO-FFI scales decreased with increasing situational pressure. In line with the hypothesis that faking reflects an ability, it could be demonstrated that general intelligence was related to the amount of faking, to the ability to perceive the situational requirements, and to the ability to fake in line with the situational requirements. In addition, self-reported ESP, but not SDE and IM, was positively related to positive self-presentation. Our findings imply that faking on personality measures should not only be seen as a threat to validity, but rather as a positive, adaptive, and probably predictive variable, which should be investigated in its own right.

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daryl G. Kroner ◽  
John R. Weekes

The relationship between socially desirable responding and offence characteristics is examined with 49 rapists. Socially desirable responding (SDR) was measured by the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Offence characteristics included: (a) perpetrator’s relationship to the victim; (b) severity of victim injury; and (c) victim’s age. Greater victim injury was associated with lower Impression Management (r = -.27, p<.03) and Denial scores (r = -.32, p<.01). No significant relationship occurred between offence characteristics and the self-deceptive scales of Denial of the Negative and Over Confident Rigidity. Alternative to the underreporting hypothesis, self-presentation and the acquisition of socially appropriate skills may explain the SDR/violence relationship.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-168
Author(s):  
Roberta Biolcati

Background: Self-esteem is a critical factor in online impression management strategies and could play a crucial role in explaining women’s selfie-posting behaviours. Previous works examining relationships between self-esteem and self-presentation on social media have yielded controversial results. Objective: This study was performed to clarify the relationship between self-esteem and the frequency of taking and posting own, group and partner selfies on Social Networking Sites (SNS). Methods: A sample of 692 Italian young women (18-28 years old) completed questionnaires on self-esteem, satisfaction with life, body satisfaction and selfie posting bahaviours. The low self-esteem group was compared with the high self-esteem group. Results: Results showed that women with low self-esteem are more dissatisfied with their body image and life and significantly they post fewer types of selfies compared to women with high self-esteem. Conclusion: Findings from this study provide new insights into the relation between self-esteem and selfie impression management strategies.


Author(s):  
Iryna Hrynyk

Abstract. The article carries out theoretical and empirical analysis of features of personality᾿s self-identity by means of fashion. It presents theoretical analysis of the main approaches to the interpretation of fashion and its evolution in the process of social development and describes the content characteristics of fashion as a social and psychological phenomenon and its impact on the individual identification and self-presentation. It has been determined that fashion is an important mechanism of self-presentation and identification of the individual with a certain social group. The author clarifies the scale of the fashion influence on the self-identification and self-presentation of the personality and its possible consequence revealing the psychological mechanisms of young people᾿s interest in modern fashion. The empirical study of the role and influence of fashion on self-presentation among students has been carried out. According to quantitative and qualitative analysis of the results obtained factors and the relationship between them have been singled out, which are the key to the self-identity of personality. It is confirmed that the studied groups of students perceive fashion as a means to emphasize their individuality; they have a clear need for material well-being, prestige, popularity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
Michael D. Barnett ◽  
Idalia V. Maciel ◽  
Marley A. King

Abstract. Sandbagging – a self-presentation strategy defined by feigned performance or false claims of inability – has been associated with lower self-esteem. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether narcissism explains the relationship between sandbagging and self-esteem. College students ( N = 813) completed a survey. Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism explained variance in sandbagging beyond what was explained by self-esteem. When grandiose or vulnerable narcissism was included, the relationship between self-esteem and sandbagging was no longer significant. Overall, the results were consistent with the notion that the relationship between lower self-esteem and sandbagging may be subsumed by narcissism.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-132
Author(s):  
Лариса Киричук

The present paper focuses on the study of the communicative nature of self-disclosure as a technique of verbal influence on people. The phenomenon of self-disclosure is interpreted as the process of divulging private information to others. The aim of the study is to determine the specific features of self-disclosure in a public speaking context. The paper discusses the communicative conventions and parameters of the public speaking scenario as the factors that determine a certain manner of self-disclosing. The key assumption of the study is that public self-disclosure should be viewed as a tactic of self-presentation that promotes the speaker’s image building. In order to indicate the verbal forms that speakers use while disclosing private information in public the discourse and lexical-grammatical analyses of eight celebrity interview texts are conducted. The results of the research demonstrate that the speakers use recurrently certain verbal patterns which are identified as statements of self-description (it includes statements of self-confirmation, self-assurance, personal preferences and personal aspirations), self-narrative and attitude statements. The study also shows which types of the statements are used more frequently than the others, particularly, the statements of self-confirmation, personal aspirations and self-narratives are apparently preferred by the speakers as tactics of public self-disclosure. The paper highlights the fact that the self-disclosure tactics are employed by public speakers selectively and that their choice is motivated by the speakers’ strategic goal of impression management. References Altman, I., Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of InterpersonalRelationship. New York, NY: Holl, Rinehart & Winston. Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. PsychologicalBulletin, 91, 3–26. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. R. (1998). On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. CambridgeUniversity Press. Cozby, P.C. (1973). Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79(2),73–91. Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-Disclosure. NewburyPart, CA: Sage. Hargie, O. (2011). Skilled Interpersonal Interaction: Research, Theory and Practice.London: Reutledge. Johnson, J.A. (1981). The ‘self-disclosure’ and ‘self-presentation’ views of item responsedynamics and personality scale validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,40(4), 761–769. Jourard, S. (1971). The Transparent Self. (2nd ed.).New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-Presentation: Impression Management and InterpersonalBehavior. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark. Leary, M. R. (1996). Self-Presentation: Iimpression Management and InterpersonalBehavior. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Leary, M. R. (2012). Introduction to Behavioral Research Methods. (6nd ed.). Boston:Pearson. Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review andtwo-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47. Luft, J., Ingham, H. (1969). Of Human Interaction. Palo Alto, CA: National Press Books. Rosenfeld, L. B. (2014). Overview of the ways privacy, secrecy, and disclosure arebalanced in today’s society. In: Balancing the Secrets of Private Disclosure, (pp. 3 – 18).S. Petronio, (ed.). New York and London: Psychology Press. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: the self-concept, social identity, andinterpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Schlenker, B. R. (1985). Identity and self-identification. In: The self and social life, (pp.65–99). B.R.Schlenker, (ed.). New York: McGrow-Hill. Schlenker, B. R. (2003). Self-presentation. In: Handbook of Self and Identity, (pp. 492–518). M. R.Leary, J. P.Tangney, (eds.). New York: Guilford. Sources J.K. Rolling meets Lauren Laverne, 2015. Oprah talks to Barack Obama, 2004. O, The Oprah magazine. Oprah talks to Daniel Pink, 2008. O, The Oprah Magazine. Oprah talks to Ellen De Generes, 2009. O, The Oprah Magazine. Oprah talks to Jay-Z, 2009. O, The Oprah Magazine. Oprah talks to Tine Fey, 2009, O, The Oprah Magazine. Oprah talks to Thich Nhat Hanh, 2010.8.The ultimate O interview: Oprah answers all your questions, 2010. O, the Oprah magazine.


2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy C. Howle ◽  
James A. Dimmock ◽  
Peter R. Whipp ◽  
Ben Jackson

With the aim of advancing the literature on impression management in physical activity settings, we developed a theoretically derived 2 by 2 instrument that was designed to measure different types of context-specific selfpresentation motives. Following item generation and expert review (Study 1), the instrument was completed by 206 group exercise class attendees (Study 2) and 463 high school physical education students (Study 3). Our analyses supported the intended factor structure (i.e., reflecting acquisitive-agentic, acquisitive-communal, protective-agentic, and protective-communal motives). We found some support for construct validity, and the self-presentation motives were associated with variables of theoretical and applied interest (e.g., impression motivation and construction, social anxiety, social and achievement goals, efficacy beliefs, engagement). Taken together, the results indicate that the Self-presentation Motives for Physical Activity Questionnaire (SMPAQ) may be useful for measuring various types of self-presentation motives in physical activity settings.


1996 ◽  
Vol 79 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1115-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Scandell ◽  
Brian G. Wlazelek

The vulnerability of the NEO-Five Factor Inventory to self-presentation strategies was assessed through manipulation of instructional set. Research participants were randomly assigned to one of five instructional sets including general fake good and bad conditions, a control condition, and two conditions directing participants to produce profiles that would maximize their chances of gaining admission to either the police academy or a graduate program in psychology. Analysis suggested that individuals instructed to fake were able to produce profiles consistent with the instructional sets provided. General fake-good and fake-bad profiles were identified and criteria were developed to detect faking in individual profiles. Caution was suggested when using this inventory in assessment situations in which self-presentation strategic; may be employed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn Komar ◽  
Jennifer A. Komar ◽  
Chet Robie ◽  
Simon Taggar

The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of imposing a time constraint on respondents completing the Big Five personality Inventory (John & Srivastava, 1999) based on a self-regulatory model of response distortion. A completely crossed 2 × 2 experimental design was used in which instructions (neutral standard instruction or a job applicant instruction) and speed (with or without a time limit) were manipulated. While speeding personality tests reduced socially desirable responding, consistent with resource allocation theory (Ackerman, 1986), this effect was only seen in low cognitive ability individuals. Speeding was not perceived negatively by participants. This study is the first to find any evidence of a possible influence of speed on impression management and suggests that manipulating time limits for completing personality measures in selection is not advised at the present time as it is likely to have the unintended effect of removing applicants with high cognitive ability from the applicant pool.


Author(s):  
Chris Fullwood

The Internet and digital technologies present abundant opportunities for individuals to manage the impressions they make on others. The ubiquitous nature of the Internet means that for most, presenting the self to other individuals via the Internet is a common, usually daily activity. This chapter examines the nature of online impression management through the lens of Goffman’s (1959) self-presentation theory and Leary and Kowalski’s (1990) two-component model of impression management. It provides definitions of impression management and self-presentation and considers where they overlap. It deliberates on the general motivations and processes involved in managing the impressions of others. It reflects on the differences between managing impressions online and offline and the different factors permitting a more flexible approach to self-presentation. It discusses factors that predict people’s propensity to experiment with self-presentation online and concludes with consideration of how a more flexible approach to impression management impacts on the self.


2000 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Conroy ◽  
Robert W. Motl ◽  
Evelyn G. Hall

Self-presentation has become an increasingly popular topic in exercise and sport psychology, yet few instruments exist to measure this construct. This paper describes two validation studies conducted on the Self-Presentation in Exercise Questionnaire (SPEQ), a paper-and-pencil instrument based on Leary and Kowalski’s (1990) two-component model of impression management. The SPEQ was designed to assess impression motivation (IM) and impression construction (IC) in exercise environments. The first study employed exploratory factor analysis to reduce a pool of 125 content-representative items to a subset of 41 items forming the hypothesized two-factor model of IM and IC. In the second study, the 41 items were further reduced using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in separate samples, and the reduced SPEQ also conformed to the IM and IC factor structure. The second study also provided initial evidence to support the convergent and discriminant validity of the SPEQ with theoretically salient constructs such as body surveillance, perceived physical ability, physical self-presentation confidence, social desirability, and social physique anxiety.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document