scholarly journals Choosing Wisely for COVID-19: ten evidence-based recommendations for patients and physicians

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Pramesh ◽  
Giridhara R. Babu ◽  
Joyeeta Basu ◽  
Indu Bhushan ◽  
Christopher M. Booth ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Mitch Levine

The Choosing Wisely Canada program is intended to facilitate the more efficient use of health care resources. The program has messages for patients to align their expectations with an evidence based delivery of health care and to increase physician knowledge regarding evidence based directives for the appropriate use of investigations and treatments. In the current issue of CJGIM, an assessment was conducted regarding physician knowledge of the program, and the message was not positive. While many physicians acknowledged awareness of the Choosing Wisely Canada program, an appreciation of the specific messages on how to steer practice to evidence based activity was lacking amongst many. As these were the 33% who agreed to participate in the survey, one can only wonder whether a greater lack of knowledge about the program resides in the 67% that refused to participate. Despite having just laid a foundation of pessimism, I still wonder whether physicians are practicing evidence-based health care even if they do not know the detailed recommendations provided by the Choosing Wisely Canada program. The array of recommendations was developed by professional societies representing different clinical specialties in Canada. The Canadian Society of Internal Medicine (CSIM) established its Choosing Wisely Canada Top 5 recommendations by convening a Committee of 20 members that represented a diverse group of general internists from across Canada, reflecting a broad range of geographical regions, practice settings, institution types and experience.1 Below is the list of the five most recent recommendations targeted for physicians practicing in the field of internal medicine. Don’t routinely obtain neuro-imaging studies (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or carotid Doppler) in the evaluation of simple syncope in patients with a normal neurological examination.Don’t place, or leave in place, urinary catheters without an acceptable indication (such as critical illness, obstruction, palliative care).Don’t transfuse red blood cells for arbitrary hemoglobin or hematocrit thresholds in the absence of symptoms, active coronary disease, heart failure, or stroke.In the inpatient setting, don’t order repeated CBC and chemistry testing in the face of clinical and lab stability.Don’t routinely perform preoperative testing (such as chest X-rays, echocardiograms, or cardiac stress tests) for patients undergoing low risk surgeries.So, how are you doing in your practice? Mitchell LevineEditor, CJGIM


Author(s):  
Francis T. Durso ◽  
Vlad L. Pop ◽  
John S. Burnett ◽  
Eric J. Stearman

For decades, the vehicle of choice for idea transfer has been Microsoft’s PowerPoint. PowerPoint gives the orator a plethora of options in the design of a presentation. Choosing configurations for the most effective presentation can prove daunting, and even professional presentations bear witness to the difficulty of choosing wisely. Guidelines based on a collection of basic human factors/ergonomics principles and a few empirical studies are presented for effective PowerPoint presentations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 331-335
Author(s):  
Alessandro C. Pasqualotto ◽  
Camila S. Almeida ◽  
Dimas A. Kliemann ◽  
Guilherme B. Barcellos ◽  
Flávio Queiroz-Telles ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen B. Born ◽  
Wendy Levinson

In the pandemic era, the Choosing Wisely Canada campaign has taken on new meanings and urgency. There are drops in utilization for necessary health care services and procedures during the pandemic; however, there is growing literature suggesting that some decreases in utilization have been driven by declines in low-value tests and treatments. As resources have shifted to pandemic priorities and essential care needs, these unnecessary tests and treatments have also declined. Choosing Wisely Canada and CADTH are proactively working to highlight key recommendations from evidence-based lists of recommendations to inform priorities for rebuilding, which include avoiding low-value care. Rebuilding the health care system in the post-pandemic era needs to take into account a diversity of perspectives on how to prioritize high-value care for those who need it most, including clinician, patient, and policy expert perspectives.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13-13
Author(s):  
Maria Pisu ◽  
Gabrielle Betty Rocque ◽  
Kelly Kenzik ◽  
Bradford E. Jackson ◽  
Yufeng Li ◽  
...  

13 Background: Under the Choosing Wisely (CW) Campaign, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) recommend against non-evidence-based costly medications, tests, and procedures. CW recommendation adherence in the Deep South is largely unknown, and opportunities to reduce overuse and costs may exist. Methods: Analysis of administrative claims and tumor registry data from 12 cancer centers of the University of Alabama Health System Cancer Community Network, for Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years old with cancer. Main outcome: percent of beneficiaries adhering to 9 CW recommendations. Results: 2012-2015 (Q1) adherence varied across CW recommendations and cancer centers, and increased over time for CW 2 and 7, decreased for 3, 5, and 6, and did not change for others. Conclusions: Opportunities to improve quality and value of cancer care exist in the Deep South. Research should understand how to minimize use of non-evidence based medications, tests, and procedures. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Barry ◽  
Steven Kaufman ◽  
David Feinstein ◽  
Nami Kim ◽  
Snehal Gandhi ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Thyroid and rheumatologic autoimmune testing are areas where evidence-based guidance from specialty organizations and Choosing Wisely support utilizing screening tests for autoimmune and thyroid disorders prior to more specialized testing. Adjustment of the orderable options in the electronic health record (EHR) can influence ordering patterns without requiring manual review or additional effort by the clinician. Methods The menu was adjusted to reflect recommendations from Choosing Wisely to favor screening tests that automatically reflex to specialized testing on primary care providers’ preference lists. Effectiveness was evaluated by reviewing total orders for individual tests. Results Shifts in ordering from individual screening tests (antinuclear antibody and thyrotropin) to ones that reflexed to specialized testing were observed in parallel with significant reductions in the corresponding specialized testing. Conclusions Optimization of the EHR laboratory ordering menu can be used to shift ordering patterns toward Choosing Wisely recommendations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
David Minh Tran ◽  
Malcolm P. Forbes

Within the past decade, there has been a significant increase in Australia’s health expenditure, with a concurrent rise in overdiagnosis. Australia has introduced the Choosing Wisely campaign in a bid to identify and reduce commonly used investigations, treatments and procedures that add little benefit to patient care. By catalysing a discussion regarding evidence-based use of medications and medical testing, the Choosing Wisely campaign can minimise risk of harm to patients, as well as reduce expenditure. Internationally, several institutions are considering introducing training regarding cost-effective medical investigations into medical school curricula. The American College of Radiology has found positive results when conducting small-group teaching sessions with medical students regarding appropriate imaging modalities. These results are reflected in a US study that used an educational intervention to improve students’ understanding of investigation costs. In addition, the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists has developed a proposed curriculum to further medical students’ training in appropriate ordering of laboratory investigations. Australian medical educators must consider whether introducing evidence-based testing into Australian medical curricula should be part of a wider strategy to prevent unnecessary testing and health expenditure now and into the future.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Karen Born ◽  
Wendy Levinson ◽  
Luis Claudio Correia ◽  
Sandra Vernero

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has brought forth issues of health system resource limitations into urgent matters of public importance. Our objective was to rapidly develop an international Choosing Wisely list of recommendations for clinicians and the public about using resources wisely in the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Choosing Wisely Canada convened a rapid Delphi process to develop an international Choosing Wisely list for COVID-19. Informed by a rapid review of emerging literature, this process engaged a small group of clinicians and public advisors in Canada (n=10) and internationally (n=8) to develop a candidate list of recommendations. A survey with candidate recommendations was sent to Choosing Wisely clinician leaders in Canada and around the world. Based on survey results and input, list recommendations were modified. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 293 potential respondents and received a 56% response rate in 72 hours (n=163). Respondents were asked to score each of the 9 recommendations on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree followed by free text comment. There were 271 total comments across 9 recommendations. Overall, all 9 recommendations had high levels of agreement with 83%-96% of respondents ranking them as strongly agree or agree. INTERPRETATION: This list of recommendations provides evidence-based statements about using resources wisely in the COVID-19 pandemic. The list reflects international consensus on evidence-based recommendations for both clinicians and the public which were achieved through a rapid consensus building process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: n/a


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Lusiani ◽  
Roberto Frediani ◽  
Roberto Nardi ◽  
Andrea Fontanella ◽  
Mauro Campanini

Consistently with its own vision on the necessity to implement a sustainable and frugal medicine, in 2013 the Italian Federation of Associations of Hospital Doctors in Internal Medicine (FADOI) decided to adhere to the Slow Medicine program entitled <em>Doing more does not mean doing better</em>, launched in Italy in late 2012, following the Choosing Wisely® campaign of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Foundation started in the USA in 2010. According to the program, FADOI has now produced a list of ten evidence-based recommendations of the <em>do not</em> type, regarding different practices whose benefits for the patients are questionable at least, if not harmful at worst. The list was obtained from a questionnaire submitted to 1175 FADOI members, containing a purposely selected choice of 32 pertinent recommendations already published by Choosing Wisely®, and reflects the qualified opinion of a large number of Italian internists. These recommendations are now endorsed by the FADOI, as a contribution to the discussion among doctors, health professionals, nurses, patients and citizens about what is worth choosing in medicine; they are also meant to promote a shared decision making process in the clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document