e14723 Background: S is the standard for HCC treatment in advanced stage. There is no date about an etiology of HCC and S efficacy/toxicity in Russian pts. Methods: 69 patients (19 f/ 50 m, average age 54 years) with advanced HCC BCLC A/B/C/D 1/30/38/0 were treated with sorafenib as a I-st line. S treatment: 400 mg bid until progression, uncontrolled toxicity, or death. S dose reduced when toxicity (NCI CTC, ver 3.0) ≥Gr 2 occured. We evaluate influences of BCLC and Child-Pugh stage, presence of C and/or viral hepatitis on S efficacy and toxicity. Results: 33 (48%) out of 69 patients had C and 36 (52%) were non-C. No hepatitis - 36 pts (C/non-C - 5/31 pts), 16 pts had HBV (C/non-C – 15/1), 17 pts had HCV (C/non-C – 15/2), 1 pt had hepatitis B+/C without C. Clinically significant toxicity (Gr 2/3) occurred in 20 (C/non-C – 9/12) pts: HFS 1/6, skin rash 3/3, diarrhea 3/2, arterial hypertension (AG) 2/0, asthenia 1/1, fever 1/0. S interrupted in 12 (C/non-C – 5/7) pts: HFS- 0/4, skin rash -1/3 diarrhea - 2/1 and AG - 2/0. Efficacy evaluated in 68 pts: PR - 5 (7,4%) pts, stable – 46 (67,6%) and disease progressed in 17 (25%) pts. All PR (OR=13,9%) observed in non-C pts: 6, 9,3, 10, 10,2 and 13+ mo). Median PFS and OS on S treatment was 5,4 and 9,3 mo respectively. No significant difference were in PFS and OS for C and non-C pts, irrespectively for HCV/HBV status and Child-Pugh stage A/B (Table). Conclusions: More than 50% of HCC pts in Russia are non-C and don’t have HBV/HCV. Clinically significant toxicity of S differs in C/non-C pts, with prevalence of skin side effects in non-C pts, AG and diarrhea in C group. Non-C HCC pts have better chance to respond to S treatment. However we didn’t find any significant difference of S treatment in terms of survival and side effects between C and non-C pts. [Table: see text]