scholarly journals An Evaluation of E-Money’s Growth, Barriers, and Challenges to Build Green Finance on Post-Covid Era

2021 ◽  
Vol 317 ◽  
pp. 05014
Author(s):  
Imanda Firmantyas Putri Pertiwi ◽  
Rosana Eri Puspita ◽  
Mohamed Asmy Byn Mohd Thas Thaker ◽  
Septi Kurnia Pratiwi ◽  
Nur Huri Mustofa

Since paper money is one of the Covid-19 transmission media, a touchless alternative is needed. Electronic money (e-money) is the best alternative. This study analyzes the growth, barriers, and challenges of e-money as a new means of payment in Indonesia by raising an empirical study on the millennial generation. Data was collected through interviews with the managers of e-money issuer companies and 18 millennial e-money customers. Using qualitative methods, this research concludes that the strategy for developing e-money is to create innovations that can make it safer for users to meet their daily needs in the post-covid era. Increased promos and cashback at merchants who have collaborated with products issued is also the most favourite development strategy for customers. E-money customers face obstacles faced by e-money customers include safety issues, limited merchants, unstable provider networks, and socio-cultural factors (the habit of using conventional cash payment methods). The challenge that e-money issuers face is competitors of similar products. Millennial Indonesia is an emerging market for e-money, and this study is the first qualitative study to bring together the topics of e-money, millennials, and green finance.

2020 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 29-38
Author(s):  
Mechthild Schrooten ◽  
Armin Varmaz

Summary: Retail shops incentive contactless transactions during the current COVID-19 pandemic. Customers are asked to pay cashless to prevent contagion. Traditionally, there are large differences in the extent and acceptance of non-cash payments among nations. This paper analyzes empirically the determinants of the payment behavior in the member states of the Eurozone asking how to explain these traditional differences in non-cash payment preferences. Our basic hypothesis is that culture makes the difference across nations matter. The paper adds to the existing literature not only by focusing on the determinants of preferences for non-cash payments from a macroeconomic perspective but also by analyzing cultural factors. The payment data is gathered with the European Central Bank (ECB) and Eurostat. We examine the impact of culture on payment preferences by the means of the Hofstede indicators. Our empirical results show the importance of cultural issues to understand the acceptance of non-cash payments. In particular, the results suggest that a higher degree of uncertainty avoidance goes in line with more non-cash payments. Zusammenfassung: Im Zuge der Corona-Pandemie hat der Einzelhandel den Einsatz von non-cash Einzelhandel vorangetrieben. Um eine Covid-Ansteckung zu verhindern, werden Kund*innen gebeten bargeldlos zu zahlen. Tatsächlich es gibt zwischen einzelnen Volkswirtschaften große Unterschiede in der Verwendung von Bargeld und bargeldlosen Zahlungen. Im Beitrag wird empirisch der Frage nachgegangen, welche Faktoren hinter diesen Unterschieden stehen. Die zentrale Hypothese ist, dass Kultur eine große Rolle spielt. Dieses Paper analysiert auf der Grundlage der vorhandenen empirischen Literatur den Einfluss kultureller Faktoren auf den Einsatz von bargeldlosen Zahlungen. Dazu werden nicht nur makroökonomische Daten von der Europäischen Zentralbank und Eurostat, sondern auch die Hofstede Indikatoren herangezogen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass insbesondere die kulturelle Dimension „Uncertainty Avoidance“ die nationalen Differenzen der gesellschaftlichen Akzeptanz erklären kann. Volkswirtschaften mit einer höheren „Uncertainty Avoidance“ setzen stärker auf non-cash.


Author(s):  
Dwiyana Dwiyana ◽  
Muqorobin Muqorobin

The writing of the Semester Final Project with the title Analysis of the Parking Payment System for Adi Soemarmo Airport Solo was compiled based on the results of observations at the exit gate of Adi Soemarmo Airport Solo. Transactions on parking payments often cause problems due to several factors, especially the time or process is quite long because sometimes the money given is too large then the cashier takes too long to give change, besides that sometimes passengers do not prepare the money they want to pay in advance and often passengers pay in a situation of insufficient money and this causes queues or jams at the gate exit. The research objective given by the author later is to provide the best solution for airport parking payment systems. In addition to making it easier for passengers, this will greatly facilitate cashiers when carrying out work operations. This payment application system is called u-nik or electronic money. Where u-nik functions to transfer the money balance data contained in u-nik to a computer using a system called AINO. So that payments occur without spending additional cash. With the existence of non-cash payment transactions using the AINO system, it is hoped that it can facilitate and provide speed in making parking payment transactions without the need to carry cash.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwi . Wulandari ◽  
Thomas Soseco ◽  
Bagus Shandy Narmaditya

Technological developments have had an impact on all aspects of life including changes to existing payment systems. Electronic money (E-Money) is a non cash payment instrument in addition to credit cards and debit cards. E-money offers advantages over debit cards and credit cards that give the ease, speed, and efficiency. The issue discussed in this research covers the intensity of the use of e-money, the volume of transactions, preferences, and perceptions about the use of e-money at the Faculty of Economics, State University of Malang. This study used a qualitative approach. The findings showed that only a small portion of the respondents (17.07%) has already been used BRIZZI card as a means of payment. Majority of students simply do as much as 3-5 times transaction per month. The volume of transactions in using E-money is still low. Student preference to use BRIZZI is relatively small. Most of the respondents supported less cash society because they believe it will promote economic growth and stability.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-148
Author(s):  
Hendra Wijaya

This research explains differences of opinion among muamalah experts contemporary about takyif fiqh (deriving law) of transactions in the use of Gopay and OVO as a means of payment (electronic money) on online transportation services, where there are at least four disputed takyifs, namely al-ijārah alMausūfah Fi al-Żimmah, Wadīah, Qard ṣ , and Ṣ ṣ arf. The differences of takyif fiqh ṣ has implications for the differences of law consequences between legal and illegal transactions in using Go-pay and OVO, this research explained that it is more effective to derive the law according to the Ṣarf contract that is more appropriate than the other contracts, the substance of Go-pay and OVO top up process is the conversion of two similar currency between paper money to electric money. Because Ṣarf contract is the most appropriate form of contract in this transaction, the discount acquired by the consumer from the Go-Pay and OVO payment is considered ataya (gift) that is legal without any usury.


2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 3440-3454
Author(s):  
Thi Khue Thu Ngo, Thu Hang Nguyen

As one of the applications of mobile banking, payment by scanning a QR code not only reduces the risks when paying via cards but also brings about more convenience than cash payment and more safety than other forms of payment, especially in the context of the current strong and complicated Covid-19 epidemic. However, the adoption of this payment technology seems to be left open in emerging markets, especially Vietnam. Within this context, this study conducted a survey on 441 customers about their intention to use QR code payment when shopping in Vietnam market. Research results show that personal innovation, perceived security and usefulness, perceived ease of use and facilitating conditions affect the attitudes towards intention to use the QR code payment service. In particular, perceived ease of use, perceived security and usefulness are the two factors that most strongly influence the intention to accept the use of QR code payment service though attitude mediator. The results of this research can assist managers with considerations in constructing development plan for new technological products and services in such an emerging market as Vietnam


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-122
Author(s):  
Fazri Muhamad Kurnia ◽  

The payment process using electronic money is a non-cash payment method based on E-Wallet aimed at facilitating users in transact. The transaction process at the coffee shop XYZ is still done conventionally and takes a long time, causing long queues. The research carried out aims to speed up the transaction process at XYZ coffee shops. The method used in this research is prototype. An alternative solution to the transaction process is to utilize the E-Wallet and QR-Code through the customer's smartphone. This study utilizes Go-Pay E-Wallet access as a means of payment through the Midtrans Payment Gateway and uses the One Time Password code as a login method on the system. Qr-code scanning to place orders can be done quickly which is around 3,551 milliseconds. Quessioner results distributed to 20 customers showed the following data, around 90% agreed on the use of e-wallet as an alternative payment, around 87% agreed on the statement of the use of e-wallet was able to reduce the slow transaction process, about 79% agreed to the statement that this system facilitates the transaction process, as well as 79% level of approval of the use of an authentication code through a mobile number that makes it easy to enter the application. The results showed that the system built can speed up the transaction process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (s1) ◽  
pp. 291-313
Author(s):  
Nur Annisa Hasniawati ◽  
Eva R. Lase ◽  
Akhis R. Hutabarat

AbstractWe examine the preferences of respondents for six types of payment instruments, namely cash, debit and credit cards, card and server-based electronic money, and internet or mobile banking. By applying a nested logit model to 500 household data covering six provincial capitals in Indonesia, we find that the decision to choose payment instruments is made sequentially. Socio-economic characteristics, including education, age, income, and transaction objectives or functionality have a significant effect on the probability of using non-cash electronic payment instruments. We find a substitution pattern between payment instruments, not only between cash and non-cash instruments but also between non-cash instruments. In light of these findings, appropriate payment system policies are in order to hasten the use of non-cash payment.


1997 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 289-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Peter Buck

The discussion of online payments, while ultimately being a key issue for the future Information SuperHighway, is as significant now as it ever will be. The explosive increase in the use of the Internet has seen the emergence of commercial services and pressures previously restricted to Compuserve and the like. Many predictions see this burgeoning electronic marketplace becoming a significant component of the world economy. However this can only happen once two key problems have been addressed, namely, protecting property rights and Making payments. This has led to a frantic battle for payment mechanisms that can provide the new medium with the means of conducting transactions. Briefly examines the inexorable evolution of money into electronic forms and discusses the alternative types of payment mechanisms proposed, on trial or in use on the Internet. Identifies the key commercial requirements that successful use of the Internet will impose on a payment mechanism, and use these requirements to evaluate each of the mechanisms to determine which (if any) are really suitable for electronic commerce.


2020 ◽  
pp. 81-92
Author(s):  
Nemanja Matić ◽  
Boris Siljković ◽  
Marko Savić

This paper addresses the challenges associated to the strength of potential for payment with traditional metal cash and paper money versus a non-cash method of payment in the era of the COVID 19 pandemic in the world and our country. The pandemic served to accelerate the contactless method of payment, because payment without contact is now not only a convenience, but a necessity. Before the pandemic in Europe, cash accounted for close to half of the payments, and in just a few weeks of the COVID 19 pandemic, it fell by 10 percent. Concepts that have so far preferred cash were definitely compromised during the pandemic crisis, and the pandemic is actually the strongest marketing of digital contactless payment methods so far, through the dominant contactless style of money exchange in the world and Europe, as shown in the paper we have today. Some research studies described in the paper in form of the health adventages of mobile wallet payments, as opposed to the proven health-threatening cash and coin-based cash payment model, indicate that the end of the cash era is approaching, being primarily accelerated by the health risk of COVID 19 infection. Particularly interesting is the live study conducted in the area of the northern Kosovo and Metohija, presented in a form of a set of financial services offered by the Postal Savings Bank of the Kosovska Mitrovica branch office, and relation between the contactless and cash payment model, before and after the COVID 19 pandemic. Naturally, all of this is accompanied by significantly limited knowledge related to SARS Cov 2, better known as the current COVID 19 pandemic.


Author(s):  
S. Zadvornykh

Modern society is determined not only with a high level of development, but also a lot of social and economic problems. In the last years more and more popular became the meaning, that a lot of these problems could be solved with the canceling of cash. Experts and usual people are thinking that a new society will be more fair and transparent with less of criminal, drugs, economic fraud, unmotivated preference for individual categories, where everybody is paying less of tax and where is a high level of wealth protection. But in the real situation seems not so optimistic. In Life privacy. Canceling of cash mean total control against all financial operations of each person, their interests and tastes by banks and government. Besides that, using most mobile payment systems need geolocation – as result everybody will be all the time trecked in all senses of this word. In psychological sphere using electronic money will increase money spendings because using cash is combined with the feeling of pain, when people are spending them and e-money are for most of people something not so important, especially for young people (like money in PC game). In social shpere the cashless society will make problems for disabled people, people with mental problems and also can influence dementia by older people. Criminal. even if we will live in the cashless society with the modern trends, the level of financial fraud will reduce maximal on 15%, and P. Schmidt considered, that all the criminals will find another way for their activity. Besides that e-money and society are stimulating the growth of cybercrime and it is always growing and the companies, who had lost against cybercrime had spent more money for investigation of that cases, then they have lost. Unemployment. First of all, the system of cash circulation is huge. A lot of people are creation, designing, proofing, printing, gathering, retailing cash and also working each day in banks, cashier’s offices, shops and so on. Also many companies are producing stuff combined with cash. From wallets to cash machines. All these brunches will not exist anymore and all the people will lose their jobs. Economy. One of the main reasons to cancel cash was that in the cashless society will be impossible to set a negative rate and with the same it will be less of economic crises. But german economists have studied and proofed that it is possible and in this situation it will be more difficult to combat the crisis and cost much more for the government and people because all existing financial instruments that the government can use to fix situation are created only for cash and are working with it. Technical. Electronic systems could be crushed. Besides of that in case of wore or other conflicts people can ruin Internet connection all over the country and inhabitants will lose everything and have no possibility even get home. In general, e-payments are part of our life and they are very comfortable nowadays. But the canceling of cash will make more problems for people and organizations. This means that this could not be the right choice in the nearest future. Keywords financial system; cash; payment systems; cybercrime; banks; sociology; taxes; offshore zones.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document