High Prevalence of Asymptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis on Admission in a Medical Unit among Elderly Patients

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (10) ◽  
pp. 592-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc Bressollette ◽  
Michel Nonent ◽  
Karine Lacut ◽  
Bruno Guias ◽  
Francis Couturaud ◽  
...  

SummaryThe prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients remains questioned. All consecutive outpatients admitted in our medical unit were considered for inclusion in this study which aimed to estimate the prevalence of asymptomatic venous thrombosis on admission and the incidence during hospital stay. Exclusion criteria were: age <18 years, suspicion of venous thromboembolism, stay <4 days, ongoing anticoagulant therapy. Venous compression ultrasonography of the lower limbs was performed within 48 h. 234 patients were included. The prevalence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis on admission and the incidence during hospital follow-up were respectively 5.5% (95% confidence interval, 3.1 to 9.5%) and 2.6 per 1000 person-days (95% confidence interval, 0.0 to 5.2). The prevalence and the incidence reached respectively 17.8% (95% confidence interval, 8.5 to 32.6%) and 6.0 per 1000 person-days (95% confidence interval, 0.0 to 12.7) among patients over 80 years. A high prevalence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis on admission was suggested particularly among elderly medical patients.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aziz S

Background: Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is a clinical disorder characterized by the pathological occurrence of single or many thrombi developing mainly in the deep veins of the lower limbs and pulmonary veins but also other parts of the venous circulation, albeit less. A frequently occurring venous thrombosis is a deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which is the presence of thrombus in deep veins of the lower extremity. Once this clot fragment is swept off (embolism), it moves along with the venous blood and flows to the pulmonary vessels, where it may result in a clinically significant disorder called pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Thrombosis occurring in the superficial veins would only cause discomfort but generally with insignificant consequences. Aim: This study aimed to assess patterns and risk factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients in the Aseer region. Methodology: A record-based descriptive analysis (retrospective) was used in this study. The clinical study targeted the patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE including PE & DVT) either admitted with the diagnosis or complicated during the hospitalization period in Aseer Central Hospital during the period from January 2010 to June 2019. Data extracted using pre-structured data collection sheet. The extracted data were patients' bio-demographic data, VTE related data, treatment received and relevant complications of treatment, and patient’s follow-up history. Results: The study included total of 207 patients with thromboembolism. The age of patients was between 15 - 100 years old with the average age being 57.3+12.9 years. Approximately 58% of the patients were female. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was recorded in 60.4% of the cases and 27.5% of them were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism (PE) while 12.1% had both PE and DVT. Exact of 59.6% of cases with PE had immobilization history for 24 to 72 hours as compared to 31.2% of DVT and 44% of patients with mixed thromboembolism. DM was recorded among 14% of PE cases and 21.6% of DVT. Warfarin with Enoxaparin was the most frequently given treatment in total (23.2%). Heparin followed by Warfarin was the second most common treatment. Conclusions and recommendation: The study revealed that VTE was commonly reported especially DVT and PE among the recorded cases and it was bilateral in a considerable number of cases. Immobilization with chronic disease and morbid obesity was noted as the most significant predictor for VTE.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Voicu ◽  
Chahinez Ketfi ◽  
Alain Stépanian ◽  
Benjamin G. Chousterman ◽  
Nassim Mohamedi ◽  
...  

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) predisposes to deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) particularly in mechanically ventilated adults with severe pneumonia. The extremely high prevalence of DVT in the COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been established between 25 and 84% based on studies including systematic duplex ultrasound of the lower limbs when prophylactic anticoagulation was systematically administrated. DVT prevalence has been shown to be markedly higher than in mechanically ventilated influenza patients (6–8%). Unusually high inflammatory and prothrombotic phenotype represents a striking feature of COVID-19 patients, as reflected by markedly elevated reactive protein C, fibrinogen, interleukin 6, von Willebrand factor, and factor VIII. Moreover, in critically ill patients, venous stasis has been associated with the prothrombotic phenotype attributed to COVID-19, which increases the risk of thrombosis. Venous stasis results among others from immobilization under muscular paralysis, mechanical ventilation with high positive end-expiratory pressure, and pulmonary microvascular network injuries or occlusions. Venous return to the heart is subsequently decreased with increase in central and peripheral venous pressures, marked proximal and distal veins dilation, and drops in venous blood flow velocities, leading to a spontaneous contrast “sludge pattern” in veins considered as prothrombotic. Together with endothelial lesions and hypercoagulability status, venous stasis completes the Virchow triad and considerably increases the prevalence of DVT and PE in critically ill COVID-19 patients, therefore raising questions regarding the optimal doses for thromboprophylaxis during ICU stay.


2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (09) ◽  
pp. 493-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Antoinette Sevestre-Pietri ◽  
Jean-Luc Bosson ◽  
Jean-Pieere Laroche ◽  
Marc Righini ◽  
Dominique Brisot ◽  
...  

SummaryThere is a lack of consensus on the value of detecting and treating symptomatic isolated distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs. In our study, we compared the risk factors and outcomes in patients with isolated symptomatic distal DVT with those with proximal symptomatic DVT. We analysed the data of patients with objectively confirmed symptomatic isolated DVT enrolled in the national (France), multicenter, prospective OPTIMEV study.This sub-study outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding and death at three months. Among the 6141 patients with suspicion of isolated DVT included between November 2004 and January 2006, DVT was confirmed in 1643 patients (26.8%). Isolated distal DVT was more frequent than proximal DVT (56.8% vs. 43.2%, respectively; p=0.01). Isolated distal DVT was significantly more often associated with transient risk factors (recent surgery, recent plaster immobilisation, recent travel), whereas proximal DVT was significantly more associated with more chronic states (active cancer, congestive heart failure or respiratory insufficiency, age >75 years). Most patients (96.8%) with isolated distal DVT received anticoagulant therapies.There was no difference in the percentage of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in patients with proximal DVT and isolated distal DVT. However, the mortality rate was significantly higher (p<0.01) in patients with proximal DVT (8.0%) than in those with isolated distal DVT (4.4%). Symptomatic isolated distal DVT differs from symptomatic proximal DVT both in terms of risk factors and clinical outcome. Whether these differences should influence the clinical management of these two events remains to be determined.


2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (08) ◽  
pp. 529-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc Bressollette ◽  
Michel Nonent ◽  
Jean-François Garcia ◽  
Pascal Larroche ◽  
Bruno Guias ◽  
...  

SummaryWe assessed the accuracy of venous compression ultrasonography (CUS) for the detection of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in 122 consecutive patients, with a mean age of 69 years, who were hospitalised in an internal medicine unit. All included patients had CUS within 48 h of admission. Twelve out of 17 patients with a positive CUS underwent phlebography, as the others withdrew their consent, whereas the remaining 105 patients with a negative serial CUS testing were clinically followed-up at 3 months. We found that CUS had a sensitivity and a specificity of respectively 1 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1) and 1 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1) for the detection of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Kappa-coefficients for intra-observer and inter-observer agreements were respectively 0.88 and 0.56. We concluded that venous compression ultrasonography, performed as described, fulfils requirements of a screening test that could be available for prophylactic clinical trials or epidemiological researches.


Author(s):  
David Spirk ◽  
Tim Sebastian ◽  
Jürg Hans Beer ◽  
Lucia Mazzolai ◽  
Drahomir Aujesky ◽  
...  

AbstractWe aimed to evaluate the impact of age, sex, and their interactions with provoking risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). In addition, we intended to provide additional insights on risk factors associated with the isolated distal versus proximal presentation of first symptomatic acute DVT, both being characterized by different prognosis. In the present analysis from the SWIss Venous ThromboEmbolism Registry (SWIVTER), we compared demographic and baseline characteristics in patients with isolated distal (n = 184; 35%) versus proximal (n = 346) DVT of the lower limbs without symptomatic pulmonary embolism, and identified factors related with the presenting thrombosis location. In the overall population, mean age was 59 ± 19 years, 266 (50%) were women, 106 (20%) patients had cancer, 86 (16%) recent surgery, and 52 (10%) acute infection/sepsis. In a multivariable analysis, recent surgery [odds ratio (OR) 2.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80–4.73] was independently associated with a diagnosis of isolated distal DVT, whereas cancer (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.20–3.35), male sex aged 41 to 75 years (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.33–3.67), and acute infection/sepsis (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.29–5.66) with a diagnosis of proximal DVT. In SWIVTER, age, sex, and several provoking risk factors for VTE appeared to be related with the presenting location of first symptomatic DVT. Cancer, male sex, and acute infection/sepsis were associated with a proximal location of DVT, whereas recent surgery was associated with a distal presentation, likely acting as confounders for the association between thrombosis location and prognosis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 367-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raveena Ravikumar ◽  
Katherine J Williams ◽  
Adarsh Babber ◽  
Hayley M Moore ◽  
Tristan RA Lane ◽  
...  

Objective Venous thromboembolism, encompassing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting one in 1000 adults per year. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is the transcutaneous application of electrical impulses to elicit muscle contraction, preventing venous stasis. This review aims to investigate the evidence underlying the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in thromboprophylaxis. Methods The Medline and Embase databases were systematically searched, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, for articles relating to electrical stimulation and thromboprophylaxis. Articles were screened according to a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results The search strategy identified 10 randomised controlled trials, which were used in three separate meta-analyses: five trials compared neuromuscular electrical stimulation to control, favouring neuromuscular electrical stimulation (odds ratio of deep vein thrombosis 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.13–0.65; P = .003); three trials compared neuromuscular electrical stimulation to heparin, favouring heparin (odds ratio of deep vein thrombosis 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.13–3.52; P = .02); three trials compared neuromuscular electrical stimulation as an adjunct to heparin versus heparin only, demonstrating no significant difference (odds ratio of deep vein thrombosis 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.10–1.14; P = .08). Conclusion Neuromuscular electrical stimulation significantly reduces the risk of deep vein thrombosis compared to no prophylaxis. It is inferior to heparin in preventing deep vein thrombosis and there is no evidence for its use as an adjunct to heparin.


1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (02) ◽  
pp. 266-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Agnelli ◽  
Benilde Cosmi ◽  
Stefano Radicchia ◽  
Franca Veschi ◽  
Enrico Boschetti ◽  
...  

SummaryImpedance plethysmography (IPG) has high sensitivity and specificity in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) while it fails to detect asymptomatic DVT. The aim of this study was to determine whether the features of thrombi such as location, size and occlusiveness could explain the different accuracy of IPG in symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT patients. One-hundred and seventeen consecutive outpatients with a clinical suspicion of DVT and 246 consecutive patients undergoing hip surgery were admitted to the study. In symptomatic patients IPG was performed on the day of referral, followed by venography, while in asymptomatic patients IPG was performed as a surveillance programme, followed by bilateral venography.A venography proved DVT was observed in 37% of the symptomatic patients and 34% of the asymptomatic limbs. A significantly higher proportion of proximal DVTs was found in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic patients (78% vs 46%; p = 0.001). The mean Marder score, taken as an index of thrombus size, was significantly higher in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic patients (19.0 vs 9.6; p = 0.0001). A significantly higher proportion of occlusive DVTs was observed in symptomatic than in asymptomatic patients (69% vs 36%; p = 0.001).We conclude that the unsatisfactory diagnostic accuracy of IPG in asymptomatic DVT is due to the high prevalence of distal, small and non occlusive thrombi. Such thrombi are unlikely to cause a critical obstruction of the venous outflow and therefore to produce a positive IPG.


1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (04) ◽  
pp. 518-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Elias ◽  
I Aptel ◽  
B Huc ◽  
J J Chale ◽  
F Nguyen ◽  
...  

SummaryThe current D-Dimer ELISA methods provide high sensitivity and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis but these methods are not suitable for emergency or for individual determination. We have evaluated the performance of 3 newly available fast D-Dimer assays (Vidas D-Di, BioMerieux; Instant IA D-Di, Stago; Nycocard D-Dimer, Nycomed) in comparison with 3 classic ELISA methods (Stago, Organon, Behring) and a Latex agglutination technique (Stago). One-hundred-and-seventy-one patients suspected of presenting a first episode of deep vein thrombosis were investigated. A deep vein thrombosis was detected in 75 patients (43.8%) by ultrasonic duplex scanning of the lower limbs; in 11 of them the thrombi were distal and very limited in size (<2 cm). We compared the performance of the tests by calculating their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for different cut-off levels and by calculating the area under ROC curves. The concordance of the different methods was evaluated by calculating the kappa coefficient. The performances of the 3 classic ELISA and of the Vidas D-Di were comparable and kappa coefficients indicated a good concordance between the results provided by these assays. Their sensitivity slightly declined for detection of the very small thrombi. Instant IA D-Di had a non-significantly lower sensitivity and negative predictive value than the 4 previous assays; however its performance was excellent for out-patients. As expected, the Latex assay had too low a sensitivity and negative predictive value to be recommended. In our hands, Nycocard D-Dimer also exhibited low sensitivity and negative predictive value, which were significantly improved when the plasma samples were tested by the manufacturer. Thus significant progress has been made, allowing clinical studies to be planned to compare the safety and cost-effectiveness of D-Dimer strategy to those of the conventional methods for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis.


1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (02) ◽  
pp. 718-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jørgen Gram ◽  
Johannes Sidelmann ◽  
Jørgen Jespersen

SummaryMany reports have demonstrated an abnormal fibrinolysis in a subset of patients with deep vein thrombosis. We have studied systemic global fibrinolytic activity and protein concentrations of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) in plasma of 25 young patients with a previous instance of spontaneous deep vein thrombosis documented by phlebography and in 50 healthy controls. The two populations were comparable with respect to a number of base-line variables (age, height, weight, etc.), while the patients had significantly lower fibrinolytic activity (p <0.02), and significantly higher protein concentrations of t-PA (p <0.0001) and PAI-1 (p <0.0006).We used probit scale plots to identify the consequence of different cut-off points to separate patients from controls. Reasonable separation could be obtained for t-PA with a cut-off point of 5.2 ng/ml and for PAI-1 18 ng/ml. The sensitivity and specificity for these cut-off points were for t-PA 73% (95% confidence interval 63%-84%) and for PAI-1 67% (confidence interval 55%-77%). The negative predictive value with a cut-off point t-PA concentration of 5.2 ng/ml was 85% (95% confidence interval 70%-94%). We observed a significantly negative association between concentration of t-PA and fibrinolytic activity (rs = -0.47; p <0.005) and also between PAI-1 and fibrinolytic activity (rs = -0.78; p <0.005).We conclude that a young healthy population is characterized by low protein concentration of t-PA (and PAI-1) compared with young patients with a previous instance of spontaneous vein thrombosis, and we tentatively state that a low protein concentration of t-PA predicts a low risk of spontaneous deep vein thrombosis.


1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (02) ◽  
pp. 141-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Bounameaux ◽  
B Krähenbühl ◽  
S Vukanovic

SummaryDoppler ultrasound flow examination, strain gauge plethysmography and contrast venography were performed in 160 lower limbs of 80 in-patients. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was suspected in 87 limbs. Using measurement of venous stop-flow pressure, the Doppler method had an overall sensitivity of 83%. By combined use of Doppler and Plethysmography, sensitivity was increased to 96%. Specificity was 62% and 51%, respectively. With a positive and a negative predictive value of 80% and 73%, respectively, the combination of both non-invasive methods cannot reliably replace venography in the diagnosis of DTV, although all (40/40) thromboses proximal to or involving the popliteal segment were detected by either Doppler and Plethysmography or both.After exclusion of 14 patients (18%) suffering from conditions known to alter the results of these non-invasive methods, the positive predictive value of abnormal findings in both Doppler and Plethysmography was increased to 94% for suspected limbs, whilst negative predictive value of both negative Doppler and Plethysmography was 90%, allowing the avoidance of venography in these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document