Thyroid Disorders and Hemostasis

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (07) ◽  
pp. 676-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Squizzato ◽  
Victor Gerdes ◽  
Laura Elbers
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Arterial Thrombosis ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Free Thyroxine ◽  
Thyroid Disorders ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Compression Effects ◽  
Cerebral Arterial Thrombosis ◽  
Different Levels

AbstractLower levels of free thyroxine (whether this is endogenous or exogenous) lead to a hypocoagulable state, and higher levels of free thyroxine lead to a hypercoagulable state. In this narrative review, the effects of different levels of thyroid hormones on clinical end points are described. Hypothyroidism is associated with an increased bleeding risk, whereas hyperthyroidism leads to an increased risk of venous thrombosis. Besides, effects of thyroid hormone on the heart may indirectly influence hemostasis. Hyperthyroidism leads to a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, and, at least partly by that mechanism, a higher risk of cerebral arterial thrombosis. In addition, compression effects of goiter on developing venous thrombosis are described. This is caused by local stasis of blood due to tumor expansion.

scholarly journals Antiphospholipid antibodies and thrombosis: association with acquired activated protein C resistance in venous thrombosis and with hyperhomocysteinemia in arterial thrombosis

2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (12) ◽  
pp. 1312-1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeannine Kassis ◽  
Carolyn Neville ◽  
Joyce Rauch ◽  
Lambert Busque ◽  
Erika Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Arterial Thrombosis ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Activated Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Activated Protein C Resistance ◽  
Increased Risk

SummaryAlthough antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are associated with thrombosis, it is not known who with aPL is at higher risk for thrombosis. It was the aim of this cross-sectional study to investigate how thrombophilic factors contribute to venous or arterial thrombosis in aPL-positive individuals. In outpatient test centres at two tertiary care hospitals, two hundred and eight (208) persons requiring aPL testing were matched by age, gender and centre to 208 persons requiring a complete blood count. Persons were classified as aPL-positive (having anticardiolipin, lupus anticoagulant and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies) or aPL-negative. Several thrombophilic factors were studied using logistic regression modelling. Results showed that the aPL-positive group had three-fold more events (37%) than the aPL-negative group (12%). In unadjusted analyses, clinically important associations were observed between factor V Leiden and venous thrombosis, hyperhomocysteinemia and arterial thrombosis, and activated protein C resistance (APCR) and venous thrombosis (OR, 95% CI = 4.00, 1.35-11.91; 4.79, 2.03-11.33; and 2.03, 1.03-3.97, respectively). After adjusting for recruitment group, persons with both APCR and aPL had a three-fold greater risk (OR, 95% CI = 3.31, 1.30-8.41) for venous thrombosis than those with neither APCR nor aPL. Similarly, after adjusting for hypertension, family history of cardiovascular disease, gender and recruitment group, persons with both hyperhomocysteinemia and aPL had a five-fold increased risk (OR, 95% CI = 4.90, 1.37-17.37) for arterial thrombosis compared to those with neither risk factor. In conclusion, APCR phenotype and hyperhomocysteinemia are associated with a higher risk of venous and arterial thrombosis, respectively, in the presence of aPL.

scholarly journals Antithrombotic therapy according to baseline bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: applying the PRECISE-DAPT score in RE-DUAL PCI

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Costa ◽  
Marco Valgimigli ◽  
Philippe Gabriel Steg ◽  
Deepak L Bhatt ◽  
Stefan H Hohnloser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Event Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Safety Endpoint ◽  
High Bleeding Risk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary intervention are at higher bleeding risk due to the concomitant need for oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. The RE-DUAL PCI trial demonstrated better safety with dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT: dabigatran 110 or 150 mg b.i.d., clopidogrel or ticagrelor) compared to triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT: warfarin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor, and aspirin). We explored the impact of baseline bleeding risk based on the PRECISE-DAPT score for decision-making regarding DAT vs. TAT. Methods and results A score ≥25 points qualified high bleeding risk (HBR). Comparisons were made for the primary safety endpoint International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and the composite efficacy endpoint of death, thrombo-embolic events, or unplanned revascularization, analysed by time-to-event analysis. PRECISE-DAPT was available in 2336/2725 patients, and 37.9% were HBR. Compared to TAT, DAT with dabigatran 110 mg reduced bleeding risk both in non-HBR [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.57] and HBR (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52–0.94), with a greater magnitude of benefit among non-HBR (Pint = 0.02). Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran 150 mg vs. TAT reduced bleeding in non-HBR (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45–0.80), with a trend toward less benefit in HBR patients (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.63–1.34; Pint = 0.08). The risk of ischaemic events was similar on DAT with dabigatran (both 110 and 150 mg) vs. TAT in non-HBR and HBR patients (Pint = 0.45 and Pint = 0.56, respectively). Conclusions PRECISE-DAPT score appeared useful to identify AF patients undergoing PCI at further increased risk of bleeding complications and may help clinicians identifying the antithrombotic regimen intensity with the best benefit–risk ratio in an individual patient.

Risk of Stroke, Bleeding, and Death in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease

Cardiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-186
Author(s):  
Yoav Arnson ◽  
Moshe Hoshen ◽  
Adi Berliner-Sendrey ◽  
Orna Reges ◽  
Ran Balicer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Impaired Renal Function ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Intracranial Bleeding ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Ckd Stage ◽  
Stroke Death

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are both associated with increased risk of stroke, and CKD carries a higher bleeding risk. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment is used to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF); however, the risk versus benefit of OAC for advanced CKD is continuously debated. We aim to assess the management and outcomes of NVAF patients with impaired renal function within a population-based cohort. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using ICD-9 healthcare coding. Patients with incident NVAF between 2004 and 2015 were identified stratified by CKD stage. We compared treatment strategies and estimated risks of stroke, death, or any major bleeding based on CKD stages and OAC treatment. Results: We identified 85,116 patients with incident NVAF. Patients with impaired renal function were older and had more comorbidities. OAC was most common among stage 2 CKD patients (49%) and least in stages 4–5 CKD patients (27.6%). Higher CKD stages were associated with worse outcomes. Stroke rates increased from 1.04 events per 100 person-years (PY) in stage 1 CKD to 3.72 in stages 4–5 CKD. Mortality increased from 3.42 to 32.95 events/100 PY, and bleeding rates increased from 0.89 to 4.91 events/100 PY. OAC was associated with reduced stroke and intracranial bleeding risk regardless of CKD stage, and with a reduced mortality risk in stages 1–3 CKD. Conclusion: Among NVAF patients, advanced renal failure is associated with higher risk of stroke, death, and bleeding. OAC was associated with reduced stroke and intracranial bleeding risk, and with improved survival in stages 1–3 CKD.

scholarly journals Addressing Stroke Risk in a Patient with CREST Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation with Left Atrial appendage Occluder Device (WATCHMAN)

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-04
Author(s):  
Ali Alkhayru
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Crest Syndrome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Occluder Device ◽  
One Year

CREST syndrome is rare autoimmune disease causing calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly and telangiectasias. We present a case of an eighty-two year old female with CREST syndrome who presented to our clinic with atrial fibrillation and prohibitive bleeding risk. Managing stroke risk in atrial fibrillation is essential to minimize the morbidity and mortality of the condition. Those with CREST syndrome presenting with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding may require alternatives to anticoagulation. Recently, the left atrial appendage occluder device became widely used to manage patients at increased risk for bleeding. The device provides a safe and efficacious alternative in lowering atrial fibrillation associated stroke risk. Our patient underwent uncomplicated implantation of the left atrial appendage occluder device. She was closely monitored for one year where she remained stroke free and had one minor episode of gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

scholarly journals Anticoagulation in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis (Literature Review)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
E. S. Eniseeva
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Coagulation Cascade ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Thromboembolic Complications ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparins ◽  
Increased Risk

Liver cirrhosis is accompanied by complex hemostatic disorders with an increase in the risk of both hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Reduced coagulation protein synthesis, such as factors II, VII, IX, X and thrombocytopenia are associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Reducing the synthesis of such anticoagulants as protein C, protein S, antithrombin III is accompanied by increased generation of thrombin, which leads to procoagulant status, increased risk of venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and portal vein thrombosis. Activation of the coagulation cascade increases the risk of thrombosis, and also plays an important role in liver damage, contributing to the progression of fibrosis. Cirrhosis increases the risk of thromboembolic complications of atrial fibrillation.Anticoagulants are necessary for the prevention of thrombosis and thromboembolic complications. However, there are no large prospective studies. There is insufficient data on the safety of anticoagulant therapy in cirrhosis. There are difficulties in monitoring anticoagulation in the application of vitamin K antagonists and low molecular weight heparins.The review presents the available data on the use of warfarin, unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparins and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with liver cirrhosis, indicating the need for prevention of venous thrombosis in patients with risk factors, the possibility of preventing decompensation of cirrhosis, reducing the frequency of cardioembolic strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Abstract 17598: More Than One in Five Older Veterans are Hospitalized for Bleeding Following Initiation of Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
John A Dodson ◽  
Andrew Petrone ◽  
David Gagnon ◽  
Mary E Tinetti ◽  
Harlan M Krumholz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Anticoagulation Clinics ◽  
Comorbidity Burden

Introduction: Clinicians are hesitant to prescribe oral anticoagulants to older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) due to concerns over bleeding risk. Hypothesis: As many data on bleeding events are from trials of rigorously selected patients, we hypothesized that major bleeding events (requiring hospitalization) would be more common than previously reported. Methods: We created a retrospective cohort of 31,951 Veterans with AF aged ≥75 years who were new referrals to VA anticoagulation clinics (warfarin) from 1/1/02 - 12/31/12. Patients with comorbid conditions requiring warfarin (e.g. pulmonary embolus) were excluded. Data were extracted from the VA electronic medical record and linked with Medicare claims data for subsequent hospitalizations. The primary outcome was any hospitalization for bleeding. We identified bleeding subtypes by source, and compared characteristics of patients with and without bleeding hospitalizations. Results: Mean population age was 81.1 years, 98.1% were male, and 8.4% were nonwhite. Over a median follow-up period of 2.62 years, 7288 patients (22.8%) were hospitalized for bleeding. There were 12,004 total bleeding events; overall, 980 (13.4%) patients experienced multiple events. The most common bleeding sources (first event) were gastrointestinal (50.8%), genitourinary (21.6%), and intracranial (9.4%) (Figure). The median time to first bleeding event was 1.59 years. Patients hospitalized for bleeding were more likely to have coronary disease (48.4% vs. 40.9%, P<0.01); COPD (28.4% vs. 24.7%, P<0.01); chronic kidney disease (17.8% vs. 16.0%, P<0.01); CHF (34.7% vs. 29.5%, P<0.01), and labile INR (63.3% vs. 53.7%, P<0.01). The rate of hospitalization for stroke over the same time period was 5.0%. Conclusions: After initiating warfarin, over one in five older Veterans are hospitalized for bleeding, most commonly from a gastrointestinal source. Comorbidity burden and labile INR place these patients at increased risk.

Risks of thromboembolism and bleeding with thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: A net clinical benefit analysis using a ‘real world’ nationwide cohort study

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 739-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Lip ◽  
Jesper Lindhardsen ◽  
Deirdre Lane ◽  
Ole Ahlehoff ◽  
Morten Hansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Chads2 Score ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Net Clinical Benefit

SummaryIt was the aim of this study to determine the efficacy and safety of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), with separate analyses according to predicted thromboembolic and bleeding risk. By individual levellinkage of nationwide registries, we identified all patients discharged with non-valvular AF in Denmark (n=132,372). For every patient, the risk of stroke and bleeding was calculated by CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED. During follow-up, treatment with VKA and ASA was determined time-dependently. VKA consistently lowered the risk of thromboembolism compared to ASA and no treatment; the combination of VKA+ASA did not yield any additional benefit. In patients at high thromboembolic risk, hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for thromboembolism were: 1.81 (1.73–1.90), 1.14 (1.06–1.23), and 1.86 (1.78–1.95) for ASA, VKA+ASA, and no treatment, respectively, compared to VKA. The risk of bleeding was increased with VKA, ASA, and VKA+ASA compared to no treatment, the hazard ratios were: 1.0 (VKA; reference), 0.93 (ASA; 0.89–0.97), 1.64 (VKA+ASA; 1.55–1.74), and 0.84 (no treatment; 0.81–0.88), respectively. There was a neutral or positive net clinical benefit (ischaemic stroke vs. intracranial haemorrhage) with VKA alone in patients with a CHADS2 score of ≥ 0, and CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 1. This large cohort study confirms the efficacy of VKA and no effect of ASA treatment on the risk of stroke/thromboembolism. Also, the risk of bleeding was increased with both VKA and ASA treatment, but the net clinical benefit was clearly positive, in favour of VKA in patients with increased risk of stroke/thromboembolism.

Observation versus antiplatelet therapy as primary prophylaxis for thrombosis in low-risk essential thrombocythemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (8) ◽  
pp. 1205-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Alvarez-Larrán ◽  
Francisco Cervantes ◽  
Arturo Pereira ◽  
Eduardo Arellano-Rodrigo ◽  
Virginia Pérez-Andreu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Essential Thrombocythemia ◽  
Arterial Thrombosis ◽  
Primary Prophylaxis ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract The effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy as primary prophylaxis for thrombosis in low-risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) is not proven. In this study, the incidence rates of arterial and venous thrombosis were retrospectively analyzed in 300 low-risk patients with ET treated with antiplatelet drugs as monotherapy (n = 198) or followed with careful observation (n = 102). Follow-up was 802 and 848 person-years for antiplatelet therapy and observation, respectively. Rates of thrombotic events were 21.2 and 17.7 per 1000 person-years for antiplatelet therapy and observation, respectively (P = .6). JAK2 V617F–positive patients not receiving antiplatelet medication showed an increased risk of venous thrombosis (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 4.0; 95% CI: 1.2-12.9; P = .02). Patients with cardiovascular risk factors had increased rates of arterial thrombosis while on observation (IRR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.02-6.1; P = .047). An increased risk of major bleeding was observed in patients with platelet count greater than 1000 × 109/L under antiplatelet therapy (IRR: 5.4; 95% CI: 1.7-17.2; P = .004). In conclusion, antiplatelet therapy reduces the incidence of venous thrombosis in patients with JAK2-positive ET and the rate of arterial thrombosis in patients with associated cardiovascular risk factors. In the remaining low-risk patients, this therapy is not effective as primary prophylaxis of thrombosis, and observation may be an adequate option.

scholarly journals Exploring patient–provider decision-making for use of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Results of the INFORM-AF study

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 280-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean D Pokorney ◽  
Diane Bloom ◽  
Christopher B Granger ◽  
Kevin L Thomas ◽  
Sana M Al-Khatib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Decision Aids ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Decisional Conflict ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Outpatient Settings ◽  
Depth Interviews

Background: Atrial fibrillation is associated with stroke, yet approximately 50% of patients are not treated with guideline-directed oral anticoagulants (OACs). Aims: Given that the etiology of this gap in care is not well understood, we explored decision-making by patients and physicians regarding OAC use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Methods and results: We conducted a descriptive qualitative study among providers ( N=28) and their patients with atrial fibrillation for whom OACs were indicated ( N=25). We used purposive sampling across three outpatient settings in which atrial fibrillation patients are commonly managed: primary care ( n=14), geriatrics ( n=10), and cardiology ( n=4). Eligible patients were stratified by those prescribed OAC ( n=13) and not prescribed OAC ( n=12). Semi-structured, in-depth interviews assessed decision-making regarding risk and OAC use. Classical content analysis was used to code narratives and identify themes. Results among patients consisted of the overarching theme of trust in provider recommendations. Sub-themes included: awareness of increased risk of stroke with atrial fibrillation; willingness to accept medications recommended by their physician; and low demand for explanatory decision aids. Among physicians, the overarching theme was decisional conflict regarding the balance between stroke and bleeding risk, and the optimal medication to prescribe. Subthemes included: absence of decision aids for communication; and misperceptions around the assessment and management of stroke risk with atrial fibrillation. Conclusions: Patient involvement in decision-making around OAC use did not occur in this study of patients with atrial fibrillation. Improved access to decision aids may increase patient engagement in the decision-making process of OAC use for stroke prevention.

Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Renal Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 499-508
Author(s):  
Junaid A. B. Zaman ◽  
Anil K. Bhandari
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Additional Risk ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

The role of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established. However, none of the randomized controlled trials included patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) leaving a lack of evidence in this large, challenging and unique patient group. Patients on hemodialysis (HD) with AF have additional risk factors for stroke due to vascular comorbidities, HD treatment, age, and diabetes. Conversely, they are also at increased risk of major bleeding due to uremic platelet impairment. Anticoagulants increase bleeding risk in patients with ESRD and HD up to 10-fold compared with non chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on warfarin. There are conflicting data and recommendations regarding use of OACs in ESRD which will be reviewed in this article. We conclude by proposing a modified strategy for OAC use in ESRD based on the latest evidence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document