Nitrate leaching and pasture production from different nitrogen sources on a shallow stoney soil under flood-irrigated dairy pasture

Soil Research ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 317 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Di ◽  
K. C. Cameron

The leaching of nitrate (NO3–) in intensive agricultural production systems, e.g. dairy pastures, is a major environmental concern in many countries. In this lysimeter study we determined the amount of NO3– leached following the application of urea, dairy effluent, urine returns, and pasture renovation to a freedraining Lismore stony silt loam (Udic Haplustept loamy skeletal) growing a mixture of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and white clover (Trifolium repens) pasture. The study showed that NO3–-N leaching losses ranged from 112 to 162 kg N/ha per year, depending on the amount and forms of N applied and pasture conditions. Nitrate leaching under the urine patches was the main contributor to the N leaching loss in a grazed paddock. Nitrate leaching losses were lower for urine applied in the spring (29% of N applied) than for urine applied in the autumn (38–58%). The application of urea or dairy effluent only contributed a small proportion to the total NO3– leaching loss in a grazed paddock. Pasture renovation by direct-drilling may also have caused an increase in NO3– leaching (c. 31 kg N/ha) in the first year. Modelled annual average NO3–-N concentrations in the mixed recharge water in the acquifer were significantly lower than those measured under the rooting zone due to dilution effects by recharge water from other sources (3.9 v. 13–27 mg N/L). Herbage nitrogen offtake and dry matter yield were higher in the urine treatments than in the non-urine treatments. groundwater, denitrification, mineralisation, grazing, forage.

Author(s):  
Cecile De Klein ◽  
Jim Paton ◽  
Stewart Ledgard

Strategic de-stocking in winter is a common management practice on dairy farms in Southland, New Zealand, to protect the soil against pugging damage. This paper examines whether this practice can also be used to reduce nitrate leaching losses. Model analyses and field measurements were used to estimate nitrate leaching losses and pasture production under two strategic de-stocking regimes: 3 months off-farm or 5 months on a feed pad with effluent collected and applied back to the land. The model analyses, based on the results of a long-term farmlet study under conventional grazing and on information for an average New Zealand farm, suggested that the 3- or 5-month de-stocking could reduce nitrate leaching losses by about 20% or 35-50%, respectively compared to a conventional grazing system. Field measurements on the Taieri Plain in Otago support these findings, although the results to date are confounded by drought conditions during the 1998 and 1999 seasons. The average nitrate concentration of the drainage water of a 5-month strategic de-stocking treatment was about 60% lower than under conventional grazing. Pasture production of the 5-month strategic de-stocking regime with effluent return was estimated based on data for apparent N efficiency of excreta patches versus uniformlyspread farm dairy effluent N. The results suggested that a strategic de-stocking regime could increase pasture production by about 2 to 8%. A cost/ benefit analysis of the 5-month de-stocking system using a feed pad, comparing additional capital and operational costs with additional income from a 5% increase in DM production, show a positive return on capital for an average New Zealand dairy farm. This suggests that a strategic destocking system has good potential as a management tool to reduce nitrate leaching losses in nitrate sensitive areas whilst being economically viable, particularly on farms where an effluent application system or a feed pad are already in place. Keywords: dairying, feed pads, nitrate leaching, nitrogen efficiency, productivity, strategic de-stocking


Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengxin Zheng ◽  
Zhanyu Zhang ◽  
Yunyu Wu ◽  
Richwell Mwiya

The use of water-saving irrigation techniques has been encouraged in rice fields in response to irrigation water scarcity. Straw return is an important means of straw reuse. However, the environmental impact of this technology, e.g., nitrogen leaching loss, must be further explored. A two-year (2017–2018) experiment was conducted to investigate the vertical migration and leaching of nitrogen in paddy fields under water-saving and straw return conditions. Treatments included traditional flood irrigation (FI) and two water-saving irrigation regimes: rain-catching and controlled irrigation (RC-CI) and drought planting with straw mulching (DP-SM). RC-CI and DP-SM both significantly decreased the irrigation input compared with FI. RC-CI increased the rice yield by 8.23%~12.26%, while DP-SM decreased it by 8.98%~15.24% compared with FI. NH4+-N was the main form of the nitrogen leaching loss in percolation water, occupying 49.06%~50.97% of TN leaching losses. The NH4+-N and TN concentration showed a decreasing trend from top to bottom in soil water of 0~54 cm depth, while the concentration of NO3−-N presented the opposite behavior. The TN and NH4+-N concentrations in percolation water of RC-CI during most of the rice growth stage were the highest among treatments in both years, and DP-SM showed a trend of decreasing TN and NH4+-N concentrations. The NO3−-N concentrations in percolation water showed a regular pattern of DP-SM > RC-CI > FI during most of the rice growth stage. RC-CI and DP-SM remarkably reduced the amount of N leaching losses compared to FI as a result of the significant decrease of percolation water volumes. The tillering and jointing-booting stages were the two critical periods of N leaching (accounted for 74.85%~86.26% of N leaching losses). Great promotion potential of RC-CI and DP-SM exists in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River, China, and DP-SM needs to be further optimized.


2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 1336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronaldo Vibart ◽  
Alec Mackay ◽  
Andrew Wall ◽  
Iris Vogeler ◽  
Josef Beautrais ◽  
...  

Farm-scale models were integrated with spatially discrete estimates of pasture production to examine the potential farm and regional implications of removing palm-kernel expeller (PKE) as a supplementary feed from dairy farms in Southland, New Zealand. The following two farm-production systems representing the majority of dairy farms in the region were modelled: a System 3 farm (D3; mid-intensification, with 10–20% of imported feed) and a System 4 farm (D4; mid- to high intensification, with 20–30% of imported feed). Within each system, the impact of the following four PKE options was explored: (1) a control with PKE (Baseline); (2) no PKE, with fewer cows producing the same amount of milk per cow as in Baseline; (3) no PKE, with the same number of cows producing less milk per cow than in Baseline; and (4) PKE replaced with barley grain. Barley grain provides for similar flexibility (timing of purchase and feeding), and can be sourced locally. Faced with the need to remove PKE as a dietary ingredient, farmers would benefit from adopting the second PKE option (no PKE, with fewer cows producing the same amount of milk per cow as in Baseline); farm-operating profits were reduced by only 3% (compared with 30% of System 4 farms adopting the third PKE option, i.e. no PKE, with the same number of cows producing less milk per cow than in Baseline) relative to the Baseline farms. The narrow range of mean annual nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate-N) leaching losses (estimates ranged from 30 to 33 kg N/ha) reflects similar estimates of N intake and N excreted in urine across the modelled options. Substantial amounts of barley grain would need to be transported into the region or produced locally to replace PKE.


Author(s):  
C.G. Roach ◽  
G. Stevens ◽  
D.A. Clark ◽  
P. Nicholas

encouraged by many regional councils, and the use of urea fertiliser on dairy farms has increased over recent years. A 3-year trial was started in September 1997 to investigate the effects of urea and dairy effluent applications on pastures, soils and groundwater quality. Twenty-one 0.25 ha paddocks received urea or dairy effluent at rates of 0, 100, 200, or 400 kg N/ha/yr, and were grazed by dairy cows. Increasing nitrogen application rates resulted in increased pasture production and ryegrass content, and nitrate leaching to ground water. Nitrate leaching was estimated to be 14, 18, 26 and 56 kg N/ha/yr for the 0, 100, 200 and 400 kg N/ha/yr application rates respectively. No differences in these responses were measured between urea and effluent when applied at the same rate of nitrogen. Application of dairy effluent resulted in increased average pasture potassium levels from 3.65%DM to 4.00%DM, which may have implications for animal health. Application of dairy effluent also decreased soil sulphur levels and increased soil magnesium status. Keywords: dairy effluent, groundwater, nitrate leaching, nitrogen, pasture, soil, urea


HortScience ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 531g-532
Author(s):  
T.K. Hartz

Trials were conducted under California field conditions examining the impact of drip irrigation and nitrogen fertigation regime on in-season NO3-N leaching losses. Six field studies were conducted, 4 on tomato and 2 on pepper. Seasonal fertigation ranged from 0-440 kg N/ha; irrigation was applied 3X per week, with leaching fractions of 10-25% of applied water. NO3-N leaching losses were estimated both by suction lysimetry and the use of buried anion resin traps. A similar pattern was seen in all trials. From transplant establishment until early fruit set soil solution at 0.8 m had relatively high NO3-N concentration (>30 mg/liter), which declined as the season progressed; in the month before harvest soil solution NO3-N at 0.8 m was consistently below 10 mg/liter (tomato) and 15 mg/liter (pepper) in appropriately fertilized plots. Seasonal NO3-N leaching estimates were generally below 25 kg/ha (tomato) and 35 kg/ha (pepper), with only modest differences among fertigation regimes. These results suggest that well managed drip irrigation can minimize in-season NO3-N leaching.


Author(s):  
K.C. Cameron ◽  
H.J. Di ◽  
J.L. Moir ◽  
A.H.C. Roberts

The decline in water quality in Lake Taupo has been attributed to nitrogen (N) leaching from surrounding land areas. Pastoral agriculture has been identified as a significant contributor to this N transfer to the lake through animal urine deposition. There is therefore an immediate need for new management options to reduce N losses. The objective of this study was to measure the effectiveness of using a nitrification inhibitor (eco-n) to reduce nitrate leaching losses from a pasture soil of the Taupo region. A 3-year study was conducted using 20 lysimeters on Landcorp's 'Waihora' sheep and beef farm, within 10 km of Lake Taupo. The results show that animal urine patches were the main source of nitrate leaching (>95% of the total annual loss) and that eco-n significantly (P


Soil Research ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 225 ◽  
Author(s):  
SK Gupta ◽  
TN Chaudhary ◽  
RN Pandey

The field evaluation and prediction of nitrate-nitrogen movement are given for varying rates of irrigation and urea application to wheat growing on a sandy soil. Nitrate leaching increased and depth to peak concentration moved deeper with heavier irrigation. Larger splits of nitrogen in combination with light irrigation reduced the leaching loss, permitting greater utilization of nitrogen by plants. Under heavier irrigation, the amount of residual nitrogen increased with the number of nitrogen splits. A simple analytical solution has been presented for predicting the movement of surface applied solutes. The solution can be used for predicting nitrate leaching losses. The applicability of the expression in determining depth to peak concentration is established under a variety of situations.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Valkama ◽  
Marco Acutis

<p>Reviews and meta-analyses generally support the perception that organic farming systems are more environmentally friendly than conventional farming systems. Organic agriculture results in more soil organic matter and higher microbiological activity, thus, providing better water holding capabilities, decreased both runoff and concentration of nitrate in soil, leading to fewer risks of nitrate leaching loss from the soil to water bodies. However, environmental quality parameters can differ between organic plant and animal production farms, moreover, they can be higher calculated per unit product.</p><p>We used the ARMOSA process-based crop model (Valkama et al., 2020) to evaluate contribution of plant and animal organic farming to soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration and N leaching loss reduction compare to conventional systems in South Savo (Finland). Since organic systems often produce about 30% less yields compared to conventional systems, we calculated SOC changes per total gross energy in harvested yields. For model inputs we used daily meteorological data, statistical annual crop yields, statistical data for sales of nitrogen fertilizers in the region during the last 20 years (1999-2018). Five-year crop rotations were simulated on loamy sand soil (C 3.5 %, C/N ratio 17, pH 6.2). On plant production farms, rotations consisted of cereals (with addition of pea in organic), oilseed rape and grass. Conventional crops were fertilized with mineral fertilizer, and residues were removed (PC-R) or retained (PC+R). Organic crops were fertilized with green manure only (PO<sub>g</sub>+R) or also with commercial organic fertilizer (PO<sub>f</sub>+R). On animal production farms, conventional (AC-R) and organic (AO-R) rotations consisted of 2 years of cereals and 3 years of grass, sown with clover in organic system. Conventional animal system was fertilized with mineral fertilizer and slurry, while organic system with slurry only, and residues were removed in both systems.</p><p>Simulations showed that both conventional plant production systems (PC-R and PC+R) led to SOC decline of 650 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup> at 0-30 cm soil depth. Organic systems showed either less SOC decline (120 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup>) as in PO<sub>g</sub>+R, or slight SOC increase (55 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup>) as in PO<sub>f</sub>+R. In contrast, organic animal production system did not differ from conventional system in terms of SOC change, showing a slight decreasing trend of about 150 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup>. Estimates of SOC per gross energy in harvested yields showed the highest value (1.3 kg GJ<sup>-1</sup>) for organic plant production fertilized with commercial organic fertilizer (PO<sub>f</sub>+R), while the lowest value (-18 and -13 kg GJ<sup>-1</sup>) for conventional plant production systems (PC-R and PC+R, respectively). In contrast, the estimates did not differ much between organic (-2.2 kg GJ<sup>-1</sup>) and conventional (-1.8 kg GJ<sup>-1</sup>) animal production systems. Simulated N leaching loss varied between 6 and 9 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> for all systems, except for organic plant rotation with green manure (PO<sub>g</sub>+R), which N leaching loss was only 3 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>. </p><p>The modelling results suggest that organic plant production farms can be more environmentally friendly per unit area as well as per unit product compared to conventional farms, while organic animal production farms seem to cause similar environmental impact as conventional farms.</p>


Author(s):  
P.A. Bishop ◽  
H.Y. Liu ◽  
M.J. Hedley ◽  
P. Loganathan

In a field trial the application of 5 and 7% polyurethane coated controlled release urea, 10% dicyanodiamide coated urea and three x 50 split urea (SU) applications at 150 kg N/ha (150 N) increased winter pasture dry matter (DM) production of Italian ryegrass over the June-September period by between 1666 to 2240 kg DM/ha. These treatments also reduced nitrate leaching losses from 6.8 to 1 kg N/ha compared to urea (U). Keywords: controlled release urea, nitrogen utilisation, pasture, ryegrass


1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 191-197
Author(s):  
T. Németh ◽  
L. Pásztor ◽  
J. Szabó

After the growing season, a part of the nitrogen remains in forms sensitive to changes of the conditions, such as nitrate. In years with above-average precipitation a significant amount of nitrate can leave the rooting zone. Integration of knowledge related to environmental conditions of a certain area with the soil, water, and crop management practices helps to prevent the simultaneity of the unfavourable processes leading to nitrate leaching, thus water resources may be protected from nitrate pollution of agricultural origin. In our work we present a stochastic approach for the evaluation of the vulnerability of soils for nitrate leaching. The method was applied for mapping N-leaching hazard in Hungary at a scale of 1:1M.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document