scholarly journals Role of the Cytoplasmic Segments of Sec61α in the Ribosome-Binding and Translocation-Promoting Activities of the Sec61 Complex

2000 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Raden ◽  
Weiqun Song ◽  
Reid Gilmore
Keyword(s):  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Immunoblot Analysis ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Dual Function ◽  
Cleavage Sites ◽  
Critical Determinant ◽  
Ribosome Binding ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Nascent Chain

The Sec61 complex performs a dual function in protein translocation across the RER, serving as both the high affinity ribosome receptor and the translocation channel. To define regions of the Sec61 complex that are involved in ribosome binding and translocation promotion, ribosome-stripped microsomes were subjected to limited digestions using proteases with different cleavage specificities. Protein immunoblot analysis using antibodies specific for the NH2 and COOH terminus of Sec61α was used to map the location of proteolysis cleavage sites. We observed a striking correlation between the loss of binding activity for nontranslating ribosomes and the digestion of the COOH- terminal tail or cytoplasmic loop 8 of Sec61α. The proteolyzed microsomes were assayed for SRP-independent translocation activity to determine whether high affinity binding of the ribosome to the Sec61 complex is a prerequisite for nascent chain transport. Microsomes that do not bind nontranslating ribosomes at physiological ionic strength remain active in SRP-independent translocation, indicating that the ribosome binding and translocation promotion activities of the Sec61 complex do not strictly correlate. Translocation-promoting activity was most severely inhibited by cleavage of cytosolic loop 6, indicating that this segment is a critical determinant for this function of the Sec61 complex.

scholarly journals Ribosome binding to the endoplasmic reticulum: a 180-kD protein identified by crosslinking to membrane-bound ribosomes is not required for ribosome binding activity.

1991 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
P G Collins ◽  
R Gilmore
Keyword(s):  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Membrane Vesicles ◽  
Immunoblot Analysis ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Size Exclusion ◽  
Ribosome Binding ◽  
Specific Subset ◽  
Microsomal Membranes ◽  
Membrane Bound

We have used the membrane-impermeable, thiol-cleavable, crosslinker 3,3'-dithio bis (sulfosuccinimidylpropionate) to identify proteins that are in the vicinity of membrane-bound ribosomes of the RER. A specific subset of RER proteins was reproducibly crosslinked to the ribosome. Immunoblot analysis of the crosslinked products with antibodies raised against signal recognition particle receptor, ribophorin I, and the 35-kD subunit of the signal sequence receptor demonstrated that these translocation components had been crosslinked to the ribosome, but each to a different extent. The most prominent polypeptide among the crosslinked products was a 180-kD protein that has recently been proposed to be a ribosome receptor (Savitz, A.J., and D.I. Meyer, 1990. Nature (Lond.). 346: 540-544). RER membrane proteins were reconstituted into liposomes and assayed with radiolabeled ribosomes to determine whether ribosome binding activity could be ascribed to the 180-kD protein. Differential detergent extraction was used to prepare soluble extracts of microsomal membrane vesicles that either contained or lacked the 180-kD protein. Liposomes reconstituted from both extracts bound ribosomes with essentially identical affinity. Additional fractionation experiments demonstrated that the bulk of the ribosome binding activity present in detergent extracts of microsomal membranes could be readily resolved from the 180-kD protein by size exclusion chromatography. Taken together, we conclude that the 180-kD protein is in the vicinity of membrane bound ribosomes, yet does not correspond to the ribosome receptor.

scholarly journals Binding of ribosomes to the rough endoplasmic reticulum mediated by the Sec61p-complex.

1994 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 925-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
K U Kalies ◽  
D Görlich ◽  
T A Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Salt Concentration ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Tight Binding ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Ribosome Binding ◽  
Ribosome Binding Sites ◽  
Low Salt ◽  
Unspecific Binding ◽  
Membrane Anchoring

The cotranslational translocation of proteins across the ER membrane involves the tight binding of translating ribosomes to the membrane, presumably to ribosome receptors. The identity of the latter has been controversial. One putative receptor candidate is Sec61 alpha, a multi-spanning membrane protein that is associated with two additional membrane proteins (Sec61 beta and gamma) to form the Sec61p-complex. Other receptors of 34 and 180 kD have also been proposed on the basis of their ability to bind at low salt concentration ribosomes lacking nascent chains. We now show that the Sec61p-complex has also binding activity but that, at low salt conditions, it accounts for only one third of the total binding sites in proteoliposomes reconstituted from a detergent extract of ER membranes. Under these conditions, the assay has also limited specificity with respect to ribosomes. However, if the ribosome-binding assay is performed at physiological salt concentration, most of the unspecific binding is lost; the Sec61p-complex then accounts for the majority of specific ribosome-binding sites in reconstituted ER membranes. To study the membrane interaction of ribosomes participating in protein translocation, native rough microsomes were treated with proteases. The amount of membrane-bound ribosomes is only slightly reduced by protease treatment, consistent with the protease-resistance of Sec61 alpha which is shielded by these ribosomes. In contrast, p34 and p180 can be readily degraded, indicating that they are not essential for the membrane anchoring of ribosomes in protease-treated microsomes. These data provide further evidence that the Sec61p-complex is responsible for the membrane-anchoring of ribosomes during translocation and make it unlikely that p34 or p180 are essential for this process.

scholarly journals The signal sequence receptor, unlike the signal recognition particle receptor, is not essential for protein translocation

1992 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Migliaccio ◽  
CV Nicchitta ◽  
G Blobel
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Protein ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Chain Complex ◽  
Secretory Protein ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Ribosome Binding ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle Receptor ◽  
Nascent Chain

Detergent extracts of canine pancreas rough microsomal membranes were depleted of either the signal recognition particle receptor (SR), which mediates the signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of the ribosome/nascent chain complex to the membrane, or the signal sequence receptor (SSR), which has been proposed to function as a membrane bound receptor for the newly targeted nascent chain and/or as a component of a multi-protein translocation complex responsible for transfer of the nascent chain across the membrane. Depletion of the two components was performed by chromatography of detergent extracts on immunoaffinity supports. Detergent extracts lacking either SR or SSR were reconstituted and assayed for activity with respect to SR dependent elongation arrest release, nascent chain targeting, ribosome binding, secretory precursor translocation, and membrane protein integration. Depletion of SR resulted in the loss of elongation arrest release activity, nascent chain targeting, secretory protein translocation, and membrane protein integration, although ribosome binding was unaffected. Full activity was restored by addition of immunoaffinity purified SR before reconstitution of the detergent extract. Surprisingly, depletion of SSR was without effect on any of the assayed activities, indicating that SSR is either not required for translocation or is one of a family of functionally redundant components.

scholarly journals The β Subunit of the Sec61 Complex Facilitates Cotranslational Protein Transport and Interacts with the Signal Peptidase during Translocation

1998 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 887-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Uwe Kalies ◽  
Tom A. Rapoport ◽  
Enno Hartmann
Keyword(s):  
Protein Transport ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Peptidase ◽  
Central Component ◽  
Β Subunit ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Cross Links ◽  
Membrane Bound ◽  
First Time

The Sec61 complex is the central component of the protein translocation apparatus of the ER membrane. We have addressed the role of the β subunit (Sec61β) during cotranslational protein translocation. With a reconstituted system, we show that a Sec61 complex lacking Sec61β is essentially inactive when elongation and membrane targeting of a nascent chain occur at the same time. The translocation process is perturbed at a step where the nascent chain would be inserted into the translocation channel. However, if sufficient time is given for the interaction of the nascent polypeptide with the mutant Sec61 complex, translocation is almost normal. Thus Sec61β kinetically facilitates cotranslational translocation, but is not essential for it. Using chemical cross-linking we show that Sec61β not only interacts with subunits of the Sec61 complex but also with the 25-kD subunit of the signal peptidase complex (SPC25), thus demonstrating for the first time a tight interaction between the SPC and the Sec61 complex. Interestingly, the cross-links between Sec61β and SPC25 and between Sec61β and Sec61α depend on the presence of membrane-bound ribosomes, suggesting that these interactions are induced when translocation is initiated. We propose that the SPC is transiently recruited to the translocation site, thus enhancing its activity.

scholarly journals A dual role of the ribosome-bound chaperones RAC/Ssb in maintaining the fidelity of translation termination

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (13) ◽  
pp. 7018-7034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Gribling-Burrer ◽  
Marco Chiabudini ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Zonghao Qiu ◽  
Mario Scazzari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crucial Role ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Translation Termination ◽  
Peptidyl Transferase ◽  
Ribosome Stalling ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Shed Light ◽  
Combined Data

Abstract The yeast ribosome-associated complex RAC and the Hsp70 homolog Ssb are anchored to the ribosome and together act as chaperones for the folding and co-translational assembly of nascent polypeptides. In addition, the RAC/Ssb system plays a crucial role in maintaining the fidelity of translation termination; however, the latter function is poorly understood. Here we show that the RAC/Ssb system promotes the fidelity of translation termination via two distinct mechanisms. First, via direct contacts with the ribosome and the nascent chain, RAC/Ssb facilitates the translation of stalling-prone poly-AAG/A sequences encoding for polylysine segments. Impairment of this function leads to enhanced ribosome stalling and to premature nascent polypeptide release at AAG/A codons. Second, RAC/Ssb is required for the assembly of fully functional ribosomes. When RAC/Ssb is absent, ribosome biogenesis is hampered such that core ribosomal particles are structurally altered at the decoding and peptidyl transferase centers. As a result, ribosomes assembled in the absence of RAC/Ssb bind to the aminoglycoside paromomycin with high affinity (KD = 76.6 nM) and display impaired discrimination between stop codons and sense codons. The combined data shed light on the multiple mechanisms by which the RAC/Ssb system promotes unimpeded biogenesis of newly synthesized polypeptides.

scholarly journals Ribosome Binding to and Dissociation from Translocation Sites of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 3860-3869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Schaletzky ◽  
Tom A. Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Structural Data ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Ribosome Binding ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Nascent Chain

We have addressed how ribosome-nascent chain complexes (RNCs), associated with the signal recognition particle (SRP), can be targeted to Sec61 translocation channels of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane when all binding sites are occupied by nontranslating ribosomes. These competing ribosomes are known to be bound with high affinity to tetramers of the Sec61 complex. We found that the membrane binding of RNC–SRP complexes does not require or cause the dissociation of prebound nontranslating ribosomes, a process that is extremely slow. SRP and its receptor target RNCs to a free population of Sec61 complex, which associates with nontranslating ribosomes only weakly and is conformationally different from the population of ribosome-bound Sec61 complex. Taking into account recent structural data, we propose a model in which SRP and its receptor target RNCs to a Sec61 subpopulation of monomeric or dimeric state. This could explain how RNC–SRP complexes can overcome the competition by nontranslating ribosomes.

scholarly journals The dynamic action of SecA during the initiation of protein translocation

2013 ◽  
Vol 449 (3) ◽  
pp. 695-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicki A. M. Gold ◽  
Sarah Whitehouse ◽  
Alice Robson ◽  
Ian Collinson
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Protein Transport ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Alternative Position ◽  
Opening And Closing

The motor ATPase SecA drives protein secretion through the bacterial Sec complex. The PPXD (pre-protein cross-linking domain) of the enzyme has been observed in different positions, effectively opening and closing a clamp for the polypeptide substrate. We set out to explore the implicated dynamic role of the PPXD in protein translocation by examining the effects of its immobilization, either in the position occupied in SecA alone with the clamp held open or when in complex with SecYEG with the clamp closed. We show that the conformational change from the former to the latter is necessary for high-affinity association with SecYEG and a corresponding activation of ATPase activity, presumably due to the PPXD contacting the NBDs (nucleotide-binding domains). In either state, the immobilization prevents pre-protein transport. However, when the PPXD was attached to an alternative position in the associated SecYEG complex, with the clamp closed, the transport capability was preserved. Therefore large-scale conformational changes of this domain are required for the initiation process, but not for translocation itself. The results allow us to refine a model for protein translocation, in which the mobility of the PPXD facilitates the transfer of pre-protein from SecA to SecYEG.

The Role of the Initiator System in the Synthesis of Acidic Multifunctional Nanoparticles Designed for Molecular Imprinting of Proteins

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-41
Author(s):  
Marwa Aly Ahmed ◽  
Júlia Erdőssy ◽  
Viola Horváth
Keyword(s):  
Acrylic Acid ◽  
Binding Affinity ◽  
Molecular Imprinting ◽  
Low Temperatures ◽  
Ammonium Persulfate ◽  
Sodium Bisulfite ◽  
Multifunctional Nanoparticles ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Initiator System

Multifunctional nanoparticles have been shown earlier to bind certain proteins with high affinity and the binding affinity could be enhanced by molecular imprinting of the target protein. In this work different initiator systems were used and compared during the synthesis of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid-co-N-tert-butylacrylamide) nanoparticles with respect to their future applicability in molecular imprinting of lysozyme. The decomposition of ammonium persulfate initiator was initiated either thermally at 60 °C or by using redox activators, namely tetramethylethylenediamine or sodium bisulfite at low temperatures. Morphology differences in the resulting nanoparticles have been revealed using scanning electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering. During polymerization the conversion of each monomer was followed in time. Striking differences were demonstrated in the incorporation rate of acrylic acid between the tetramethylethylenediamine catalyzed initiation and the other systems. This led to a completely different nanoparticle microstructure the consequence of which was the distinctly lower lysozyme binding affinity. On the contrary, the use of sodium bisulfite activation resulted in similar nanoparticle structural homogeneity and protein binding affinity as the thermal initiation.

Redox State in Atrial Fibrillation Pathogenesis and Relevant Therapeutic Approaches

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexios S. Antonopoulos ◽  
Athina Goliopoulou ◽  
Evangelos Oikonomou ◽  
Sotiris Tsalamandris ◽  
Georgios-Angelos Papamikroulis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Redox State ◽  
Redox Balance ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Critical Determinant ◽  
Electrophysiological Properties ◽  
Antioxidant Agents ◽  
Clinical Benefits

Background: Myocardial redox state is a critical determinant of atrial biology, regulating cardiomyocyte apoptosis, ion channel function, and cardiac hypertrophy/fibrosis and function. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether the targeting of atrial redox state is a rational therapeutic strategy for atrial fibrillation prevention. Objective: To review the role of atrial redox state and anti-oxidant therapies in atrial fibrillation. Method: Published literature in Medline was searched for experimental and clinical evidence linking myocardial redox state with atrial fibrillation pathogenesis as well as studies looking into the role of redoxtargeting therapies in the prevention of atrial fibrillation. Results: Data from animal models have shown that altered myocardial nitroso-redox balance and NADPH oxidases activity are causally involved in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation. Similarly experimental animal data supports that increased reactive oxygen / nitrogen species formation in the atrial tissue is associated with altered electrophysiological properties of atrial myocytes and electrical remodeling, favoring atrial fibrillation development. In humans, randomized clinical studies using redox-related therapeutic approaches (e.g. statins or antioxidant agents) have not documented any benefits in the prevention of atrial fibrillation development (mainly post-operative atrial fibrillation risk). Conclusion: Despite strong experimental and translational data supporting the role of atrial redox state in atrial fibrillation pathogenesis, such mechanistic evidence has not been translated to clinical benefits in atrial fibrillation risk in randomized clinical studies using redox-related therapies.

Acid-Sensing Ion Channels

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Gründer
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Ion Channels ◽  
Excitatory Synapses ◽  
Detailed Characterization ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Acid Sensing Ion Channels ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Pathological Pain

Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are proton-gated Na+ channels. Being almost ubiquitously present in neurons of the vertebrate nervous system, their precise function remained obscure for a long time. Various animal toxins that bind to ASICs with high affinity and specificity have been tremendously helpful in uncovering the role of ASICs. We now know that they contribute to synaptic transmission at excitatory synapses as well as to sensing metabolic acidosis and nociception. Moreover, detailed characterization of mouse models uncovered an unanticipated role of ASICs in disorders of the nervous system like stroke, multiple sclerosis, and pathological pain. This review provides an overview on the expression, structure, and pharmacology of ASICs plus a summary of what is known and what is still unknown about their physiological functions and their roles in diseases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document