scholarly journals Novel Control of S Phase of the Cell Cycle by Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzyme H7

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Whitcomb ◽  
Edward J. Dudek ◽  
Qing Liu ◽  
Allen Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Proteolytic Pathway ◽  
Dynamic Cell ◽  
Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme ◽  
Phase Progression ◽  
Cycle Dependent ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Timely degradation of regulatory proteins by the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway (UPP) is an established paradigm of cell cycle regulation during the G2/M and G1/S transitions. Less is known about roles for the UPP during S phase. Here we present evidence that dynamic cell cycle–dependent changes in levels of UbcH7 regulate entrance into and progression through S phase. In diverse cell lines, UbcH7 protein levels are dramatically reduced in S phase but are fully restored by G2. Knockdown of UbcH7 increases the proportion of cells in S phase and doubles the time to traverse S phase, whereas UbcH7 overexpression reduces the proportion of cells in S phase. These data suggest a role for UbcH7 targets in the completion of S phase and entry into G2. Notably, UbcH7 knockdown was coincident with elevated levels of the checkpoint kinase Chk1 but not Chk2. These results argue that UbcH7 promotes S phase progression to G2 by modulating the intra-S phase checkpoint mediated by Chk1. Furthermore, UbcH7 levels appear to be regulated by a UPP. Together the data identify novel roles for the UPP, specifically UbcH7 in the regulation of S phase transit time as well as in cell proliferation.

scholarly journals A novel pool of protein phosphatase 2A is associated with microtubules and is regulated during the cell cycle.

1995 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 1131-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Sontag ◽  
V Nunbhakdi-Craig ◽  
G S Bloom ◽  
M C Mumby
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Enzymatic Activity ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 2A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phosphatase 2A ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Cycle Dependent ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed the presence of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) on microtubules in neuronal and nonneuronal cells. Interphase and mitotic spindle microtubules, as well as centrosomes, were all labeled with antibodies against individual PP2A subunits, showing that the AB alpha C holoenzyme is associated with microtubules. Biochemical analysis showed that PP2A could be reversibly bound to microtubules in vitro and that approximately 75% of the PP2A in cytosolic extracts could interact with microtubules. The activity of microtubule-associated PP2A was differentially regulated during the cell cycle. Enzymatic activity was high during S phase and intermediate during G1, while the activity in G2 and M was 20-fold lower than during S phase. The amount of microtubule-bound PP2A remained constant throughout the cell cycle, implying that cell cycle regulation of its enzymatic activity involves factors other than microtubules. These results raise the possibility that PP2A regulates cell cycle-dependent microtubule functions, such as karyokinesis and membrane transport.

Dynamic cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation modulates CENP-L-CENP-N centromere recruitment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra P Navarro ◽  
Iain M Cheeseman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Dynamic Cell ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cycle Dependent ◽  
Unique Cell ◽  
Localization Behavior ◽  
Constitutive Phosphorylation

The kinetochore is a macromolecular structure that is required to ensure proper chromosome segregation during each cell division. The kinetochore is assembled upon a platform of the 16-subunit Constitutive Centromere Associated Network (CCAN), which is present at centromeres throughout the cell cycle. The nature and regulation of CCAN assembly, interactions, and dynamics required to facilitate changing centromere properties and requirements remain to be fully elucidated. The CENP-LN CCAN sub-complex displays a unique cell cycle-dependent localization behavior, peaking in S phase. Here, we demonstrate that phosphorylation of CENP-L and CENP-N controls CENP-LN complex formation and localization in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Mimicking constitutive phosphorylation of either CENP-L or CENP-N or simultaneously preventing phosphorylation of both proteins prevents CENP-LN localization and disrupts chromosome segregation. Together, our work suggests that cycles of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation are critical for CENP-LN complex recruitment and dynamics at centromeres to enable cell cycle-dependent CCAN reorganization.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle-Regulated Transcription of CENP-A by the MBF Complex Ensures Optimal Level of CENP-A for Centromere Formation

Genetics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 211 (3) ◽  
pp. 861-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Aristizabal-Corrales ◽  
Jinpu Yang ◽  
Fei Li
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Optimal Level ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Temporal Control ◽  
Centromere Function ◽  
Histone H3 Variant ◽  
Cycle Dependent ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle ◽  
Cycle Regulation

The centromere plays an essential role in chromosome segregation. In most eukaryotes, centromeres are epigenetically defined by the conserved histone H3 variant CENP-A. Proper centromere assembly is dependent upon the tight regulation of CENP-A level. Cell cycle regulation of CENP-A transcription appears to be a universal feature across eukaryotes, but the molecular mechanism underlying the temporal control of CENP-A transcription and how such regulation contributes to centromere function remains elusive. CENP-A in fission yeast has been shown to be transcribed before S phase. Using various synchronization methods, we confirmed that CENP-A transcription occurs at G1, leading to an almost twofold increase of the protein during S phase. Through a genetic screen, we identified the MBF (MluI box-binding factors) complex as a key regulator of temporal control of CENP-A transcription. The periodic transcription of CENP-A is lost in MBF mutants, resulting in CENP-A mislocalization and chromosome segregation defects. We identified the MCB (MluI cell cycle box) motif in the CENP-A promoter, and further showed that the MBF complex binds to the motif to restrict CENP-A transcription to G1. Mutations of the MCB motif cause constitutive CENP-A expression and deleterious effects on cell survival. Using promoters driving transcription to different cell cycle stages, we found that timing of CENP-A transcription is dispensable for its centromeric localization. Our data instead indicate that cell cycle-regulated CENP-A transcription is a key step to ensure that a proper amount of CENP-A is generated across generations. This study provides mechanistic insights into the regulation of cell cycle-dependent CENP-A transcription, as well as its importance on centromere function.

scholarly journals The Meiosis-Specific Crs1 Cyclin Is Required for Efficient S-Phase Progression and Stable Nuclear Architecture

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 5483
Author(s):  
Luisa F. Bustamante-Jaramillo ◽  
Celia Ramos ◽  
Cristina Martín-Castellanos
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Architecture ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Single Wave ◽  
Phase Progression

Cyclins and CDKs (Cyclin Dependent Kinases) are key players in the biology of eukaryotic cells, representing hubs for the orchestration of physiological conditions with cell cycle progression. Furthermore, as in the case of meiosis, cyclins and CDKs have acquired novel functions unrelated to this primal role in driving the division cycle. Meiosis is a specialized developmental program that ensures proper propagation of the genetic information to the next generation by the production of gametes with accurate chromosome content, and meiosis-specific cyclins are widespread in evolution. We have explored the diversification of CDK functions studying the meiosis-specific Crs1 cyclin in fission yeast. In addition to the reported role in DSB (Double Strand Break) formation, this cyclin is required for meiotic S-phase progression, a canonical role, and to maintain the architecture of the meiotic chromosomes. Crs1 localizes at the SPB (Spindle Pole Body) and is required to stabilize the cluster of telomeres at this location (bouquet configuration), as well as for normal SPB motion. In addition, Crs1 exhibits CDK(Cdc2)-dependent kinase activity in a biphasic manner during meiosis, in contrast to a single wave of protein expression, suggesting a post-translational control of its activity. Thus, Crs1 displays multiple functions, acting both in cell cycle progression and in several key meiosis-specific events.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle-Dependent Expression of Mammalian E2-C Regulated by the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 2821-2831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Yamanaka ◽  
Shigetsugu Hatakeyama ◽  
Kin-ichiro Kominami ◽  
Masatoshi Kitagawa ◽  
Masaki Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Substrate Specificity ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Polyubiquitin Chain ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme ◽  
Recognition Motifs ◽  
Cycle Dependent ◽  
Conjugating Enzyme

Progression through mitosis requires the precisely timed ubiquitin-dependent degradation of specific substrates. E2-C is a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme that plays a critical role with anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) in progression of and exit from M phase. Here we report that mammalian E2-C is expressed in late G2/M phase and is degraded as cells exit from M phase. The mammalian E2-C shows an autoubiquitinating activity leading to covalent conjugation to itself with several ubiquitins. The ubiquitination of E2-C is strongly enhanced by APC/C, resulting in the formation of a polyubiquitin chain. The polyubiquitination of mammalian E2-C occurs only when cells exit from M phase. Furthermore, mammalian E2-C contains two putative destruction boxes that are believed to act as recognition motifs for APC/C. The mutation of this motif reduced the polyubiquitination of mammalian E2-C, resulting in its stabilization. These results suggest that mammalian E2-C is itself a substrate of the APC/C-dependent proteolysis machinery, and that the periodic expression of mammalian E2-C may be a novel autoregulatory system for the control of the APC/C activity and its substrate specificity.

scholarly journals Cell cycle–dependent localization of macroH2A in chromatin of the inactive X chromosome

2002 ◽  
Vol 157 (7) ◽  
pp. 1113-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian P. Chadwick ◽  
Huntington F. Willard
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Degradation Pathway ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
Inactivation Center ◽  
Chromatin Proteins ◽  
Cycle Dependent

One of several features acquired by chromatin of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) is enrichment for the core histone H2A variant macroH2A within a distinct nuclear structure referred to as a macrochromatin body (MCB). In addition to localizing to the MCB, macroH2A accumulates at a perinuclear structure centered at the centrosome. To better understand the association of macroH2A1 with the centrosome and the formation of an MCB, we investigated the distribution of macroH2A1 throughout the somatic cell cycle. Unlike Xi-specific RNA, which associates with the Xi throughout interphase, the appearance of an MCB is predominantly a feature of S phase. Although the MCB dissipates during late S phase and G2 before reforming in late G1, macroH2A1 remains associated during mitosis with specific regions of the Xi, including at the X inactivation center. This association yields a distinct macroH2A banding pattern that overlaps with the site of histone H3 lysine-4 methylation centered at the DXZ4 locus in Xq24. The centrosomal pool of macroH2A1 accumulates in the presence of an inhibitor of the 20S proteasome. Therefore, targeting of macroH2A1 to the centrosome is likely part of a degradation pathway, a mechanism common to a variety of other chromatin proteins.

scholarly journals CLN3 expression is sufficient to restore G1-to-S-phase progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants defective in translation initiation factor eIF4E

1999 ◽  
Vol 340 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa DANAIE ◽  
Michael ALTMANN ◽  
Michael N. HALL ◽  
Hans TRACHSEL ◽  
Stephen B. HELLIWELL
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Phase Progression ◽  
Type Gene

The essential cap-binding protein (eIF4E) of Saccharomycescerevisiae is encoded by the CDC33 (wild-type) gene, originally isolated as a mutant, cdc33-1, which arrests growth in the G1 phase of the cell cycle at 37 °C. We show that other cdc33 mutants also arrest in G1. One of the first events required for G1-to-S-phase progression is the increased expression of cyclin 3. Constructs carrying the 5ʹ-untranslated region of CLN3 fused to lacZ exhibit weak reporter activity, which is significantly decreased in a cdc33-1 mutant, implying that CLN3 mRNA is an inefficiently translated mRNA that is sensitive to perturbations in the translation machinery. A cdc33-1 strain expressing either stable Cln3p (Cln3-1p) or a hybrid UBI4 5ʹ-CLN3 mRNA, whose translation displays decreased dependence on eIF4E, arrested randomly in the cell cycle. In these cells CLN2 mRNA levels remained high, indicating that Cln3p activity is maintained. Induction of a hybrid UBI4 5ʹ-CLN3 message in a cdc33-1 mutant previously arrested in G1 also caused entry into a new cell cycle. We conclude that eIF4E activity in the G1-phase is critical in allowing sufficient Cln3p activity to enable yeast cells to enter a new cell cycle.

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe hus5 gene encodes a ubiquitin conjugating enzyme required for normal mitosis

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 475-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. al-Khodairy ◽  
T. Enoch ◽  
I.M. Hagan ◽  
A.M. Carr
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Schizosaccharomyces Pombe ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme ◽  
Efficient Recovery ◽  
Mediate Cell

Normal eukaryotic cells do not enter mitosis unless DNA is fully replicated and repaired. Controls called ‘checkpoints’, mediate cell cycle arrest in response to unreplicated or damaged DNA. Two independent Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutant screens, both of which aimed to isolate new elements involved in checkpoint controls, have identified alleles of the hus5+ gene that are abnormally sensitive to both inhibitors of DNA synthesis and to ionizing radiation. We have cloned and sequenced the hus5+ gene. It is a novel member of the E2 family of ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (UBCs). To understand the role of hus5+ in cell cycle control we have characterized the phenotypes of the hus5 mutants and the hus5 gene disruption. We find that, whilst the mutants are sensitive to inhibitors of DNA synthesis and to irradiation, this is not due to an inability to undergo mitotic arrest. Thus, the hus5+ gene product is not directly involved in checkpoint control. However, in common with a large class of previously characterized checkpoint genes, it is required for efficient recovery from DNA damage or S-phase arrest and manifests a rapid death phenotype in combination with a temperature sensitive S phase and late S/G2 phase cdc mutants. In addition, hus5 deletion mutants are severely impaired in growth and exhibit high levels of abortive mitoses, suggesting a role for hus5+ in chromosome segregation. We conclude that this novel UBC enzyme plays multiple roles and is virtually essential for cell proliferation.

scholarly journals Posttranslational Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Poly(A) Polymerase at the S/G2 Stage of the Cell Cycle

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 2794-2802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neptune Mizrahi ◽  
Claire Moore
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Sorting ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phase Arrest ◽  
Phosphatase Treatment ◽  
M Phase ◽  
64 Kda Protein ◽  
Mitotic Phosphorylation ◽  
Cycle Regulation

ABSTRACT The poly(A) polymerase of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Pap1) is a 64-kDa protein essential for the maturation of mRNA. We have found that a modified Pap1 of 90 kDa transiently appears in cells after release from α-factor-induced G1 arrest or from a hydroxyurea-induced S-phase arrest. While a small amount of modification occurs in hydroxyurea-arrested cells, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and microscopic examination of bud formation indicate that the majority of modified enzyme is found at late S/G2 and disappears by the time cells have reached M phase. The reduction of the 90-kDa product upon phosphatase treatment indicates that the altered mobility is due to phosphorylation. A preparation containing primarily the phosphorylated Pap1 has no poly(A) addition activity, but this activity is restored by phosphatase treatment. A portion of Pap1 is also polyubiquitinated concurrent with phosphorylation. However, the bulk of the 64-kDa Pap1 is a stable protein with a half-life of 14 h. The timing, nature, and extent of Pap1 modification in comparison to the mitotic phosphorylation of mammalian poly(A) polymerase suggest an intriguing difference in the cell cycle regulation of this enzyme in yeast and mammalian systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document