scholarly journals P-P51 Assessing the severity of pre and post-operative malnutrition in cancer patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A review of a virtual dietetic prehabilitation service

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah Cox
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Median Weight Loss ◽  
Dietetic Intervention

Abstract Background The prevalence of malnutrition amongst pancreatic cancer patients is widely reported. This is due to reduced nutritional intake, increased energy expenditure and increased nutrient losses secondary to malabsorption. A Whipple's procedure or pancreaticoduodenectomy is the only potentially curable intervention for pancreatic cancer patients. Malnutrition is associated with increased peri and post-operative complications including delayed wound healing, longer hospital admission and higher mortality rate. Dietetic prehabilitation is a proactive intervention to assess patients’ nutritional status in preparation for elective surgery and, through early dietetic intervention, has the potential to improve perioperative outcomes. This pilot study reviewed the severity of nutritional risk in both the pre and post-operative stages to understand the need for dietetic prehabilitation in this patient group. Methods All patients referred were nutritionally assessed as part of a dietetic cancer prehabilitation pathway, which includes pre-surgical nutritional assessment within one week of referral and early post discharge nutritional assessment. Nutritional assessment was carried out using the PG-SGA short form and patients were triaged as requiring either a universal, targeted or specialist dietetic intervention dependent on severity of nutritional risk. Patients who scored <4 were triaged as universal, and were low nutritional risk. Patients who scored 5-9 were triaged as targeted and were medium nutritional risk, and patients who scored >9 were triaged as specialist, and were high nutritional risk. Results 35 patients were referred for dietetic prehabilitation assessment. 71% of patients were triaged as requiring either a targeted or specialist prehabilitiation intervention. BMI ranged from 15.7kg/m² to 35.9kg/m² and median weight loss was 10.0%. 23 patients received early post surgical nutritional assessment, within 12 days of discharge from hospital. All 23 patients required targeted or specialist dietetic intervention. 22 patients reported post-operative weight loss, with a median weight loss of 7.5%. There was no correlation between pre-surgical and post-surgical nutritional risk. Conclusions Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy are at high nutritional risk in both the pre and post-operative periods. Patients without evidence of malnutrition in the pre-operative stage remain at high risk of malnutrition and the associated complications in the post operative stage. A prehabilitation programme can identify patients at nutritional risk and institute interventions to optimise perioperative nutritional status.  Findings from this review will form the basis of a study examining the effects of a prehabilitation programme on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

scholarly journals Altered Preoperative Nutritional Status in Colorectal Cancer: A Not So Infrequent Issue

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Javier Páramo-Zunzunegui ◽  
Araceli Ramos-Carrasco ◽  
Marcos Alonso-García ◽  
Rosa Cuberes-Montserrat ◽  
Gil Rodríguez-Caravaca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasia ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
A Value ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients

Introduction. Malnutrition and weight loss in cancer patients is a common problem that affects the prognosis of the disease. In the case of CRC, malnutrition rates range between 30 and 60%. Objectives. Description of the preoperative nutritional status of patients diagnosed with colorectal neoplasia who will undergo surgery. Materials and Methods. A prospective observational study is performed. Results. Of 234 patients studied, we observed that 139 (59%) had some degree of nutritional risk. Of all of them, 44.9% (N = 47) had 1-2 points according to MUST and 25% (N = 27) had more than 2 points. No differences were found when studying nutritional risk according to the location of the neoplasm. It was observed that 2.15% of the patients were underweight, 51% overweight, and 23% obese. 19.4% of patients lost less than 5 kg in the 3–6 months prior to diagnosis, 20.7% lost between 5 and 10 kg, and 2.1% lost more than 10 kg. In asymptomatic patients, the weight loss was lower than in symptomatic patients, loss <5 kg, 8.2% vs. 22.8%, and loss 5–10 kg, 16.2% vs. 29.3%, with a value of p = 0.016 . 5% (N = 7) of the patients had hypoalbuminemia record. 16.5% (N = 23) had some degree of prealbumin deficiency and 20.9% (N = 29) of hypoproteinemia. Symptomatic patients had more frequent analytical alterations, 1-2 altered parameters in 48.8% (N = 20) of asymptomatic vs. 61.2% (N = 22) in the symptomatic, p = 0.049 .

scholarly journals Standardized Phase Angle as a Prognostic and Nutritional Status Tool for Pancreatic Cancer Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Cross-sectional Study (P12-025-19)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Chen ◽  
Shengnan Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Phase Angle ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Nrs 2002

Abstract Objectives This study investigated the use of standardized phase angle (SPA), determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), as a nutrition status tool and prognostic factor for complications associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in pancreatic cancer patients. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with 49 participants. All participants were assessed for nutritional risk and nutritional status using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) tools, Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) tool and BIA. The Clavien-Dindo classification method for surgical complications was used to identify and classify postoperative complications. Independent-samples T-tests, chi-square tests and Spearman correlation analyses were used to evaluate the association between SPA, nutrition and postoperative complications. Results A total of 49 patients were enrolled, and 20 patients (40%) had postoperative complications. The SPA value for the nourished group was significantly higher than the SPA value for the malnourished group (P = 0.021, 0.019, 0.023). Patients who were below the SPA cut-off values (−1.015, −1.065, and −0.69) were more likely to have postoperative complications (P = 0.009), whereas NRS-2002, SGA, and GLIM scores were not associated with postoperative complications. The SPA value of the group with complications was significantly lower than that of the group without complications (P = 0.004). The SPA threshold value for predicting postoperative complications in pancreatic cancer was −1.095 (AUC 0.737; 95% CI, 0.59, 0.88; P = 0.005). Conclusions The SPA is a prognostic indicator of postoperative complications in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing PD and is an effective tool for assessing nutritional status in pancreatic cancer patients. Funding Sources none. Supporting Tables, Images and/or Graphs

scholarly journals Nutritional Profile of Patients with Colorretal Cancer Candidates for Big Surgery (P05-035-19)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Rocha Trotte ◽  
Rosana Oliveira Macedo ◽  
Thaiza Fragoso Nunes ◽  
Danielly Rodrigues Wassita da Rocha ◽  
Maria Eliza De Gouvêa Marti Ferrão
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Nutritional Profile ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Nrs 2002

Abstract Objectives To identify the nutritional profile of adult and elderly patients with colorectal cancer admitted to a Proctology ward for large elective surgeries. Methods A cross-sectional and retrospective study was performed with 31 patients of both genders, aged 39 to 77 years with colorectal cancer. The nutritional screening parameters used were the percentage of weight loss and Nutrition Risck Screening (NRS 2002). The data (percentage of weight loss and NRS 2002) were collected through a nutritional assessment form completed in the care routine, applied within 72 hours after the patient's hospitalization. Results The study included 13 adults (41.9%) and 18 elderly (58.1%). The evaluation of the percentage of weight loss showed that 7 patients (22.5%) had weight loss greater than 15% in a period of less than or equal to 6 months. In the nutritional risk assessment based on the NRS 2002, we observed that 9 patients (29%) scored 2, while 22 patients (71%) achieved a score equal to or greater than 3. Conclusions The nutritional profile of the evaluated patients showed a considerable prevalence of malnutrition, considering a weight loss of more than 15% in a period of 6 months, which is associated to a decrease in survival in patients with cancer, and is a very relevant data to help in the classification of nutritional status. The classification by the NRS 2002, showed a high prevalence of patients at nutritional or malnourished risk. Variation in the classification of nutritional status using several parameters reinforces the need for them to be used in a complementary way. Funding Sources Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, Ministerio da Saude.

scholarly journals Relationship Between Risk, Nutritional Status and Functional Capacity and Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 277-277
Author(s):  
Mariana Scortegagna Crestani ◽  
Thaiciane Grassi ◽  
Thais Steemburgo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Functional Capacity ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment ◽  
Nutritional Screening ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Abstract Objectives To systematically review the published evidence on nutritional risk screening instruments, nutritional assessment and functional capacity used in hospitalized cancer patients and possible associations with unfavorable clinical outcomes. Methods A systematic search was performed in EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, LiLACS and SciELO (publications from January 2010 to January 2021) databases by search terms related to “nutritional risk”, “nutritional assessment”, functional capacity” and “cancer”. Results 3753 articles were identified, and 321 duplicates were excluded. Of the 3432 articles analyzed by title/abstract, 109 were selected for full reading and 28 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The agreement analysis between the researchers generated a Kappa of 0.813. The evaluated studies included comparison of tools: 1) nutritional screening, 2) nutritional screening based on laboratory parameters, 3) nutritional assessment, 4) nutritional diagnosis and, 5) functional capacity. The higher nutritional risk, worst nutritional status and low functional capacity assessed by the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS- 2002), Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA); Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and lower handgrip strength, respectively, were associated with longer of hospital stay. The worst nutritional status, identified by the SGA scores, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) were significant predictors of postoperative mortality. Conclusions The studies included in this systematic review showed that higher nutritional risk, worse nutritional status and low functional capacity are associated with unfavorable outcomes such as longer hospital stay and mortality. The combination of the tools can be recommended for a complete assessment of the nutritional status of hospitalized cancer patients. Funding Sources Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa (FIPE) do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. (number# 2019/0708).

scholarly journals Malnutrition and cancer, diagnosis and treatment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Beirer
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Cachexia ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Psychological Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Nutritional Therapy ◽  
German Society ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Nutritional Risk

Summary Background The prevalence of malnutrition in cancer patients ranges from about 20% to more than 70%. However, 10–20% of cancer patients’ deaths are related to malnutrition, not the malignancy itself. To reverse the pattern of weight loss, improve the patients’ quality of life, reduce the treatment toxicity, the psychological stress and the risk of mortality, the diagnosis of malnutrition should be made as early as possible to facilitate the best possible treatment. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted following guidelines of ESPEN (European Society for Clinical Nutrition), DGEM (German Society for Nutritional Medicine) and ASPEN (American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition). Results and conclusion To assess the risk of malnutrition, all cancer patients should be screened regularly with a valid screening tool (e.g., MUST [Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool], NRS [Nutritional Risk Screening] or PG-SGA [Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment]). If risk of malnutrition is present, adequate nutritional therapy is recommended to stop involuntary weight loss. Patients should engage in exercise to maintain and improve muscle mass, strength and function. They should be offered regular dietetic counselling, and their muscle depletion should be monitored by determining fat-free mass. As cachectic patients in particular are at risk, the presence of cachexia should also be recognized at an early stage. Three consensus-based definitions are widely accepted: Fearon et al. and the EPCRC (European Palliative Care Research Collaborative) propose definitions specifically for cancer cachexia, while Evans et al. put forward a definition for cachexia associated with all types of underlying chronic diseases. However, if there is a cancer cachexia diagnosis, additional pharmacological and psychological treatment should be considered.

Importance of body composition in grading body mass index and weight loss-related nutritional risk in cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 550-551
Author(s):  
E. Cereda ◽  
F. Lobascio ◽  
S. Masi ◽  
S. Crotti ◽  
S. Cappello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Body Composition ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Nutritional Risk

scholarly journals A study of nutritional status, development of malnutrition and food consumption in hospitalized patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-80
Author(s):  
Anil Evrim Gungor ◽  
Perihan Arslan ◽  
Osman Abbasoglu
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Food Services ◽  
Hospital Malnutrition ◽  
Arm Circumference ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Mid Upper Arm Circumference ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Purpose: To investigate the nutritional status of patients on admission and during hospital stay, the factors leading to weight loss, and to evaluate patient satisfaction of hospital food. Methods: On admission, Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), weight, height, Body Mass Index (BMI), mid upper arm circumference (MAC) measurements were carried out; serum total protein and albumin levels were recorded. Upon discharge, measurements of weight, MAC were repeated, along with a food satisfaction questionnaire. Results: Patients with NRS-2002>3, BMI<20, were classified as nutrionally at risk which were 43.6% and 9.4% respectively. Of the patients, 77% lost weight (2.6±1.9 kg). Patients who were determined to be malnourished on admission by BMI and NRS-2002 stayed longer in hospital (p<0.0 and p<0.001, respectively). The relationships between weight loss and lenght of stay, use of medications and period of starvation were significant (p<0.0001, for each). Of the patients, 49.9% did not satisfy with the hospital food. Conclusions: Nutritional status of hospitalized patients should be screened with NRS-2002, assessed and monitored. Keywords: NRS-2002, hospital malnutrition, hospital food services

Enteral nutritional support in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (35) ◽  
pp. 2949-2957
Author(s):  
Bei Wang ◽  
Xiaowen Jiang ◽  
Dalong Tian ◽  
Wei Geng
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Nutritional Support ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Tumor Patients ◽  
Selection Of

Esophageal cancer patients are at a high risk of malnutrition. Both the disease itself and chemoradiotherapy will lead to the deterioration of nutritional status. The development of nutritional oncology promotes the application of enteral nutrition in tumor patients. Through nutritional support, prognosis is improved and the incidence of adverse chemoradiotherapy reactions is reduced, especially in those with head and neck or esophageal cancer. This review summarizes enteral nutritional support in esophageal cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy in recent years, including a selection of nutritional assessment tools, the causes and consequences of malnutrition in esophageal cancer patients, types of access and effects of enteral nutrition. More patients with esophageal cancer will benefit from the development of enteral nutrition technology in the future.

scholarly journals Preoperative Nutritional Status and Its Consequences on Abdominal Surgery in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: An Institution-Based Observational Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Leila Hussen ◽  
Elazar Tadesse ◽  
Dereje Yohannes Teferi
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Southern Ethiopia ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Nutritional Risk Index

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of malnutrition and its association with wound healing and length of hospitalization among patients undergoing abdominal surgery admitted to hospitals in the Wolaita zone in southern Ethiopia. Methods. An institution-based prospective observational study was conducted in three hospitals in the Wolaita zone from August to October 2016. All eligible individuals aged between 19 and 55 years were recruited in this study. Anthropometric and biochemical analyses, such as serum albumin (Alb) and total lymphocyte count (TLC), were taken for nutritional assessment during the preoperative period. Quantitative variables were compared using Student’s t test. Cox’s regression was employed to determine which variables were possible risk factors for poor wound healing. Results. A total of 105 patients aged 19 to 55 with a mean age (±SD) of 34 ± 9.6 years were included, and the prevalence of preoperative malnutrition was 27.6%, 87%, according to BMI and nutritional risk index, respectively. Poor wound healing was significantly associated with underweight patients (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) (AHR: 6.5 : 95%CI: 3.312.9), postoperative weight loss (AHR: 4.9; 95%CI: 2.8–8.5), and nutritional risk index (NRI) less than 97.5 (AHR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.09–3.1). Conclusion. The prevalence of malnutrition is high in our study setup; this is associated with an increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes. Therefore, our results emphasize the need of routine preoperative nutritional assessment, optimizing nutritional status of patients and postoperative nutritional support.

scholarly journals Protein–energy undernutrition in hospital in-patients

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 575-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare A. Corish ◽  
Nicholas P. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Nutritional Interventions ◽  
True Prevalence ◽  
Protein Energy ◽  
Hospital Patients ◽  
Hospital Practices

Impaired nutritional status has been frequently reported in surveys estimating its prevalence amongst patients in hospital. While there is no doubt that protein–energy undernutrition has serious implications for health, recovery from illness or surgery and hospital costs, lack of nationally or internationally accepted cut-off points and guidelines for most nutrition-related variables make nutritional assessment difficult and proper comparisons between studies impossible. In reviewing published work in which the prevalence of undernutrition has been assessed, it can be seen that each study defined undernutrition, or nutritional risk, using different methodology. This present review aims to highlight the problems which arise when deciphering these studies, and the resulting difficulty in determining the true prevalence of undernutrition and nutritional risk, amongst both general and specific groups of hospital in-patients. It is widely agreed that routine hospital practices can further adversely affect the nutritional status of sick patients in hospital. How this occurs, and the potential effects of impaired nutritional status on clinical outcome are examined. The methods currently available to assess nutritional status are evaluated in the knowledge that such assessments are difficult in clinical practice. The review concludes by proposing that if we want the medical and nursing professions to consider the nutritional status of hospital patients seriously, definitions of undernutrition and nutritional risk, and cut-off values for the nutritional variables measured must be agreed to allow evidence-based practice. Outcome measures which allow clear comparisons between groups and treatments must be used in studies assessing the effects of nutritional interventions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document