scholarly journals Perspectives of asylum seekers, refugees, and other migrant groups on approaches to catch-up vaccination on arrival to Europe

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Louka

Abstract Very few research studies to date have explored the views and concerns of the broad range of migrants residing in Europe around vaccination in general, vaccine hesitancy, and approaches to catch-up vaccination on arrival. In this talk, CL will discuss the current research in this area, and implications for policy and practice.

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

Abstract Background and Objectives Migrants are thought to be one of several under-immunised groups in Europe, and involved in outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases - including the recent large pan-European outbreak of measles. They may be under-immunised because of poor functioning of the health systems in countries they come from, because of barriers to catch-up vaccination and health services on arrival to Europe, and vaccine hesitancy may play a role. Amid substantial migration to Europe in recent years, ECDC public health guidelines for newly arrived migrants to EU/EEA countries have defined new recommendations, including focusing on catch-up vaccination in adult migrants. Yet there is an urgent need to better define what strategies work to improve vaccine coverage and to better understand the views of migrant communities, which will be the focus of this workshop. In this workshop we will explore various facets of migration and vaccination in the European context, and seek audience participation in better defining innovative implementation models and models of best practice to improve vaccine coverage in migrant populations residing in the region. Workshop plan The workshop will start with 15-minute presentations by each of the 4 speakers (to include a short Q&A after each talk). This will then move into a 30-minute audience discussion centred around seeking specific feedback on examples of innovation, good practice, and lessons learned across EU/EEA countries in engaging migrants and improving vaccine coverage in this group. Speakers and topics Sally Hargreaves (St George's, University of London): Are migrants to Europe an under-immunised group and involved in outbreaks? implications for health systems, policy, and practice. Elizabeth de Vito (Università degli Studi Di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale, Italy) Barriers and facilitators to catch-up vaccination in migrant populations: defining effective and cost-effective implementation strategies. Ines Campos-Matos (Public Health England, UK) Vaccination on the move for asylum seekers and refugees: evidence, policies and practicalities. Christina Louka (University of Groningen, The Netherlands) Perspectives of asylum seekers, refugees, and other migrant groups on approaches to catch-up vaccination on arrival to Europe. Key messages Migrants are likely to be an under-immunised group in Europe, with new ECDC guidelines outlining key recommendations for catch-up vaccination on arrival. There is a need to better define more effective strategies to improve vaccine coverage in migrant populations in Europe.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Deal ◽  
Sally E Hayward ◽  
Mashal Huda ◽  
Felicity Knights ◽  
Alison F Crawshaw ◽  
...  

Introduction Early evidence confirms lower COVID-19 vaccine uptake in established ethnic minority populations, yet there has been little focus on understanding vaccine hesitancy and barriers to vaccination in migrants. Growing populations of precarious migrants (including undocumented migrants, asylum seekers and refugees) in the UK and Europe are considered to be under-immunised groups and may be excluded from health systems, yet little is known about their views on COVID-19 vaccines specifically, which are essential to identify key solutions and action points to strengthen vaccine roll-out. Methods We did an in-depth semi-structured qualitative interview study of recently arrived migrants (foreign-born, >18 years old; <10 years in the UK) to the UK with precarious immigration status between September 2020 and March 2021, seeking their input into strategies to strengthen COVID-19 vaccine delivery and uptake. We used the Three Cs model (confidence, complacency and convenience) to explore COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, barriers and access. Data were analysed using a thematic framework approach. Data collection continued until data saturation was reached, and no novel concepts were arising. The study was approved by the University of London ethics committee (REC 2020.00630). Results We approached 20 migrant support groups nationwide, recruiting 32 migrants (mean age 37.1 years; 21 [66%] female; mean time in the UK 5.6 years [SD 3.7 years]), including refugees (n = 3), asylum seekers (n = 19), undocumented migrants (n = 8) and migrants with limited leave to remain (n = 2) from 15 different countries (5 WHO regions). 23 (72%) of 32 migrants reported being hesitant about accepting a COVID-19 vaccine and communicated concerns over vaccine content, side-effects, lack of accessible information in an appropriate language, lack of trust in the health system and low perceived need. Participants reported a range of barriers to accessing the COVID-19 vaccine and expressed concerns that their communities would be excluded from or de-prioritised in the roll-out. Undocumented migrants described fears over being charged and facing immigration checks if they present for a vaccine. All participants (n = 10) interviewed after recent government announcements that COVID-19 vaccines can be accessed without facing immigration checks remained unaware of this. Participants stated that convenience of access would be a key factor in their decision around whether to accept a vaccine and proposed alternative access points to primary care services (for example, walk-in centres in trusted places such as foodbanks, community centres and charities), alongside promoting registration with primary care for all, and working closely with communities to produce accessible information on COVID-19 vaccination. Conclusions Precarious migrants may be hesitant about accepting a COVID-19 vaccine and face multiple and unique barriers to access, requiring simple but innovative solutions to ensure equitable access and uptake. Vaccine hesitancy and low awareness around entitlement and relevant access points could be easily addressed with clear, accessible, and tailored information campaigns, co-produced and delivered by trusted sources within marginalised migrant communities. These findings have immediate relevance to the COVID-19 vaccination initiatives in the UK and in other European and high-income countries with diverse migrant populations.


Refuge ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26
Author(s):  
John Van Kooy ◽  
Liam Magee ◽  
Shanthi Robertson

This article draws upon content analysis of Australian parliamentary transcripts to examine debates about asylum seekers who arrived by boat in three historical periods: 1977–1979, 1999–2001, and 2011–2013. We analyze term frequency and co-occurrence to identify patterns in specific usage of the phrase “boat people.” We then identify how the term is variously deployed in Parliament and discuss the relationship between these uses and government policy and practice. We conclude that forms of “discursive bordering” have amplified representations of asylum seekers as security threats to be controlled within and outside Australia’s sovereign territory. The scope of policy or legislative responses to boat arrivals is limited by a poverty of political language, thus corroborating recent conceptual arguments about the securitization and extra-territorialization of the contemporary border.


Author(s):  
Robert Sandieson ◽  
Jack Hourcade ◽  
Val Sharpe

Knowing the existing research literature has become important for anyone involved with education, informed research, policy, and practice rests on an understanding of unfiltered original source material. Although there has been a proliferation of research studies which are now easily accessible through online resources, being able to find information on specific topics is proving to be a challenge even for experienced researchers. This chapter describes a procedure which first identified field-specific terminology associated with original source material. The parallel terms used in the ERIC database to code the same material was then found. The resulting parallel list of ERIC keywords was tested and validated for preciseness. The finding was that each term’s precision could be established. The general methodology developed here is presented as a way of enhancing peoples’ use of online resources.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 464-483
Author(s):  
MARIA TOUNTOPOULOU ◽  
Nikos Drosos ◽  
Maria-Eirini Triantafillopoulou ◽  
Fotini Vlachaki ◽  
Petros Daras ◽  
...  

Due to forced migration migrants, asylum seekers and refugees finding themselves in a new cultural environment and trying to build a new life, they need to feel affiliated, to achieve peer acceptance among natives and diverse migrant groups. Such affiliation needs can be achieved by tailored training interventions aiming to promote the development of prosocial skills of cultural diverse groups, as alternative actions to facilitate better migrants’/asylum seekers/refugees’ integration into the host society. The scope of this survey is to study the short-term effects of a social skills and prosocial behaviour training for adult migrants, refugees or asylum seekers. The method is based on the theory of prosociality and explores the effectiveness of a prosocial game in the development of prosocial skills, which are considered important for the social and emotional wellbeing and smoother integration of migrant groups in the new host community. A pre-test-post-test design was used, assigning 110 migrant participants to either an experimental or a control group and comparing them on their prosocial skills as evaluated through the NADINE questionnaire. Those who played the game significantly improved in their teamwork and interpersonal skills. Although further research should be made on the use of serious games in Social Emotional Learning (SEL) in migrant adults, this study adds to the research literature, supporting the potential of a game-based SEL intervention for effectively assisting migrant groups develop their prosocial skills and facilitating their better integration into the host society.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Scott ◽  
L Ellis ◽  
A Khanom ◽  
M Rhydderch ◽  
G Richardson ◽  
...  

Abstract There are concerns that people seeking sanctuary (asylum seekers and refugees) in Wales, UK, have unmet health needs and face difficulties accessing services, but little collated evidence. This study addressed this gap to inform policy and practice in reducing health inequities. It aimed to: investigate the health, wellbeing and healthcare experiences of adults seeking sanctuary in Wales, including the views of healthcare recipients and providers; and establish what helped or hindered the healthcare experiences of those seeking sanctuary. It is the most comprehensive study of this population in Wales. A mixed-method approach was taken, including a literature search, a cross-sectional survey of 210 adults seeking sanctuary, telephone interviews with 32 health professionals and third sector support workers, and 8 focus groups including 57 people seeking sanctuary and those supporting them. Eight trained volunteer peer researchers, themselves asylum seekers or refugees, administered the surveys. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using a standard framework. The literature search identified 5 themes that help or hinder people seeking sanctuary to access healthcare. The survey found 79% of respondents attended an initial health assessment on arriving in Wales, with 94% currently registered with Primary healthcare. 64% reported difficulties in accessing health services. Awareness of services was mixed, with 66% having used healthcare in working hours (planned) and 28% out of hours (unplanned). Mainstream health professionals felt they lack capacity to deliver care effectively due to time and other pressures on the healthcare system and the need for appropriate translation/interpretation services. This study triangulates the experiences of people seeking sanctuary with those providing healthcare and general support. Peer researchers maximised sanctuary seekers’ participation. Many of its methods and findings have relevance to other countries in Europe. Key messages Improving health equity is key to realising Wales’ ambition to become a Nation of Sanctuary. Peer Researchers enabled participation by sanctuary seekers and revealed useful findings to steer future policy and practice.


Author(s):  
Stanley Yip ◽  
Kenneth Javate ◽  
Dinesh Bhugra

The healthcare needs of migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers are important to assess and meet because the majority of migrants are of a young age group, which is more prone to developing psychiatric disorders, particularly in response to the stress of migration, which may act as a precipitating factor. In addition, their healthcare models and explanations can be strongly influenced by their cultural models. Many migrant groups show higher-than-expected rates of psychiatric disorders for a number of reasons. Combined with discrimination and stigma, it is likely that there may well be delays in seeking help, thereby making their prognosis poor. When planning, developing, and delivering services for migrant groups it is important to remember guidelines for good practice and also engage the groups appropriately. In this chapter we highlight differences in rates of psychiatric disorders, vulnerability factors, and healthcare needs of migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Gonthier ◽  
Pauline Basselin ◽  
Jean-Marc Boivin ◽  
Joelle Kivits ◽  
Céline Pulcini

Abstract Background Vaccination postponement is an important contributing factor to low vaccination coverage. The causes of vaccine postponement are numerous, but the presence of viral infection, whether febrile or not, is the most frequent cause. Objective The objective was to explore the factors motivating the practice of vaccination postponement in a child with an infection by general practitioners (GPs) and paediatricians. Methods An exploratory qualitative study using semi-directive individual interviews was carried out among GPs and paediatricians in a French region between November 2015 and January 2018. After the interviews were fully transcribed, an analysis of the data was performed using an inductive method derived from the grounded theory. Results Fourteen GPs and four paediatricians participated in the study. Vaccination postponement during infection in children is rooted in doctors’ practices; it is considered a low-risk habit that is shared with parents, and vaccine hesitancy reinforces this practice. In children presenting with an infection, the presence of uncertainty about vaccine safety and effectiveness seems to justify postponing vaccination. The organization of a consultation dedicated to vaccination catch-up was cited as the best tool to limit the effects of vaccination delay on vaccination coverage. Discussion In children presenting with an infection, vaccination postponement is widely used by GPs and paediatricians. Simplification of the vaccination catch-up process and clear and consistent recommendations on the indications and modalities for vaccination postponement would be useful.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (44) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Langholz Kristensen ◽  
Troels Lillebaek ◽  
Joergen Holm Petersen ◽  
Sally Hargreaves ◽  
Laura B Nellums ◽  
...  

Background Migrants account for the majority of tuberculosis (TB) cases in low-incidence countries in western Europe. TB incidence among migrants might be influenced by patterns of migration, but this is not well understood. Aim To investigate differences in TB risk across migrant groups according to migrant status and region of origin. Methods This prospective cohort study included migrants ≥ 18 years of age who obtained residency in Denmark between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2015, matched 1:6 to Danish-born individuals. Migrants were grouped according to legal status of residency and region of origin. Incidence rates (IR) and incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated by Poisson regression. Results The cohort included 142,314 migrants. Migrants had significantly higher TB incidence (IR: 120/100,000 person-years (PY); 95% confidence interval (CI): 115–126) than Danish-born individuals (IR: 4/100,000 PY; 95% CI: 3–4). The IRR was significantly higher in all migrant groups compared with Danish-born (p < 0.01). A particularly higher risk was seen among family-reunified to refugees (IRR: 61.8; 95% CI: 52.7–72.4), quota refugees (IRR: 46.0; 95% CI: 36.6–57.6) and former asylum seekers (IRR: 45.3; 95% CI: 40.2–51.1), whereas lower risk was seen among family-reunified to Danish/Nordic citizens (IRR 15.8; 95% CI: 13.6–18.4) and family-reunified to immigrants (IRR: 16.9; 95% CI: 13.5–21.3). Discussion All migrants had higher TB risk compared with the Danish-born population. While screening programmes focus mostly on asylum seekers, other migrant groups with high risk of TB are missed. Awareness of TB risk in all high-risk groups should be strengthened and screening programmes should be optimised.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document