Antibiotic appropriateness and guideline adherence in hospitalized children: results of a nationwide study

Abstract Background Information on the nature and appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for children in hospitals is important, but scarce. Objectives To analyse antimicrobial prescribing and appropriateness, and guideline adherence, in hospitalized children across Australia. Patients and methods We analysed data from the National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (NAPS) from 2014 to 2017. Surveys were performed in hospital facilities of all types (public and private; major city, regional and remote). Participants were admitted children <18 years old. Risk factors associated with inappropriate prescribing were explored using logistic regression models. Results Among 6219 prescriptions for 3715 children in 253 facilities, 19.6% of prescriptions were deemed inappropriate. Risk factors for inappropriate prescribing included non-tertiary paediatric hospital admission [OR 1.37 (95% CI 1.20–1.55)] and non-major city hospital location [OR 1.52 (95% CI 1.30–1.77)]. Prescriptions for neonates, immunocompromised children and those admitted to an ICU were less frequently inappropriate. If a restricted antimicrobial was prescribed and not approved, the prescription was more likely to be inappropriate [OR 12.9 (95% CI 8.4–19.8)]. Surgical prophylaxis was inappropriate in 59% of prescriptions. Conclusions Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing in children was linked to specific risk factors identified here, presenting opportunities for targeted interventions to improve prescribing. This information, using a NAPS dataset, allows for analysis of antimicrobial prescribing among different groups of hospitalized children. Further exploration of barriers to appropriate prescribing and facilitators of best practice in this population is recommended.

Download Full-text

P39 Start smart: improving the quality of empiric antimicrobial prescribing at a tertiary paediatric hospital

Archives of Disease in Childhood ◽

10.1136/archdischild-2017-314585.48 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 103 (2) ◽

pp. e2.43-e2

Author(s):

Michelle Kirrane ◽

Rob Cunney ◽

Roisin McNamara ◽

Ike Okafor

Keyword(s):

Antibiotic Therapy ◽

Drug Effects ◽

Empiric Antibiotic Therapy ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Monday Morning ◽

Paediatric Hospital ◽

Antimicrobial Prescribing ◽

National Quality ◽

Empiric Antibiotic

Appropriate choice of empiric antibiotic therapy, in line with local guidelines, improves outcome for children with infection, while reducing adverse drug effects, cost, and selection of antimicrobial resistance. Data from national point prevalence surveys showed compliance with local prescribing guidelines at our hospital was suboptimal. A team with representatives from the pharmacy, microbiology and emergency departments collaborated with prescribers to improve the quality of empiric antibiotic prescribing. The project aim was, using the ‘Model for Improvement’, to ensure ≥90% of children admitted via the Emergency Department (ED) and commenced on antibiotic therapy, have a documented indication and a choice of therapy in line with local antimicrobial guidelines.MethodResults of weekly audits of the first ten children admitted via ED and started on antibiotics were fed back to prescribers. Front line ownership techniques were used to develop ideas for change, including; regular antibiotic prescribing discussion at Monday morning handover meeting, antibiotic ‘spot quiz’ for prescribers, updates to prescribing guidelines (along with improved access and promotion of prescribing app), printed ID badge guideline summary cards, reminders and guideline summaries at point of prescribing in ED.Collection of audit data initially proved challenging, but was resolved through a series of rapid PDSA cycles. Initial support from ED consultants and other ED staff facilitated establishment of the project. Presentation of weekly run charts to prescribers fostered considerable support among consultants and non-consultant doctors (NCHDs). We saw a shift in perspective from ‘how is your project going?’ to ‘How are we doing?’.ResultsDocumentation of indication and guideline compliance increased from a median of 30% in December 2014/January 2015 to 100% consistently from February 2015 to the present. It is felt that a change in approach to antimicrobial prescribing is now embedded in our hospital culture as this improvement has remained constant through three NCHD changeovers. A comparison of 2014 Antimicrobial expenditure to 2015 figures shows a reduction in expenditure of €101,078.44.ConclusionThis project has inspired other departments to develop local QIPs and has encouraged the surgical teams to lead their own audits in antimicrobial stewardship. An improvement in other areas of antimicrobial prescribing has also been noted e.g. documentation of review date.The initiative has been shared with other hospitals throughout Ireland via presentations at the National Patient Safety Conference, Antimicrobial Awareness day and the Irish Antimicrobial Pharmacist’s Group meeting. It has also been shared at both European and international conferences. The project was a shortlisted finalist for a national healthcare excellence award and has been rolled out as part of a national quality improvement collaborative.

Download Full-text

Pharmacist-Driven Implementation of Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Algorithms Improves Guideline Adherence in the Emergency Department

Journal of Pharmacy Practice ◽

10.1177/0897190020930979 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 089719002093097

Author(s):

Kristin Stoll ◽

Erik Feltz ◽

Steven Ebert

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Clinical Practice ◽

Guideline Adherence ◽

Inappropriate Prescribing ◽

Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽

Urgent Care ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Duration Of Therapy ◽

Tract Infections ◽

Selection Of

Background: Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics has been identified as the most important modifiable risk factor for antimicrobial resistance. Objective: The purpose of this project was to improve guideline adherence and promote optimal use of outpatient antibiotics in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Prescribing algorithms for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), and urinary tract infections (UTI) were developed to integrate clinical practice guideline recommendations with local ED antibiogram data. Outcomes were evaluated through chart review of patients prescribed outpatient antibiotics by ED providers. The primary outcome was adherence to clinical practice guidelines, defined as the selection of an appropriate antibiotic agent, dose, and duration of therapy for each patient discharged. Results: When compared to patients discharged from the ED prior to algorithm implementation (N = 325), the post-implementation group (N = 353) received more antibiotic prescriptions that were completely guideline adherent (61.5% vs 11.7%, P < .00001). Post-implementation discharge orders demonstrated improvement in the selection of an appropriate agent (87.3% vs 45.5%, P < .00001), dose (91.5% vs 77.2%, P < .00001), and duration of therapy (71.1% vs 39.1%, P < .01). Additionally, fluoroquinolone prescribing rates were reduced (2.3% vs 12.3%, P < .00001). A reduction in all-cause 30-day returns to the ED or urgent care was observed (15.3% vs 21.5%, P = .036). Conclusion: Pharmacist-driven implementation of antibiotic prescribing algorithms improved guideline adherence in the outpatient treatment of CAP, SSTI, and UTI.

Download Full-text

Road to Increasing AMR: A Study on Antibiotics Prescribing Pattern

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2020.1174 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (S1) ◽

pp. s496-s497

Author(s):

Bobson Derrick Fofanah ◽

Christiana Conteh ◽

Jamine Weiss

Keyword(s):

Broad Spectrum ◽

Inappropriate Prescribing ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Prescribing Patterns ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Antimicrobial Use ◽

Strict Adherence ◽

Targeted Interventions ◽

Broad Spectrum Antibiotics ◽

Trade Names

Background: Infectious diseases and the rapid emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens continue to pose a threat to global health. The development of antimicrobial-resistant organisms is an alarming issue caused by inappropriate use of antibiotic agents. It is estimated that death from antimicrobial resistant pathogens could increase >10-fold to ~10 million deaths annually by 2050 if action is not taken. “It is essential to have reliable data on how medicines are used in order to identify areas to develop targeted interventions” (WHO 2011). Investigating antimicrobial use in hospitals is the first step in evaluating the underlying causes of AMR. In Sierra Leone, no other study related to antibiotic prescribing patterns in hospital setting has been undertaken. Objective: To investigate antibiotic prescription patterns using the WHO hospital antimicrobial use indicator tool at the Kingharman Hospital for 1 month. Methods: Data were collected from patient charts for 1 month, January 1–31, 2019. A data extraction tool was used to capture information on patient demographics, diagnosis, and antibiotics prescription details regarding dosage, duration, and frequency of administration. The tool adopted 6 selected indicators from the WHO antimicrobial use manual to measure the extent of antibiotic use in hospital and performance among prescribers. Results: Of the 189 charts reviewed, 175 included antibiotic prescriptions. The percentage of prescriptions involving antibiotics was 92.5%. The average number of drugs prescribed was 2, with an average duration of 5.2 days. Moreover, 50.5% of antibiotics prescribed were generic, and 96.6% were from the Ministry of Health and Sanitation Essential Medicine List (EML). The most commonly used antibiotics were ciprofloxacin (38.8%), followed by ceftriaxone (23.0%), amoxicillin (16.8%), metronidazole (8.5%), and others(12.7%). Typhoid accounted for 34.8% of broad-spectrum antibiotics, UTI accounted for 17.7%, malaria accounted for 12.5%, 25.5% were unspecified, and 9.5% were for unclear diagnoses. Typically, combinations of fluroquinolones and cephalosporins were used to treat typhoid and UTIs. Conclusions: This cross-sectional study represents a broad picture of antibiotic prescribing patterns at the King Harman Hospital. There was no strict adherence to the WHO recommended prescribing guidelines. These findings also indicate the degree of irrational and inappropriate prescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics. This study highlights the need for a comprehensive assessment of antimicrobial use to gain a better understanding of national antibiotic use and to guide interventions to reducing AMR.Funding: NoneDisclosures: NoneIf I am discussing specific healthcare products or services, I will use generic names to extent possible. If I need to use trade names, I will use trade names from several companies when available, and not just trade names from any single company.DisagreeChristiana Kallon

Download Full-text

Patient, Provider, and Practice Characteristics Associated with Inappropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing in Ambulatory Practices

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2017.263 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 39 (3) ◽

pp. 307-315 ◽

Cited By ~ 26

Author(s):

Monica L. Schmidt ◽

Melanie D. Spencer ◽

Lisa E. Davidson

Keyword(s):

Internal Medicine ◽

Family Medicine ◽

Inappropriate Prescribing ◽

Urgent Care ◽

Future Research ◽

Study Cohort ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Specific Patient ◽

Antimicrobial Prescribing ◽

Care Family

OBJECTIVETo reduce inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing across ambulatory care, understanding the patient-, provider-, and practice-level characteristics associated with antibiotic prescribing is essential. In this study, we aimed to elucidate factors associated with inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing across urgent care, family medicine, and pediatric and internal medicine ambulatory practices.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSData for this retrospective cohort study were collected from outpatient visits for common upper respiratory conditions that should not require antibiotics. The cohort included 448,990 visits between January 2014 and May 2016. Carolinas HealthCare System urgent care, family medicine, internal medicine and pediatric practices were included across 898 providers and 246 practices.METHODSPrescribing rates were reported per 1,000 visits. Indications were defined using the International Classification of Disease, Ninth and Tenth Revisions, Clinical Modification (ICD-9/10-CM) criteria. In multivariable models, the risk of receiving an antibiotic prescription was reported with adjustment for practice, provider, and patient characteristics.RESULTSThe overall prescribing rate in the study cohort was 407 per 1,000 visits (95% confidence interval [CI], 405–408). After adjustment, adult patients seen by an advanced practice practitioner were 15% more likely to receive an antimicrobial than those seen by a physician provider (incident risk ratio [IRR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03–1.29). In the pediatric sample, older providers were 4 times more likely to prescribe an antimicrobial than providers aged ≤30 years (IRR, 4.21; 95% CI, 2.96–5.97).CONCLUSIONSOur results suggest that patient, practice, and provider characteristics are associated with inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing. Future research should target antibiotic stewardship programs to specific patient and provider populations to reduce inappropriate prescribing compared to a “one size fits all” approach.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:307–315

Download Full-text

Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing in United States Children’s Hospitals: A National Point Prevalence Survey

Clinical Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/cid/ciaa036 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 71 (8) ◽

pp. e226-e234 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alison C Tribble ◽

Brian R Lee ◽

Kelly B Flett ◽

Lori K Handy ◽

Jeffrey S Gerber ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Inappropriate Prescribing ◽

The United States ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Hospitalized Children ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Children's Hospitals ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

Children’S Hospitals

Abstract Background Studies estimate that 30%–50% of antibiotics prescribed for hospitalized patients are inappropriate, but pediatric data are limited. Characterization of inappropriate prescribing practices for children is needed to guide pediatric antimicrobial stewardship. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of antibiotic prescribing at 32 children’s hospitals in the United States. Subjects included hospitalized children with ≥ 1 antibiotic order at 8:00 am on 1 day per calendar quarter, over 6 quarters (quarter 3 2016–quarter 4 2017). Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) physicians and/or pharmacists used a standardized survey to collect data on antibiotic orders and evaluate appropriateness. The primary outcome was the percentage of antibiotics prescribed for infectious use that were classified as suboptimal, defined as inappropriate or needing modification. Results Of 34 927 children hospitalized on survey days, 12 213 (35.0%) had ≥ 1 active antibiotic order. Among 11 784 patients receiving antibiotics for infectious use, 25.9% were prescribed ≥ 1 suboptimal antibiotic. Of the 17 110 antibiotic orders prescribed for infectious use, 21.0% were considered suboptimal. Most common reasons for inappropriate use were bug–drug mismatch (27.7%), surgical prophylaxis > 24 hours (17.7%), overly broad empiric therapy (11.2%), and unnecessary treatment (11.0%). The majority of recommended modifications were to stop (44.7%) or narrow (19.7%) the drug. ASPs would not have routinely reviewed 46.1% of suboptimal orders. Conclusions Across 32 children’s hospitals, approximately 1 in 3 hospitalized children are receiving 1 or more antibiotics at any given time. One-quarter of these children are receiving suboptimal therapy, and nearly half of suboptimal use is not captured by current ASP practices.

Download Full-text

Friend or Foe: Perceptions of Infectious Disease Specialists as Stewards and Social Determinants of Antimicrobial Prescribing

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2020.791 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (S1) ◽

pp. s236-s237

Author(s):

Cora Constantinescu ◽

Caitlyn Cook Furr ◽

Joseph Vayalumkal ◽

John Conly ◽

Elaine Gilfoyle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mixed Methods ◽

Social Determinants ◽

Mixed Methods Research ◽

Clinical Teaching ◽

Qualitative Interviews ◽

Inappropriate Prescribing ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Prescribing Behavior ◽

Antimicrobial Prescribing

Background: Inappropriate prescribing behavior can be associated with higher rates of antibiotic resistance, calling for detailed studies on how physicians make prescribing decisions. We conducted a mixed-methods study to investigate physician antibiotic prescribing behavior in a 141-bed pediatric hospital. Methods: We applied a mixed-methods research design. The quantitative phase was conducted over a 6-month period to identify cases of inappropriate prescribing. The qualitative phase comprised 22 qualitative interviews with clinical teaching units (CTU) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) team members (physicians and pharmacists). Two coders analyzed the data deductively using the theoretical domain framework (TDF), as well as the social determinants of antimicrobial prescribing (SDAP). Results: In 52.9% of the 36 identified cases in the CTU and 31.4% of the 37 cases in the PICU, an infectious diseases (ID) consultation occurred. Compliance rates with ID recommendations were 79% and 91% in the CTU and PICU, respectively. The CTU and PICU expressed appreciation for ID involvement when ID supported their de-escalation choices in complex cases and in cases in which less commonly known antibiotics were used. However, the ID service involvement was perceived as detrimental to antimicrobial prescribing decisions for CTU and PICU across 3 of the 4 SDAP domains (Fig. 1, qualitative research quotes). Relationship between clinicians: CTU physicians and pharmacists perceived ID involvement as negatively impacting the relationship of the team. Antimicrobial decisions were automatically defaulted to ID, whereas pharmacy involvement was disregarded and the decisions were delayed. Risk, fear, and emotion: These were experienced across all respondents’ groups that identified ID specialists’ egos and personalities as contrary to open collaborative discussion on antimicrobial decisions. (Mis)perception of the problem: ID physicians were identified as more conservative in their antimicrobial choices, leading to prolonged duration of treatment, broader choices, and longer hospitalizations. The CTU and pharmacy respondents felt that ID recommendations were inconsistent among physicians and deviated from guidelines with little justification. Conclusions: Although CTU and PICU teams tend to comply with ID prescribing recommendations and ID involvement with complicated cases, pharmacists, CTU physicians, and PICU physicians perceived ID consultations to negatively affect collaborative efforts for stewardship. These findings offer novel insights into how an ID service can improve its role to positively affect appropriate prescribing. CTU and PICU respondents called for a supportive and trusting relationship with the ID service as a major driver for behavioral change and enhanced stewardship.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Download Full-text

Prevalence and risk factors for antibiotic utilization in Chinese children

BMC Pediatrics ◽

10.1186/s12887-021-02706-z ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Shasha Guo ◽

Qiang Sun ◽

Xinyang Zhao ◽

Liyan Shen ◽

Xuemei Zhen

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Healthcare Research ◽

Chinese Children ◽

Rural Setting ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Antibiotic Utilization ◽

At Home

Abstract Background Antibiotic resistance poses a significant threat to public health globally. Irrational utilization of antibiotics being one of the main reasons of antibiotic resistant. Children as a special group, there's more chance of getting infected. Although most of the infection is viral in etiology, antibiotics still are the most frequently prescribed medications for children. Therefore, high use of antibiotics among children raises concern about the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing. This systematic review aims to measuring prevalence and risk factors for antibiotic utilization in children in China. Methods English and Chinese databases were searched to identify relevant studies evaluating the prevalence and risk factors for antibiotic utilization in Chinese children (0-18 years), which were published between 2010 and July 2020. A Meta-analysis of prevalence was performed using random effect model. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and modified Jadad score was used to assess risk of bias of studies. In addition, we explored the risk factors of antibiotic utilization in Chinese children using qualitative analysis. Results Of 10,075 studies identified, 98 eligible studies were included after excluded duplicated studies. A total of 79 studies reported prevalence and 42 studies reported risk factors for antibiotic utilization in children. The overall prevalence of antibiotic utilization among outpatients and inpatients were 63.8% (35 studies, 95% confidence interval (CI): 55.1-72.4%), and 81.3% (41 studies, 95% CI: 77.3-85.2%), respectively. In addition, the overall prevalence of caregiver’s self-medicating of antibiotics for children at home was 37.8% (4 studies, 95% CI: 7.9-67.6%). The high prevalence of antibiotics was associated with multiple factors, while lacking of skills and knowledge in both physicians and caregivers was the most recognized risk factor, caregivers put pressure on physicians to get antibiotics and self-medicating with antibiotics at home for children also were the main factors attributed to this issue. Conclusion The prevalence of antibiotic utilization in Chinese children is heavy both in hospitals and home. It is important for government to develop more effective strategies to improve the irrational use of antibiotic, especially in rural setting.

Download Full-text

Ergonomic Process Improvement for Mapping Risk and Identifying Key Interventions for Eliminating Injuries from Needles and Sharps in the OR

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting ◽

10.1177/1071181320641166 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 64 (1) ◽

pp. 716-720

Author(s):

Pramila Kalaga ◽

Barbara Wolford ◽

Matthew Mormino ◽

Timothy Kingston ◽

Julie Fedderson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Process Improvement ◽

Injury Risk ◽

Best Practice ◽

Physical Workload ◽

Physical Factors ◽

Improvement Project ◽

Targeted Interventions ◽

Effective Interventions ◽

Sharps Injury

The risk of a needle stick or sharps injury in the operating room (OR) is high due to conditions such as minimal physical protective measures, frequent transfer of sharps, and reliance on human attention and skill for injury avoidance. An ergonomic process improvement project was initiated at a large metro teaching hospital to identify ergonomic risk factors for these OR injuries. To maximize the engagement of the front- end users, an ergonomic process improvement (EPI) team was developed, consisting of representatives from participating OR teams, an employee health nurse and two ergonomists. Surveys, observations, and interviews were conducted to quantify injury risk for the OR teams, evaluate barriers to best practice adherence, and identify opportunities for targeted interventions. Risk mapping was completed for the surgeons, surgical techs and OR nurses identifying double gloving and safe passing zone as areas in need of improvement. Through observation and interviews, researchers identified physical factors relating to musculoskeletal pain and cognitive factors leading to distractions as safety risk concerns. The overall success of the EPI was the engagement of the OR teams and surgeons in the process of identifying risk factors and potential opportunities for ergonomic solutions related to cognitive workload, physical workload, teamwork, and work design for injury prevention. The risk factors identified will provide the basis for developing targeted, effective interventions for eliminating injuries from needles and sharps within the OR.

Download Full-text

Prevalence and factors associated with intestinal schistosomiasis and human fascioliasis among school children in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia

Tropical Medicine and Health ◽

10.1186/s41182-021-00326-y ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 49 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Teshome Bekana ◽

Nega Berhe ◽

Tadesse Eguale ◽

Mulugeta Aemero ◽

Girmay Medhin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

School Children ◽

Neglected Tropical Diseases ◽

Significant Risk ◽

Parasitic Infections ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Targeted Interventions ◽

Intestinal Schistosomiasis ◽

Regional State ◽

Human Fascioliasis

Abstract Background Schistosomiasis and fascioliasis are digenean parasitic infections and are among the neglected tropical diseases that have both medical and veterinary importance. They are found mainly in areas having limited access to safe water supply and improved sanitation. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni and Fasciola species infections and to identify associated risk factors among school children in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. Stool specimens were collected from 798 children (419 males, 379 females) and processed using Kato-Katz and formol-ether concentration techniques. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic and other exposure information to explore potential risk factors for the infections. Results The overall prevalence of S. mansoni and Fasciola species infections was 25.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 22.5-28.6) and 5.5% (95% CI: 3.9-7.1), respectively. S. mansoni was present in all surveyed schools with the prevalence ranging from 12.8% (16/125; 95% CI = 5.6-20.0) to 39.7% (64/161; 95% CI = 32.2-47.2) while Fasciola species was identified in five schools with the prevalence ranging from 2.5% (4/160; 95% CI = 0.001–4.9) to 9.8% (13/133; 95% CI = 4.7–14.8). The prevalence of S. mansoni infection was significantly associated with swimming in rivers (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.79, 95% CI, 1.22–2.62; P=0.003), bathing in open freshwater bodies (AOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.39–2.94; P<0.001) and engaging in irrigation activities (AOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.19-2.39; P=0.004), and was higher in children attending Addis Mender (AOR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.20–5.46; P=0.015 ) and Harbu schools (AOR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.64–7.59; P=0.001). Fasciola species infection was significantly associated with consumption of raw vegetables (AOR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.23-4.97; P=0.011) and drinking water from unimproved sources (AOR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.11–4.70; P=0.026). Conclusion Both intestinal schistosomiasis and human fascioliasis are prevalent in the study area, affecting school children. Behaviors and access to unimproved water and sanitation are among significant risk factors. The findings are instrumental for targeted interventions.

Download Full-text

154. Development of an Electronic Algorithm to Target Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts for Adults with Acute Pharyngitis

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.199 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S87-S87

Author(s):

Ebbing Lautenbach ◽

Keith W Hamilton ◽

Robert Grundmeier ◽

Melinda M Neuhauser ◽

Lauri Hicks ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chart Review ◽

Inappropriate Prescribing ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

University Of Pennsylvania ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Acute Pharyngitis ◽

Test Characteristics ◽

Appropriate Prescribing ◽

Concurrent Infections ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Although most antibiotic use occurs in outpatients, antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) have primarily focused on inpatients. A major challenge for outpatient ASPs is lack of accurate and accessible electronic data to target interventions. We developed and validated an electronic algorithm to identify inappropriate antibiotic use for adult outpatients with acute pharyngitis. Methods In the University of Pennsylvania Health System, we used ICD-10 diagnostic codes to identify patient encounters for acute pharyngitis at outpatient practices between 3/15/17 – 3/14/18. Exclusion criteria included immunocompromising conditions, comorbidities, and concurrent infections that might require antibiotic use. We randomly selected 300 eligible subjects. Inappropriate antibiotic use based on chart review served as the basis for assessment of the electronic algorithm which was constructed using only data in the electronic health record (EHR). Criteria for appropriate prescribing, choice of antibiotic, and duration included positive streptococcal testing, use of penicillin/amoxicillin (absent b-lactam allergy), and 10 days maximum duration of therapy. Results Of 300 subjects, median age was 42, 75% were female, 64% were seen by internal medicine (vs. family medicine), and 69% were seen by a physician (vs. advanced practice provider). On chart review, 127 (42%) subjects received an antibiotic, of which 29 had a positive streptococcal test and 4 had another appropriate indication. Thus, 74% (94/127) of patients received antibiotics inappropriately. Of the 29 patients who received appropriate prescribing, 27 (93%) received an appropriate antibiotic. Finally, of the 29 patients who were appropriately treated, 29 (100%) received the correct duration. Test characteristics of the EHR algorithm (compared to chart review) are noted in the Table. Conclusion Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute pharyngitis is common. An electronic algorithm for identifying inappropriate prescribing, antibiotic choice, and duration is highly accurate. This algorithm could be used to efficiently assess prescribing among practices and individual clinicians. The impact of interventions based on this algorithm should be tested in future work. Test Characteristics of Electronic Algorithm for Inappropriate Prescribing, Agent, and Duration Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text