scholarly journals 146 Evaluation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on stockpiled bermudagrass

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Megan E Griffin ◽  
Mary K Mullenix ◽  
D W Held ◽  
Russ B Muntifering ◽  
Sandra L Dillard
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Nutritive Value ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria ◽  
N Fertilization ◽  
Alternative Form ◽  
Forage Production ◽  
Commercial Fertilizer ◽  
Harvest Dates ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
Growth Promoting

Abstract Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are non-pathogenic, soil-inhabiting, beneficial bacteria that colonize the roots of plants. Some PGPR strains are reported to increase nutrient uptake and fix atmospheric N, which suggests that biofertilization with PGPR may provide an alternative to N fertilization for forage production. In mid-August 2017, a study was initiated to evaluate PGPR as an alternative form of N fertilization for fall-stockpiled bermudagrass. Eighteen 1-m2plots were mowed to a 2.5-cm stubble height prior to stockpiling. Two strains of PGPR (Blend 20 and DH44) were selected for evaluation based on performance in greenhouse trials. Treatments included: control, fertilizer, DH44, DH44+fertilizer, Blend 20, and Blend 20+fertilizer (n = 3).Two applications of PGPR were applied at the beginning of the stockpiling season and 30 d later. Ammonium sulfate was applied at 56 kg/ha during the first PGPR application. Plots were clipped to a height of 2.5 cm in mid-November, December, and January to determine yield and nutritive value. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED (SAS 9.4) as a completely randomized design.Yield was greater (P ≤ 0.007) for Blend 20+fertilizer, DH44, and Blend 20 (695, 673, and 664 kg DM/ha, respectively) than the control (598 kg DM/ha). Forage DM yield differed among harvest dates, with Blend 20+Fertilizer having the highest yield in January (835 kg DM/ha). Blend 20+fertilizer, control, and fertilizer treatments had the greatest effect on CP concentration (9.1, 9.5, and 10.1%, respectively). Concentrations of NDF and ADF were greatest (P ≤ 0.01) for Blend 20, Blend 20+fertilizer, DH44, and fertilizer. Percentage IVTD decreased with the later harvests (46.1, 33.8, and 39.0% in November, December, and January, respectively); however, CP was unchanged across all harvests (P3 0.12). Overall, PGPR increased DM yield of stockpiled bermudagrass while maintaining forage nutritive value similar to commercial fertilizer.

scholarly journals 68 Effects of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Fall-Stockpiled Bermudagrass

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 31-32
Author(s):  
Madison Cole ◽  
Megan E Griffin ◽  
Sandra L Dillard ◽  
Mary K Mullenix ◽  
Russ B Muntifering ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Nutritive Value ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria ◽  
N Fertilizer ◽  
Alternative Form ◽  
Forage Production ◽  
Synthetic Fertilizer ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
Growth Promoting

Abstract Forage production practices have been greatly affected by the increasing cost of N fertilization. Therefore, supplemental and alternative N sources are needed to ensure the economic viability of these systems. A 2-yr, small plot study was designed to evaluate plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as an alternative form of N fertilizer for fall-stockpiled bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Eighteen 1-m2 ‘Coastal’ bermudagrass plots were treated with a synthetic N fertilizer, DH44 (PGPR strain), DH44+fertilizer, Blend 20 (PGPR blend), Blend 20+fertilizer, and a control, then stockpiled through the fall. Two PGPR applications were applied in late-August and again 30 d later. Fertilizer and PGPR+fertilizer plots received (NH4)2SO4, at a rate of 56 kg N/ha. One-third of each plot was clipped to 2.5 cm in November, December, and January, respectively. Forage DM yield, CP, NDF, ADF, and ADL were determined via wet chemistry at the Auburn University Ruminant Nutrition Laboratory (Auburn, AL). Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED (SAS 9.4, SAS Inst., Cary, NC) as a completely randomized design. Yield was greatest (P ≤ 0.0318) for Blend 20+fertilizer, but it was not different (P = 0.2552) from that of the synthetic fertilizer (1,914 kg ha-1, 1,768 kg ha-1, respectively). Concentration of CP was least (P ≤ 0.0437) for DH44 and Blend 20 treatments (90 g kg-1 and 92 g kg-1, respectively). Concentrations of NDF for the control were different (P ≤ 0.0045) for all treatments except synthetic fertilizer (P = 0.1092). Concentrations of ADF were not different (P ≥ 0.1613) excluding the control (P ≤ 0.0525; 342.8 g kg-1and 358.0 g kg-1, respectively). In vitro true digestibility (IVTD) was not different (P = 0.0947) among all treatments (463.1 g kg-1). All yield and nutritive value parameters were greater (P ≤ 0.0246) in Year 2. These results indicate that PGPR is a viable option for biofertilization of fall-stockpiled bermudagrass; however, further investigation into the effects of PGPR inoculants at a field scale are needed.

scholarly journals Impacts of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Tropical Forage Grass in Brazil

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 342
Author(s):  
Monyck Jeane dos Santos Lopes ◽  
Moacyr Bernardino Dias-Filho ◽  
Thomaz Henrique dos Reis Castro ◽  
Edilson Ferreira da Silva ◽  
Marcela Cristiane Ferreira Rêgo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Plant Height ◽  
Biomass Production ◽  
Nutritive Value ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria ◽  
Soluble Carbohydrates ◽  
Production Plant ◽  
Pasture Production ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
Growth Promoting

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria effects on anatomical characteristics and nutritional value of Brachiaria (Syn. Urochloa) brizantha cv. BRS Piatã. The experimental design applied was completely randomized design  with three treatments: (1) non-inoculated unfertilized-control plants (C-), (2) non-inoculated fertilized-control plants (C+) and (3) B. brizantha inoculated with Pseudomonas fluorescens (BRM-32111) and Burkholderia pyrrocinia (BRM-32113). The following parameters were evaluated at 35 days after seedling emergence: biomass production, plant height, net photosynthesis (A), water-use efficiency (WUE), chlorophyll (SPAD), anatomical and nutritional. The rhizobacteria modified the anatomy of the leaf, culm and roots of B. brizantha. They also increased the chlorophyll content, A, WUE, total soluble carbohydrates, starch and crude protein contents, N, P, Mg and Fe concentrations, plant height, root area and biomass production. Therefore, we conclude that co-inoculation with P. fluorescens (BRM-32111) and B. pyrrocinia (BRM-32113) modified the anatomy and biochemistry of B. brizantha, promoting growth and nutrient accumulation. Therefore, these findings set up the basis for additional exploratory studies, using these rhizobacteria as biotechnological innovation with potential of use as biofertilizer in B. brizantha, aiming higher productivity and nutritive value in a more eco-friendly and sustainable pasture production system.

Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria: Effects on Yield and Nutritive Value of ‘Russell’ Bermudagrass and ‘KY 31’ Tall Fescue

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 21-21
Author(s):  
Madison Cole ◽  
S Leanne L Dillard
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Tall Fescue ◽  
Nutritive Value ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria ◽  
Single Strain ◽  
Randomized Design ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
Nirs Data ◽  
Growth Promoting ◽  
N Fertility

Abstract Commercial N fertilizer are labor intensive and expensive for many forage producers. Alternative N fertility options are necessary for the long-term sustainability of forage systems. A 2-yr experiment evaluating plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as an alternative N source for ‘Russell’ bermudagrass (C. dactylon) and ‘KY 31’ tall fescue (L. arundinaceum) was conducted in Alabama. Fourteen, 3-m2 plots were treated with full N (56 kg/ha) and ½ N (28 kg/ha), Accomplish LM (AMS), AMS + ½ N, DH44, Blend 20, and a control. DH44 is a single strain of Paenibacillus sonchi, while Blend 20 contains 2 strains of Bacillus pumilus and 1 strain of B. spaericus. Forage samples were taken every 4 weeks with a 0.1-m2 quadrat then analyzed for NDF, ADF, CP, and yield using NIRS. Data were analyzed using Proc GLIMMIX of SAS 9.4 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC) as a completely randomized design (n = 2). For both forages, full N had greater (P < 0.0139) yield when compared to the control (tall fescue: 8,295 vs. 7,353 kg/ha; bermudagrass: 9,329 vs. 8,109 kg/ha). There were no differences (P ≥ 0.05) in NDF concentration for either forage. Full and ½ N had greater CP than AMS in bermudagrass (11.5, 11.4%; P ≤ 0.0490). Blend 20 treated bermudagrass had greater ADF than full and ½ N (32.7, 30.7, and 30.9%, respectively; P < 0.0313). Blend 20 treated tall fescue had greater ADF compared to AMS + N and DH44 (35.8, 12.1, and 33.9%, respectively; P < 0.0227). Full N tall fescue had greater CP) compared to AMS (12.1, AMS CP %, respectively; P < 0.0082). DH44 had greater CP compared to AMS and Blend 20 (11.9, 11.0, and 11.0%, respectively; P < 0.0423). For both forages, PGPR treated plots produced yields and maintained forage nutritive value not different than the commercial fertilizer.

Aplikasi Bacillus subtilis pada beberapa Bahan Organik terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Tanaman Cabai Rawit (Capsicum frutescens L.)

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
Praptiningsih Gamawati Adinurani ◽  
Sri Rahayu ◽  
Nurul Fima Zahroh
Keyword(s):  
Bacillus Subtilis ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria ◽  
Capsicum Frutescens ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
Growth Promoting

Mikroba Bacillus subtilis merupakan agen pengendali hayati mempunyai kelebihan sebagai Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) yaitu dapat berfungsi sebagai biofertilizer, biostimulan, biodekomposer dan bioprotektan. Tujuan penelitian mengetahui potensi B. subtilis dalam merombak bahan organik sebagai usaha meningkatkan ketersediaan bahan organik tanah yang semakin menurun. Penelitian menggunakan Rancangan Petak Terbagi dengan berbagai  bahan organik sebagai petak utama (B0 = tanpa bahan organik, B1 = kotoran ayam,  B2 = kotoran kambing, B3 = kotoran sapi) dan aplikasi B.subtilis sebagai anak petak (A0 = 0 cc/L, A1 = 5cc/L, A2 = 10 cc/L, Pengamatan meliputi variabel tinggi tanaman, indeks luas daun, jumlah buah per tanaman, berat buah per tanaman, dan bahan organik tanah. Data pengamatan  dianalisis ragam  menggunakan  Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) versi 25 dan dilanjutkan dengan uji Duncan untuk mengetahui signifikansi perbedaan antar perlakuan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tidak terdapat interaksi antara bahan organik kotoran ternak dan konsentrasi B. subtilis terhadap semua variabel pengamatan. Potensi B. subtilis sangat baik dalam mendekomposisi bahan organik yang ditunjukkan dengan peningkatan bahan organik, dan hasil terbaik pada kotoran  sapi (B3) dan konsentrasi B. subtilis 15 mL/L masing-masing sebesar 46.47 % dan 34.76 %. Variabel pertumbuhan tidak berbeda nyata kecuali tinggi tanaman dengan pertambahan tinggi paling banyak pada pemberian kotoran kambing sebesar 170.69 %.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document