635 Free Versus Pedicled Flaps for Primary Reconstruction of Electrical Injuries: A Systematic Review and Observational Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S173-S174
Author(s):  
Kimberly Khoo ◽  
Laura Bashour ◽  
Joshua M Peterson ◽  
Pablo L Padilla ◽  
Sagar R Mulay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Voltage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Pedicled Flap ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Tissue Loss ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Post Injury ◽  
Pedicled Flaps ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction Both high-voltage (>1000 V) and low-voltage (< 1000 V) electrical burns can cause serious injuries due to dissipation of heat as electric current passes through deep tissues. Because of tissue loss and vital structure exposure, flap-based reconstruction is frequently performed in patients with these injuries. Depending on clinical presentation, both free and pedicled flaps may be indicated. We wondered if reported reconstructive outcomes after electrical injury differ between free and pedicled flaps when implemented in the immediate post-injury period. Methods A systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted using PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE databases. Articles that were included described patients with electrical burn injuries who underwent reconstruction with either free or pedicled flaps within 90 days of injury. Technique articles or articles lacking outcomes analysis were excluded. Data was extracted from articles that met inclusion and exclusion criteria, including flap type, timing of reconstruction, complications, and patient demographics. Statistical analysis was performed with chi-square tests. Results Of 536 articles obtained from the literature search, 37 met criteria. To date, no randomized control trials comparing these modalities have been performed. In total, these studies reported on 364 total patients who experienced high- and low-voltage electrical burn injuries. Pooled reported outcomes of 374 flap reconstructions were analyzed, including 145 free flaps and 229 pedicled flaps. Reported complication rates did not differ significantly between free flaps (30/145, 20.7%) and pedicled flaps (46/229, 20.1%; p = .89). However, free flaps experienced significantly higher failure rates than pedicled flaps (13/145, 9.0% vs. 0/229, 0%; p = < .05). Conclusions Electrical burn injuries present a unique indication for flap-based reconstruction in the immediate post-burn phase of care. However, substantial variation exists amongst physicians regarding whether to proceed with a free flap or pedicled flap surgery when indicated. Our data identified an overall significant difference between free versus pedicled flap failure rate but did not identify a significant difference between overall complication rates.

scholarly journals Is jumbo biopsy forceps comparable to cold snare for diminutive colorectal polyps? – a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. E9-E13
Author(s):  
Sachin Srinivasan ◽  
Peter D. Siersema ◽  
Madhav Desai
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Complete Removal ◽  
Colorectal Polyps ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Incomplete Resection ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Biopsy Forceps ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Leave One Out ◽  
Endoscopic Assessment

Abstract Background and study aims Diminutive colorectal polyps are increasingly being detected and it is not clear whether jumbo biopsy forceps (JBF) has comparable efficacy to that of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for management of these lesions. Methods An electronic literature search was performed for studies comparing resection rates of JBF and CSP for diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm). The primary outcome was incomplete resection rate (IRR). Secondary outcomes included failure of tissue retrieval and complication rates (post-polypectomy bleeding, perforation etc.). Leave-one-out analysis was performed to examine the disproportionate role of any of the studies. Meta-analysis outcomes and heterogeneity (I2) were computed using Comprehensive meta-analysis software. Results A total of 4 studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 1 retrospective study) with 407 patients and 569 total polyps (mean size of 3.62 mm) was included for analysis. IRR of JBF was slightly higher than that of CSP (10.2 % vs 7.2 %) but this was not statistically significantly different (Pooled OR 1.76; 95 % CI 0.94–3.28; I2 = 0). Leave-one-out analysis showed no significant difference in the pooled OR comparison either. Two of the 4 studies reported 0 % failure of tissue retrieval for JBF and 1 % and 4.3 % for CSP. There were no complications for either group from the 2 studies that reported this outcome. The quality of the included studies was moderate to high. Conclusions This systematic review with only limited data shows that JBF and CSP are not statistically different in completely removing diminutive polyps, although careful endoscopic assessment is needed to ensure complete removal of all polyp tissue.

scholarly journals Endoscopic versus Surgical Intervention for Painful Obstructive Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2636
Author(s):  
Ka Wing Ma ◽  
Hoonsub So ◽  
Euisoo Shin ◽  
Janice Hoi Man Mok ◽  
Kim Ho Kam Yuen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Endoscopic Drainage ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Surgical Drainage ◽  
Endocrine Insufficiency ◽  
Significant Difference

There is limited evidence on the standard care for painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis (CP), while comparisons of endoscopic and surgical modes for pain relief have yielded conflicting results from small sample sizes. We aimed to obtain a clear picture of the matter by a meta-analysis of these results. We searched the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies comparing endoscopic and surgical treatments for painful obstructive CP. Pooled effects were calculated by the random effect model. Primary outcomes were overall pain relief (complete and partial), and secondary outcomes were complete and partial pain relief, complication rate, hospitalization duration, and endocrine insufficiency. Seven studies with 570 patients were included in the final analysis. Surgical drainage was associated with superior overall pain relief [OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23–0.47, p < 0.001, I2 = 4%] and lesser incidence of endocrine insufficiency [OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.20–3.67, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%], but no significant difference in the subgroup of complete [OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32–1.01, p = 0.054, I2 = 0%] or partial [OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.37–1.22, p = 0.19, I2 = 0%] pain relief, complication rates [OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.41–2.46, p = 0.99, I2 = 49%], and hospital stay [OR −0.54, 95% CI −1.23–0.15, p = 0.13, I2 = 87%] was found. Surgery is associated with significantly better overall pain relief and lesser endocrine insufficiency in patients with painful obstructive CP. However, considering the invasiveness of surgery, no significant differences in complete or partial pain relief, and heterogeneity of a few parameters between two groups, endoscopic drainage may be firstly performed and surgical drainage may be considered when endoscopic drainage fails.

Integrated dual lag screws versus single lag screw cephalomedullary nail constructs: a meta-analysis and systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002098506
Author(s):  
James R Onggo ◽  
Mithun Nambiar ◽  
Jason D Onggo ◽  
Anuruban Ambikaipalan ◽  
Parminder J Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lower Complication ◽  
Cephalomedullary Nails

Background/Aim: This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of integrated dual lag screw (IDL) cephalomedullary nails (CMN) when compared with single lag screw (SL) constructs, in the internal fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Methods: The Smith & Nephew InterTan IDL was compared with SL CMN group consisting of the Stryker Gamma-3 (G3) and Synthes Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) CMN. A multi-database search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Data from studies assessing the clinical and radiological outcomes, complications and perioperative parameters of InterTan versus G3 or PFNA CMN in patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures were extracted and analysed. Results: 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis, consisting of 2643 patients. InterTan was associated with lower complication rates in terms of all-cause revisions (OR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22–0.51; p < 0.001), cut-outs (OR 0.30; 95% CI, 0.17–0.51; p < 0.001), medial or lateral screw migration (OR 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06–0.65; p = 0.008) as well as persistent hip and thigh pain (OR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47–0.90; p = 0.008). In terms of perioperative parameters, InterTan is associated with longer operative times (MD 5.57 minutes; 95% CI, 0.37–10.78 minutes, p = 0.04) and fluoroscopy times (MD 38.89 seconds, 95% CI, 15.88–61.91 seconds; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of clinical Harris Hip Score and radiological outcomes, non-union, haematoma, femoral fractures, varus collapse, length of stay and mean intraoperative blood loss between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Integrated dual lag screw cephalomedullary nails are associated with fewer revisions and complications. However, there is insufficient data to suggest that either nail construct is associated with better functional outcomes.

scholarly journals Radiofrequency Ablation versus Cryoablation in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali H. Hachem ◽  
Joseph E. Marine ◽  
Housam A. Tahboub ◽  
Sana Kamdar ◽  
Shaffi Kanjwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fluoroscopy Time ◽  
Radiofrequency Energy ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Ablation Time ◽  
Significant Difference

Background. Pulmonary vein isolation is commonly performed using radiofrequency energy with cryoablation gaining acceptance. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which compared radiofrequency versus cryoablation for patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods. A systematic search strategy identified both published and unpublished articles from inception to November 10, 2016, in multiple databases. The primary outcomes for this meta-analysis were long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation at 12-month follow-up and overall postoperative complication rates. For all included studies, the methodological quality was assessed through the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for risk of bias. Results. A total of 247 articles were identified with eight being included in this review as they satisfied the prespecified inclusion criteria. Overall, there was no significant difference in freedom from atrial fibrillation at ≥12-month follow-up between those receiving cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation, respectively (OR = 0.98, CI = 0.67–1.43, I2 = 56%, p=0.90). Additionally, the secondary outcomes of duration of ablation, fluoroscopy time, and ablation time failed to reach significance. Cryoballoon ablation had significantly greater odds of postoperative phrenic nerve injury at 12-month follow-up. Conclusions. Our meta-analysis suggests that cryoballoon ablation provides comparable benefits with regard to freedom from atrial fibrillation at medium-term follow-up, fluoroscopy time, ablation time, operative duration, and overall complication rate in comparison to radiofrequency ablation.

scholarly journals Safety of Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketan Yerneni ◽  
John F Burke ◽  
Pranathi Chunduru ◽  
Annette M Molinaro ◽  
K Daniel Riew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level I ◽  
High Level

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is being increasingly offered on an outpatient basis. However, the safety profile of outpatient ACDF remains poorly defined. OBJECTIVE To review the medical literature on the safety of outpatient ACDF. METHODS We systematically reviewed the literature for articles published before April 1, 2018, describing outpatient ACDF and associated complications, including incidence of reoperation, stroke, thrombolytic events, dysphagia, hematoma, and mortality. A random-effects analysis was performed comparing complications between the inpatient and outpatient groups. RESULTS We identified 21 articles that satisfied the selection criteria, of which 15 were comparative studies. Most of the existing studies were retrospective, with a lack of level I or II studies on this topic. We found no statistically significant difference between inpatient and outpatient ACDF in overall complications, incidence of stroke, thrombolytic events, dysphagia, and hematoma development. However, patients undergoing outpatient ACDF had lower reported reoperation rates (P &lt; .001), mortality (P &lt; .001), and hospitalization duration (P &lt; .001). CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis indicates that there is a lack of high level of evidence studies regarding the safety of outpatient ACDF. However, the existing literature suggests that outpatient ACDF can be safe, with low complication rates comparable to inpatient ACDF in well-selected patients. Patients with advanced age and comorbidities such as obesity and significant myelopathy are likely not suitable for outpatient ACDF. Spine surgeons must carefully evaluate each patient to decide whether outpatient ACDF is a safe option. Higher quality, large prospective randomized control trials are needed to accurately demonstrate the safety profile of outpatient ACDF.

A Meta-Analysis of Complication Rates Among Different SMAS Facelift Techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 927-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew A Jacono ◽  
A Sean Alemi ◽  
Joseph L Russell
Keyword(s):  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Facial Nerve Injury ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Smas Flap

AbstractBackgroundSub-superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) rhytidectomy techniques are considered to have a higher complication profile, especially for facial nerve injury, compared with less invasive SMAS techniques. This results in surgeons avoiding sub-SMAS dissection.ObjectivesThe authors sought to aggregate and summarize data on complications among different SMAS facelift techniques.MethodsA broad systematic search was performed. All included studies: (1) described a SMAS facelifting technique categorized as SMAS plication, SMASectomy/imbrication, SMAS flap, high lateral SMAS flap, deep plane, and composite; and (2) reported the number of postoperative complications in participants. Meta-analysis was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.ResultsA total 183 studies were included. High lateral SMAS (1.85%) and composite rhytidectomy (1.52%) had the highest rates of temporary nerve injury and were the only techniques to show a statistically significant difference compared with SMAS plication (odds ratio [OR] = 2.71 and 2.22, respectively, P < 0.05). Risk of permanent injury did not differ among techniques. An increase in major hematoma was found for the deep plane (1.22%, OR = 1.67, P < 0.05) and SMAS imbrication (1.92%, OR = 2.65, P < 0.01). Skin necrosis was higher with the SMAS flap (1.57%, OR = 2.29, P < 0.01).ConclusionsThere are statistically significant differences in complication rates between SMAS facelifting techniques for temporary facial nerve injury, hematoma, seroma, necrosis, and infection. Technique should be selected based on quality of results and not the complication profile.Level of Evidence: 2

Outcomes of Concurrent Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Rhinoplasty: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 194589242098067
Author(s):  
Benjamin F. Bitner ◽  
Karthik R. Prasad ◽  
Khodayar Goshtasbi ◽  
Brandyn S. Dunn ◽  
Edward C. Kuan
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Medical Problems ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Ovid Medline ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and functional nasal airway obstruction are common but distinct medical problems which affect quality of life. In certain instances, patients often benefit from concomitant functional septorhinoplasty, or elect for cosmetic rhinoplasty, in addition to functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and prefer combining procedures. Determining outcomes of combined surgery is important when discussing risks and benefits with patients. Methods A thorough literature search of articles published in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. Patients were categorized as either having FESS or rhinoplasty alone or combined. Binary random-effects models were applied to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for outcomes including complications, recurrence, and satisfaction. Results Of the 55 screened articles, 6 were included in the analysis, and of these, 6 (405 patients), 2 (90 patients), 4 (290 patients), and 3 (190 patients) provided data for postoperative complications, recurrence of CRS symptoms, revision rates, and patient satisfaction, respectively. Major complications were observed in 11 (5.8%) total combined cases, 0 (0%) FESS cases, and 6 (3.5%) rhinoplasty cases with no statistical difference between combined cases and rhinoplasties (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.45–4.16, p = 0.58). Recurrence of CRS symptoms was noted in 35.6% combined cases and 28.9% FESS cases (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.55–3.64, p = 0.47). There was no observed difference in revision rates between combined and isolated rhinoplasties (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.43–2.32, p = 1). Lastly, 91.6% of patients were satisfied with results of combined cases compared to 87.4% of patients in standalone cases (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.61–4.03, p = 0.35). Conclusion Aggregate evidence demonstrates similar risk in complication rates in combined surgical cases compared to stand-alone rhinoplasty. There appears to be no significant difference in recurrence of symptoms, revision rates or patient satisfaction.

Resident training in head and neck flap reconstruction in U.S. academic otolaryngology programmes

2001 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahesh H. Bhaya ◽  
Gady Har-El
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Resident Training ◽  
Flap Reconstruction ◽  
Pedicled Flaps ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Radial Forearm

The main objective of this study was to assess resident training in head and neck flap reconstruction, and to determine the confidence of graduating residents in performing these flaps independently. Questionnaires were distributed to otolaryngology residents graduating in 1997. Respondents recorded the number of pedicled and free flap procedures they performed, or assisted with, and indicated flaps they felt confident about performing independently.Pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) (n = 560, mean 6.59) and radial forearm (RF) (66, 0.78) were the most common pedicled and free flaps performed. There was a significant difference (p = 0.0002, Mann-Whitney U test) between median confidence for pedicled (44.5 per cent) and free flaps (two per cent). Ten of the 17 flaps showed a significant Pearson correlation (p<0.05) between number of procedures performed and confidence in performing them independently. Of the pedicled flaps, latissimus dorsi (LD) showed good correlation (r = 0.67), PMMC showed low correlation (r = 0.19) and other pedicled flaps fair correlation. Of the free flaps, LD (r = 0.64) and fibula (r = 0.50) showed good correlation and rectus abdominis and RF fair correlation. There was a fair inverse correlation (r =−0.29) between numbers of pedicled and free flaps performed.Higher correlation in flaps uncommonly performed reflects greater operative training necessary to achieve the confidence for performing these flaps independently. As respondents perfomed greater numbers of free flaps, the number of pedicled flaps decreased. It might thus be important to train residents in all aspects of pedicled flaps. Most respondents were of the opinion that additional training in free flaps was necessary for those planning a career in head and neck reconstructive surgery.

Free versus Pedicled Perforator Flaps for Lower Extremity Reconstruction: A Multicenter Comparison of Institutional Practices and Outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (08) ◽  
pp. 572-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Koh ◽  
Terence Goh ◽  
Christopher Song ◽  
Hyun Suh ◽  
Peter Rovito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Pedicled Flap ◽  
Perforator Flaps ◽  
Body Regions ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Of all body regions, lower extremity wounds have been and remain the greatest challenge. Perforator free flaps have been accepted as a reasonable option to solve this dilemma but require the complexity of microsurgery. As a consequence, the possibility that pedicled perforator flaps could supplant even perforator free flaps has recently gained intense enthusiasm. Methods A retrospective investigation was undertaken to compare the validity for the use of perforator flaps of all types at three dissimilar institutions, that is, a university, a regional center, and a community hospital. All flaps performed in the 5-year period, 2011 to 2015, were included to allow at least 1-year follow-up before data analysis. A total of 433 free perforator flaps and 52 pedicled perforator flaps had been performed specifically for the lower extremity. Results Patient demographics, wound etiology, and comorbidities were similar for all institutions. Free flaps were more commonly needed after trauma and for chronic ulcers. Pedicled flaps were more likely an option after tumor excision. Large defects or those involving the foot were better served by free flaps. Overall success for free perforator flaps was 90.1% and for pedicled perforator flaps was 92.3%, with no significant difference noted (p = 0.606) between institutions. Peripheral vascular disease was the only significant comorbidity risk factor for both free and pedicled flap failure. Conclusion Perforator flaps in general have become a reasonable solution for soft tissue defects of the lower extremity. Following careful consideration of the etiology, dimensions, location, patient comorbidities, and presence of adequate perforators, a pedicled or free perforator flap could potentially be successful. Pedicled perforator flaps, if adequate healthy soft tissues remain adjacent to the defect, forecast a continuance of the evolution in seeking simplicity yet reliability by the best flap possible for soft tissue closure of the lower limb wound.

Awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a critical comparison and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (7) ◽  
pp. 687-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen L Ho ◽  
Rohaid Ali ◽  
Ian D Connolly ◽  
Jaimie M Henderson ◽  
Rohit Dhall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Deep Brain

ObjectiveNo definitive comparative studies of the efficacy of ‘awake’ deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) under local or general anaesthesia exist, and there remains significant debate within the field regarding differences in outcomes between these two techniques.MethodsWe conducted a literature review and meta-analysis of all published DBS for PD studies (n=2563) on PubMed from January 2004 to November 2015. Inclusion criteria included patient number >15, report of precision and/or clinical outcomes data, and at least 6 months of follow-up. There were 145 studies, 16 of which were under general anaesthesia. Data were pooled using an inverse-variance weighted, random effects meta-analytic model for observational data.ResultsThere was no significant difference in mean target error between local and general anaesthesia, but there was a significantly less mean number of DBS lead passes with general anaesthesia (p=0.006). There were also significant decreases in DBS complications, with fewer intracerebral haemorrhages and infections with general anaesthesia (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Section II scores off medication, UPDRS III scores off and on medication or levodopa equivalent doses between the two techniques. Awake DBS cohorts had a significantly greater decrease in treatment-related side effects as measured by the UPDRS IV off medication score (78.4% awake vs 59.7% asleep, p=0.022).ConclusionsOur meta-analysis demonstrates that while DBS under general anaesthesia may lead to lower complication rates overall, awake DBS may lead to less treatment-induced side effects. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in clinical motor outcomes between the two techniques. Thus, DBS under general anaesthesia can be considered at experienced centres in patients who are not candidates for traditional awake DBS or prefer the asleep alternative.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document