Chronic heart failure diagnosis: HFpEF

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1762-1768
Author(s):  
Daniel N. Silverman ◽  
Sanjiv J. Shah

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a very common clinical syndrome that is often misdiagnosed or overlooked due to diagnostic challenges with the lack of a specific imaging test or biomarker to make a conclusive diagnosis. Unlike HF with reduced ejection fraction, neither a reduced ejection fraction nor a dilated left ventricle is available to easily make the diagnosis of HFpEF. Furthermore, while echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction is common in patients with HFpEF, it is not a universal phenomenon. Even natriuretic peptides, which are generally thought to have good negative predictive value for the diagnosis of HF, are frequently not elevated in HFpEF patients. Finally, the cardinal symptoms of HFpEF such as dyspnoea and exercise intolerance are non-specific and may be due to many of the co-morbidities present in patients in whom the HFpEF diagnosis is entertained. This chapter presents a step-wise approach utilizing a careful clinical history, physical examination, natriuretic peptide testing, and echocardiography, which can reliably provide appropriate information to rule in or rule out the HFpEF diagnosis in the majority of patients. If there is still a question about the diagnosis, or if initial general treatment measures for the HF syndrome do not result in clinical improvement, additional testing such as right heart catheterization or cardiopulmonary exercise testing can be performed to further confirm the diagnosis. With a systematic approach to the patient with dyspnoea, the accurate diagnosis of HFpEF can be made reliably so that these high-risk patients can be appropriately treated.

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 726
Author(s):  
Samarthkumar Thakkar ◽  
Harsh Patel ◽  
Kirtenkumar Patel ◽  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
Smit Patel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beata Zaborska ◽  
Grażyna Sygitowicz ◽  
Krzysztof Smarż ◽  
Ewa Pilichowska-Paszkiet ◽  
Andrzej Budaj

Abstract Galectin-3 is a biomarker of fibrosis, inflammation and oxidative stress, and its role in heart remodelling and exercise intolerance has not been conclusively proven in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (rEF). We prospectively assessed 67 consecutive patients with symptomatic HF and left ventricular (LV) EF ≤ 35% during optimal medical therapy, with a mean serum galectin-3 concentration of 15.3 ± 6.4 and a median of 13.5 ng/mL. The group with galectin-3 concentrations greater than or equal to the median had significantly worse right ventricular (RV) systolic function parameters (s′, TAPSE), higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure, more advanced tricuspid regurgitation and lower RV-to-pulmonary circulation coupling index, while no significant differences were found in LV parameters. Moreover, this group achieved significantly lower parameters in cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Significant negative correlations were found between galectin-3 concentration and RV parameters and exercise capacity parameters and have persisted after adjustment for glomerular filtration rate, but not all of them have persisted after adjustment for NT-proBNP. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that TAPSE (β coefficient: − 0.605; p < 0.001) and heart rate at peak exercise (β coefficient: − 0.98; p = 0.009) were independently related to galectin-3 concentration. Elevated galectin-3 concentration in patients with HFrEF might indicate concomitant RV dysfunction and exercise intolerance.


Author(s):  
Massar Omar ◽  
Jesper Jensen ◽  
Daniel Burkhoff ◽  
Peter H. Frederiksen ◽  
Caroline Kistorp ◽  
...  

Background: Stressed blood volume (SBV) is a major determinant of systemic and pulmonary venous pressures which, in turn, determine left and right ventricular fillings and regulates cardiac output via the Frank-Starling mechanism. It is not known whether inhibition of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) favorably affects SBV. We investigated the effect of empagliflozin on estimated stressed blood volume (eSBV) in patients with heart failure andreduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared to placebo. Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of an investigator-initiated, double-blinded, placebo controlled, randomized trial. Seventy patients were assigned to empagliflozin 10 mg or matching placebo once-daily for 12 weeks. Patients underwent right heart catheterization at rest and during exercise at baseline and follow-up. The outcome was change in eSBV after 12 weeks of empagliflozin treatment over the full range of exercise, determined using a recently introduced analytical approach based on invasive hemodynamic assessment. Results: Patients with HFrEF, mean age, 57 years and mean ejection fraction 27 %, with 47 patients (71%) receiving diuretics were randomized. The effect of empagliflozin on eSBV over the full range of exercise loads showed a statistically significant reduction compared with placebo (−198.4 mL, 95%CI: −317.4; −79.3, p=0.001), a 9% decrease. The decrease in eSBV by empagliflozin was significantly correlated with the decrease in PCWP ((R= ̶ 0.33, p<0.0001). The effect of empagliflozin was consistent across subgroup analysis. Conclusions: Empagliflozin treatment significantly reduced stressed blood volume compared with placebo after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with stable chronic HFrEF during sub maximal exercise. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: NCT03198585


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Iwahashi ◽  
J Kirigaya ◽  
M Horii ◽  
Y Hanajima ◽  
T Abe ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Doppler echocardiography is a well-recognized technique for noninvasive evaluation; however, little is known about its efficacy in patients with rapid atrial fibrillation (AF) accompanied by acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The aim of this study was to explore the usefulness of serial echocardiographical assessment for rapid AF patients with ADHF. Patients A total of 110 ADHF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and rapid AF who were admitted to the CCU unit and received landiolol treatmentto decrease the heart rate (HR) to &lt;110 bpm and change HR (ΔHR) of &gt;20% within 24 hours were enrolled. Interventions Immediately after admission, the patients (n=110) received landiolol, and its dose was increased to the maximum; then, we repeatedly performed echocardiography. Among them, 39 patients were monitored using invasive right heart catheterization (RHC) simultaneously with echocardiography. Measurements and main results There were significant relationships between Doppler and RHC parameters through the landiolol treatment (Figure, baseline–max HR treatment). We observed for the major adverse events (MAE) during initial hospitalization, which included cardiac death, HF prolongation (required intravenous treatment at 30 days), and worsening renal function (WRF). MAE occurred in 44 patients, and logistic regression analyses showed that the mean left atrial pressure (mLAP)-Doppler (odds ratio = 1.132, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05–1.23, p=0.0004) and stroke volume (SV)-Doppler (odds ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–0.97, p=0.001) at 24 hours were the significant predictors for MAE, and multivariate analysis showed that mLAP-Doppler was the strongest predictor (odds ratio = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.107–1.27, p=0.0005) (Table). Conclusions During the control of the rapid AF in HFrEF patients withADHF, echocardiography was useful to assess their hemodynamic condition, even at bedside. Doppler for rapid AF of ADHF Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayesha Azmeen ◽  
Naga Vaishnavi Gadela ◽  
Vergara Cunegundo

Introduction: Heart failure(HF) is a clinical syndrome that is widely prevalent affecting approximately 6.5 million people in the United States. It accounts for the ever-rising health care costs in the US due to recurrent hospitalizations. Despite advancements in medical management, the mortality and the rate of hospitalizations continues to be high with geographic variations and racial disparities. Through this descriptive study, we sought to analyze the health disparities among Hispanic, African American (AA) and Caucasian population in a single-center. Methods: We identified a total of 178 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction from our outpatient clinic by utilizing the ICD-10 codes. Patients with ejection fraction >50% have been excluded. A retrospective chart review of their ethnic background, medications, and number of heart failure exacerbations per year has been performed. Results: 178 patients (mean age 62 years, 35.56% of females) including Hispanics (n=102), AA(n=44), and Caucasians (n=32) were included in the study. Although all patients were started on Beta-blockers, only 76.4% and 37.2% of Hispanics were started on ACEi/ARBs and spironolactone respectively. Similarly, 72.7% and 45.4% of AA were started on ACEi/ARBs and spironolactone respectively. This is in contrast to Caucasians population, where a majority of patients were on started on GDMT; 90% and 75% were started on ACEi/ARBs and spironolactone respectively. This was also reflected by the number of admissions due to HF exacerbations which ranged from 2-4/year for Hispanics and AA populations and 0-1/year for Caucasians. Conclusions: GDMT for HF is known to reduce heart failure exacerbations, mortality and the ever rising cost of the healthcare system. We have observed that despite recommendations to initiate GDMT in all patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, racial disparities exist. Physicians should be mindful of initiating GDMT in all patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanos Sakellaropoulos ◽  
Dimitra Lekaditi ◽  
Stefano Svab

A robust literature, over the last years, supports the indication of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Understanding exercise physiology is a crucial component of the critical evaluation of exercise intolerance. Shortness of breath and exercise limitation is often treated with an improper focus, partly because the pathophysiology is not well understood in the frame of the diagnostic spectrum of each subspecialty. A vital field and research area have been cardiopulmonary exercise test in heart failure with preserved/reduced ejection fraction, evaluation of heart failure patients as candidates for LVAD-Implantation, as well as for LVAD-Explantation and ultimately for heart transplantation. All the CPET variables provide synergistic prognostic discrimination. However, Peak VO2 serves as the most critical parameter for risk stratification and prediction of survival rate.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia S Hahn ◽  
Hildur Knutsdottir ◽  
Kenneth C Bedi ◽  
Kenneth B Margulies ◽  
Saptarsi M Haldar ◽  
...  

Introduction: Serum natriuretic peptides (NP) are reduced in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared to HFrEF; however, myocardial NP expression in HFpEF is unknown. We analyzed serum NTproBNP and myocardial RNAseq data to test the hypothesis that 1) lower myocardial NP expression in HFpEF drives the difference in serum levels, and 2) HFpEF with higher NP expression have transcriptomic signatures more similar to HFrEF. Methods: HFpEF patients (n=41) with clinical HF, LVEF≥50%, and meeting current consensus criteria for HFpEF underwent right heart catheterization and right ventricular (RV) endomyocardial biopsy. We performed differential gene expression analysis of RV septal tissue from HFpEF and compared to explanted HFrEF (n=30) and unused donor hearts (n=24, Control). Results: Myocardial NPPB expression was 5-fold higher in HFrEF vs Control (p<0.001) and unchanged in HFpEF vs Control, while NPPA expression was 9-fold higher in HFrEF and 5-fold higher in HFpEF vs Control (p<0.0001 for both comparisons). After adjustment for renal function and BMI, myocardial NPPB expression was significantly associated with serum NTproBNP in HFpEF (R 2 0.68; p<0.0001 for renal function, NPPB expression; p=0.03 for BMI). Pulmonary artery (PA) systolic pressure and PA wedge pressure correlated with myocardial NPPB expression (PASP R 2 0.45, p<0.0001; PAWP R 2 0.25, p=0.01), even after adjustment for comorbidities. HFpEF patients with high (≥ median NPPB expression in HFpEF) vs low NPPB expression had transcriptomic signatures more similar to HFrEF using ~13,000 genes in a Principal Component Analysis (Figure), quantified by vector distance from HFrEF (p=0.017). Conclusions: HFpEF patients have reduced serum NTproBNP due to lower myocardial NPPB gene expression. HFpEF patients with higher NPPB expression have transcriptomic signatures more similar to HFrEF, highlighting a HFpEF subgroup that may benefit from targeted therapies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. CMC.S21372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Asrar Ul Haq ◽  
Cheng Yee Goh ◽  
Itamar Levinger ◽  
Chiew Wong ◽  
David L. Hare

Reduced exercise tolerance is an independent predictor of hospital readmission and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). Exercise training for HF patients is well established as an adjunct therapy, and there is sufficient evidence to support the favorable role of exercise training programs for HF patients over and above the optimal medical therapy. Some of the documented benefits include improved functional capacity, quality of life (QoL), fatigue, and dyspnea. Major trials to assess exercise training in HF have, however, focused on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). At least half of the patients presenting with HF have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) and experience similar symptoms of exercise intolerance, dyspnea, and early fatigue, and similar mortality risk and rehospitalization rates. The role of exercise training in the management of HFPEF remains less clear. This article provides a brief overview of pathophysiology of reduced exercise tolerance in HFREF and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), and summarizes the evidence and mechanisms by which exercise training can improve symptoms and HF. Clinical and practical aspects of exercise training prescription are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document