NCOG-34. A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF GLIOMATOSIS CEREBRI CASES, COMPARED ACCORDING TO IDH STATUS

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi159-vi159
Author(s):  
Lisa Boris ◽  
Elizabeth Vera ◽  
Alvina Acquaye ◽  
Nicole Briceno ◽  
Anna Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Gliomatosis Cerebri ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Natural History Study ◽  
Adjuvant Temozolomide ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) is a controversial entity no longer recognized as a histopathologic-defined diagnosis, characterized by diffuse, commonly bilateral infiltration of cerebral hemispheres. The purpose of this report is to describe clinical, imaging, patient-reported outcomes (PRO’s) and pathologic characteristics of clinically-defined cases from a large natural history study cohort (N=769). Of 19 patients, 10 male, 16 white, mean age at diagnosis 43 (19-70), seventeen presented as primary GC, while 2 developed GC after treatment. Ten patients were IDH-WT, 7 IDH-M, and 2 IDH undetermined. The majority (7/10) IDH-WT patients presented acutely (5 with seizures), whereas, 3 had a protracted presentation of 2 weeks-3months with 6/10 having enhancing tumors and 8/10 undergoing biopsy only. On histopathologic review, 4 were anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), 3 GBMs, 2 grade II astrocytoma, and 1 histone-mutated glioma. Nearly all (9/10) IDH-WT patients received radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. 7/10 IDH-WT patients had a survival of only 1.5yrs or less from diagnosis. Of the 7 IDH-M patients, 4 had protracted presentations of 1 month-5 years. 6/7 had non-enhancing tumors at presentation. 4 had biopsy only and 3 underwent partial resection. 3 were AA, 2 grade II astrocytoma, 1 grade II oligodendroglioma, and 1 grade IV astrocytoma. 3/7 received radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, 3/7 chemotherapy alone, and 1 RT alone. All 7 IDH-M patients survived 3+ years from diagnosis (range 3-10+ yrs). Both patients who developed GC later, were IDH-M, with prolonged survival (3.5yrs and the other still alive 10+yrs). PRO's at time of last clinical assessment revealed GC patients to be highly symptomatic with mean overall symptom burden, depression, and anxiety higher than our overall glioma population. GC patients have a varied clinical course mandating further investigation to enable better prognostic definition to refine treatments based on the varying clinical and molecular characteristics.

Association between allostatic load, symptom burden and mortality in E1A11 trial for myeloma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12102-12102
Author(s):  
Samilia Obeng-Gyasi ◽  
Noah Graham ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
David Cella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Allostatic Load ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Unit Increase

12102 Background: Allostatic load (AL) conceptualizes the effects of chronic psychosocial adversity on physiologic dysregulation. To date, studies have shown an association between elevated AL and higher disease-specific and overall mortality among cancer patients; however, none have focused on multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We aim to understand the relationship between baseline AL, symptom burden, and mortality among patients enrolled in the E1A11 therapeutic trial in MM. Methods: ECOG-ACRIN E1A11 was a phase III RCT comparing induction with Bortezomib (Arm A) versus Carfilzomib (Arm B) in conjunction with Lenalidomide +Dexamethasone. AL included 7 biomarkers: BMI, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, albumin and creatinine clearance. AL7 was a composite summary score with a point was assigned for each biomarker value in the highest quartile, except for albumin and creatinine clearance, where a point was assigned for values in the lowest quartile. Endpoints included symptom burden at baseline and ̃1 month, non-completion of induction therapy, and overall survival (OS). Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Multiple Myeloma (FACT-MM) items assessed patient-reported symptom burden, including fatigue (item HI7), pain (GP4), and bother by side effects of treatment (GP5) on a 5-point Likert scale. Multivariable logistic regressions assessed the effect of AL7 (ranging 0-7) on high-pain, -fatigue, and -bother (QOL score > = 3 vs < 3), and non-completion of induction therapy. The effect of AL7 on OS was assessed using multivariable Cox regression. Regression covariates included study arm, age, sex, race, ECOG performance status, and the target symptom burden score at baseline. Results: The study cohort included 1087 patients. Mean baseline AL7 was 1.8 (±1.4). In adjusted analysis, a unit increase in AL7 was associated with a greater odds of high pain (OR 1.15, 95%CI [1.04-1.27]) and high fatigue (OR 1.19, 95%CI [1.07-1.32]) at baseline, which did not persist at ̃1 month (pain OR 0.96, 95%CI [0.84-1.10]; fatigue OR 1.03, 95%CI [0.91-1.16]). There was no association between AL7 and high side effect bother at baseline (OR 1.06, 95% CI [0.83-1.35]) or at ̃1 month (OR 1.06, 95%CI [0.90-1.24]). There was no association between AL7 and induction non-completion (OR 1.07, 95%CI [0.96-1.18]). Notably, each unit increase in AL7 was associated with higher mortality (HR 1.26, 95%CI [1.14-1.39]). Conclusions: Despite its association with fatigue and pain at baseline, AL7 was not associated with these symptoms at ̃1 month nor induction non-completion. However, elevated baseline AL7 was associated with poorer OS. AL composite score at baseline, which we interpret as a measure of physiological dysregulation associated with adverse social factors, may have implications on clinical outcomes within clinical trials despite presumed equal treatment access.

scholarly journals Living with a Central Nervous System (CNS) Tumor: Findings on Long-Term Survivorship from the NIH Natural History Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L Rogers ◽  
Elizabeth Vera ◽  
Alvina Acquaye ◽  
Nicole Briceno ◽  
Varna Jammula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Cns Tumor ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Symptom Trajectory ◽  
Anxiety Depression

Abstract Background Primary CNS tumors are often associated with high symptom burden and a poor prognosis from the time of diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to describe patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data from long-term survivors (LTS; ≥5-year survival post-diagnosis). Methods Clinical/treatment/molecular characteristics and PROs (symptom burden/interference (MDASI-BT/SP), perceived cognition (Neuro-QOL), anxiety/depression (PROMIS), and general health status (EQ-5D-3L)) were collected on 248 adult LTS between 9/2016-8/2019. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to report results. Results Participants had a median age of 47 years (19-82) and were primarily White (83%) males (51%) with high-grade tumors (59%) and few mutations. Forty-two percent of the 222 brain tumor LTS reported no moderate-to-severe symptoms while 45% reported three or more; most common symptoms were fatigue (40%), difficulty remembering (29%), and drowsiness (28%). Among spine tumor LTS (n=42), nearly half reported moderate-to-severe weakness, pain, fatigue, and numbness/tingling, with 72% experiencing activity-related interference. Severe anxiety, depression, and cognitive symptoms were reported in up to 23% of the sample. Brain tumor LTS at higher risk for severe symptoms were more likely to be young, unemployed, and have poor KPS, while high symptom-risk spinal cord tumor LTS had poor KPS and received any tumor treatment. Conclusions Findings indicate LTS fall into distinct cohorts with no significant symptoms or very high symptom burden, regardless of tumor grade or mutational profile. These LTS data demonstrate the need for survivorship care programs and future studies to explore the symptom trajectory of all CNS tumor patients for prevention and early interventions.

scholarly journals Determinants of patient-reported outcome trajectories and symptomatic recovery in Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jan Stochl ◽  
Emma Soneson ◽  
Freya Stuart ◽  
Jessica Fritz ◽  
Annabel E. L. Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Severity ◽  
Severe Depression ◽  
Anxiety Symptoms ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Rapid Improvement ◽  
Baseline Severity ◽  
Psychological Therapies ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Functionally Impaired

Abstract Background Despite evidence for the general effectiveness of psychological therapies, there exists substantial heterogeneity in patient outcomes. We aimed to identify factors associated with baseline severity of depression and anxiety symptoms, rate of symptomatic change over the course of therapy, and symptomatic recovery in a primary mental health care setting. Methods Using data from a service evaluation involving 35 527 patients in England's psychological and wellbeing [Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT)] services, we applied latent growth models to explore which routinely-collected sociodemographic, clinical, and therapeutic variables were associated with baseline symptom severity and rate of symptomatic change. We used a multilevel logit model to determine variables associated with symptomatic recovery. Results Being female, younger, more functionally impaired, and more socioeconomically disadvantaged was associated with higher baseline severity of both depression and anxiety symptoms. Being older, less functionally impaired, and having more severe baseline symptomatology was associated with more rapid improvement of both depression and anxiety symptoms (male gender and greater socioeconomic disadvantage were further associated with rate of change for depression only). Therapy intensity and appointment frequency seemed to have no correlation with rate of symptomatic improvement. Patients with lower baseline symptom severity, less functional impairment, and older age had a greater likelihood of achieving symptomatic recovery (as defined by IAPT criteria). Conclusions We must continue to investigate how best to tailor psychotherapeutic interventions to fit patients’ needs. Patients who begin therapy with more severe depression and/or anxiety symptoms and poorer functioning merit special attention, as these characteristics may negatively impact recovery.

Clinical Traits Characterizing an Exacerbation-Prone Phenotype in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (5) ◽  
pp. 890-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie M. Phillips ◽  
Eric Barbarite ◽  
Lloyd P. Hoehle ◽  
David S. Caradonna ◽  
Stacey T. Gray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Oral Corticosteroids ◽  
Sinonasal Outcome Test ◽  
Snot 22

Objective Acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is associated with significant quality-of-life decreases. We sought to determine characteristics associated with an exacerbation-prone phenotype in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Study Design Cross-sectional. Setting Tertiary care rhinology clinic. Subjects Patients with CRS (N = 209). Methods Patient-reported number of sinus infections, CRS-related antibiotics, and CRS-related oral corticosteroids taken in the last 12 months were used as metrics for AECRS frequency. Sinonasal symptom burden was assessed with the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Ninety patients reporting 0 for all AECRS metrics were considered to have had no AECRS in the prior 12 months. A total of 119 patients reported >3 on at least 1 AECRS metric and were considered as having an exacerbation-prone phenotype. Characteristics associated with patients with an exacerbation-prone phenotype were identified with exploratory regression analysis. Results An exacerbation-prone phenotype was positively associated with comorbid asthma (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 3.68, 95% CI: 1.42-9.50, P = .007) and SNOT-22 (ORadj = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.09, P < .001). Polyps were negatively associated (ORadj = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11-0.68, P = .005) with an exacerbation-prone phenotype. SNOT-22 score ≥24 identified patients with an exacerbation-prone phenotype with a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 57.8%. Having either a SNOT-22 score ≥24 with a nasal subdomain score ≥12 or a SNOT-22 score ≥24 with an ear/facial discomfort subdomain score ≥3 provided >80% sensitivity and specificity for detecting patients prone to exacerbation. Conclusions In total, these results point to a CRS exacerbation-prone phenotype characterized by high sinonasal disease burden with comorbid asthma but interestingly without polyps.

PCN224 Incorporating a Patient-Reported Symptom Burden Tool in Cancer Care Settings

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. S61-S62
Author(s):  
T. Conner ◽  
D. Raju ◽  
R. Hauser ◽  
T. Gyory
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Care ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals P1.10-005 Generation of Symptom Burden Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients with Lung Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. S2024
Author(s):  
L. Williams ◽  
C. Cleeland ◽  
O. Bamidele ◽  
G. Simon
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Longitudinal study of symptom burden in outpatients with advanced cancers based on electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) platform: a single institution, prospective study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e038223
Author(s):  
Lili Tang ◽  
Ying Pang ◽  
Yi He ◽  
Qiuling Shi ◽  
Xinkun Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Study Protocol ◽  
Symptom Management ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Critical Parameters ◽  
Advanced Lung Cancer ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Patient Reported

IntroductionAn electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) platform is needed for implementing evidence-based symptom management in outpatients with advanced cancer. We describe the overall protocol and the methodology for measuring symptom burden, to provide critical parameters needed to implement symptom management on the ePRO platform.Methods and analysisThe study focusses on patients with advanced lung cancer, stomach cancer, oesophagus cancer, liver cancer, colorectal cancer or breast cancer. The primary outcome is the change of symptom burden. MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, and other PRO instruments (Insomnia Severity Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and EuroQol-5 dimensions-5 levels version) were used. The secondary outcomes include feasibility of using ePRO, symptom-related quality of life, reasons for no improvement of symptoms, defining frequency of PRO assessments and cut-points, items for screening and management of comorbidity and satisfaction with ePRO platform in patients and health providers. After initial outpatient visit for baseline assessment, ePRO system will automatically send follow-up notification seven times over 4 weeks to patients. The characteristics and changing trajectory of symptoms of patients will be described. Parameters for using PROs, such as optimal time points for follow-up and cut-off point for alert will be determined. The feasibility of ePRO platform to track the changes of target symptoms in outpatients will be evaluated.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol and related documents were approved by the Institutional Research Board (IRB) of Peking University Cancer Hospital on 13 February 2019 (2019YJZ07). The results of this study will be disseminated through academic workshops, peer-reviewed publications and conferences.Trial registration numberChiCTR1900023560.

NCOG-16. RELEVANCE OF GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT FOR PRIMARY BRAIN TUMOR PATIENTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND CARE

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi155-vi155
Author(s):  
Heather Leeper ◽  
Anna Choi ◽  
Elizabeth Vera ◽  
Alvina Acquaye ◽  
Nicole Briceno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Primary Brain Tumor ◽  
Functional Impairments ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract BACKGROUND The utility of geriatric assessment (GA) has been evaluated in older adults diagnosed with solid tumors other than primary brain tumors (PBT). We assessed several key GA domains in adults with PBT receiving tumor-directed treatment. METHODS Patient and disease characteristics and key GA domains within patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including symptom burden (MDASI-BT), Anxiety/ Depression (PROMIS-short forms) and general health status (EQ-5D-3L) were systematically and prospectively collected between 9/2016–8/2019 from adults diagnosed with PBT. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to assess PROs. RESULTS Of 581 participants, 92 were 65 – 85 years old (median age = 70 years; “older”) and 489 were ≤ 64 years (median age = 46 years; “younger”). Tumor grade distribution in the older group was 74% WHO grade III/IV, 26% WHO grade I/II; tumor types included gliomas and meningiomas with no tissue diagnosis in 3 patients. Older patients were 49% less likely to receive chemotherapy and twice as likely to have KPS ≤ 80 (p=0.003, OR=0.51, OR=1.98). More older patients reported problems with mobility (57% vs 44%), self-care (38% vs 26%), and usual activities (64% vs 51%) than younger patients. Charlson Comorbidity Index mean scores were significantly higher in older patients (3.5 vs 0.6, p&lt; 0.001). The top 3 most frequently reported moderate-to-severe symptoms were similar in older vs younger groups: fatigue (44% vs 41%), feeling drowsy (29% vs 30%) and difficulty remembering (28% vs 29%). Feeling distressed was the only symptom whose frequency differed between the age groups (11% older vs 27% younger, p=0.001). CONCLUSION Older PBT patients had lower performance status, more co-morbidities and increased functional impairments, affirming that GA is relevant. Symptom burden was similarly high in both age groups. These findings support conducting GA concurrently in future symptom intervention and therapeutic clinical trials for adults with PBT receiving tumor-directed treatment.

Patient reported outcomes in patients with desmoid type fibromatosis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11574-11574
Author(s):  
VIKAS GARG ◽  
Sameer Rastogi ◽  
Adarsh Barwad ◽  
Rambha Panday ◽  
Sandeep Kumar Bhoriwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Benign Neoplasm ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Appendicular Skeleton ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Symptom Scale ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

11574 Background: Desmoid type fibromatosis (DTF) is a rare benign neoplasm with infiltrative growth and high local recurrences. Due to long disease course, unpredictable growth pattern, and low mortality, using only survival outcomes may be inappropriate. In this study we assessed the impact of DTF on health related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done in patients with DTF. The study participants were asked to fill the EORTC QLQ-C30, GAD-7 and PHQ- 9 q uestionnaires to assess HRQoL, anxiety and depression . Outcomes were also compared with healthy controls. Results: 204 subjects (102 DTF patients and 102 healthy controls) were recruited. Study parameters have been summarized in Table. Appendicular skeleton (limbs + girdle) was most commonly involved in 59 % patients and abdominal wall or mesentery was involved in 22.5 %. Patients have received median of 2 lines of therapy. 54 % patients were currently on sorafenib and 41 % were under active surveillance. Mean global health status in DTF patient 65.58 ± 22.64, was significantly lower than healthy controls. Similarly, DTF patients scored low on all functional scales except cognitive functioning. Symptom scale showed significantly higher symptom burden of fatigue, pain, insomnia and financial difficulties. Anxiety & depression was observed in 39.22 % and 50 % of DTF patients respectively. DTF patients had higher rates of mild, moderate and severe anxiety and depression compared to healthy controls. No difference was observed based on site of disease. Conclusions: DTF patients have significant symptom burden, poor functioning, and heightened anxiety and depression. Patient reported outcomes should be routinely used to assess treatment efficacy in DTF patients.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document