scholarly journals 968. Effect of Outpatient Antibiotic Ordering Restrictions on Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns at a State-wide VA Healthcare System

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S32-S32
Author(s):  
Rohini Dave ◽  
Jacqueline Bork
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare System ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Inappropriate Use ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanate ◽  
Rural Clinics ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Approximately 30% of antibiotics prescribed in the outpatient setting are inappropriate, mostly due to unnecessary prescriptions (Rx) for upper respiratory infections. Ordering restrictions is one approach to curtail inappropriate use. However, this approach may cause unintended consequences, such as increases in Rx of higher level antibiotics. This study evaluated the downstream effect of an azithromycin (AZM) ordering restriction. Methods This was a pre–post evaluation of the impact of an AZM removal (October 2017) on prescribing patterns of common outpatient antibiotics at the VA Maryland Healthcare System. AZM restriction was placed >10 years ago for concerns of emerging AZM resistance and overuse. During the study period, fluoroquinolone (FQ) use was scrutinized due to increasing toxicity risk. The proportion of several outpatient antibiotic Rx were compared between October 2017 and September 2018 (FY17) and October 2018 and September 30, 2018 (FY18) using χ 2 and logistic regression. FQ and AZM Rx were also stratified by location of prescribing clinic (urban vs. rural) and duration (≤14 days vs. >14 days). Results There were 15,972 and 14,451 prescriptions in FY17 and FY18, respectively. AZM Rx increased from 1,247 (7%) Rx in FY17 to 1,734 (11%) in FY18 (P < 0.0001) with an OR of 1.8 (95% CI 1.65–1.94). There was a greater effect on shorter than longer duration (OR 1.9 vs. 1.3, P < 0.0001), but no significant effect difference for urban and rural clinics (OR 1.8 vs. 1.9, P = 0.6). Conversely, FQ Rx decreased from 2,414 (15%) in FY17 to 1,731 (11%) in FY18 (P < 0.0001) with an OR of 0.7 (95% CI 0.66–0.76). There was a greater effect on shorter than longer duration (0.6 vs. 1.2, P < 0.0001) and also a greater effect on urban than rural clinics (OR 0.6 vs. 0.97, P < 0.0001). Doxycycline, amoxicillin–clavulanate and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole did not change significantly. Conclusion Removal of AZM restriction led to a significant decrease in FQ Rx, with greater effect in shorter duration and urban clinics, and an increase in AZM Rx, with greater effect in shorter duration, but no difference in clinic setting. Disparity of rural prescribers needs further exploration, as do other interventions outside of restrictive ordering, which needs periodic evaluation of risk and benefit if implemented. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

scholarly journals Impact of a pilot multimodal intervention to decrease antibiotic use for respiratory infections in a geriatric clinic

2022 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lakshmi R. Chauhan ◽  
Misha Huang ◽  
Mona Abdo ◽  
Skotti Church ◽  
Danielle Fixen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanate

Abstract Background: More than 80% of antibiotics are prescribed in the outpatient setting, of which 30% are inappropriate. The National Action Plan for Combating Antimicrobial Resistance called for a 50% decrease in outpatient antibiotic use by 2020. Inappropriate antibiotics are associated with adverse reactions and Clostridioides difficile infection, especially among older adults. Study design: Before and after study. Methods: We performed a quality improvement initiative at the University of Colorado Seniors Clinic. Providers received education on antibiotic guidelines, electronic antibiotic order sets were introduced with standardized stop dates. Antibiotic use data were collected for 6 months before and 6 months after the intervention, from December to May to avoid seasonal variation. Descriptive statistics and linear mixed-effects regression models were used for this comparison. Results: Total antibiotic prescriptions for acute respiratory conditions decreased from 137 prescriptions before the intervention (December 1, 2017, to May 31, 2018) to 112 prescriptions after the intervention (December 1, 2018, to May 31, 2019), driven primarily by decreases in antibiotic prescriptions for pneumonia, sinusitis, and bronchitis. Prescriptions for broad-spectrum antibiotics declined following the intervention including decreases in levofloxacin from 12 (9%) to 3 (3%) and amoxicillin-clavulanate from 15 (12%) to 7 (7%). We detected significant reductions in prescribed antibiotic durations (days) after the intervention for sinusitis (estimate, −2.0; 95% CI, −3.1 to −1.0; P = .0003), pharyngitis (estimate, −2.5; 95% CI, −4.6 to −0.5; P = .018), and otitis (−3.2; 95% CI, −5.2 to −1.3; P = .008). Conclusions: Low-cost interventions were initially successful in changing patterns of antibiotic use and decreasing overall antibiotic prescribing among older patients in the outpatient setting. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to determine the sustainability and clinical impact of these interventions.

scholarly journals 95. Reduced Antibiotic Duration Defaults in Outpatient Automated Dispensing Cabinets Change Antibiotic Prescribing Habits in a Tertiary VA Healthcare System

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S162-S163
Author(s):  
Nicholas J Newman ◽  
Usha Stiefel ◽  
Robert C Wenzell ◽  
Daniel Papell ◽  
Jeffrey Cooney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare System ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Prescribing Habits ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanate ◽  
Antibiotic Duration ◽  
Adult Outpatient ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Ten percent of adult, outpatient visits result in an antibiotic prescription (Rx). At the start of our intervention, our VA healthcare system consisted of 13 community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs), 9 of which did not have an onsite pharmacy but utilized automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) for prepackaged outpatient Rxs. ADC antibiotic orders are generated from electronic medical record (EMR) order sets. The stewardship team shortened the durations of 5 antibiotics in the ADC order sets to make them consistent with current literature and guidelines. We assessed the impact of these changes on antibiotic prescribing habits. Methods We compared outpatient antibiotic Rx data between 10/1/2018-9/30/2019 (pre-intervention) and 10/1/19-9/30/20 (post-intervention) from 8 CBOCs with ADCs (1 closed during the pandemic). Amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125mg (AMC), cephalexin 500mg (CPH), levofloxacin 500mg and 750mg (LEV 500 and LEV 750), and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim 800/160mg (SXT) prescription durations were all reduced by 3 days. Process metrics included days supplied/1000 prescriptions (DS/1000 Rx), median DS, and ADC utilization rates. We used Mann-Whitney U and correlation statistical analyses to assess differences and associations. Results The DS/1000 Rx of antibiotics with a default duration change decreased in the post-intervention phase for CBOCs with ADCs (AMC, -25.4%; CPH, -21.1%; LEV 500, -18.9%; LEV 750, -28.0%; SXT, -27.4%). The median DS for these antibiotics all reduced by 3 days in concordance with new ADC prescriptions defaults (AMC, 10 vs 7 days, P&lt; 0.001; CPH, 10 vs 7 days, P&lt; 0.001; LEV 500, 8 vs 5 days, P&lt; 0.001; LEV 750, 8 vs 5 days, P&lt; 0.001; SXT 10 vs 7 days, P&lt; 0.001). Due to COVID-19, 7/8 ADC CBOCs closed for in-person visits from 3/20/20-5/4/20. ADC utilization was inversely proportional to DS/1000 Rx for most antibiotics (R: -0.51 to -0.77) except SXT. Conclusion EMR-driven reductions in ADC default Rx durations led to a corresponding decrease in overall outpatient antibiotic prescribing. Higher DS/1000 Rx were often associated with lower ADC utilization. Informatics-driven antibiotic interventions may be potential outpatient stewardship tools to increase guideline-concordant prescribing across multisite healthcare systems. Disclosures Sharanie Sims, PharmD, AbbVie (formerly Allergan) (Speaker’s Bureau)

Evaluation of FDA Boxed Warning on Prescribing Patterns of Fluoroquinolones for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. 1192-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Cowart ◽  
Marylee Worley ◽  
Nihal El Rouby ◽  
Karen Sando
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Boxed Warning ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background: Little is known regarding the impact of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) boxed warning on prescribing rates of fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics in the outpatient setting. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the 2016 FDA boxed warning update on FQ prescribing rates for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI). Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted at 6 family medicine practices, including women aged 18 to 65 years with an outpatient visit for uUTI from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. Results: A total of 436 patients met inclusion. FQs were prescribed in 38% of patients before the FDA boxed warning and in 30% of patients after (8% reduction). Non-FQ prescribing had a corresponding 8% increase, comprising 62% of uUTI prescribing before the FDA boxed warning and 70% after ( P = 0.08). The likelihood of being prescribed a FQ was not significantly different following release of the FDA boxed warning (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67 [95% CI = 0.41-1.10]). Variables significantly associated with an increase in FQ prescribing based on logistic regression were age ≥58 years and chronic kidney disease. Concordance of antibiotic prescribing with the Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guidelines for uUTI was low, and the incidence of treatment failure was low. Conclusion and Relevance: The 2016 FDA boxed warning was not significantly associated with decreased FQ prescribing for uUTI across a large academic family medicine practice. Methods to improve education and disseminate FDA warnings in practice are needed.

scholarly journals 229. Hospitalists Antimicrobial Scorecard Improves Antibiotic Prescribing at a Community Teaching Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S116-S116
Author(s):  
Julia Sessa ◽  
Helen Jacoby ◽  
Bruce Blain ◽  
Lisa Avery
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Measuring antimicrobial consumption data is a foundation of antimicrobial stewardship programs. There is data to support antimicrobial scorecard utilization to improve antibiotic use in the outpatient setting. There is a lack of data on the impact of an antimicrobial scorecard for hospitalists. Our objective was to improve antibiotic prescribing amongst the hospitalist service through the development of an antimicrobial scorecard. Methods Conducted in a 451-bed teaching hospital amongst 22 full time hospitalists. The antimicrobial scorecard for 2019 was distributed in two phases. In October 2019, baseline antibiotic prescribing data (January – September 2019) was distributed. In January 2020, a second scorecard was distributed (October – December 2019) to assess the impact of the scorecard. The scorecard distributed via e-mail to physicians included: Antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days (corrected for attending census), route of antibiotic prescribing (% intravenous (IV) vs % oral (PO)) and percentage of patients prescribed piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) for greater than 3 days. Hospitalists received their data in rank order amongst their peers. Along with the antimicrobial scorecard, recommendations from the antimicrobial stewardship team were included for hospitalists to improve their antibiotic prescribing for these initiatives. Hospitalists demographics (years of practice and gender) were collected. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze pre and post data. Results Sixteen (16) out of 22 (73%) hospitalists improved their antibiotic prescribing from pre- to post-scorecard (χ 2(1)=3.68, p = 0.055). The median antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days decreased from 661 pre-scorecard to 618 post-scorecard (p = 0.043). The median PT use greater than 3 days also decreased significantly, from 18% pre-scorecard to 11% post-scorecard (p = 0.0025). There was no change in % of IV antibiotic prescribing and no correlation between years of experience or gender to antibiotic prescribing. Conclusion Providing antimicrobial scorecards to our hospitalist service resulted in a significant decrease in antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days and PT prescribing beyond 3 days. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 141. Implementation of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Acute Respiratory Infections, a Stepped Wedge Randomized Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S81-S82
Author(s):  
Grace Mortrude ◽  
Mary Rehs ◽  
Katherine Sherman ◽  
Nathan Gundacker ◽  
Claire Dysart
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Acute Respiratory Infections ◽  
Stepped Wedge ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Outpatient antimicrobial prescribing is an important target for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions to decrease antimicrobial resistance in the United States. The objective of this study was to design, implement and evaluate the impact of AMS interventions focused on asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in the outpatient setting. Methods This randomized, stepped-wedge trial evaluated the impact of educational interventions to providers on adult patients presenting to primary care (PC) clinics for ARIs and ASB from 10/1/19 to 1/31/20. Data was collected by retrospective chart review. An antibiotic prescribing report card was provided to PC providers, then an educational session was delivered at each PC clinic. Patient education materials were distributed to PC clinics. Interventions were made in a step-wise (figure 1) fashion. The primary outcome was percentage of overall antibiotic prescriptions as a composite of prescriptions for ASB, acute bronchitis, upper-respiratory infection otherwise unspecified, uncomplicated sinusitis, and uncomplicated pharyngitis. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, a composite safety endpoint of related hospital, emergency department or primary care visit within 4 weeks, antibiotic appropriateness, and patient satisfaction surveys. Figure 1 Results There were 887 patients included for analysis (405 pre-intervention, 482 post-intervention). Baseline characteristics are summarized in table 1. After controlling for type 1 error using a Bonferroni correction the primary outcome was not significantly different between groups (56% vs 49%). There was a statistically significant decrease in prescriptions for bronchitis (20.99% vs 12.66%; p=0.0003). Appropriateness of prescriptions for sinusitis (OR 4.96; CI 1.79–13.75; p=0.0021) and pharyngitis (OR 5.36; CI 1.93 – 14.90; p=0.0013) was improved in the post-intervention group. The composite safety outcome and patient satisfaction survey ratings did not differ between groups. Table 1 Conclusion Multifaceted educational interventions targeting providers can improve antibiotic prescribing for indications rarely requiring antimicrobials without increasing re-visit or patient satisfaction surveys. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on community antibiotic prescribing in Scotland

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
William Malcolm ◽  
Ronald A Seaton ◽  
Gail Haddock ◽  
Linsey Baxter ◽  
Sarah Thirlwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescription Data ◽  
National Data ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Electronic Messaging ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Background Following concerns about increased antibiotic use during the COVID-19 pandemic, trends in community antibiotic prescriptions in Scotland were evaluated. Methods The primary care prescription electronic messaging system used in GP practices with NHS contracts provided near real-time data analysis of national data. The main outcome measures were the weekly number of prescriptions for antibiotics generated by prescribers in GP practices in 2020 compared with 2019. Results At end of Week 12 2020 (22 March), after a sharp increase, the number of prescriptions commonly used for respiratory infections was 44% higher than the corresponding week in 2019. The number of prescriptions for respiratory antibiotics reduced through April and May 2020, with 34% fewer prescriptions issued by end of Week 22 (31 May) than in the corresponding week in 2019. Reductions were pronounced in all age groups but particularly apparent for prescriptions for children aged 0–4 years. These data were compared with weekly prescriptions for a selection of non-respiratory antibiotics and no difference was seen between 2020 and 2019. Conclusions Trends in antibiotic prescription data show that after an initial surge, and following ‘lockdown’ in Scotland, the total number of prescriptions for antibiotics commonly used for respiratory infections fell. We believe this is the first published national evaluation of the impact of COVID-19 on community use of antibiotics. Further analysis of national data is planned to provide a greater understanding of the reasons behind these trends.

scholarly journals 82. Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns Following Implementation of the GenMark ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Panel for Gram-positive Bloodstream Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S157-S157
Author(s):  
Megan Wein ◽  
Shawn Binkley ◽  
Vasilios Athans ◽  
Stephen Saw ◽  
Tiffany Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Gram Stain ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Culture Identification ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) of bloodstream pathogens provides key information sooner than conventional identification and susceptibility testing. The GenMark ePlex® blood culture identification gram-positive (BCID-GP) panel is a molecular-based multiplex platform, with 20 Gram-positive target pathogens and 4 bacterial resistance genes that can be detected within 1.5 hours of blood culture positivity. Published studies have evaluated the accuracy of the ePlex® BCID-GP panel compared to traditional identification methods; however, studies evaluating the impact of this panel on clinical outcomes and prescribing patterns are lacking. Methods This multi-center, quasi-experimental study evaluated clinical outcomes and prescribing patterns before (December 2018 – June 2019) and after (August 2019 – January 2020) implementation of the ePlex® BCID-GP panel in June 2019. Hospitalized, adult patients with growth of Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, or Staphylococcus aureus from blood cultures were included. The primary endpoint was time to targeted antibiotic therapy, defined as time from positive Gram-stain to antibiotic adjustment for the infecting pathogen. Results A total of 200 patients, 100 in each group, were included. Time to targeted therapy was 47.9 hours in the pre-group versus 24.8 hours in the post-group (p&lt; 0.0001). Time from Gram-stain to organism identification was 23.03 hours (pre) versus 2.56 hours (post), p&lt; 0.0001. There was no statistically significant difference in time from Gram-stain to susceptibility results, hospital length of stay (LOS), or all-cause 30-day mortality. Conclusion Implementation of the GenMark ePlex® BCID-GP panel reduced time to targeted antibiotic therapy by nearly 24 hours. Clinical outcomes including hospital LOS and all-cause 30-day mortality did not show a statistical difference, although analysis of a larger sample size is necessary to appropriately assess these outcomes. This study represents the effect of RDT implementation alone, in the absence of stewardship intervention, on antibiotic prescribing patterns. These findings will inform the design of a dedicated RDT antimicrobial stewardship intervention at our institution, while also being generalizable to other institutions with RDT capabilities. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Antibiotic Use Among Hospitalized Children and Neonates in China: Results From Quarterly Point Prevalence Surveys in 2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chu-ning Wang ◽  
Jianning Tong ◽  
Bin Yi ◽  
Benedikt D. Huttner ◽  
Yibing Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Hospitalized Children ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Common Diagnosis ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a significant clinical problem in pediatric practice in China. Surveillance of antibiotic use is one of the cornerstones to assess the quality of antibiotic use and plan and assess the impact of antibiotic stewardship interventions.Methods: We carried out quarterly point prevalence surveys referring to WHO Methodology of Point Prevalence Survey in 16 Chinese general and children’s hospitals in 2019 to assess antibiotic use in pediatric inpatients based on the WHO AWaRe metrics and to detect potential problem areas. Data were retrieved via the hospital information systems on the second Monday of March, June, September and December. Antibiotic prescribing patterns were analyzed across and within diagnostic conditions and ward types according to WHO AWaRe metrics and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification.Results: A total of 22,327 hospitalized children were sampled, of which 14,757 (66.1%) were prescribed ≥1 antibiotic. Among the 3,936 sampled neonates (≤1 month), 59.2% (n = 2,331) were prescribed ≥1 antibiotic. A high percentage of combination antibiotic therapy was observed in PICUs (78.5%), pediatric medical wards (68.1%) and surgical wards (65.2%). For hospitalized children prescribed ≥1 antibiotic, the most common diagnosis on admission were lower respiratory tract infections (43.2%, n = 6,379). WHO Watch group antibiotics accounted for 70.4% of prescriptions (n = 12,915). The most prescribed antibiotic ATC classes were third-generation cephalosporins (41.9%, n = 7,679), followed by penicillins/β-lactamase inhibitors (16.1%, n = 2,962), macrolides (12.1%, n = 2,214) and carbapenems (7.7%, n = 1,331).Conclusion: Based on these data, overuse of broad-spectrum Watch group antibiotics is common in Chinese pediatric inpatients. Specific interventions in the context of the national antimicrobial stewardship framework should aim to reduce the use of Watch antibiotics and routine surveillance of antibiotic use using WHO AWaRe metrics should be implemented.

scholarly journals Decreased Outpatient Fluoroquinolone Prescribing Using a Multimodal Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiative

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Lin ◽  
Yorgo Zahlanie ◽  
Jessica K Ortwine ◽  
Norman S Mang ◽  
Wenjing Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Hospital System ◽  
Inappropriate Use ◽  
History Of ◽  
Outpatient Settings ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Fluoroquinolones are antibiotics prescribed in the outpatient setting, though they have serious side effects. This study evaluates the impact of stewardship interventions on total and inappropriate prescribing of fluoroquinolones in outpatient settings in a large county hospital and health system. Methods In an effort to decrease inappropriate outpatient fluoroquinolone usage, a multimodal antimicrobial stewardship initiative was implemented in November 2016. Education regarding the risks, benefits, and appropriate uses of fluoroquinolones was provided to providers in different outpatient settings, Food and Drug Administration warnings were added to all oral fluoroquinolone orders, an outpatient order set for cystitis treatment was created, and fluoroquinolone susceptibilities were suppressed when appropriate. Charts from October 2016, 2017, and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed if the patient encounter occurred in primary care clinics, emergency departments, or urgent care centers within Parkland Health & Hospital System and a fluoroquinolone was prescribed. Inappropriate use was defined as a fluoroquinolone prescription for cystitis, bronchitis, or sinusitis in a patient without a history of Pseudomonas aeruginosa or multidrug-resistant organisms and without drug allergies that precluded use of other oral antibiotics. Results Total fluoroquinolone prescriptions per 1000 patient visits decreased significantly by 39% (P &lt; .01), and inappropriate fluoroquinolone use decreased from 53% to 34% (P &lt; .01). More than 90% of inappropriate fluoroquinolone prescriptions were given for cystitis, while bronchitis and sinusitis accounted for only 4.4% and 1.6% of inappropriate indications, respectively. Conclusion A multimodal stewardship initiative appears to effectively reduce both total and inappropriate outpatient fluoroquinolone prescriptions.

Understanding the impacts of NPM and proposed solutions to the healthcare system reforms in Indonesia: the case of BPJS

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-353
Author(s):  
Erniaty Erniaty ◽  
Harun Harun
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
New Public Management ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Healthcare Sector ◽  
Social Security Administration ◽  
Insurance Programme ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Health Insurance Programme

Abstract This study critically evaluates the adoption of a universal healthcare system recently introduced by the Indonesian government in 2014. Our study is driven by the lack of critical analysis of social and political factors and unintended consequences of New Public Management, which is evident in the healthcare sector reforms in emerging economies. This study not only examines the impact of economic and political forces surrounding the introduction of a universal health insurance programme in the country but also offers insights into the critical challenges and undesirable outcomes of a fundamental reform of the healthcare sector in Indonesia. Through a systematic and detailed review of prior studies, legal sources and reports from government and media organizations about the implementation and progress of an UHC health insurance programme in Indonesia, the authors find that a more democratic political system that emerged in 1998 created the opportunity for politicians and international financial aid agencies to introduce a universal social security administration agency called Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS). Despite the introduction of BPJS to expand the health services’ coverage, this effort faces critical challenges and unintended outcomes including: (1) increased financial deficits, (2) resistance from medical professionals and (3) politicians’ tendency to blame BPJS’s management for failing to pay healthcare services costs. We argue that the adoption of the insurance system was primarily motivated by politicians’ own interests and those of international agencies at the expense of a sustainable national healthcare system. This study contributes to the healthcare industry policy literature by showing that a poorly designed UHC system could and will undermine the core values of healthcare services. It will also threaten the sustainability of the medical profession in Indonesia. The authors offer several suggestions for devising better policies in this sector in the developing nations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document