scholarly journals 1122. Implementation of an Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Program within a Pediatric Health System

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S398-S399
Author(s):  
Alaina Burns ◽  
Brian R Lee ◽  
Jennifer Goldman ◽  
Angela Myers ◽  
Angela Myers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Otitis Media ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Baseline Data ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Over 60% of antibiotic expenditures occur in outpatient settings with at least 30% being unnecessary. In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defined core elements for outpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP): commitment from all members of the healthcare team, action for policy and practice, tracking and reporting, and education and expertise. Quantifying local prescribing practices and frontline provider engagement are essential for successful outpatient ASP. We describe our outpatient ASP efforts at Children’s Mercy Kansas City (CM) emergency departments (ED) and urgent care clinics (UCC). Methods In March 2018, we created a report defining antibiotic prescribing patterns in 16 common pediatric infections using ICD-10 codes from ED and UCC encounters. Baseline data helped identify areas for targeted interventions and establish ED/UCC engagement, which we have maintained by ongoing review and sharing of data with leadership and frontline providers. Results Baseline data showed low antibiotic prescribing rates (<5%) for most viral infections, except a rate of 74% in otitis media with effusion (OME) (Figure 1). We also identified a higher rate of cefdinir use in acute otitis media (AOM), community-acquired pneumonia, and urinary tract infections (Figure 2). We developed and shared an outpatient antibiotic handbook facilitating diagnosis and treatment of common infections. Ongoing QI teams are focusing on increasing utilization of safety-net antibiotic prescriptions for eligible patients with AOM in EDs, decreasing antibiotic prescriptions of OME, and decreasing unnecessary rapid streptococcal testing in UCCs. Through these multiple interventions, in addition to email communications and newsletter articles, we observed early improvements in prescribing patterns, including OME antibiotic prescriptions and cefdinir use (Figures 1 and 2). Conclusion We used the CDC’s core elements for outpatient ASP to successfully develop interventions in our EDs and UCCs. We created a report defining baseline prescribing patterns and identifying opportunities for improvement. Data sharing with leadership and frontline providers facilitated widespread engagement in ASP efforts. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Impact of Education and Data Feedback on Guideline Concordant Prescribing for Urinary Tract Infections in the Outpatient Setting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R Funaro ◽  
Rebekah W Moehring ◽  
Beiyu Liu ◽  
Hui-Jie Lee ◽  
Siyun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Routine Data ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Data Feedback ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common outpatient indication for antibiotics and an important target for antimicrobial stewardship (AS) activities. With The Joint Commission standards now requiring outpatient AS, data supporting effective strategies are needed. Methods We conducted a two-phase, prospective, quasi-experimental study to estimate the effect of an outpatient AS intervention on guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing in a primary care (PC) and urgent care (UC) clinic between August 2017 and July 2019. Phase 1 of the intervention included the development of clinic-specific antibiograms and UTI diagnosis and treatment guidelines, presented during educational sessions with clinic providers. Phase 2, consisting of routine clinic- and provider-specific feedback, began approximately twelve months after the initial education. The primary outcome was percent of encounters with first- or second-line antibiotics prescribed according to clinic-specific guidelines, and was assessed using an interrupted time series approach. Results Data were collected on 4,724 distinct patients seen during 6,318 UTI encounters. The percent of guideline-concordant prescribing increased by 22% (95% CI: 12% to 32%) after Phase 1 education, but decreased by 0.5% every two weeks afterwards (95% CI: -0.9% to 0%). Following routine data feedback in Phase 2, guideline concordance stabilized and significant further decline was not seen (-0.6%, 95% CI: -1.6% to 0.4%). This shift in prescribing patterns resulted in a 52% decrease in fluoroquinolone use. Conclusions Clinicians increased guideline-concordant prescribing, reduced UTI diagnoses, and limited use of high-collateral damage agents following this outpatient AS intervention. Routine data feedback was effective to maintain the response to the initial education.

scholarly journals Delayed prescribing of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections by GP registrars: a qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 406-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthea Dallas ◽  
Andrew Davey ◽  
Katie Mulquiney ◽  
Joshua Davis ◽  
Paul Glasziou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Career Stage ◽  
Diagnostic Uncertainty ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Antibiotic prescribing for acute self-limiting respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in Australia is higher than international benchmarks. Antibiotics have little or no efficacy in these conditions, and unnecessary use contributes to antibiotic resistance. Delayed prescribing has been shown to reduce antibiotic use. GP registrars are at a career-stage when long-term prescribing patterns are being established. Aim To explore experiences, perceptions and attitudes of GP registrars and supervisors to delayed antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs. Design and setting A qualitative study of Australian GP registrars and supervisors using a thematic analysis approach. Method GP registrars and supervisors were recruited across three Australian states/territories, using maximum variation sampling. Telephone interviews explored participants’ experience and perceptions of delayed prescribing of antibiotics in ARTIs. Data collection and analysis were concurrent and iterative. Results A total of 12 registrars and 10 supervisors were interviewed. Key themes included the use of delayed prescribing as a safety-net in cases of diagnostic uncertainty or when clinical review was logistically difficult. Delayed prescribing was viewed as a method of educating and empowering patients, and building trust and the doctor–patient relationship. Conversely, it was also seen as a loss of control over management decisions. Supervisors, more so than registrars, appreciated the psychosocial complexity of ARTI consultations and the importance of delayed antibiotic prescribing in this context. Conclusion Better awareness and understanding by GP registrars of the evidence for delayed antibiotic prescription may be a means of reducing antibiotic prescribing. Understanding both registrar and supervisor usage, uncertainties and attitudes should inform educational approaches on this topic.

scholarly journals Inappropriate Azithromycin Use in Nine Primary-Care Clinics Before and After Implementation of Provider Guidance in the EMR

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s292-s293
Author(s):  
Alexandria May ◽  
Allison Hester ◽  
Kristi Quairoli ◽  
Sheetal Kandiah
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Upper Respiratory ◽  
Tract Infections

Background: According to the CDC Core Elements of Outpatient Stewardship, the first step in optimizing outpatient antibiotic use the identification of high-priority conditions in which antibiotics are commonly used inappropriately. Azithromycin is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial commonly used inappropriately in clinical practice for nonspecific upper respiratory infections (URIs). In 2017, a medication use evaluation at Grady Health System (GHS) revealed that 81.4% of outpatient azithromycin prescriptions were inappropriate. In an attempt to optimize outpatient azithromycin prescribing at GHS, a tool was designed to direct the prescriber toward evidence-based therapy; it was implemented in the electronic medical record (EMR) in January 2019. Objective: We evaluated the effect of this tool on the rate of inappropriate azithromycin prescribing, with the goal of identifying where interventions to improve prescribing are most needed and to measure progress. Methods: This retrospective chart review of adult patients prescribed oral azithromycin was conducted in 9 primary care clinics at GHS between February 1, 2019, and April 30, 2019, to compare data with that already collected over a 6-month period in 2017 before implementation of the antibiotic prescribing guidance tool. The primary outcome of this study was the change in the rate of inappropriate azithromycin prescribing before and after guidance tool implementation. Appropriateness was based on GHS internal guidelines and national guidelines. Inappropriate prescriptions were classified as inappropriate indication, unnecessary prescription, excessive or insufficient treatment duration, and/or incorrect drug. Results: Of the 560 azithromycin prescriptions identified during the study period, 263 prescriptions were included in the analysis. Overall, 181 (68.8%) of azithromycin prescriptions were considered inappropriate, representing a 12.4% reduction in the primary composite outcome of inappropriate azithromycin prescriptions. Bronchitis and unspecified upper respiratory tract infections (URI) were the most common indications where azithromycin was considered inappropriate. Attending physicians prescribed more inappropriate azithromycin prescriptions (78.1%) than resident physicians (37.0%) or midlevel providers (37.0%). Also, 76% of azithromycin prescriptions from nonacademic clinics were considered inappropriate, compared with 46% from academic clinics. Conclusions: Implementation of a provider guidance tool in the EMR lead to a reduction in the percentage of inappropriate outpatient azithromycin prescriptions. Future targeted interventions and stewardship initiatives are needed to achieve the stewardship program’s goal of reducing inappropriate outpatient azithromycin prescriptions by 20% by 1 year after implementation.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Development of an Electronic Algorithm to Identify Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Pharyngitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s188-s189
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Gerber ◽  
Robert Grundmeier ◽  
Keith Hamilton ◽  
Lauri Hicks ◽  
Melinda Neuhauser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background: Antibiotic overuse contributes to antibiotic resistance and unnecessary adverse drug effects. Antibiotic stewardship interventions have primarily focused on acute-care settings. Most antibiotic use, however, occurs in outpatients with acute respiratory tract infections such as pharyngitis. The electronic health record (EHR) might provide an effective and efficient tool for outpatient antibiotic stewardship. We aimed to develop and validate an electronic algorithm to identify inappropriate antibiotic use for pediatric outpatients with pharyngitis. Methods: This study was conducted within the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Care Network, including 31 pediatric primary care practices and 3 urgent care centers with a shared EHR serving >250,000 children. We used International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes to identify encounters for pharyngitis at any CHOP practice from March 15, 2017, to March 14, 2018, excluding those with concurrent infections (eg, otitis media, sinusitis), immunocompromising conditions, or other comorbidities that might influence the need for antibiotics. We randomly selected 450 features for detailed chart abstraction assessing patient demographics as well as practice and prescriber characteristics. Appropriateness of antibiotic use based on chart review served as the gold standard for evaluating the electronic algorithm. Criteria for appropriate use included streptococcal testing, use of penicillin or amoxicillin (absent β-lactam allergy), and a 10-day duration of therapy. Results: In 450 patients, the median age was 8.4 years (IQR, 5.5–9.0) and 54% were women. On chart review, 149 patients (33%) received an antibiotic, of whom 126 had a positive rapid strep result. Thus, based on chart review, 23 subjects (5%) diagnosed with pharyngitis received antibiotics inappropriately. Amoxicillin or penicillin was prescribed for 100 of the 126 children (79%) with a positive rapid strep test. Of the 126 children with a positive test, 114 (90%) received the correct antibiotic: amoxicillin, penicillin, or an appropriate alternative antibiotic due to b-lactam allergy. Duration of treatment was correct for all 126 children. Using the electronic algorithm, the proportion of inappropriate prescribing was 28 of 450 (6%). The test characteristics of the electronic algorithm (compared to gold standard chart review) for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were sensitivity (99%, 422 of 427); specificity (100%, 23 of 23); positive predictive value (82%, 23 of 28); and negative predictive value (100%, 422 of 422). Conclusions: For children with pharyngitis, an electronic algorithm for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is highly accurate. Future work should validate this approach in other settings and develop and evaluate the impact of an audit and feedback intervention based on this tool.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals 142. Implementing an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Outpatient Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S82-S82
Author(s):  
Travis B Nielsen ◽  
Maressa Santarossa ◽  
Beatrice D Probst ◽  
Laurie Labuszewski ◽  
Jenna Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
The United States ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Stewardship Program

Abstract Background Antimicrobial-resistant infections lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Among the most facile modifiable risk factors for developing resistance is inappropriate prescribing. The CDC estimates that 47 million (or ≥30% of) outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in the United States are unnecessary. This has provided impetus for expanding our antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) into the outpatient setting. Initial goals included the following: continuous evaluation and reporting of antibiotic prescribing compliance; minimize underuse of antibiotics from delayed diagnoses and misdiagnoses; ensure proper drug, dose, and duration; improve the percentage of appropriate prescriptions. Methods To achieve these goals, we first sent a baseline survey to outpatient prescribers, assessing their understanding of stewardship and antimicrobial resistance. Questions were modeled from the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Precious Drugs & Scary Bugs Campaign. The survey was sent to prescribers at 19 primary care and three immediate/urgent care clinics. Compliance rates for prescribing habits were subsequently tracked via electronic health records and reported to prescribers in accordance with IRB approval. Results Prescribers were highly knowledgeable about what constitutes appropriate prescribing, with verified compliance rates highly concordant with self-reported rates. However, 74% of respondents reported intense pressure from patients to inappropriately prescribe antimicrobials. Compliance rates have been tracked since December 2018 and comparing pre- with post-intervention rates shows improvement in primary care since reporting rates to prescribers in August 2019. Conclusion Reporting compliance rates has been helpful in avoiding inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. However, the survey data reinforce the importance of behavioral interventions to bolster ASP efficacy in the outpatient setting. Going forward, posters modeled off of the IDPH template will be conspicuously exhibited in exam rooms, indicating institutional commitment to the enumerated ASP guidelines. Future studies will allow for comparison of pre- and post-intervention knowledge and prescriber compliance. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 23. Regional Variation in Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing in a Commercially-insured Population, United States, 2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S12-S12
Author(s):  
Destani J Bizune ◽  
Danielle Palms ◽  
Laura M King ◽  
Monina Bartoces ◽  
Ruth Link-Gelles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Otitis Media ◽  
Acute Otitis Media ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Regional Variability ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Patient Âgé ◽  
Tier 3

Abstract Background Studies have shown that the Southern United States has higher rates of outpatient antibiotic prescribing compared to other regions in the country, but reasons for this variation are unclear. We aimed to determine whether the regional variability in outpatient antibiotic prescribing for respiratory diagnoses can be explained by differences in patient age, care setting, comorbidities, and diagnosis in a commercially-insured population. Methods We analyzed the 2017 IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Database of commercially-insured individuals aged &lt; 65 years. We included visits with acute respiratory tract infection (ARTI) diagnoses from retail clinics, urgent care centers, emergency departments, and physician offices. ARTI diagnoses were categorized as: Tier 1, antibiotics are almost always indicated (pneumonia); Tier 2, antibiotics are sometimes indicated (sinusitis, acute otitis media, pharyngitis); and Tier 3, antibiotics are not indicated (asthma, allergy, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, influenza, nonsuppurative otitis media, viral upper respiratory infections, viral pneumonia). We calculated risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) stratified by US Census region and ARTI tier using log-binomial models controlling for patient age, comorbidities (Elixhauser and Complex Chronic Conditions for Children), and setting of care, with Tier 3 visits in the West, the strata with the lowest antibiotic prescription rate, as the reference for all strata. Results A total of 100,104,860 visits were analyzed. In multivariable modeling, ARTI visits in the South and Midwest were highly associated with receiving an antibiotic for Tier 2 conditions vs. patients in other regions (Figure 1). Figure 1. Multivariable model comparing risk of receiving an antibiotic for an ARTI by region and diagnostic tier in urgent care, retail health, emergency department, and office visits, MarketScan® 2017, United States Conclusion Regional variability in outpatient antibiotic prescribing for Tier 2 and 3 ARTIs remained even after controlling for patient age, comorbidities, and setting of care. It is likely that this variability is in part due to non-clinical factors such as regional differences in clinicians’ prescribing habits and patient expectations. Targeted and enhanced public health stewardship interventions are needed to address cultural factors that affect antibiotic prescribing in outpatient settings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Diagnostic Stewardship in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Using Procalcitonin

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s31-s32
Author(s):  
Amanda Gusovsky ◽  
David Burgess ◽  
Donna Burgess ◽  
Emily Slade ◽  
Chris Delcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Tract Infections

Background: A team of infectious diseases physicians, infectious diseases pharmacists, clinical laboratorians, and researchers collaborated to assess the management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). In 1 sample from our institution, 96.1% of pneumonia cases were prescribed antibiotics, compared to 85.0% in a comparison group. A collaborative effort led to the development of a protocol for procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic prescribing that was approved by several hospital committees, including the Antimicrobial Stewardship Committee and the Healthcare Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee in December 2020. The aim of this analysis was to develop baseline information on PCT ordering and antibiotic prescribing patterns in LRTIs. Methods: We evaluated all adult inpatients (March–September 2019 and 2020) with a primary diagnosis of LRTI who received at least 1 antibiotic. Two cohorts were established to observe any potential differences in the 2 most recent years prior to adoption of the PCT protocol. Data (eg, demographics, specific diagnosis, length of stay, antimicrobial therapy and duration, PCT labs, etc) were obtained from the UK Center for Clinical and Translational Science, and the study was approved by the local IRB. The primary outcome of interest was antibiotic duration; secondary outcomes of interest were PCT orders, discharge antibiotic prescription, and inpatient length of stay. Results: In total, 432 patients (277 in 2019 and 155 in 2020) were included in this analysis. The average patient age was 61.2 years (SD, ±13.7); 47.7% were female; and 86.1% were white. Most patients were primarily diagnosed with pneumonia (58.8%), followed by COPD with complication (40.5%). In-hospital mortality was 3.5%. The minority of patients had any orders for PCT (29.2%); among them, most had only 1 PCT level measured (84.1%). The median length of hospital stay was 4 days (IQR, 2–6), and the median duration of antibiotic therapy was 4 days (IQR, 3–6). Conclusions: The utilization of PCT in LRTIs occurs in the minority of patient cases at our institution and mostly as a single measurement. The development and implementation of a PCT-guided therapy could help optimize antibiotic usage in patients with LRTIs.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns for Sinusitis Within a Direct-to-Consumer Virtual Urgent Care

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 519-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher B. Davis ◽  
Lucas N. Marzec ◽  
Zachary Blea ◽  
Diana Godfrey ◽  
Daniel Bickley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Direct To Consumer

scholarly journals 2045. GAIN (Generating Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiatives in Chicago Skilled Nursing Facilities) Collaborative Survey Results: CDC Core Elements of Antimicrobial Stewardship Compliance Assessment in 27 Chicago Skilled Nursing Facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S687-S688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy P Hanson ◽  
Massimo Pacilli ◽  
Shannon N Xydis ◽  
Kelly Walblay ◽  
Stephanie R Black
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Treatment Guideline ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facilities ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Director Of Nursing ◽  
Minimum Criteria

Abstract Background Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) in long-term care facilities is a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requirement as of 2017. The CDC recommends that ASPs in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) fulfill 7 Core Elements: leadership commitment, accountability, drug expertise, action, tracking, reporting and education. Methods An electronic survey utilizing REDCap was sent to the 76 Chicago SNFs representatives (Administrator, Director of Nursing, and/or Assistant Director of Nursing). Survey questions were adopted from the CDC Core Elements of Antimicrobial Stewardship for Nursing Homes Checklist. Results Twenty-seven (36%) of Chicago SNFs responded. Bed size ranged from 36 – 307 (median 150). Although 93% of facilities had a written statement of leadership support for antimicrobial stewardship, only 22% cited any budgeted financial support for antimicrobial stewardship activities. While Pharmacist Consultants visited all SNFs (most visiting monthly), only 33% of SNFs had an Infectious Disease Provider that consulted on-site. Dedicated time for antimicrobial stewardship activities was less than 10 hours per week in 78% of facilities, with half of all respondents reporting less than 5 hours per week. Treatment guidelines were in place for 63% of SNFs, 56% had an antibiogram, and only 7% utilized the Loeb criteria to guide appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Many facilities tracked antimicrobial stewardship metrics (93%) and reported out to staff (70%). Annual nursing training on antimicrobial stewardship occurs more frequently (85%) than prescriber education (56%). The top 3 barriers identified in implementing ASPs were financial limitations (33%), lack of clinical expertise (33%), and provider opposition (30%). Facilities’ compliance in all seven core elements varied from partially compliant (65%), majority compliant (19%), and majority non-compliant (16%). Conclusion Data from this baseline survey informed focused antimicrobial stewardship initiatives for the GAIN Collaborative. Targeted areas to incorporate into facility action plans include treatment guideline development, antibiograms, annual staff antimicrobial stewardship education, and adoption of the Loeb minimum criteria for antibiotic prescribing into clinical practice. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document