Prichard on Causing a Change
This paper starts by considering an interesting argument of H. A. Prichard’s against the view that to act is to cause a change; the argument is that causing is not an activity. The argument is important because of the recent emergence of an ‘agent-causation’ view according to which actions are the causing of changes by agents. The author suggests a way of responding to Prichard’s argument, and then, profiting from one of his own conclusions, turns to consider the relation between neurophysiological changes and the causation of bodily movement by the agent. The paper makes a suggestion about the proper way to understand the relation between the neurophysiological changes, the bodily movements and the action.
1987 ◽
Vol 17
(4)
◽
pp. 831-854
◽
Keyword(s):
1965 ◽
Vol 20
(3_suppl)
◽
pp. 1109-1112
◽
Keyword(s):
2014 ◽
Vol 5
(1)
◽
pp. 65-89
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2021 ◽
2018 ◽
Vol 22
(1)
◽
pp. 198-237
◽
1981 ◽
Vol 39
◽
pp. 162-163