scholarly journals Regulatory Certification, Risk Factor Disclosure, and Investor Behavior*

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1079-1106
Author(s):  
Ruben Cox ◽  
Peter de Goeij
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Risk Perceptions ◽  
Financial Marketing ◽  
Investor Behavior ◽  
Survey Experiment ◽  
Regulatory Oversight ◽  
Perceived Risks ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Risk Factor Information

Abstract This article examines the question: Does regulatory approval of prospectuses act as a “certification” of securities offerings? Rational investors should generally ignore prospectus approval due to its being uninformative regarding either the quality of, or motives for, the underlying offering. Our survey experiment demonstrates that salient references to regulatory oversight in investment advertisements can lead to significant increases in willingness to invest and concomitant decreases in perceived risks. Conversely, salient disclosure of risk factor information increases risk perceptions and reduces the intention to search for additional information. Various robustness tests confirm that investors can perceive regulatory oversight of securities offerings as an endorsement. Our results provide insight regarding the design of the disclosure and the effective regulation of financial marketing.

Implementation of a new patient health questionnaire into standard practice in outpatient cancer clinics to improve patient care and quality of treatment.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 214-214
Author(s):  
Kathryn Estey ◽  
Catherine Brown ◽  
Andrea Perez-Cosio ◽  
Gursharan Gill ◽  
Mindy Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Electronic Version ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Risk Factor Information

214 Background: Patient socio-demographic, lifestyle, and risk factor information at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) is routinely collected for clinical purposes. The only standardized patient information presently being gathered in the outpatient cancer clinics at the PM is symptom management data, which is linked directly into the electronic medical records. Collecting and recording additional data can improve the quality of patient care, help identify risk factors, and guide treatment options. Our aim was to determine the feasibility of collecting this additional information in a clinical setting. Methods: This pilot cohort study was implemented in the thoracic outpatient oncology clinic at the PM. It involved developing a questionnaire utilizing literature sources, expert review, and pilot testing. Adult cancer patients completed the questionnaire and a complementary acceptability survey during their first clinic visit. Results: 170 patients with thoracic tumours, primarily lung cancer, took part in the feasibility study. Of these, 51% were female, 67% were Caucasian, and the median age was 65 (range 32 to 88) years old. The acceptability survey demonstrated that: 76% of respondents found that the questionnaire did not make their clinic visit more difficult, 68% found that it asked the right questions, 79% thought the questionnaire contained pertinent information for their doctor and other healthcare providers to know, and 51% found that it was time consuming to complete. Conclusions: This study determined that it is feasible to implement a standardized questionnaire that gathers patient socio-demographic, lifestyle, and risk factor information in routine clinical cancer care. Since half of the study population found the questionnaire time consuming to complete it should be administered prior to patient visits, in an electronic format, and with greater explanation/education. The next phase is converting the questionnaire into an electronic version, which aligns with the preferences of study participants and will allow the information to be more easily accessible by clinicians/researchers.

Convergent Beam Electron Diffraction

1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-315
Author(s):  
G. Lehmpfuhl
Keyword(s):  
Electron Diffraction ◽  
Diffraction Pattern ◽  
Crystal Surface ◽  
Diffraction Spot ◽  
Crystal Thickness ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Microscopic Investigations

Introduction In electron microscopic investigations of crystalline specimens the direct observation of the electron diffraction pattern gives additional information about the specimen. The quality of this information depends on the quality of the crystals or the crystal area contributing to the diffraction pattern. By selected area diffraction in a conventional electron microscope, specimen areas as small as 1 µ in diameter can be investigated. It is well known that crystal areas of that size which must be thin enough (in the order of 1000 Å) for electron microscopic investigations are normally somewhat distorted by bending, or they are not homogeneous. Furthermore, the crystal surface is not well defined over such a large area. These are facts which cause reduction of information in the diffraction pattern. The intensity of a diffraction spot, for example, depends on the crystal thickness. If the thickness is not uniform over the investigated area, one observes an averaged intensity, so that the intensity distribution in the diffraction pattern cannot be used for an analysis unless additional information is available.

Integrating Safety-II into Safety Management

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toni Wäfler ◽  
Rahel Gugerli ◽  
Giulio Nisoli
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Safety Factor ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Safety Management Systems ◽  
Safety Science ◽  
Human Failure ◽  
The Given ◽  
Freedom Of Action

We all aim for safe processes. However, providing safety is a complex endeavour. What is it that makes a process safe? And what is the contribution of humans? It is very common to consider humans a risk factor prone to errors. Therefore, we implement sophisticated safety management systems (SMS) in order to prevent potential "human failure". These SMS provide an impressive increase of safety. In safety science this approach is labelled "Safety-I", and it starts to be questioned because humans do not show failures only. On the contrary, they often actively contribute to safety, sometimes even by deviating from a procedure. This "Safety-II" perspective considers humans to be a "safety factor" as well because of their ability to adjust behaviour to the given situation. However, adaptability requires scope of action and this is where Safety-I and Safety-II contradict each other. While the former restricts freedom of action, the latter requires room for manoeuvring. Thus, the task of integrating the Safety-II perspective into SMS, which are traditionally Safety-I based, is difficult. This challenge was the main objective of our project. We discovered two methods that contribute to the quality of SMS by integrating Safety-II into SMS without jeopardizing the Safety-I approach.

scholarly journals 179 Improving Operative Notes in Upper GI Surgery: An Innovative QI Project Utilising Existing Electronic Hospital Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Sadik ◽  
A Butt ◽  
Z Gowie ◽  
J Carew ◽  
A Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Records ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Operative Care ◽  
Adequate Care ◽  
Hospital Systems ◽  
Operative Notes ◽  
Mean Compliance ◽  
Valuable Role ◽  
Electronic Hospital

Abstract Introduction Operative notes play a valuable role in ensuring that surgical patients receive consistent and adequate care. There are many inherent difficulties affecting their quality. We performed a QI project to improve surgical operative notes at our centre. Method A questionnaire assessing subjective quality of operative notes was sent to all foundation doctors delivering post-operative care. Compliance to each inclusion recommendation in the RCS guidelines was analysed. A standardised template for operative notes was incorporated into the hospital’s electronic records system, compliance was then reassessed. Results Questionnaire responses (16) were better for typed vs hand-written notes in all domains: ease of accessing notes, following intra-operative steps, following post-operative plans and frequency of asking for additional information regarding plans. After implementation of the template, mean compliance across 19 RCS parameters improved from 69% (55 operations) to 89% (46 operations). Number of parameters with 100% compliance improved from 2/19 to 8/19. Compliance increased in 14/19 parameters, there was no change in 2/19 (already 100%) and a reduction was seen in 3/19. Conclusions Results from our analysis and questionnaire showed that typed notes were favourable when compared to hand-written. The introduction of a standardised electronic template, without investment in new software, improved compliance to RCS guidelines.

scholarly journals Patient perspectives on tablet-based technology to collect risk factor information in primary care

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanne Kosowan ◽  
Alan Katz ◽  
Gayle Halas ◽  
Alexander Singer
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Information Technology ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Risk Behaviours ◽  
Patient Risk ◽  
Self Reflection ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
User Friendly ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Risk Factor Information

Abstract Background Primary care provides an opportunity to introduce prevention strategies and identify risk behaviours. Algorithmic information technology such as the Risk Factor Identification Tool (RFIT) can support primary care counseling. This study explores the integration of the tablet-based RFIT in primary care clinics to support exploration of patient risk factor information. Methods Qualitative study to explore patients’ perspectives of RFIT. RFIT was implemented in two primary care clinics in Manitoba, Canada. There were 207 patients who completed RFIT, offered to them by eight family physicians. We conducted one-on-one patient interviews with 86 patients to capture the patient’s perspective. Responses were coded and categorized into five common themes. Results RFIT had a completion rate of 86%. Clinic staff reported that very few patients declined the use of RFIT or required assistance to use the tablet. Patients reported that the tablet-based RFIT provided a user-friendly interface that enabled self-reflection while in the waiting room. Patients discussed the impact of RFIT on the patient-provider interaction, utility for the clinician, their concerns and suggested improvements for RFIT. Among the patients who used RFIT 12.1% smoked, 21.2% felt their diet could be improved, 9.3% reported high alcohol consumption, 56.4% reported less than 150 min of PA a week, and 8.2% lived in poverty. Conclusion RFIT is a user-friendly tool for the collection of patient risk behaviour information. RFIT is particularly useful for patients lacking continuity in the care they receive. Information technology can promote self-reflection while providing useful information to the primary care clinician. When combined with practical tools and resources RFIT can assist in the reduction of risk behaviours.

scholarly journals The expanded prostate cancer index composite short form (EPIC-26) for measuring health-related quality of life: content analysis of patients’ spontaneous comments written in survey margins

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna-Maija Talvitie ◽  
Hanna Ojala ◽  
Teuvo Tammela ◽  
Ilkka Pietilä
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Urinary Catheters ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Response Data ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Abstract Introduction This study investigates comments that prostate cancer patients spontaneously write in the margins of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Short Form (EPIC-26) questionnaire. We aim to show the possible barriers that patients face while answering the survey, and to consider how these barriers may affect the response data generated. We investigate the kind of information patients’ comments on EPIC-26 contain, and patients’ motivations to provide this information. We also study why some EPIC domains spark more comments than others. Method We analyzed 28 pages of transcribed comments and four pages of supplementary letters from our survey participants (n = 496). Using inductive content analysis, we generated 10 categories describing the content of participants’ comments, and four themes demonstrating their motives for commenting. The comments regarding each EPIC domain were quantified to discover any differences between domains. Results The sexual domain of EPIC-26 provoked over half of all comments. Patients without recent sexual activity or desire had difficulties answering sexual function questions 8–10. The lack of instructions on whether to take erectile aid use into account when answering erectile function questions led to a diversity of answering strategies. Patients with urinary catheters could not find suitable answer options for questions 1–4. All domains sparked comments containing additional information about experienced symptoms. Conclusion Patients are mainly willing to report their symptoms, but a lack of suitable answer options causes missing data and differing answering strategies in the sexual and urinary domains of EPIC-26, weakening the quality of the response data received.

A STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF CANCER RISK FACTOR INFORMATION REPORTED TO A CENTRAL REGISTRY COMPARED WITH THAT OBTAINED BY INTERVIEW

1989 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 616-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROSS C. BROWNSON ◽  
JAMES R DAVIS ◽  
JIAN C. CHANG ◽  
THOMAS M. DILORENZO ◽  
THOMAS J. KEEFE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk Factor ◽  
Central Registry ◽  
Risk Factor Information

scholarly journals Lived post-stroke of a Senegalese cohort: What risk factor for what quality of life items?

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. e76
Author(s):  
Ngor Side Diagne ◽  
Massaman Camara ◽  
Abou Sy ◽  
Ousmane Cissé ◽  
Amadou Koura Ndao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Post Stroke
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document