scholarly journals Gpr19 is a circadian clock-controlled orphan GPCR with a role in modulating free-running period and light resetting capacity of the circadian clock

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Yamaguchi ◽  
Iori Murai ◽  
Kaoru Goto ◽  
Shotaro Doi ◽  
Huihua Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Dorsal Region ◽  
Circadian Expression ◽  
Delayed Initiation ◽  
Free Running ◽  
Responsive Element ◽  
Free Running Period ◽  
Orphan Gpcr

Background and Purpose: Gpr19 encodes an evolutionarily conserved orphan G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with no established physiological function in vivo. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of Gpr19 in the circadian clock system. Experimental Approach: We examined whether and how the master circadian clock neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) express Gpr19. By analysing Gpr19-deficient (Gpr19−/−) mice, we asked whether Gpr19 has a role in modulating free-running period and light resetting capacity of the circadian clock. Key Results: Compared with the known common core clock genes, Gpr19 was identified to show several distinct yet limited features related to the circadian clock. Gpr19 mRNA was mainly expressed in the middle-to-dorsal region of the SCN. A conserved cAMP-responsive element within the Gpr19 promoter drove the circadian expression of Gpr19. Gpr19−/− mice exhibited a prolonged circadian period and a delayed initiation of daily locomotor activity in a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle. Gpr19 deficiency caused the downregulation of several genes that normally peak during the night, including Bmal1 and Gpr176. Gpr19−/− mice had a reduced capacity for phase shift to early subjective night light. The defect was only observed for phase-delay, but not phase-advance, and accompanied by reduced response of c-Fos expression in the dorsal region of the SCN, while apparently normal in the ventral part of the SCN, in Gpr19−/− mice. Conclusion and Implications: Gpr19 is an SCN-enriched orphan GPCR with a distinct role in circadian regulation and thus may be a potential target for alleviating circadian clock disorders.

scholarly journals Gpr19 is a circadian clock-controlled orphan GPCR with a role in modulating free-running period and light resetting capacity of the circadian clock

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Yamaguchi ◽  
Iori Murai ◽  
Kaoru Goto ◽  
Shotaro Doi ◽  
Huihua Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Light Exposure ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Delayed Initiation ◽  
Free Running ◽  
Responsive Element ◽  
Free Running Period ◽  
Ventral Area ◽  
Orphan Gpcr

AbstractGpr19 encodes an evolutionarily conserved orphan G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with currently no established physiological role in vivo. We characterized Gpr19 expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the locus of the master circadian clock in the brain, and determined its role in the context of the circadian rhythm regulation. We found that Gpr19 is mainly expressed in the dorsal part of the SCN, with its expression fluctuating in a circadian fashion. A conserved cAMP-responsive element in the Gpr19 promoter was able to produce circadian transcription in the SCN. Gpr19−/− mice exhibited a prolonged circadian period and a delayed initiation of daily locomotor activity. Gpr19 deficiency caused the downregulation of several genes that normally peak during the night, including Bmal1 and Gpr176. In response to light exposure at night, Gpr19−/− mice had a reduced capacity for light-induced phase-delays, but not for phase-advances. This defect was accompanied by reduced response of c-Fos expression in the dorsal region of the SCN, while apparently normal in the ventral area of the SCN, in Gpr19−/− mice. Thus, our data demonstrate that Gpr19 is an SCN-enriched orphan GPCR with a distinct role in circadian regulation and may provide a potential target option for modulating the circadian clock.

scholarly journals A Circadian Clock Entrained by Melatonin Is Ticking in the Rat Fetal Adrenal

Endocrinology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. 1891-1900 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Torres-Farfan ◽  
N. Mendez ◽  
L. Abarzua-Catalan ◽  
N. Vilches ◽  
G. J. Valenzuela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adrenal Gland ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Regulatory Protein ◽  
Fetal Life ◽  
Early Growth Response ◽  
Circadian Expression ◽  
Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory

The adrenal gland in the adult is a peripheral circadian clock involved in the coordination of energy intake and expenditure, required for adaptation to the external environment. During fetal life, a peripheral circadian clock is present in the nonhuman primate adrenal gland. Whether this extends to the fetal adrenal gland like the rat is unknown. Here we explored in vivo and in vitro whether the rat fetal adrenal is a peripheral circadian clock entrained by melatonin. We measured the 24-h changes in adrenal content of corticosterone and in the expression of clock genes Per-2 and Bmal-1 and of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), Mt1 melatonin receptor, and early growth response protein 1 (Egr-1) expression. In culture, we explored whether oscillatory expression of these genes persisted during 48 h and the effect of a 4-h melatonin pulse on their expression. In vivo, the rat fetal adrenal gland showed circadian expression of Bmal-1 and Per-2 in antiphase (acrophases at 2200 and 1300 h, respectively) as well as of Mt1 and Egr-1. This was accompanied by circadian rhythms of corticosterone content and of StAR expression both peaking at 0600 h. The 24-h oscillatory expression of Bmal-1, Per-2, StAR, Mt1, and Egr-1 persisted during 48 h in culture; however, the antiphase between Per-2 and Bmal-1 was lost. The pulse of melatonin shifted the acrophases of all the genes studied and restored the antiphase between Per-2 and Bmal-1. Thus, in the rat, the fetal adrenal is a strong peripheral clock potentially amenable to regulation by maternal melatonin.

scholarly journals Cell type resolved co-expression networks of core clock genes in brain development

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surbhi Sharma ◽  
Asgar Hussain Ansari ◽  
Soundhar Ramasamy
Keyword(s):  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Radial Glia ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Neuronal Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Developing Brain ◽  
Knock Out

AbstractThe circadian clock regulates vital cellular processes by adjusting the physiology of the organism to daily changes in the environment. Rhythmic transcription of core Clock Genes (CGs) and their targets regulate these processes at the cellular level. Circadian clock disruption has been observed in people with neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Also, ablation of CGs during development has been shown to affect neurogenesis in both in vivo and in vitro models. Previous studies on the function of CGs in the brain have used knock-out models of a few CGs. However, a complete catalog of CGs in different cell types of the developing brain is not available and it is also tedious to obtain. Recent advancements in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revealed novel cell types and elusive dynamic cell states of the developing brain. In this study by using publicly available single-cell transcriptome datasets we systematically explored CGs-coexpressing networks (CGs-CNs) during embryonic and adult neurogenesis. Our meta-analysis reveals CGs-CNs in human embryonic radial glia, neurons and also in lesser studied non-neuronal cell types of the developing brain.

CORTISOL CIRCADIAN RHYTHM AND INSULIN RESISTANCE IN MUSCLE: EFFECT OF DOSING AND TIMING OF HYDROCORTISONE EXPOSURE ON INSULIN SENSITIVITY IN SYNCHRONIZED MUSCLE CELLS.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariarosaria Negri ◽  
Claudia Pivonello ◽  
Chiara Simeoli ◽  
Gilda Di Gennaro ◽  
Mary Anna Venneri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Circadian Rhythm ◽  
Insulin Sensitivity ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Insulin Signaling ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Muscle Cells ◽  
C2c12 Cells ◽  
Circadian Expression

Introduction/Aim: Circadian rhythm disruption is emerging as a risk factor for metabolic disorders and particularly, alterations in clock genes circadian expression have been shown to influence insulin sensitivity. Recently, the reciprocal interplay between the circadian clock machinery and HPA axis has been largely demonstrated: the circadian clock may control the physiological circadian endogenous glucocorticoids secretion and action; glucocorticoids, in turn, are potent regulator of the circadian clock and their inappropriate replacement has been associated with metabolic impairment. The aim of the current study was to investigate in vitro the interaction between the timing-of-the-day exposure to different hydrocortisone (HC) concentrations on muscle insulin sensitivity. Methods: Serum-shock synchronized mouse skeletal muscle C2C12 cells were exposed to different HC concentrations recapitulating the circulating daily physiological cortisol profile (standard cortisol profile), the circulating daily cortisol profile that reached in adrenal insufficient (AI) patients treated with once-daily MR-HC (flat cortisol profile) and treated with thrice-daily of conventional IR-HC (steep cortisol profile). The 24 hrs spontaneous oscillation of the clock genes in synchronized C2C12 cells was used to align the timing for in vitro HC exposure (Bmal1 acrophase, midphase and bathyphase) with the reference times of cortisol peaks in AI treated with IR-HC (8 am, 1 pm, 6 pm). A panel of 84 insulin sensitivity related genes and intracellular insulin signaling proteins were analyzed by RT-qPCR and western blot, respectively. Results: Only the steep profile, characterized by a higher HC exposure during Bmal1 bathyphase, produced significant downregulation in 21 insulin sensitivity-related genes. Among these, Insr, Irs1, Irs2, Pi3kca and Adipor2 were downregulated when compared the flat to the standard or steep profile. Reduced intracellular IRS1 Tyr608, AKT Ser473, AMPK Thr172 and ACC Ser79 phosphorylations were also observed. Conclusions: The current study demonstrated that is late-in-the-day cortisol exposure that modulates insulin sensitivity-related genes expression and intracellular insulin signaling in skeletal muscle cells.

scholarly journals Period 2: A Regulator of Multiple Tissue-Specific Circadian Functions

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennaro Ruggiero ◽  
Zohar Ben-Moshe Livne ◽  
Yair Wexler ◽  
Nathalie Geyer ◽  
Daniela Vallone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Central Element ◽  
Light Sensitivity ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Rhythmic Expression ◽  
Period 2 ◽  
Circadian Clock Genes

The zebrafish represents a powerful model for exploring how light regulates the circadian clock due to the direct light sensitivity of its peripheral clocks, a property that is retained even in organ cultures as well as zebrafish-derived cell lines. Light-inducible expression of the per2 clock gene has been predicted to play a vital function in relaying light information to the core circadian clock mechanism in many organisms, including zebrafish. To directly test the contribution of per2 to circadian clock function in zebrafish, we have generated a loss-of-function per2 gene mutation. Our results reveal a tissue-specific role for the per2 gene in maintaining rhythmic expression of circadian clock genes, as well as clock-controlled genes, and an impact on the rhythmic behavior of intact zebrafish larvae. Furthermore, we demonstrate that disruption of the per2 gene impacts on the circadian regulation of the cell cycle in vivo. Based on these results, we hypothesize that in addition to serving as a central element of the light input pathway to the circadian clock, per2 acts as circadian regulator of tissue-specific physiological functions in zebrafish.

Regularly scheduled voluntary exercise synchronizes the mouse circadian clock

1991 ◽  
Vol 261 (4) ◽  
pp. R928-R933 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Edgar ◽  
W. C. Dement
Keyword(s):  
Circadian Rhythms ◽  
Phase Shift ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Wheel Running ◽  
External Environment ◽  
Voluntary Exercise ◽  
Wheel Rotation ◽  
Exercise Activity ◽  
Free Running ◽  
Free Running Period

Circadian rhythm entrainment has long been thought to depend exclusively on periodic cues in the external environment. However, evidence now suggests that appropriately timed vigorous activity may also phase shift the circadian clock. Previously it was not known whether levels of exercise/activity associated with spontaneous behavior provided sufficient feedback to phase shift or synchronize circadian rhythms. The present study investigated this issue by monitoring the sleep-wake, drinking, and wheel-running circadian rhythms of mice (Mus musculus) during unrestricted access to running wheels and when free wheel rotation was limited to either 12- or 6-h intervals with a fixed period of 24 h. Wheel rotation was controlled remotely. Mice spontaneously ran in wheels during scheduled access, and free-running sleep-wake and drinking circadian rhythms became entrained to scheduled exercise in 11 of 15 animals. However, steady-state entrainment was achieved only when exercise commenced several hours into the subjective night. The temporal placement of running during entrainment was related (r = 0.7003, P less than 0.02) to free-running period before entrainment. Mice with a free-running period less than 23.0 h did not entrain but exhibited relative coordination between free-running variables and the wheel availability schedule. Thus the circadian timekeeping system responds to temporal feedback arising from the timing of volitional exercise/activity, suggesting that the biological clock not only is responsive to periodic geophysical events in the external environment but also derives physiological feedback from the spontaneous activity behaviors of the organism.

scholarly journals Intracellular Ca2+ Regulates Free-Running Circadian Clock Oscillation In Vivo

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (46) ◽  
pp. 12489-12499 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. Harrisingh ◽  
Y. Wu ◽  
G. A. Lnenicka ◽  
M. N. Nitabach
Keyword(s):  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Free Running

scholarly journals Machine Learning and In-Vivo Expression Analyses Reveal Circadian Clock Features Predictive of Anxiety in Humans

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aziz Zafar ◽  
Rebeccah Overton ◽  
Ziad Attia ◽  
Ahmet Ay ◽  
Krista Ingram
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Circadian Rhythms ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Clock Gene ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Anxiety Symptoms ◽  
Circadian Phase ◽  
Functional Studies

Abstract Mood disorders, including anxiety, are associated with disruptions in circadian rhythms and are linked to polymorphisms in circadian clock genes. Molecular mechanisms underlying these connections may be direct—via transcriptional activity of clock genes on downstream mood pathways in the brain, or indirect—via clock gene influences on the phase and amplitude of circadian rhythms which, in turn, modulate physiological processes influencing mood. Employing machine learning combined with statistical approaches, we explored clock genotype combinations that predict risk for anxiety symptoms in a deeply phenotyped population. We identified multiple novel circadian genotypes predictive of anxiety, with the PER3B-AG/CRY1-CG genotype being the strongest predictor of anxiety risk in males. Molecular chronotyping, using clock gene expression oscillations, revealed that advanced circadian phase and robust circadian amplitudes are associated with high levels of anxiety symptoms. Further analyses revealed that individuals with advanced phases and pronounced circadian misalignment were at higher risk for severe anxiety symptoms. Our results support both direct and indirect influences of clock gene variants on mood: while sex-specific clock genotype combinations predictive of anxiety symptoms suggest direct effects on mood pathways, the mediation of PER3B effects on anxiety via diurnal preference measures and the association of circadian phase with anxiety symptoms provide evidence for indirect effects of the molecular clockwork on mood. Unraveling the complex molecular mechanisms underlying the links between circadian physiology and mood is essential to identifying the core clock genes to target in future functional studies, thereby advancing the development of non-invasive treatments for anxiety-related disorders.

scholarly journals Identification of PCBP1 as a Novel Modulator of Mammalian Circadian Clock

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaling Wu ◽  
Haijiao Zhao ◽  
Eric Erquan Zhang ◽  
Na Liu
Keyword(s):  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Mechanistic Study ◽  
Daily Cycle ◽  
Rhythmic Expression ◽  
Circadian Expression ◽  
E Box ◽  
Cryptochrome 1

The circadian clock governs our daily cycle of behavior and physiology. Previous studies have identified a handful of core clock components and hundreds of circadian modifiers. Here, we report the discovery that poly(C)-binding protein 1 (PCBP1), displaying a circadian expression pattern, was a novel circadian clock regulator. We found that knocking down PCBP1 resulted in period shortening in human U2OS cells, and that manipulations of PCBP1 expression altered the activity of CLOCK/BMAL1 in an E-box-based reporter assay. Further mechanistic study demonstrated that this clock function of PCBP1 appears to work by enhancing the association of Cryptochrome 1 (CRY1) with the CLOCK/BMAL1 complex, thereby negatively regulating the latter’s activation. Co-immunoprecipitation of PCBP1 and core clock molecules confirmed the interactions between PCBP1 and CRY1, and a time-course qPCR assay revealed the rhythmic expression of PCBP1 in mouse hearts in vivo. Given that the RNA interference of mushroom-body expressed (mub), the poly(rC) binding protein (PCBP) homolog of Drosophila, in the clock neurons also led to a circadian phenotype in the locomotor assay, our study deemed PCBP1 a novel clock modifier whose circadian regulatory mechanism is conserved during evolution.

scholarly journals Cancer clocks in tumourigenesis: the p53 pathway and beyond

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. R95-R110
Author(s):  
Ewan M Stephenson ◽  
Laura E J Usselmann ◽  
Vinay Tergaonkar ◽  
David M Virshup ◽  
Robert Dallmann
Keyword(s):  
Circadian Rhythms ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Cancer Biology ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Clock Genes ◽  
Human Cancer ◽  
Epidemiologic Studies ◽  
Current Evidence

Circadian rhythms regulate a vast array of physiological and cellular processes, as well as the hormonal milieu, to keep our cells synchronised to the light–darkness cycle. Epidemiologic studies have implicated circadian disruption in the development of breast and other cancers, and numerous clock genes are dysregulated in human tumours. Here we review the evidence that circadian rhythms, when altered at the molecular level, influence cancer growth. We also note some common pitfalls in circadian-cancer research and how they might be avoided to maximise comparable results and minimise misleading data. Studies of circadian gene mutant mice, and human cancer models in vitro and in vivo, demonstrate that clock genes can impact tumourigenesis. Clock genes influence important cancer-related pathways, ranging from p53-mediated apoptosis to cell cycle progression. Confusingly, clock dysfunction can be both pro- or anti-tumourigenic in a model and cell type-specific manner. Due to this duality, there is no canonical mechanism for clock interaction with tumourigenic pathways. To understand the role of the circadian clock in patients’ tumours requires analysis of the molecular clock status compared to healthy tissue. Novel mathematical approaches are under development, but this remains largely aspirational, and is hampered by a lack of temporal information in publicly available datasets. Current evidence broadly supports the notion that the circadian clock is important for cancer biology. More work is necessary to develop an overarching model of this connection. Future studies would do well to analyse the clock network in addition to alterations in single clock genes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document