scholarly journals Maintenance of Cell Fates by Regulation of the Histone Variant H3.3 in Caenorhabditis elegans

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukimasa Shibata ◽  
Kiyoji Nishiwaki
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Histone Variants ◽  
Histone Variant ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Selector Genes

HighlightsTLK-1 maintains cell fates by repression of selector genesTLK-1 and downstream H3 chaperone CAF1 inhibit H3.3 depositionLoss of sin-3 suppresses the defect in cell-fate maintenance of tlk-1 mutantsAcH4-binding protein BET-1 is necessary for sin-3 suppressionSummaryCell-fate maintenance is important to preserve the variety of cell types that are essential for the formation and function of tissues. We previously showed that the acetylated histone H4-binding protein BET-1 maintains cell fate by recruiting the histone variant H2A.z. Here, we report that Caenorhabditis elegans tousled-like kinase TLK-1 and the histone H3 chaperone CAF1 maintain cell fate by preventing the incorporation of histone variant H3.3 into nucleosomes, thereby repressing ectopic expression of transcription factors that induce cell-fate specification. Genetic analyses suggested that TLK-1 and BET-1 act in parallel pathways. In tlk-1 mutants, the loss of SIN-3, which promotes histone acetylation, suppressed a defect in cell-fate maintenance in a manner dependent on MYST family histone acetyltransferase MYS-2 and BET-1. sin-3 mutation also suppressed abnormal H3.3 incorporation. Thus, we propose that the regulation and interaction of histone variants play crucial roles in cell-fate maintenance through the regulation of selector genes.

scholarly journals CtBP impedes JNK- and Upd/STAT-driven cell fate misspecifications in regenerating Drosophila imaginal discs

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie I Worley ◽  
Larissa A Alexander ◽  
Iswar K Hariharan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Tissue Damage ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Imaginal Discs ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Genetic Ablation ◽  
Compartment Boundary ◽  
Wing Pouch

Regeneration following tissue damage often necessitates a mechanism for cellular re-programming, so that surviving cells can give rise to all cell types originally found in the damaged tissue. This process, if unchecked, can also generate cell types that are inappropriate for a given location. We conducted a screen for genes that negatively regulate the frequency of notum-to-wing transformations following genetic ablation and regeneration of the wing pouch, from which we identified mutations in the transcriptional co-repressor C-terminal Binding Protein (CtBP). When CtBP function is reduced, ablation of the pouch can activate the JNK/AP-1 and JAK/STAT pathways in the notum to destabilize cell fates. Ectopic expression of Wingless and Dilp8 precede the formation of the ectopic pouch, which is subsequently generated by recruitment of both anterior and posterior cells near the compartment boundary. Thus, CtBP stabilizes cell fates following damage by opposing the destabilizing effects of the JNK/AP-1 and JAK/STAT pathways.

scholarly journals C. elegans LIN-28 controls temporal cell-fate progression by regulating LIN-46 expression via the 5’UTR of lin-46 mRNA

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orkan Ilbay ◽  
Charles Nelson ◽  
Victor Ambros
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cellular Differentiation ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
L1 And L2 ◽  
Proliferative Cell

ABSTRACTHuman Lin28 is a conserved RNA-binding protein that promotes proliferation and pluripotency and can be oncogenic. Lin28 and C. elegans LIN-28 bind to precursor RNAs of the conserved, cellular differentiation-promoting, microRNA let-7 and inhibits production of mature let-7 microRNA. Lin28/LIN-28 also binds to and regulates many mRNAs in various cell types. However, the determinants and consequences of these LIN-28-mRNA interactions are not well understood. Here, we report that LIN-28 in C. elegans represses the expression of LIN-46, a downstream protein in the heterochronic pathway, via the 5’ UTR of the lin-46 mRNA. We show that both LIN-28 and the 5’UTR of lin-46 are required to prevent LIN-46 expression in the L1 and L2 stages, and that precocious LIN-46 expression is sufficient to skip L2 stage proliferative cell-fates, resulting in heterochronic defects similar to the ones observed in lin-28(0) animals. We propose that the lin-46 5’UTR mediates LIN-28 binding to and repression of the lin-46 mRNA. Our results demonstrate that precocious LIN-46 expression alone can account for lin-28(0) phenotypes, demonstrating the biological importance of regulation of individual target mRNAs by LIN-28.

scholarly journals LIN-12/Notch signaling instructs postsynaptic muscle arm development by regulating UNC-40/DCC and MADD-2 in Caenorhabditis elegans

eLife ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengpeng Li ◽  
Kevin M Collins ◽  
Michael R Koelle ◽  
Kang Shen
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Dendritic Spine ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Synaptic Connectivity ◽  
Target Cells

The diverse cell types and the precise synaptic connectivity between them are the cardinal features of the nervous system. Little is known about how cell fate diversification is linked to synaptic target choices. Here we investigate how presynaptic neurons select one type of muscles, vm2, as a synaptic target and form synapses on its dendritic spine-like muscle arms. We found that the Notch-Delta pathway was required to distinguish target from non-target muscles. APX-1/Delta acts in surrounding cells including the non-target vm1 to activate LIN-12/Notch in the target vm2. LIN-12 functions cell-autonomously to up-regulate the expression of UNC-40/DCC and MADD-2 in vm2, which in turn function together to promote muscle arm formation and guidance. Ectopic expression of UNC-40/DCC in non-target vm1 muscle is sufficient to induce muscle arm extension from these cells. Therefore, the LIN-12/Notch signaling specifies target selection by selectively up-regulating guidance molecules and forming muscle arms in target cells.

scholarly journals Histone Acetyltransferases and Stem Cell Identity

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2407
Author(s):  
Ruicen He ◽  
Arthur Dantas ◽  
Karl Riabowol
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Epigenetic Modification ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferases ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Cell Identity ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Acetylation of histones is a key epigenetic modification involved in transcriptional regulation. The addition of acetyl groups to histone tails generally reduces histone-DNA interactions in the nucleosome leading to increased accessibility for transcription factors and core transcriptional machinery to bind their target sequences. There are approximately 30 histone acetyltransferases and their corresponding complexes, each of which affect the expression of a subset of genes. Because cell identity is determined by gene expression profile, it is unsurprising that the HATs responsible for inducing expression of these genes play a crucial role in determining cell fate. Here, we explore the role of HATs in the maintenance and differentiation of various stem cell types. Several HAT complexes have been characterized to play an important role in activating genes that allow stem cells to self-renew. Knockdown or loss of their activity leads to reduced expression and or differentiation while particular HATs drive differentiation towards specific cell fates. In this study we review functions of the HAT complexes active in pluripotent stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells, muscle satellite cells, mesenchymal stem cells, neural stem cells, and cancer stem cells.

Serrate and Notch specify cell fates in the heart field by suppressing cardiomyogenesis

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (17) ◽  
pp. 3865-3876
Author(s):  
M.S. Rones ◽  
K.A. McLaughlin ◽  
M. Raffin ◽  
M. Mercola
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Notch Pathway ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Myocardial Cell ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Heart Field

Notch signaling mediates numerous developmental cell fate decisions in organisms ranging from flies to humans, resulting in the generation of multiple cell types from equipotential precursors. In this paper, we present evidence that activation of Notch by its ligand Serrate apportions myogenic and non-myogenic cell fates within the early Xenopus heart field. The crescent-shaped field of heart mesoderm is specified initially as cardiomyogenic. While the ventral region of the field forms the myocardial tube, the dorsolateral portions lose myogenic potency and form the dorsal mesocardium and pericardial roof (Raffin, M., Leong, L. M., Rones, M. S., Sparrow, D., Mohun, T. and Mercola, M. (2000) Dev. Biol., 218, 326–340). The local interactions that establish or maintain the distinct myocardial and non-myocardial domains have never been described. Here we show that Xenopus Notch1 (Xotch) and Serrate1 are expressed in overlapping patterns in the early heart field. Conditional activation or inhibition of the Notch pathway with inducible dominant negative or active forms of the RBP-J/Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)] transcription factor indicated that activation of Notch feeds back on Serrate1 gene expression to localize transcripts more dorsolaterally than those of Notch1, with overlap in the region of the developing mesocardium. Moreover, Notch pathway activation decreased myocardial gene expression and increased expression of a marker of the mesocardium and pericardial roof, whereas inhibition of Notch signaling had the opposite effect. Activation or inhibition of Notch also regulated contribution of individual cells to the myocardium. Importantly, expression of Nkx2. 5 and Gata4 remained largely unaffected, indicating that Notch signaling functions downstream of heart field specification. We conclude that Notch signaling through Su(H) suppresses cardiomyogenesis and that this activity is essential for the correct specification of myocardial and non-myocardial cell fates.

scholarly journals Hypoxia-Inducible Factors 1α and 2α Regulate Trophoblast Differentiation

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (23) ◽  
pp. 10479-10491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen D. Cowden Dahl ◽  
Benjamin H. Fryer ◽  
Fiona A. Mack ◽  
Veerle Compernolle ◽  
Emin Maltepe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factors ◽  
Low Oxygen ◽  
Placental Development ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Trophoblast Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Hypoxic Environment ◽  
Life Threatening

ABSTRACT Placental development initially occurs in a low-oxygen (O2) or hypoxic environment. In this report we show that two hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), HIF1α and HIF2α, are essential for determining murine placental cell fates. HIF is a heterodimer composed of HIFα and HIFβ (ARNT) subunits. Placentas from Arnt − / − and Hif1α − / − Hif2α −/− embryos exhibit defective placental vascularization and aberrant cell fate adoption. HIF regulation of Mash2 promotes spongiotrophoblast differentiation, a prerequisite for trophoblast giant cell differentiation. In the absence of Arnt or Hifα, trophoblast stem cells fail to generate these cell types and become labyrinthine trophoblasts instead. Therefore, HIF mediates placental morphogenesis, angiogenesis, and cell fate decisions, demonstrating that O2 tension is a critical regulator of trophoblast lineage determination. This novel genetic approach provides new insights into the role of O2 tension in the development of life-threatening pregnancy-related diseases such as preeclampsia.

scholarly journals Ras is required for a limited number of cell fates and not for general proliferation in Caenorhabditis elegans.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 2716-2722 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Yochem ◽  
M Sundaram ◽  
M Han
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Duct Cell ◽  
Small Gtpase ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Larval Stages ◽  
Culture Cells ◽  
Genetic Mosaic ◽  
Distinct Cell

Experiments with mammalian tissue culture cells have implicated the small GTPase Ras in the control of cellular proliferation. Evidence is presented here that this is not the case for a living animal, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: proliferation late in embryogenesis and throughout the four larval stages is not noticeably affected in animals lacking Ras in various parts of their cell lineages. Instead, genetic mosaic analysis of the let-60 gene suggests that Ras is required only, at least later in development (a maternal effect cannot be excluded), for establishment of a few temporally and spatially distinct cell fates. Only one of these, the duct cell fate, appears to be essential for viability.

scholarly journals Hydrozoan sperm-specific H2B histone variants stabilize chromatin and block transcription without enhancing chromatin condensation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Torok ◽  
Martin JG Browne ◽  
Jordina C Vilar ◽  
Indu Patwal ◽  
Timothy Q DuBuc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Urchins ◽  
Chromatin Condensation ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Histone Variants ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Chromatin Compaction ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Many animals achieve sperm chromatin compaction and stabilisation during spermatogenesis by replacing canonical histones with sperm nuclear basic proteins (SNBPs) such as protamines. A number of animals including hydrozoan cnidarians and echinoid sea urchins lack protamines and have instead evolved a distinctive family of sperm-specific histone H2Bs (spH2Bs) with extended N-termini rich in SPKK-related motifs. Sperm packaging in echinoids such as sea urchins is regulated by spH2Bs and their sperm is negatively buoyant for fertilization on the sea floor. Hydroid cnidarians also package sperm with spH2Bs but undertake broadcast spawning and their sperm properties are poorly characterised. We show that sperm chromatin from the hydroid Hydractinia possesses higher stability than its somatic equivalent, with reduced accessibility of sperm chromatin to transposase Tn5 integration in vivo and to endonucleases in vitro. However, nuclear dimensions are only moderately reduced in mature Hydractinia sperm compared to other cell types. Ectopic expression of spH2B in the background of H2B knockdown resulted in downregulation of global transcription and cell cycle arrest in embryos without altering their nuclear density. Taken together, spH2B variants containing SPKK-related motifs act to stabilise chromatin and silence transcription in Hydractinia sperm without significant chromatin compaction. This is consistent with a contribution of spH2B to sperm buoyancy as a reproductive adaptation.

scholarly journals Chromatin Regulation in Development: Current Understanding and Approaches

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Zi Hao Zheng ◽  
Tsz Wing Sam ◽  
YingYing Zeng ◽  
Justin Jang Hann Chu ◽  
Yuin-Han Loh
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Histone Variants ◽  
Early Embryogenesis ◽  
Gene Interactions ◽  
Cell Fate Determination ◽  
Chromatin Regulation ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Stem Cell Fate

The regulation of mammalian stem cell fate during differentiation is complex and can be delineated across many levels. At the chromatin level, the replacement of histone variants by chromatin-modifying proteins, enrichment of specific active and repressive histone modifications, long-range gene interactions, and topological changes all play crucial roles in the determination of cell fate. These processes control regulatory elements of critical transcriptional factors, thereby establishing the networks unique to different cell fates and initiate waves of distinctive transcription events. Due to the technical challenges posed by previous methods, it was difficult to decipher the mechanism of cell fate determination at early embryogenesis through chromatin regulation. Recently, single-cell approaches have revolutionised the field of developmental biology, allowing unprecedented insights into chromatin structure and interactions in early lineage segregation events during differentiation. Here, we review the recent technological advancements and how they have furthered our understanding of chromatin regulation during early differentiation events.

Patterning of dopaminergic neurotransmitter identity among Caenorhabditis elegans ray sensory neurons by a TGFbeta family signaling pathway and a Hox gene

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (24) ◽  
pp. 5819-5831 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Lints ◽  
S.W. Emmons
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Sensory Neurons ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Temperature Shift ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Hox Gene

We have investigated the mechanism that patterns dopamine expression among Caenorhabditis elegans male ray sensory neurons. Dopamine is expressed by the A-type sensory neurons in three out of the nine pairs of rays. We used expression of a tyrosine hydroxylase reporter transgene as well as direct assays for dopamine to study the genetic requirements for adoption of the dopaminergic cell fate. In loss-of-function mutants affecting a TGFbeta family signaling pathway, the DBL-1 pathway, dopaminergic identity is adopted irregularly by a wider subset of the rays. Ectopic expression of the pathway ligand, DBL-1, from a heat-shock-driven transgene results in adoption of dopaminergic identity by rays 3–9; rays 1 and 2 are refractory. The rays are therefore prepatterned with respect to their competence to be induced by a DBL-1 pathway signal. Temperature-shift experiments with a temperature-sensitive type II receptor mutant, as well as heat-shock induction experiments, show that the DBL-1 pathway acts during an interval that extends from two to one cell generation before ray neurons are born and begin to differentiate. In a mutant of the AbdominalB class Hox gene egl-5, rays that normally express EGL-5 do not adopt dopaminergic fate and cannot be induced to express DA when DBL-1 is provided by a heat-shock-driven dbl-1 transgene. Therefore, egl-5 is required for making a subset of rays capable of adopting dopaminergic identity, while the function of the DBL-1 pathway signal is to pattern the realization of this capability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document