scholarly journals Prevalence, awareness and control of hypertension in Malaysia 1980 – 2017: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Yee Chow ◽  
Soo Man Jun ◽  
Siew Mooi Ching ◽  
Chun Han Tan ◽  
Kai Wei Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Hypertension Status ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
And Control

AbstractBackgroundHypertension is a common public health problem worldwide and is a well-known risk factor for increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, contributing to high morbidity and mortality. However, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis that has been done in a multi-ethnic population like Malaysia. This systematic review aims to determine the trend in prevalence, awareness and control of hypertension in Malaysia.MethodsSystematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Malaysian Medical Repository and Malaysia Citation Index published between 1980 and 2017. All original articles in English were included. Studies included were those on adults aged 18 years and above. Studies of prevalence in children and adolescents and pregnancy related hypertension were excluded. Two authors independently reviewed the studies, carried out data extraction and performed quality assessment. Heterogeneity between studies and publication bias was assessed and effect size was pooled by the random effect model.ResultsFifty-six studies with a total of 241,796 subjects were included. The prevalence of hypertension throughout Malaysia varied (I2= 99.3%). The overall pooled prevalence of hypertension over the past 4 decades was 28.2% in adults aged 18 years and older (95% CI: 26.1 – 33.3) and the prevalence in those 30 years and older was 40.0% (95% CI: 35.3-44.8).For subgroup analysis, the prevalence of hypertension in male aged 18 and above was 31.4% (95% CI: 26.5 - 36.2) and 27.8% in female (95% CI: 20.7 – 34.9). The prevalence of hypertension among the ethnic groups aged 18 years and above were 37.3% in Malays (95% CI: 32.9 – 41.7); 36.4% in Chinese (95% CI 31.6 - 41.2) and 34.8% in Indians (95% CI: 31.2-38.4). The prevalence of hypertension was the lowest in the 1980s (16.2%, 95% CI: 13.4-19.0%), increases up to 36.8% in the 1990s (95% CI: 6.1-67.5), then came down to 28.7% (95% CI: 21.7-35.8) in the 2000s and 29.2% (95% CI: 24.0-34.4) in the 2010s. The prevalence of awareness was 38.7% (95% CI: 31.7 – 45.8) whereas the control of hypertension of those on treatment was 33.3% (95% CI: 28.4 – 38.2).ConclusionThree in 10 adults aged 18 years old and above have hypertension, whereas four in 10 adults aged 30 years old and above have hypertension. Four out of 10 are aware of their hypertension status and only one-third of them who were under treatment achieved control of their hypertension. Concerted efforts by policymakers and healthcare professionals to improve the awareness and control of hypertension should be of high priority.

scholarly journals Association between Oral Contraceptives and cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and metanalysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Giacchetta ◽  
M Chiavarini ◽  
G Naldini ◽  
R Fabiani
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Oral Contraceptives ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Hormonal Factors ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background The probability of developing invasive cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) is higher in women than in men up until the age of 49. Several studies investigated the association between hormonal factors and CMM. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize the evidence on the association between Oral Contraceptives (OC) and the risk of CMM. Methods This review and meta-analysis follow the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted on Medline and Web of Science until December 2019. Studies were eligible if reported a risk estimate for the association between OC and CMM. Heterogeneity testing was performed using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test and Begg's test. Meta-analysis was performed using random effect model. Results The results of the pooled analysis of all 32 studies showed no significant association between OC and the risk of CMM (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.94-1.11; I2=39.32%, p = 0.013). The stratified analyses by study design found no significant association between OC and the risk of CMM neither in the 18 case-control studies (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.87-1.21; I2=56.91%, p = 0.002) nor in the 14 cohort studies (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.98-1.11; I2=0.00%, p = 0.557). No significant publication bias could be detected by Egger's test or Begg's test. Conclusions This meta-analysis of available literature suggests no significant association between OC and the risk of developing CMM. Further investigations are needed to evaluate the possible relationship of OC use and other hormonal factors potentially contributing to the increased risk of CMM in women during their reproductive years. Key messages Oral contraceptives (OC) do not significantly contribute to the risk of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma (CMM). Further studies are needed to investigate the potential role of other hormonal factors in the increased probability of developing CMM in women during their reproductive years.

Abstract 16310: Association Between the Use of Antithrombotics and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chol Techorueangwiwat ◽  
Chanavuth Kanitsoraphan ◽  
Jakrin Kewcharoen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Systemic Infection ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device ◽  
Inverse Variance ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: Studies have shown that the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant increases the risk of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection following the implantation. However, results were contradicting. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effect of antiplatelets and anticoagulants and the risk of CIED infection following the implantation. Methods: We searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to March 2020. Included studies were published studies of patients undergoing CIED implantations which reported effect size of the use of either antiplatelet or anticoagulant, or both, on the risk of CIED infections. CIED infection was defined as either device-related local or systemic infection. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of Der Simonian and Laird to calculate effect size and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Fifteen studies from 2008-2019 involving a total of 72,028 patients were included. In random-effect model, we found that the use of antiplatelet was not associated with an increased risk of CIED infections (risk ratio (RR) =1.13, 95% CI: 0.89-1.44, p=0.314, I 2 =51.3%), while the use of anticoagulant was associated with increased risk of CIED infections (RR =1.50, 95%CI: 1.02-2.21, p=0.038, I 2 =75%). There was no publication bias observed in the funnel plot as well as no small-study effect observed in Egger’s test. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of anticoagulant significantly increases the risk of CIED infection following the implantation by up to 1.50-fold, however, this effect was not observed with antiplatelet use. Our study suggested that patients on anticoagulation considering CIED implantations should proceed with caution.

scholarly journals Association between Anemia and Risk of Parkinson Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yao-Chin Wang ◽  
Abel Po-Hao Huang ◽  
Sheng-Po Yuan ◽  
Chu-Ya Huang ◽  
Chieh-Chen Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Effect Model ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Risk Ratios

Background and Objective. People with anemia have higher rates of developing Parkinson disease (PD) than the general population. Previous epidemiological studies have invested the risk of PD in patients with anemia. However, the findings are still inconclusive. Therefore, we did a systematic review with meta-analysis to clarify the association between anemia and risk of PD. Methods. We systematically searched articles on electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar between January 1, 2000 and July 30, 2020. Articles were independently evaluated by two authors. We included observational studies (case-control and cohort) and calculated the risk ratios (RRs) for associated with anemia and PD. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed using the Q and I 2 statistic. We utilized the random-effect model to calculate the overall RR with 95% CI. Results. A total of 342 articles were identified in the initial searches, and 7 full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility. Three articles were further excluded for prespecified reasons including insufficient data and duplications, and 4 articles were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. A random effect model meta-analysis of all 4 studies showed no increased risk of PD in patients with anemia ( N = 4 , R R adjusted = 1.17 (95% CI: 0.94-1.45, p = 0.15 ). However, heterogeneity among the studies was significant ( I 2 = 92.60 , p = < 0.0001 ). The pooled relative risk of PD in female patients with anemia was higher ( N = 3 , R R adjusted = 1.14 (95% CI: 0.83-1.57, p = 0.40 ) as compared to male patients with anemia ( N = 3 , R R adjusted = 1.09 (95% CI: 0.83-1.42, p = 0.51 ). Conclusion. This is the first meta-analysis that shows that anemia is associated with higher risk of PD when compared with patients without anemia. However, more studies are warranted to evaluate the risk of PD among patients with anemia.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Capgras syndrome in Alzheimer’s patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-468
Author(s):  
Gabriela Caparica Muniz Pereira ◽  
Gustavo Carvalho de Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Effect Model ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Capgras Syndrome

ABSTRACT The association between Capgras syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease has been reported in several studies, but its prevalence varies considerably in the literature, making it difficult to measure and manage this condition. Objective: This study aims to estimate the prevalence of Capgras syndrome in patients with Alzheimer’s disease through a systematic review, and to review etiological and pathophysiological aspects related to the syndrome. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the Medline, ISI, Cochrane, Scielo, Lilacs, and Embase databases. Two independent researchers carried out study selection, data extraction, and qualitative analysis by strictly following the same methodology. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The meta-analysis was performed using the random effect model. Results: 40 studies were identified, 8 of which were included in the present review. Overall, a total of 1,977 patients with Alzheimer’s disease were analyzed, and the prevalence of Capgras syndrome in this group was 6% (CI: 95% I² 54% 4.0-8.0). Conclusion: The study found a significant prevalence of Capgras syndrome in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. These findings point to the need for more studies on the topic to improve the management of these patients.

Does Obesity Increase the Risk and Severity of Falls in People Aged 60 Years and Older? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 952-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia G R Neri ◽  
Juliana S Oliveira ◽  
Amabile B Dario ◽  
Ricardo M Lima ◽  
Anne Tiedemann
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Falls

Abstract Background Recent investigations suggest that obesity may be associated with an increased risk of falls; however, this theory has yet to be definitively confirmed. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the strength of the association between obesity and falls, multiple falls, fall-related injuries, and fall-related fractures among older adults. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify observational studies that assessed the association between obesity and fall-related outcomes in participants aged 60 years and older. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using random effect meta-analyses. Results Thirty-one studies including a total of 1,758,694 participants were selected from 7,815 references. Pooled estimates showed that obese older adults have an increased risk of falls compared with nonobese counterparts (24 studies; relative risk: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.07–1.26; I2: 90%). Obesity was also associated with an increased risk of multiple falls (four studies; relative risk: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.08–1.29; I2: 0%). There was no evidence, however, of an association between obesity and fall-related injuries (seven studies; relative risk: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.92–1.18; I2: 65%). Fall-related fractures were reported in only one study, which demonstrated a lower risk of hip fracture with obesity (odds ratio: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.63–0.68). Conclusions Obesity increases the risk of falls and multiple falls in people aged 60 years and older; however, there is insufficient evidence of an association with fall-related injuries or fractures. Prevention and treatment of obesity may play a role in preventing falls in older age.

scholarly journals The association between angiotensin II type 1 receptor A1166C gene polymorphism and the risk of essential hypertension: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonny Karunia Fajar ◽  
Melly Susanti ◽  
Budi Susetio Pikir ◽  
Putu Nina Berlinda Saka ◽  
Erdo Puncak Sidarta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Essential Hypertension ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Since first reported having the association with essential hypertension, angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) A1166C was globally investigated worldwide. However, controversy was found. Furthermore, previous meta-analyses did not adequate to clarify the precise correlation due to some limitations. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis concerning the association between AT1R A1166C single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and the risk of essential hypertension with eliminating the limitations of previous studies. Methods A meta-analysis was conducted from February to March 2019. Some information related to sample size of hypertension and control groups and genotype frequencies of hypertension and control groups were extracted from each study. Data were analyzed using fixed or random effect model to determine the overall correlation. Results A total of 45 papers consisting of 11911 cases and 1340 controls were enrolled for the study. Our overall analysis showed that C allele and AC genotype of AT1R A1166C was associated with 1.18-fold and 1.15-fold respectively increased risk of essential hypertension, while the decreased risk of essential hypertension was observed in A allele and AA genotype. In sub-group analysis, increased risk of essential hypertension was found in C allele, AC genotype, and CC genotype of both Asian population and PCR-RFLP sub-groups, while decreased risk was observed in A allele and AA genotype. Conclusions Our meta-analysis reveals that AT1R A1166C remains a valuable SNP having an association with the risk of essential hypertension.

scholarly journals Birth by Caesarean Section and Offspring Overweight and Obesity in Adult Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Chiavarini ◽  
Benedetta De Socio ◽  
Irene Giacchetta ◽  
Roberto Fabiani
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Adult Life ◽  
Overweight And Obesity ◽  
Risk Estimate ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Important Health

Overweight/obesity is one of the most important health problem worldwide. Birth by cesarean section has been shown to influence long-term health outcome including obesity. The aim of this systematic review-meta-analysis is to examine whether cesarean section increases the risk of offspring&rsquo; s overweight/obesity. The study follows the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A systematic literature search was con-ducted on Scopus, PubMed, and WoS until December 2020. For inclusion, studies must have re-ported either (I) both Birth by cesarean section and adult (&ge; 18 years) offspring BMI, (II) cohort or case&ndash;control study design and (III) a risk estimate. Heterogeneity testing was performed using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Publication bias was assessed by Egger&rsquo;s test and Begg&rsquo;s test. Me-ta-analysis was performed through a random effect model. Eleven studies with a combined population of 180.408 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The overall analysis (n = 18) yielded a combined risk estimate for overweight/obesity of 1.19 (95% CI 1.08-1.31) and the test of heterogeneity resulted Q=53,37 (I2 = 70,37 %, P&le;0&bull;0001). The risk of offspring obesity is 1.23 (95% CI 1.09-1.39) and the test of heterogeneity resulted Q=39.50 (I2= 72,15%, P&le;0&bull;0001). Children born by cesarean section have an increased risk of developing obesity in adulthood

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Ambient Ozone Exposure and COPD Hospitalizations

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 2130
Author(s):  
Hui Gao ◽  
Kan Wang ◽  
William W. Au ◽  
Wensui Zhao ◽  
Zhao-lin Xia
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Ozone Exposure ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Ambient Ozone ◽  
Ambient Level ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Subgroup Analyses

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death globally and ozone exposure is a main cause of its disease burden. However, studies on COPD hospitalizations from short-term ambient level ozone exposure have not generated consensus results. To address the knowledge gap, comprehensive and systematic searches in several databases were conducted using specific keywords for publications up to February 14, 2020. Random-effect models were used to derive overall excess risk estimates between short-term ambient-level ozone exposure and COPD hospitalizations. The influence analyses were used to test the robustness of the results. Both meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to explore the sources of heterogeneity and potential modifying factors. Based on the results from 26 eligible studies, the random-effect model analyses show that a 10 µg/m3 increase in maximum 8-h ozone concentration was associated with 0.84% (95% CI: 0.09%, 1.59%) higher COPD hospitalizations. The estimates were higher for warm season and multiple-day lag but lower for old populations. Results from subgroup analyses also indicate a multiple-day lag trend and bigger significant health effects during longer day intervals. Although characteristics of individual studies added modest heterogeneity to the overall estimates, the results remained robust during further analyses and exhibited no evidence of publication bias. Our systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that short-term ambient level ozone exposure was associated with increased risk of COPD hospitalizations. The significant association with multiple-day lag trend indicates that a multiple-day exposure metric should be considered for establishing ambient ozone quality and exposure standards for improvement of population health. Future investigations and meta-analysis studies should include clinical studies as well as more careful lag selection protocol.

scholarly journals Risk of Infection with Methotrexate Therapy in Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ammar Ibrahim ◽  
Mohammed Ahmed ◽  
Richard Conway ◽  
John J. Carey
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Methotrexate Therapy ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Risk Of Infection ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Serious Infections

The aim of this study was to determine the risk of infection in adults with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) treated with methotrexate. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing methotrexate versus placebo in adults using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases from 1980 to August 2017. The primary outcome was the risk of infection associated with methotrexate therapy. We chose a random effect model to summarize adverse event outcomes as risk ratios (RRs) and related 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Twelve RCTs (total patients 1146) met the inclusion criteria for our main analysis, and ten for risk of serious infection (total patients 906). Overall, methotrexate was associated with increased risk of infection in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (RR: 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01–1.56; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%), but not in other non-RA IRD populations. There was no increased risk of total infections (RR: 1.14; 95% CI, 0.98–1.34; p = 0.10; I2 = 0%) or serious infections (RR: 0.76; 95% CI, 0.11–5.15; p = 0.78; I2 = 0%) in all included IRDs. Conclusively, methotrexate use in IRDs is associated with a higher risk of all infections in RA, but not in other non-RA (IRD) populations. There is no increased risk of serious infections.

scholarly journals Association between metformin and neurodegenerative diseases of observational studies: systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001370
Author(s):  
Fan Ping ◽  
Ning Jiang ◽  
Yuxiu Li
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neurodegenerative Diseases ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

Background and aimsAging becomes a growing global concern with an increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) that mainly consist of cognitive decline and Parkinson disease (PD). As the most commonly prescribed antidiabetic drug, metformin has been shown to have inconsistent roles in the incidence of NDs. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to evaluate the effect of metformin exposure on onset of NDs.MethodsThe observational studies that investigated the associations between metformin and the incidence of NDs were searched in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. A random-effect model was performed using STATA to calculate the combined ORs.ResultsIn total, 23 comparisons out of 19 studies with 285 966 participants were included. Meta-analysis found there was no significant effect on incidence of all the subtypes of NDs with metformin exposure (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.17). However, metformin monotherapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of PD incidence compared with non-metformin users or glitazone users (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.42).ConclusionMetformin has failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect on NDs. In addition, it may increase the risk of PD development. In light of current results, how metformin would impact NDs, especially the potential risk of PD, needs to be scrutinized. The underlying mechanisms are vital to achieve some more profound understanding on the regimen.Trial registration numberCRD 42019133285.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document