scholarly journals Interaction of the Srb10 Kinase with Sip4, a Transcriptional Activator of Gluconeogenic Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 5790-5796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Vincent ◽  
Sergei Kuchin ◽  
Seung-Pyo Hong ◽  
Robert Townley ◽  
Valmik K. Vyas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Carbon Sources ◽  
Transcriptional Activator ◽  
Glucose Limitation ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Holoenzyme

ABSTRACT Sip4 is a Zn2Cys6 transcriptional activator that binds to the carbon source-responsive elements of gluconeogenic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Snf1 protein kinase interacts with Sip4 and regulates its phosphorylation and activator function in response to glucose limitation; however, evidence suggested that another kinase also regulates Sip4. Here we examine the role of the Srb10 kinase, a component of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme that has been primarily implicated in transcriptional repression but also positively regulates Gal4. We show that Srb10 is required for phosphorylation of Sip4 during growth in nonfermentable carbon sources and that the catalytic activity of Srb10 stimulates the ability of LexA-Sip4 to activate transcription of a reporter. Srb10 and Sip4 coimmunoprecipitate from cell extracts and interact in two-hybrid assays, suggesting that Srb10 regulates Sip4 directly. We also present evidence that the Srb10 and Snf1 kinases interact with different regions of Sip4. These findings support the view that the Srb10 kinase not only plays negative roles in transcriptional control but also has broad positive roles during growth in carbon sources other than glucose.

scholarly journals The rye Mutants Identify a Role for Ssn/Srb Proteins of the RNA Polymerase II Holoenzyme During Stationary Phase Entry in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Wen Chang ◽  
Susie C Howard ◽  
Yelena V Budovskaya ◽  
Jasper Rine ◽  
Paul K Herman
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Stationary Phase ◽  
Yeast Cell ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Nutrient Deprivation ◽  
Ras Signaling ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Holoenzyme

Abstract Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells enter into a distinct resting state, known as stationary phase, in response to specific types of nutrient deprivation. We have identified a collection of mutants that exhibited a defective transcriptional response to nutrient limitation and failed to enter into a normal stationary phase. These rye mutants were isolated on the basis of defects in the regulation of YGP1 expression. In wild-type cells, YGP1 levels increased during the growth arrest caused by nutrient deprivation or inactivation of the Ras signaling pathway. In contrast, the levels of YGP1 and related genes were significantly elevated in the rye mutants during log phase growth. The rye defects were not specific to this YGP1 response as these mutants also exhibited multiple defects in stationary phase properties, including an inability to survive periods of prolonged starvation. These data indicated that the RYE genes might encode important regulators of yeast cell growth. Interestingly, three of the RYE genes encoded the Ssn/Srb proteins, Srb9p, Srb10p, and Srb11p, which are associated with the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Thus, the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme may be a target of the signaling pathways responsible for coordinating yeast cell growth with nutrient availability.

scholarly journals Loss of Ubp3 increases silencing, decreases unequal recombination in rDNA, and shortens the replicative life span in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1916-1924 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Öling ◽  
Rehan Masoom ◽  
Kristian Kvint
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Life Span ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Genetic Evidence ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Replicative Life Span ◽  
Unequal Recombination

Ubp3 is a conserved ubiquitin protease that acts as an antisilencing factor in MAT and telomeric regions. Here we show that ubp3∆ mutants also display increased silencing in ribosomal DNA (rDNA). Consistent with this, RNA polymerase II occupancy is lower in cells lacking Ubp3 than in wild-type cells in all heterochromatic regions. Moreover, in a ubp3∆ mutant, unequal recombination in rDNA is highly suppressed. We present genetic evidence that this effect on rDNA recombination, but not silencing, is entirely dependent on the silencing factor Sir2. Further, ubp3∆ sir2∆ mutants age prematurely at the same rate as sir2∆ mutants. Thus our data suggest that recombination negatively influences replicative life span more so than silencing. However, in ubp3∆ mutants, recombination is not a prerequisite for aging, since cells lacking Ubp3 have a shorter life span than isogenic wild-type cells. We discuss the data in view of different models on how silencing and unequal recombination affect replicative life span and the role of Ubp3 in these processes.

scholarly journals The Rpd3-Sin3 Histone Deacetylase Regulates Replication Timing and Enables Intra-S Origin Control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 4769-4780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer G. Aparicio ◽  
Christopher J. Viggiani ◽  
Daniel G. Gibson ◽  
Oscar M. Aparicio
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
Histone Deacetylation ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Genome Transcription ◽  
Late Origin

ABSTRACT The replication of eukaryotic genomes follows a temporally staged program, in which late origin firing often occurs within domains of altered chromatin structure(s) and silenced genes. Histone deacetylation functions in gene silencing in some late-replicating regions, prompting an investigation of the role of histone deacetylation in replication timing control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Deletion of the histone deacetylase Rpd3 or its interacting partner Sin3 caused early activation of late origins at internal chromosomal loci but did not alter the initiation timing of early origins or a late-firing, telomere-proximal origin. By delaying initiation relative to the earliest origins, Rpd3 enables regulation of late origins by the intra-S replication checkpoint. RPD3 deletion suppresses the slow S phase of clb5Δ cells by enabling late origins to fire earlier, suggesting that Rpd3 modulates the initiation timing of many origins throughout the genome. Examination of factors such as Ume6 that function together with Rpd3 in transcriptional repression indicates that Rpd3 regulates origin initiation timing independently of its role in transcriptional repression. This supports growing evidence that for much of the S. cerevisiae genome transcription and replication timing are not linked.

scholarly journals NC2α Interacts with BTAF1 and Stimulates Its ATP-Dependent Association with TATA-Binding Protein

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (22) ◽  
pp. 10072-10082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin P. Klejman ◽  
Lloyd A. Pereira ◽  
Hester J. T. van Zeeburg ◽  
Siv Gilfillan ◽  
Michael Meisterernst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Present Evidence ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Human Ortholog ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Transcription

ABSTRACT Transcriptional activity of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) is controlled by a variety of proteins. The BTAF1 protein (formerly known as TAFII170/TAF-172 and the human ortholog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mot1p) and the NC2 complex composed of NC2α (DRAP1) and NC2β (Dr1) are able to bind to TBP directly and regulate RNA polymerase II transcription both positively and negatively. Here, we present evidence that the NC2α subunit interacts with BTAF1. In contrast, the NC2β subunit is not able to associate with BTAF1 and seems to interfere with the BTAF1-TBP interaction. Addition of NC2α or the NC2 complex can stimulate the ability of BTAF1 to interact with TBP. This function is dependent on the presence of ATP in cell extracts but does not involve the ATPase activity of BTAF1 nor phosphorylation of NC2α. Together, our results constitute the first evidence of the physical cooperation between BTAF1 and NC2α in TBP regulation and provide a framework to understand transcription functions of NC2α and NC2β in vivo.

scholarly journals TFG/TAF30/ANC1, a component of the yeast SWI/SNF complex that is similar to the leukemogenic proteins ENL and AF-9.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 3308-3316 ◽  
Author(s):  
B R Cairns ◽  
N L Henry ◽  
R D Kornberg
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Genetic Studies ◽  
Biochemical Studies ◽  
Transcription Complexes

The SWI1/ADR6, SWI2/SNF2, SWI3, SNF5, and SNF6 gene products are all required for proper transcriptional control of many genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetic studies indicated that these gene products might form a multiprotein SWI/SNF complex important for chromatin transitions preceding transcription from RNA polymerase II promoters. Biochemical studies identified a SWI/SNF complex containing these and at least six additional polypeptides. Here we show that the 29-kDa component of the SWI/SNF complex is identical to TFG3/TAF30/ANC1. Thus, a component of the SWI/SNF complex is also a member of the TFIIF and TFIID transcription complexes. TFG3 interacted with the SNF5 component of the SWI/SNF complex in protein interaction blots. TFG3 is significantly similar to ENL and AF-9, two proteins implicated in human acute leukemia. These results suggest that ENL and AF-9 proteins interact with the SNF5 component of the human SWI/SNF complex and raise the possibility that the SWI/SNF complex is involved in acute leukemia.

Regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase and pyruvate kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in the presence of glycolytic and gluconeogenic carbon sources and the role of mitochondrial function on gluconeogenesis

1986 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 969-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert J. Wilson ◽  
J. K. Bhattacharjee
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Pyruvate Kinase ◽  
Growth Medium ◽  
Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase ◽  
Carbon Sources ◽  
Absolute Requirement ◽  
Fructose 1,6 Bisphosphatase ◽  
Futile Cycling ◽  
Respiratory Deficient

Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCKase) and pyruvate kinase (PKase) were measured in Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in the presence of glycolytic and gluconeogenic carbon sources. The PEPCKase activity was highest in ethanol-grown cells. However, high PEPCKase activity was also observed in cells grown in 1% glucose, especially as compared with the activity of sucrose-, maltose-, or galactose-grown cells. Activity was first detected after 12 h when glucose was exhausted from the growth medium. The PKase activity was very high in glucose-grown cells; considerable activity was also present in ethanol- and pyruvate-grown cells. The absolute requirement of respiration for gluconeogenesis was demonstrated by the absence or significantly low levels of PEPCKase and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase activities observed in respiratory deficient mutants, as well as in wild-type S. cerevisiae cells grown in the presence of glucose and antimycin A or chloramphenicol. Obligate glycolytic and gluconeogenic enzymes were present sumultaneously only in stationary phase cells, but not in exponential phase cells; hence futile cycling could not occur in log phase cells regardless of the presence of carbon source in the growth medium.

scholarly journals Interaction of a Swi3 homolog with Sth1 provides evidence for a Swi/Snf-related complex with an essential function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1768-1775 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Treich ◽  
M Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Hybrid System ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Leucine Zipper Motif ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Essential Function ◽  
Self Association ◽  
Two Hybrid

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Swi/Snf complex has a role in remodeling chromatin structure to facilitate transcriptional activation. The complex has 11 components, including Swi1/Adr6, Swi2/Snf2, Swi3, Snf5, Snf6, Snf11, Swp73/Snf12, and Tfg3. Mammalian homologs of these proteins have been shown to form multiple Swi/Snf-related complexes. Here we characterize an S. cerevisiae Swi3 homolog (Swh3) and present evidence that it associates in a complex with a Snf2 homolog, Sthl. We identified Swh3 as a protein that interacts with the N terminus of Snf2 in the two-hybrid system. Swh3 and Swi3 are functionally distinct, and overexpression of one does not compensate for loss of the other. Swh3 is essential for viability and does not activate transcription of reporters. The Snf2 sequence that interacts with Swh3 was mapped to a region conserved in Sth1. We show that Swh3 and Sth1 fusion proteins interact in the two-hybrid system and coimmunoprecipitate from yeast cell extracts. We also map interactions between Swh3 and Sth1 and examine the role of a leucine zipper motif in self-association of Swh3. These findings, together with previous analysis of Sth1, indicate that Swh3 and Sth1 are associated in a complex that is functionally distinct from the Swi/Snf complex and essential for viability.

scholarly journals The Gcn4p Activation Domain Interacts Specifically In Vitro with RNA Polymerase II Holoenzyme, TFIID, and the Adap-Gcn5p Coactivator Complex

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 1711-1724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Connie M. Drysdale ◽  
Belinda M. Jackson ◽  
Richard McVeigh ◽  
Edward R. Klebanow ◽  
Yu Bai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Adapter Proteins ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Hydrophobic Residues ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Tata Box Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Holoenzyme

ABSTRACT The Gcn4p activation domain contains seven clusters of hydrophobic residues that make additive contributions to transcriptional activation in vivo. We observed efficient binding of a glutathioneS-transferase (GST)–Gcn4p fusion protein to components of three different coactivator complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell extracts, including subunits of transcription factor IID (TFIID) (yeast TAFII20 [yTAFII20], yTAFII60, and yTAFII90), the holoenzyme mediator (Srb2p, Srb4p, and Srb7p), and the Adap-Gcn5p complex (Ada2p and Ada3p). The binding to these coactivator subunits was completely dependent on the hydrophobic clusters in the Gcn4p activation domain. Alanine substitutions in single clusters led to moderate reductions in binding, double-cluster substitutions generally led to greater reductions in binding than the corresponding single-cluster mutations, and mutations in four or more clusters reduced binding to all of the coactivator proteins to background levels. The additive effects of these mutations on binding of coactivator proteins correlated with their cumulative effects on transcriptional activation by Gcn4p in vivo, particularly with Ada3p, suggesting that recruitment of these coactivator complexes to the promoter is a cardinal function of the Gcn4p activation domain. As judged by immunoprecipitation analysis, components of the mediator were not associated with constituents of TFIID and Adap-Gcn5p in the extracts, implying that GST-Gcn4p interacted with the mediator independently of these other coactivators. Unexpectedly, a proportion of Ada2p coimmunoprecipitated with yTAFII90, and the yTAFII20, -60, and -90 proteins were coimmunoprecipitated with Ada3p, revealing a stable interaction between components of TFIID and the Adap-Gcn5p complex. Because GST-Gcn4p did not bind specifically to highly purified TFIID, Gcn4p may interact with TFIID via the Adap-Gcn5p complex or some other adapter proteins. The ability of Gcn4p to interact with several distinct coactivator complexes that are physically and genetically linked to TATA box-binding protein can provide an explanation for the observation that yTAFII proteins are dispensable for activation by Gcn4p in vivo.

scholarly journals Interplay of a Ligand Sensor and an Enzyme in Controlling Expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL Genes

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 334-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dariusz Abramczyk ◽  
Stacey Holden ◽  
Christopher J. Page ◽  
Richard J. Reece
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Considerable Debate ◽  
Active Transcription ◽  
Gal Genes ◽  
The Subject

ABSTRACT The regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL genes in response to galactose as a source of carbon has served as a paradigm for eukaryotic transcriptional control over the last 50 years. Three proteins—a transcriptional activator (Gal4p), an inhibitor (Gal80p), and a ligand sensor (Gal3p)—control the switch between inert and active gene expression. The molecular mechanism by which the recognition of galactose within the cell is converted into a transcriptional response has been the subject of considerable debate. In this study, using a novel and powerful method of localizing active transcription factors within the nuclei of cells, we show that a short-lived complex between Gal4p, Gal80p, and Gal3p occurs soon after the addition of galactose to cells to activate GAL gene expression. Gal3p is subsequently replaced in this complex by Gal1p, and a Gal4p-Gal80p-Gal1p complex is responsible for the continued expression of the GAL genes. The transient role of the ligand sensor indicates that current models for the induction and continued expression of the yeast GAL genes need to be reevaluated.

scholarly journals Transcriptional control and the role of silencers in transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes

1998 ◽  
Vol 331 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven OGBOURNE ◽  
Toni M. ANTALIS
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Cellular Biology ◽  
Complete Understanding ◽  
Silencer Elements ◽  
Transcriptional Elements

Mechanisms controlling transcription and its regulation are fundamental to our understanding of molecular biology and, ultimately, cellular biology. Our knowledge of transcription initiation and integral factors such as RNA polymerase is considerable, and more recently our understanding of the involvement of enhancers and complexes such as holoenzyme and mediator has increased dramatically. However, an understanding of transcriptional repression is also essential for a complete understanding of promoter structure and the regulation of gene expression. Transcriptional repression in eukaryotes is achieved through ‘silencers ’, of which there are two types, namely ‘silencer elements ’ and ‘negative regulatory elements ’ (NREs). Silencer elements are classical, position-independent elements that direct an active repression mechanism, and NREs are position-dependent elements that direct a passive repression mechanism. In addition, ‘repressors ’ are DNA-binding trasncription factors that interact directly with silencers. A review of the recent literature reveals that it is the silencer itself and its context within a given promoter, rather than the interacting repressor, that determines the mechanism of repression. Silencers form an intrinsic part of many eukaryotic promoters and, consequently, knowledge of their interactive role with enchancers and other transcriptional elements is essential for our understanding of gene regulation in eukaryotes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document