scholarly journals Sinorhizobium meliloti, a Slow-Growing Bacterium, Exhibits Growth Rate Dependence of Cell Size under Nutrient Limitation

mSphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiongfeng Dai ◽  
Zichu Shen ◽  
Yiheng Wang ◽  
Manlu Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Sinorhizobium Meliloti ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
Progression Rate ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Slow Growing

ABSTRACTBacterial cells need to coordinate the cell cycle with biomass growth to maintain cell size homeostasis. For fast-growing bacterial species likeEscherichia coliandBacillus subtilis, it is well-known that cell size exhibits a strong dependence on the growth rate under different nutrient conditions (known as the nutrient growth law). However, cell size changes little with slow growth (doubling time of >90 min) forE. coli, posing the interesting question of whether slow-growing bacteria species also observe the nutrient growth law. Here, we quantitatively characterize the cell size and cell cycle parameter of a slow-growing bacterium,Sinorhizobium meliloti, at different nutrient conditions. We find thatS. melilotiexhibits a threefold change in its cell size when its doubling time varies from 2 h to 6 h. Moreover, the progression rate of its cell cycle is much longer than that ofE. coli, suggesting a delicate coordination between the cell cycle progression rate and the biomass growth rate. Our study shows that the nutrient growth law holds robustly regardless of the growth capacity of the bacterial species, generalizing its applicability among the bacterial kingdom.IMPORTANCEThe dependence of cell size on growth rate is a fundamental principle in the field of bacterial cell size regulation. Previous studies of cell size regulation mainly focus on fast-growing bacterial species such asEscherichia coliandBacillussubtilis. We find here thatSinorhizobium meliloti, a slow-growing bacterium, exhibits a remarkable growth rate-dependent cell size pattern under nutrient limitation, generalizing the applicability of the empirical nutrient growth law of cell size. Moreover,S. melilotiexhibits a much slower speed of cell cycle progression thanE. colidoes, suggesting a delicate coordination between the cell cycle progression rate and the biomass growth rate.

scholarly journals Conserved Ark1-related kinases control TORC2 signaling

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Alcaide-Gavilán ◽  
Selene Banuelos ◽  
Rafael Lucena ◽  
Douglas R. Kellogg
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Coordinated Control ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Membrane Growth ◽  
Slow Growing

AbstractIn all orders of life, cell cycle progression is dependent upon cell growth, and the extent of growth required for cell cycle progression is proportional to growth rate. Thus, cells growing rapidly in rich nutrients are substantially larger than slow growing cells. In budding yeast, a conserved signaling network surrounding Tor complex 2 (TORC2) controls growth rate and cell size in response to nutrient availability. Here, a search for new components of the TORC2 network identified a pair of redundant kinase paralogs called Ark1 and Prk1. Previous studies found that Ark/Prk play roles in endocytosis. Here, we show that Ark/Prk are embedded in the TORC2 network, where they appear to influence TORC2 signaling independently of their roles in endocytosis. We also show that reduced endocytosis leads to increased cell size, which indicates that cell size homeostasis requires coordinated control of plasma membrane growth and endocytosis. The discovery that Ark/Prk are embedded in the TORC2 network suggests a model in which TORC2-dependent signals control both plasma membrane growth and endocytosis, which would ensure that the rates of each process are matched to each other and to the availability of nutrients so that cells achieve and maintain an appropriate size.

scholarly journals Coordination between E. coli Cell Size and Cell Cycle Mediated by DnaA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Zhang ◽  
Zhichao Zhang ◽  
Hualin Shi
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Doubling Time ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
General Relationship ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Regulatory Processes

Sixty years ago, bacterial cell size was found as an exponential function of growth rate. Fifty years ago, a more general relationship was proposed, in which the cell mass was equal to the initiation mass multiplied by the ratio of the total time of the C and D periods to the doubling time. This relationship has recently been experimentally confirmed by perturbing doubling time, C period, D period or the initiation mass. However, the underlying molecular mechanism remains unclear. Here, we developed a mechanistic and kinetic model to describe how the initiator protein DnaA mediates the initiation of DNA replication in E. coli. In the model, we introduced an initiation probability function involving competitive binding of DnaA-ATP (active) and DnaA-ADP (inactive) at replication origin to determine the initiation of replication. In addition, we considered RNAP availability, ppGpp inhibition, DnaA autorepression, DnaA titration by chromosomal sites, hydrolysis of DnaA-ATP along with DNA replication, reactivation of DnaA-ADP and established a kinetic description of these DnaA regulatory processes. We simulated DnaA kinetics and obtained a self-consistent cell size and a regular DnaA oscillation coordinated with the cell cycle at steady state. The relationship between the cell size obtained by the simulation and the growth rate, C period, D period or initiation mass reproduces the results of the experiment. This model also predicts how the number of DnaA and the initiation mass vary with the perturbation parameters (including those reflecting the mutation or interference of DnaA regulatory processes), which is comparable to experimental data. The results suggest that the regulatory mechanisms of DnaA level and activity are associated with the invariance of initiation mass and the cell size general relationship for matching frequencies of replication initiation and cell division. This study may provide clues for concerted control of cell size and cell cycle in synthetic biology.

scholarly journals Growth Rate and Cell Size Modulate the Synthesis of, and Requirement for, G1-Phase Cyclins at Start

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 10802-10813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandt L. Schneider ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
J. Markwardt ◽  
George Tokiwa ◽  
Tom Volpe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Size Control ◽  
Small Cells ◽  
Critical Threshold ◽  
Cycle Progression

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, commitment to cell cycle progression occurs at Start. Progression past Start requires cell growth and protein synthesis, a minimum cell size, and G1-phase cyclins. We examined the relationships among these factors. Rapidly growing cells expressed, and required, dramatically more Cln protein than did slowly growing cells. To clarify the role of cell size, we expressed defined amounts of CLN mRNA in cells of different sizes. When Cln was expressed at nearly physiological levels, a critical threshold of Cln expression was required for cell cycle progression, and this critical threshold varied with both cell size and growth rate: as cells grew larger, they needed less CLN mRNA, but as cells grew faster, they needed more Cln protein. At least in part, large cells had a reduced requirement for CLN mRNA because large cells generated more Cln protein per unit of mRNA than did small cells. When Cln was overexpressed, it was capable of promoting Start rapidly, regardless of cell size or growth rate. In summary, the amount of Cln required for Start depends dramatically on both cell size and growth rate. Large cells generate more Cln1 or Cln2 protein for a given amount of CLN mRNA, suggesting the existence of a novel posttranscriptional size control mechanism.

scholarly journals Sinorhizobium meliloti CtrA Stability Is Regulated in a CbrA-Dependent Manner That Is Influenced by CpdR1

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (13) ◽  
pp. 2139-2149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla B. Schallies ◽  
Craig Sadowski ◽  
Julia Meng ◽  
Peter Chien ◽  
Katherine E. Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Living Cell ◽  
Sinorhizobium Meliloti ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Caulobacter Crescentus ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Free Living ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACTCbrA is a DivJ/PleC-like histidine kinase of DivK that is required for cell cycle progression and symbiosis in the alphaproteobacteriumSinorhizobium meliloti. Loss ofcbrAresults in increased levels of CtrA as well as its phosphorylation. While many of the knownCaulobacter crescentusregulators of CtrA phosphorylation and proteolysis are phylogenetically conserved withinS. meliloti, the latter lacks the PopA regulator that is required for CtrA degradation inC. crescentus. In order to investigate whether CtrA proteolysis occurs inS. meliloti, CtrA stability was assessed. During exponential growth, CtrA is unstable and therefore likely to be degraded in a cell cycle-regulated manner. Loss ofcbrAsignificantly increases CtrA stability, but this phenotype is restored to that of the wild type by constitutive ectopic expression of a CpdR1 variant that cannot be phosphorylated (CpdR1D53A). Addition of CpdR1D53Afully suppressescbrAmutant cell cycle defects, consistent with regulation of CtrA stability playing a key role in mediating proper cell cycle progression inS. meliloti. Importantly, thecbrAmutant symbiosis defect is also suppressed in the presence of CpdR1D53A. Thus, regulation of CtrA stability by CbrA and CpdR1 is associated with free-living cell cycle outcomes and symbiosis.IMPORTANCEThe cell cycle is a fundamental process required for bacterial growth, reproduction, and developmental differentiation. Our objective is to understand how a two-component signal transduction network directs cell cycle events during free-living growth and host colonization. TheSinorhizobium melilotinitrogen-fixing symbiosis with plants is associated with novel cell cycle events. This study identifies a link between the regulated stability of an essential response regulator, free-living cell cycle progression, and symbiosis.

scholarly journals Integrated biphasic growth rate, gene expression, and cell-size homeostasis behaviour of singleB. subtiliscells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niclas Nordholt ◽  
Johan H. van Heerden ◽  
Frank J. Bruggeman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Average Cell ◽  
Cycle Dependent

ABSTRACTThe growth rate of single bacterial cells is continuously disturbed by random fluctuations in biosynthesis rates and by deterministic cell-cycle events, such as division, genome duplication, and septum formation. It is not understood whether, and how, bacteria reject these disturbances. Here we quantified growth and constitutive protein expression dynamics of singleBacillus subtiliscells, as a function of cell-cycle-progression. Variation in birth size and growth rate, resulting from unequal cell division, is largely compensated for when cells divide again. We analysed the cell-cycle-dynamics of these compensations and found that both growth and protein expression exhibited biphasic behaviour. During a first phase of variable duration, the absolute rates were approximately constant and cells behaved as sizers. In the second phase, rates increased and growth behaviour exhibited characteristics of a timer-strategy. This work shows how cell-cycle-dependent rate adjustments of biosynthesis and growth are integrated to compensate for physio-logical disturbances caused by cell division.IMPORTANCEUnder constant conditions, bacterial populations can maintain a fixed average cell size and constant exponential growth rate. At the single cell-level, however, cell-division can cause significant physiological perturbations, requiring compensatory mechanisms to restore the growth-related characteristics of individual cells toward that of the average cell. Currently, there is still a major gap in our understanding of the dynamics of these mechanisms, i.e. how adjustments in growth, metabolism and biosynthesis are integrated during the bacterial cell-cycle to compensate the disturbances caused by cell division. Here we quantify growth and constitutive protein expression in individual bacterial cells at sub-cell-cycle resolution. Significantly, both growth and protein production rates display structured and coordinated cell-cycle-dependent dynamics. These patterns reveal the dynamics of growth rate and size compensations during cell-cycle progression. Our findings provide a dynamic cell-cycle perspective that offers novel avenues for the interpretation of physiological processes that underlie cellular homeostasis in bacteria.

scholarly journals Control of Bacillus subtilis Replication Initiation during Physiological Transitions and Perturbations

mBio ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Sauls ◽  
Sarah E. Cox ◽  
Quynh Do ◽  
Victoria Castillo ◽  
Zulfar Ghulam-Jelani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Bacillus Subtilis ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Physiological Parameters ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli

ABSTRACT Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli are evolutionarily divergent model organisms whose analysis has enabled elucidation of fundamental differences between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. Despite their differences in cell cycle control at the molecular level, the two organisms follow the same phenomenological principle, known as the adder principle, for cell size homeostasis. We thus asked to what extent B. subtilis and E. coli share common physiological principles in coordinating growth and the cell cycle. We measured physiological parameters of B. subtilis under various steady-state growth conditions with and without translation inhibition at both the population and single-cell levels. These experiments revealed core physiological principles shared between B. subtilis and E. coli. Specifically, both organisms maintain an invariant cell size per replication origin at initiation, under all steady-state conditions, and even during nutrient shifts at the single-cell level. Furthermore, the two organisms also inherit the same “hierarchy” of physiological parameters. On the basis of these findings, we suggest that the basic principles of coordination between growth and the cell cycle in bacteria may have been established early in evolutionary history. IMPORTANCE High-throughput, quantitative approaches have enabled the discovery of fundamental principles describing bacterial physiology. These principles provide a foundation for predicting the behavior of biological systems, a widely held aspiration. However, these approaches are often exclusively applied to the best-known model organism, E. coli. In this report, we investigate to what extent quantitative principles discovered in Gram-negative E. coli are applicable to Gram-positive B. subtilis. We found that these two extremely divergent bacterial species employ deeply similar strategies in order to coordinate growth, cell size, and the cell cycle. These similarities mean that the quantitative physiological principles described here can likely provide a beachhead for others who wish to understand additional, less-studied prokaryotes.

scholarly journals Cell size sensing in animal cells coordinates anabolic growth rates with cell cycle progression to maintain uniformity of cell size

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam B. Ginzberg ◽  
Nancy Chang ◽  
Ran Kafri ◽  
Marc W. Kirschner
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Small Cells ◽  
Live Cells ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Animal Cells

AbstractThe uniformity of cell size in healthy tissues suggests that control mechanisms might coordinate cell growth and division. We derived a method to assay whether growth rates of individual cells depend on cell size, by combining time-lapse microscopy and immunofluorescence to monitor how variance in cell size changes as cells grow. This analysis revealed two periods in the cell cycle when cell size variance decreases in a manner incompatible with unregulated growth, suggesting that cells sense their own size and adjust their growth rate to correct aberrations. Monitoring nuclear growth in live cells confirmed that these decreases in variance reflect a process that selectively inhibits the growth of large cells while accelerating growth of small cells. We also detected cell-size-dependent adjustments of G1 length, which further reduce variability. Combining our assays with chemical and genetic perturbations confirmed that cells employ two strategies, adjusting both cell cycle length and growth rate, to maintain the appropriate size.

scholarly journals A conserved Lkb1 signaling axis modulates TORC2 signaling in budding yeast

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Alcaide-Gavilán ◽  
Rafael Lucena ◽  
Katherine Schubert ◽  
Karen Artiles ◽  
Jessica Zapata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Carbon Source ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Nutrient Availability ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Small Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression

ABSTRACTNutrient availability, growth rate and cell size are closely linked. For example, in budding yeast, the rate of cell growth is proportional to nutrient availability, cell size is proportional to growth rate, and growth rate is proportional to cell size. Thus, cells grow slowly in poor nutrients and are nearly half the size of cells growing in rich nutrients. Moreover, large cells grow faster than small cells. A signaling network that surrounds Tor kinase complex 2 (TORC2) plays an important role in enforcing these proportional relationships. Cells that lack components of the TORC2 network fail to modulate their growth rate or size in response to changes in nutrient availability. Here, we show that budding yeast homologs of the Lkb1 tumor suppressor kinase are required for normal modulation of TORC2 signaling and in response to changes in carbon source. Lkb1 kinases activate Snf1/AMPK to initiate transcription of genes required for utilization of poor carbon sources. However, Lkb1 influences TORC2 signaling via a novel pathway that is independent of Snf1/AMPK. Of the three Lkb1 homologs in budding yeast, Elm1 plays the most important role in modulating TORC2. Elm1 activates a pair of related kinases called Gin4 and Hsl1. Previous work found that loss of Gin4 and Hsl1 causes cells to undergo unrestrained growth during a prolonged mitotic arrest, which suggests that play a role in linking cell cycle progression to cell growth. We found that Gin4 and Hsl1 also control the TORC2 network. In addition, Gin4 and Hsl1 are themselves influenced by signals from the TORC2 network, consistent with previous work showing that the TORC2 network constitutes a feedback loop. Together, the data suggest a model in which the TORC2 network sets growth rate in response to carbon source, while also relaying signals via Gin4 and Hsl1 that set the critical amount of growth required for cell cycle progression. This kind of close linkage between control of cell growth and size would suggest a simple mechanistic explanation for the proportional relationship between cell size and growth rate.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

scholarly journals Enhancing Terpene Yield from Sugars via Novel Routes to 1-Deoxy-d-Xylulose 5-Phosphate

2014 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Kirby ◽  
Minobu Nishimoto ◽  
Ruthie W. N. Chow ◽  
Edward E. K. Baidoo ◽  
George Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Species ◽  
Xylose Reductase ◽  
Pentose Phosphate ◽  
Terpene Biosynthesis ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Pathway Expression ◽  
Terpene Synthesis ◽  
Selection For

ABSTRACTTerpene synthesis in the majority of bacterial species, together with plant plastids, takes place via the 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate (DXP) pathway. The first step of this pathway involves the condensation of pyruvate and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate by DXP synthase (Dxs), with one-sixth of the carbon lost as CO2. A hypothetical novel route from a pentose phosphate to DXP (nDXP) could enable a more direct pathway from C5sugars to terpenes and also circumvent regulatory mechanisms that control Dxs, but there is no enzyme known that can convert a sugar into its 1-deoxy equivalent. Employing a selection for complementation of adxsdeletion inEscherichia coligrown on xylose as the sole carbon source, we uncovered two candidate nDXP genes. Complementation was achieved either via overexpression of the wild-typeE. coliyajOgene, annotated as a putative xylose reductase, or via various mutations in the nativeribBgene.In vitroanalysis performed with purified YajO and mutant RibB proteins revealed that DXP was synthesized in both cases from ribulose 5-phosphate (Ru5P). We demonstrate the utility of these genes for microbial terpene biosynthesis by engineering the DXP pathway inE. colifor production of the sesquiterpene bisabolene, a candidate biodiesel. To further improve flux into the pathway from Ru5P, nDXP enzymes were expressed as fusions to DXP reductase (Dxr), the second enzyme in the DXP pathway. Expression of a Dxr-RibB(G108S) fusion improved bisabolene titers more than 4-fold and alleviated accumulation of intracellular DXP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document