scholarly journals Survival after bone metastasis by primary cancer type: a Danish population-based cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. e016022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Svensson ◽  
Christian F Christiansen ◽  
Sinna P Ulrichsen ◽  
Mikael R Rørth ◽  
Henrik T Sørensen
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Adjusted Relative Risk ◽  
Primary Cancer ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Synchronous Metastases

ObjectiveIn the 10 most common primary types with bone metastases, we aimed to examine survival, further stratifying on bone metastases only or with additional synchronous metastases.MethodsWe included all patients aged 18 years and older with incident hospital diagnosis of solid cancer between 1994 and 2010, subsequently diagnosed with BM until 2012. We followed patients from date of bone metastasis diagnosis until death, emigration or 31 December 2012, whichever came first. We computed 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival (%) and the corresponding 95% CIs stratified on primary cancer type. Comparing patients with bone metastasis only and patients with other synchronous metastases, we estimated crude and adjusted HRs and corresponding 95% CI for mortality.ResultsWe included 17 251 patients with bone metastasis. The most common primary cancer types with bone metastasis were prostate (34%), breast (22%) and lung (20%). One-year survival after bone metastasis diagnosis was lowest in patients with lung cancer (10%, 95% CI 9% to 11%) and highest in patients with breast cancer (51%, 50% to 53%). At 5 years of follow-up, only patients with breast cancer had over 10% survival (13%, 11% to 14%). The risk of mortality was increased for the majority of cancer types among patients with bone and synchronous metastases compared with bone only (adjusted relative risk 1.29–1.57), except for cervix, ovarian and bladder cancer.ConclusionsWhile patients with bone metastases after most primary cancers have poor survival, one of ten patients with bone metastasis from breast cancer survived 5 years.

scholarly journals Risk of New Primary Cancer in Patients with Posterior Uveal Melanoma: A National Cohort Study

Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 284
Author(s):  
Mette Bagger ◽  
Vanna Albieri ◽  
Tine Gadegaard Hindso ◽  
Karin Wadt ◽  
Steffen Heegaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Uveal Melanoma ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Primary Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Specific Cancer ◽  
National Cohort ◽  
Cancer Types

Background: Studies on the risk of new primary cancer in patients with posterior uveal melanoma (UM) have produced conflicting results, and the role of socioeconomic status (SES) is unknown. The purpose of this population-based matched cohort study was to determine the risk of new primary cancer following the diagnosis of posterior UM. Methods: 2179 patients with posterior UM 1968–2016 and 22,717 matched controls without cancer were included. Incidence and time-dependent hazard ratio (HR) of new primary cancer were described, and the effect of SES was emphasized in a sub-cohort. Results: The incidence of new primary cancer was increased in patients with posterior UM, rate ratio (RR) 1.21 (95% CI: 1.08; 1.35), but the specific cancer types did not differ compared to the controls. The rate of new primary cancer following the diagnosis of posterior UM was significantly increased 2–5 years (HR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.23; 1.80)) and 11–15 years (HR: 1.49 (95% CI: 1.12; 1.99)), and adjusting for SES did not change the rate (HR 1.35 (95% CI:1.20; 1.55)). Conclusions: Patients with posterior UM have an increased risk of new primary cancer independent of SES. No difference in incidence of specific cancer type was observed compared to the control group.

Correlation between biopsy type and insufficient tissue availability for biomarker testing in five solid cancer types.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22136-e22136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter De Richter ◽  
Jackie Ilacqua
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Multiple Cancer ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Biomarker Testing ◽  
Cancer Types

e22136 Background: Limited tissue availability is a known barrier to conducting biomarker testing on cancer tissue specimens. It has been assumed that the frequency of insufficient tissue being available is correlated with type of tissue biopsy performed, but this has not previously been quantified across multiple cancer types. Methods: A panel of pathologists in the US (N=90) were asked to report on recent cancer tissues they prepared/handled for biomarker testing. The physicians were asked to report on the cancer type, biopsy method, molecular diagnostics tests conducted, and whether sufficient tissue was available for all requested tests. If insufficient tissue was available, they were asked to report on which tests they were unable to perform as a result. All data was collected through an online survey between August and November 2012. Results: In total, 99 breast cancer samples, 85 NSCLC samples, 60 CRC samples, 30 gastric cancer samples and 40 melanoma samples were reported on. Insufficient tissue was available in 5 (6%) of all NSCLC samples, 2 of which were obtained through fine needle aspirations (14% of all FNAs), a further 2 through core biopsies (5%), and a further 1 through a bronchoscopy (8%). Insufficient tissue was available in 1 (1%) of all breast cancer samples (core biopsy, 1% of all core biopsies), 1 (3%) of all melanoma samples (core biopsy, 13% of all core biopsies) and 1 (2%) of all CRC samples (core biopsy, 11% of all core biopsies). Conclusions: Insufficient cancer tissue for biomarker testing occurred across 4 out of 5 cancer types reported on, though was rare (<5%) in cancers other than NSCLC. The majority of tissue samples in which insufficient tissue was present were acquired through core biopsies (67% of all cases) or FNAs (22% of all cases).

scholarly journals Bone Metastasis Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117822341983097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akram Yazdani ◽  
Sara Dorri ◽  
Alireza Atashi ◽  
Hoda Shirafkan ◽  
Hedieh Zabolinezhad
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Axillary Lymph Nodes ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Factors Associated

Objective: Bone is the most common site of metastasis in breast cancer. Prognostic factors for predicting bone metastases in breast cancer are controversial yet. In this study, we investigated clinical factors associated with secondary bone metastasis of breast cancer. Methods: In total, 1690 patients with breast cancer recorded between 2002 and 2012 in Motamed Cancer Institute, Tehran, Iran entered in the retrospective study. We studied age, menopausal status, histologic type, tumor size, number of cancerous axillary lymph nodes, serum concentrations of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), carcinogenicity antigen (CEA), cancer antigen (CA)-153, and hemoglobin (HB) in 2 groups with bone metastases (n = 123) and without it, respectively. We applied logistic regression to identify bone metastasis prognostic factors in breast cancer patients and calculated the cut-off value, sensitivity, and characteristics of independent prognostic factors using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Menopause, larger tumor size, and the greater number of cancerous axillary lymph nodes increased the chance of bone metastases significantly ( P < .05). There was no significant difference between mean groups with and without bone metastases regarding serum concentration of CEA, CA-153, HB, and histopathologic type ( P > .05). Logistic regression showed that age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.021), menopausal status (OR = 1.854), number of cancerous axillary lymph nodes (OR = 1.065), a tumor size between 2 and 5 cm diameter (OR = 2.002) and more than 5 cm diameter (OR = 4.009), and ALP (OR = 1.005) are independent prognostic factors associated with bone metastases. The ROC curve showed that the abovementioned factors have comparable predictive accuracy for bone metastases. Conclusions: Age, menopausal status, number of axillary lymph node metastases, tumor size, and ALP were identified as prognostic factors for bone metastasis in patients with breast cancer. So patients with these characteristics should be monitored more precisely with regular follow-ups.

scholarly journals Microenvironmental IL1β promotes breast cancer metastatic colonisation in the bone via activation of Wnt signalling

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Eyre ◽  
Denis G. Alférez ◽  
Angélica Santiago-Gómez ◽  
Kath Spence ◽  
James C. McConnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Colony Formation ◽  
Breast Cancer Cells ◽  
Wnt Signalling ◽  
Early Event ◽  
Metastatic Lesions ◽  
Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis

Abstract Dissemination of tumour cells to the bone marrow is an early event in breast cancer, however cells may lie dormant for many years before bone metastases develop. Treatment for bone metastases is not curative, therefore new adjuvant therapies which prevent the colonisation of disseminated cells into metastatic lesions are required. There is evidence that cancer stem cells (CSCs) within breast tumours are capable of metastasis, but the mechanism by which these colonise bone is unknown. Here, we establish that bone marrow-derived IL1β stimulates breast cancer cell colonisation in the bone by inducing intracellular NFkB and CREB signalling in breast cancer cells, leading to autocrine Wnt signalling and CSC colony formation. Importantly, we show that inhibition of this pathway prevents both CSC colony formation in the bone environment, and bone metastasis. These findings establish that targeting IL1β-NFKB/CREB-Wnt signalling should be considered for adjuvant therapy to prevent breast cancer bone metastasis.

scholarly journals Long-Term Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer: The Scandinavian Thrombosis and Cancer Cohort

TH Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. e131-e138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inger Lise Gade ◽  
Sigrid Brækkan ◽  
Inger Anne Næss ◽  
John-Bjarne Hansen ◽  
Suzanne Cannegieter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Background Population ◽  
Hematological Cancers ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
After Cancer ◽  
Rate Ratios

AbstractThe risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients who survive the first years after a cancer diagnosis after the acute effects of disease and treatment in comparison to a similar background population has been sparsely investigated. The aim of the study was to investigate if incidence rates (IRs) of VTE differed in patients who were alive at least 2 years after a cancer diagnosis without VTE compared with cancer-free references in a population-based cohort study. The study entry was 2 years after a first cancer diagnosis. For each cancer-exposed subject, five reference subjects were identified within the cohort. The IRs were calculated as number of VTEs per 1,000 person years (×10−3 p-y) in total and in distinct cancer types and corresponding reference subjects. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated by Poisson's regression. During a mean follow-up of 5.3 years, 110 VTEs occurred among the 7,288 cancer-exposed subjects and 321 VTEs occurred among the 36,297 identified reference subjects. The IR of VTE was higher for cancer-exposed subjects compared with reference subjects, IRs 3.7 × 10−3 p-y, 95% CI: 3.1 to 4.5 and 1.9 × 10−3 p-y, 95% CI: 1.7 to 2.2, respectively. IRs of VTE in most solid cancer types declined to almost the same level as in the reference subjects 2 years after cancer diagnosis, but remained higher in hematological cancers, IRR 4.0, 95% CI: 2.0 to 7.8.

CA 15.3 with Urinary Calcium Excretion is Useful in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer

1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-214
Author(s):  
G.C. Yadav ◽  
A. Rao ◽  
M.M. Motawy ◽  
N. Safadi ◽  
M. Jameel Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Urinary Calcium ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Urinary Calcium Excretion ◽  
Calcium Excretion ◽  
Diagnostic Efficacy ◽  
Ca 15.3

Serum levels of breast carcinoma antigen (CA 15.3) and urinary calcium excretion (UCa) were determined in 73 patients with breast cancer: 36 without bone metastases (stage I-IV) and 37 with bone metastases. The patients in the latter group were further investigated at 2,4 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Both markers showed significant elevations in the group with bone metastases (CA 15.3: P = 1.0×10–6, UCa: P = 8.6×10–9). The bone metastasis index (BMI), which represents the combination of the markers, had better diagnostic efficacy (90%) than CA 15.3 alone (84%) or UCa alone (82%). During treatment of bone metastasis, the longitudinal levels of the markers showed a highly significant association with the therapeutic response assessed by the UICC criteria. For identifying progression of disease, the diagnostic efficacy of CA 15.3, UCa and a combination of both, the so-called Biochemical Index of Response (BIR), was 65%, 70% and 79%, respectively, at two months and 89%, 84% and 92% at four months. Application of the tandem, CA 15.3 with UCa, was very useful for the detection of bone metastases and the prediction of response to therapy.

scholarly journals Breast Subtypes and Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients With Initial Bone Metastasis: A Population-Based Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deyue Liu ◽  
Jiayi Wu ◽  
Caijin Lin ◽  
Lisa Andriani ◽  
Shuning Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

BackgroundMetastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease and bone is one of the most common metastatic sites. This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the clinical features, prognostic factors and benefits of surgery of breast cancer patients with initial bone metastases.MethodsFrom 2010 to 2015, 6,860 breast cancer patients diagnosed with initial bone metastasis were analyzed from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and Multivariable analysis were used to identify prognostic factors. A nomogram was performed based on the factors selected from cox regression result. Survival curves were plotted according to different subtypes, metastatic burdens and risk groups differentiated by nomogram.ResultsHormone receptor (HR) positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive patients showed the best outcome compared to other subtypes. Patients of younger age (&lt;60 years old), white race, lower grade, lower T stage (&lt;=T2), not combining visceral metastasis tended to have better outcome. About 37% (2,249) patients received surgery of primary tumor. Patients of all subtypes could benefit from surgery. Patients of bone-only metastases (BOM), bone and liver metastases, bone and lung metastases also showed superior survival time if surgery was performed. However, patients of bone and brain metastasis could not benefit from surgery (p = 0.05). The C-index of nomogram was 0.66. Cutoff values of nomogram point were identified as 87 and 157 points, which divided all patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups. Patients of all groups showed better overall survival when receiving surgery.ConclusionOur study has provided population-based prognostic analysis in patients with initial bone metastatic breast cancer and constructed a predicting nomogram with good accuracy. The finding of potential benefit of surgery to overall survival will cast some lights on the treatment tactics of this group of patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document