scholarly journals Spirometry parameters used to define small airways obstruction in population-based studies: systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e052931
Author(s):  
Ben Knox-Brown ◽  
Octavia Mulhern ◽  
Andre F S Amaral
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Small Airways ◽  
Abnormal Result ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Airways Obstruction ◽  
Prevalence Estimates ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

IntroductionIn recent years, there has been increasing interest in the use of spirometry for the assessment of small airways obstruction (SAO) driven by the idea that these changes occur prior to development of established obstructive lung disease. Maximal mid-expiratory and distal flow rates have been widely used despite a lack of agreement regarding parameter selection or definition of an abnormal result. We aim to provide evidence from population-based studies, describing the different parameters, definitions of normal range and the resulting impact on prevalence estimates for SAO. Summarising this evidence is important to inform development of future studies in this area.Methods and analysisA systematic review of population-based studies will be conducted. MEDLINE, Web of Science and Google Scholar will be searched from database inception to May 2021. Primary outcomes will include the spirometry parameter used to define SAO, and the definition of an abnormal result. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be followed for study selection. Study methods will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group methodology. Narrative synthesis will be conducted for all included studies. Meta-analysis will also be conducted for prevalence estimates and associated risk factors where data quality and availability allow. Random effects models will be used to conduct the meta-analysis and I2 statistics will be used to assess heterogeneity across studies. Where appropriate subgroup analysis will be conducted to explore heterogeneity.Ethics and disseminationThere is no requirement for ethical approval for this project. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and other formats, for example, conferences, congresses or symposia.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021250206.

scholarly journals Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of ovine neosporosis worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 2111-2126
Author(s):  
Paulo Roberto Romanelli ◽  
◽  
Eloiza Teles Caldart ◽  
Felippe Danyel Cardoso Martins ◽  
Camila Marinelli Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neospora Caninum ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Immunofluorescence Assay ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

Neosporosis, caused by the protozoan Neospora caninum, has been widely reported and discussed as a major disease associated with reproductive problems in herds of various animal species. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence and risk factors associated with ovine neosporosis worldwide. This is the first systematic review, which was performed according to the established preferred reporting items in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to address ovine neosporosis. Four databases were used in this study: PubMed, SciELO, Web of Science, and Scopus. The selected keywords were “neospora AND sheep,” “neosporosis AND sheep,” “neospora AND lamb,” “neosporosis AND lamb,” “neospora AND ewe,” and “neosporosis AND ewe.” The meta-analysis calculations were performed with random-effects models for proportions, and heterogeneity was tested using the I2 test. This study identified 24 studies on ovine neosporosis, nine of which evaluated the factors associated with the risk of seropositivity. After meta-analysis, the pooled estimated prevalence was 12% (95% CI, 8-16%; I² p-value < 0.01). The evaluation of the included studies allowed the identification of ovine neosporosis distribution in continents according to demonstrated prevalence rates. We confirmed via metaanalysis that the use of indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFAT) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the diagnosis of ovine neosporosis was not a source of data heterogeneity. The presence of dogs on the properties was reported as the main risk factor associated with the occurrence of ovine neosporosis; however, this was not confirmed by the meta-analysis.

scholarly journals The Relation Between Cortisol and Anthropometric Measurements Throughout Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A30-A30
Author(s):  
Eline S van der Valk ◽  
Ozair Abawi ◽  
Mostafa Mohseni ◽  
Amir Abdelmoumen ◽  
Vincent L Wester ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Population Characteristics ◽  
Central Adiposity ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Outcome Information

Abstract Introduction: Recently, cross-sectional studies report associations between long-term glucocorticoid levels in scalp hair (HairGC) and obesity. However, there is a wide variation in studied outcomes and associations, possibly caused by differences in population characteristics, e.g. age, sex, dispersion of adiposity, and used laboratory methods. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the relation between HairGC and anthropometrics and to explore possible moderators of this association. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, Cinahl, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar databases for articles that relate HairGC to measures of adiposity (date 11-16-2020). Primary outcomes were correlations between hair cortisol (HairF) and cortisone (HairE), and anthropometrics: BMI, waist circumference (WC) and waist-hip-ratio (WHR). Authors were contacted to provide missing outcome information. Pooled correlation coefficients were calculated using random effects models. Assessment of heterogeneity was performed using the I2 statistic. Exploratory moderator analyses were performed with subgroup analyses and meta-regression. This systematic review was performed in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Our systematic search identified 150 cohorts, comprising a total of 37,107 unique individuals, of which 15,033 sampled from population-based cohorts. For BMI, the pooled correlation for HairF was 0.121 (95% CI 0.083–0.158, n=26,941; I2 94.2%, p&lt;0.001) and for HairE 0.108 (95% CI 0.047–0.167, n=7,250; I2 52%, p&lt;0.01). For WC, the pooled correlation for HairF was 0.111 (95% CI 0.058–0.164, n=10,290; I2 63%, p&lt;0.01) and for HairE 0.200 (95% CI 0.137–0.264, n=2,198; I2 0%, p=0.42). For WHR, the pooled correlation for HairF was 0.102 (95% CI 0.040–0.163, n=6,865; I2 27%, p=0.14) and for HairE 0.261 (95% CI 0.195–0.330, n=1,314; I2 0%, p=0.40). A higher percentage of male participants was related to stronger correlations with WC (p&lt;0.001), but not with BMI and WHR. Mean age, mean BMI, and mean HairGC levels of the cohorts did not significantly moderate the pooled correlations, neither did the used laboratory techniques (immunoassays vs mass spectrometry-based assays). Conclusion: This unique, large meta-analysis demonstrates that long-term endogenous glucocorticoids as assessed by HairGC show small but consistent correlations to measures of obesity, despite a large heterogeneity between the included cohorts. The strongest associations were found between HairE and WC and between HairE and WHR. This suggests that glucocorticoid levels in the high-normal range, especially cortisone, may contribute to or reflect the state of specifically central adiposity, even within the general population.

scholarly journals Maternal pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity and the risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring: a systematic review, meta-analysis and quasi-experimental family-based study

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 857-875
Author(s):  
Lin Li ◽  
Tyra Lagerberg ◽  
Zheng Chang ◽  
Samuele Cortese ◽  
Mina A Rosenqvist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Maternal Overweight

Abstract Background Previous studies are inconclusive concerning the association between maternal pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity and risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in offspring. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify this association. To address the variation in confounding adjustment between studies, especially inadequate adjustment of unmeasured familial confounding in most studies, we further performed cousin and sibling comparisons in a nationwide population-based cohort in Sweden. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO during 1975–2018. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval. In the population-based study, Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and HRs adjusted for all confounders identified in previous studies. Stratified Cox models were applied to data on full cousins and full siblings to further control for unmeasured familial confounding. Results Eight cohorts with a total of 784 804 mother–child pairs were included in the meta-analysis. Maternal overweight [RRoverweight = 1.31 (1.25–1.38), I2 = 6.80%] and obesity [RRobesity = 1.92 (1.84–2.00), I2 = 0.00%] were both associated with an increased risk of ADHD in offspring. In the population-based cohort of 971 501 individuals born between 1992 and 2004, unadjusted Cox models revealed similar associations [HRoverweight = 1.30 (1.28–1.34), HRobesity = 1.92 (1.87–1.98)]. These associations gradually attenuated towards the null when adjusted for measured confounders [HRoverweight = 1.21 (1.19–1.25), HRobesity = 1.60 (1.55–1.65)], unmeasured factors shared by cousins [HRoverweight = 1.10 (0.98–1.23), HRobesity = 1.44 (1.22–1.70)] and unmeasured factors shared by siblings [HRoverweight = 1.01 (0.92–1.11), HRobesity = 1.10 (0.94–1.27)]. Conclusion Pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity is associated with an increased risk of ADHD in offspring. The observed association is largely due to unmeasured familial confounding.

scholarly journals Cannabinoids for the Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 365-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anees Bahji ◽  
Arthi Chinna Meyyappan ◽  
Emily R. Hawken
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neuropsychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Number Of Individuals ◽  
Events Data ◽  
Full Text Screening

Background: In 2016, the global number of individuals living with dementia was 43.8 million, representing a 117% increase from 1990—mainly due to increases in aging and population growth. Up to 90% of individuals with dementia experience neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). However, the limitations of current treatments for NPS have drivent he search for safer pharmacotherapies—including cannabinoids. Aim: To assess the efficacy and acceptability of cannabinoids for the treatment of NPS in individuals with dementia. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Setting and participants: Of 6,902 papers, 9 were eligible ( n = 205, 44% female, 78 ± 7 years, 85% Alzheimer disease). Trials were in North America and Europe and explored tetrahydrocannabinol ( n = 3), dronabinol ( n = 5), or nabilone ( n = 1). Measurement: Titles/abstracts were independently screened by one reviewer and reviewed by a second. Full-text screening was by two reviewers with discrepancies resolved via a third reviewer. We extracted data on the standardized mean difference (SMD) for several NPS instruments, trial completion, and adverse events. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Findings: Cannabinoids led to significant improvements across NPS instruments, including the Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (SMD = −0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.45 to −0.16), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (SMD = −0.61; CI, −1.07 to −0.15), and nocturnal actigraphy (SMD = −1.05; CI, −1.56 to −0.54h). Cannabinoids were well-tolerated, with an overall trial completion rate of 93% (193/205) and no serious treatment-related adverse events. Treatment efficacy was associated with baseline dementia severity and dose, but not dementia subtype, age, or sex. The overall study quality was rated as low. Conclusions: There is preliminary evidence for the efficacy and tolerability of cannabinoids as treatments for NPS. Population-based studies are needed to characterize their real-world effectiveness and acceptability.

scholarly journals Sarcopenia in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (154) ◽  
pp. 190049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Benz ◽  
Katerina Trajanoska ◽  
Lies Lahousse ◽  
Josje D. Schoufour ◽  
Natalie Terzikhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
International Comparisons ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Meta Analyses

COPD is associated with a progressive loss of muscle mass and function. However, there is an unmet need to define and standardise methods to estimate the prevalence of sarcopenia in COPD patients.We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of this extrapulmonary manifestation in COPD patients. We searched Embase, Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar for studies published up to January 17, 2019, assessing sarcopenia in COPD patients based on low muscle mass and decreased muscle function. Interventional studies, in vitro experiments, protocols or reviews and meta-analyses were excluded. We estimated heterogeneity (I2) and assessed significance (Q) using a Chi-squared test for estimates obtained from random-effects models.4465 articles were initially identified. After removing the duplicates and applying the selection criteria, we reviewed 62 full-text articles. Finally, 10 articles (n=2565 COPD patients) were included in this systematic review and meta-analyses. Overall, the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with COPD was 21.6% (95% CI 14.6–30.9%, I2=94%), ranging from 8% in population-based to 21% in clinic-based studies, and 63% in COPD patients residing in nursing homes.Sarcopenia is frequently observed in COPD patients, with varying prevalence across population settings. Sarcopenia in COPD should be assessed using standardised tests and cut-off points from sarcopenia consensus criteria for clinical practice and international comparisons.

scholarly journals Prevalence and risk factors of epiretinal membranes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. e014644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Xiao ◽  
Xiaoyun Chen ◽  
William Yan ◽  
Zhuoting Zhu ◽  
Mingguang He
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Epiretinal Membranes ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Prevalence Estimates ◽  
Potential Risk Factors

ObjectiveThis study was to aggregate the prevalence and risks of epiretinal membranes (ERMs) and determine the possible causes of the varied estimates.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesThe search strategy was designed prospectively. We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases from inception to July 2016. Reference lists of the included literatures were reviewed as well.Study selectionSurveys published in English language from any population were included if they had a population-based design and reported the prevalence of ERM from retinal photography with or without optical coherence tomography. Eligibility and quality evaluation was conducted independently by two investigators.Data extractionThe literature search generated 2144 records, and 13 population-based studies comprising 49 697 subjects were finally included. The prevalence of ERM and the ORs of potential risk factors (age, sex, myopia, hypertension and so on) were extracted.ResultsThe pooled age-standardised prevalence estimates of earlier ERM (cellophane macular reflex (CMR)), advanced ERM (preretinal macular fibrosis (PMF)) and any ERM were 6.5% (95% CI 4.2% to 8.9%), 2.6% (95% CI 1.8% to 3.4%) and 9.1% (95% CI 6.0% to 12.2%), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, race and photography modality contributed to the variation in the prevalence estimates of PMF, while the WHO regions and image reading methods were associated with the varied prevalence of CMR and any ERM. Meta-analysis showed that only greater age and female significantly conferred a higher risk of ERMs.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that ERMs are relatively common among aged population. Race, image taking and reading methodology may play important roles in influencing the large variability of ERM prevalence estimates.

scholarly journals The Impact of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Maternal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 666
Author(s):  
Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani ◽  
Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz ◽  
Razieh Bidhendi Yarandi ◽  
Samira Behboudi-Gandevani
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Maternal Outcomes ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Iadpsg Criteria ◽  
The Impact

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of different gestational-diabetes (GDM) diagnostic-criteria on the risk of adverse-maternal-outcomes. The search process encompassed PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science databases to retrieve original, population-based studies with the universal GDM screening approach, published in English language and with a focus on adverse-maternal-outcomes up to January 2020. According to GDM diagnostic criteria, the studies were classified into seven groups. A total of 49 population-based studies consisting of 1409018 pregnant women with GDM and 7,667,546 non-GDM counterparts were selected for data analysis and knowledge synthesis. Accordingly, the risk of adverse-maternal-outcomes including primary-cesarean, induction of labor, maternal-hemorrhage, and pregnancy-related-hypertension, overall, regardless of GDM diagnostic-criteria and in all diagnostic-criteria subgroups were significantly higher than non-GDM counterparts. However, in meta-regression, the increased risk was not influenced by the GDM diagnostic-classification and the magnitude of the risks among patients, using the IADPSG criteria-classification as the most strict-criteria, was similar to other criteria. In conclusion, a reduction in the diagnostic-threshold increased the prevalence of GDM, but the risk of adverse-maternal-outcome was not different among those women who were diagnosed through more or less intensive strategies. Our review findings can empower health-care-providers to select the most cost-effective approach for the screening of GDM among pregnant women.

scholarly journals Effect of somatometric parameters on the prevalence and severity of varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Runqing Li ◽  
Junjie Liu ◽  
Yushan Li ◽  
Quanxian Wang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Regression Test ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Q Statistic ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Background Published studies have shown contradictory results regarding the relationship between somatometric parameters and varicoceles. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the possible effects of age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) on the presence and severity of varicoceles. Methods Databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Web of Science, and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify relevant articles published up to March 2020. Two researchers independently identified eligible articles and extracted data. Cochran’s Q statistic and I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. Meta-analysis was performed using StataSE 12.0 software (StataCorp LP, USA). Random-effects models were used to obtain the weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was assessed using Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s regression test. Results The search strategy produced 272 articles, of which 18 articles were eligible according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. A total of 56,325 patients with varicocele and 1,334,694 patients without varicocele were included in the meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of somatometric parameters on the presence and severity of varicocele. The overall results demonstrated that the presence of varicoceles was significantly associated with height (WMD = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.74, P < 0.001) and inversely correlated with BMI (WMD = − 1.35, 95% CI = -1.67 to − 1.03, P < 0.001) but not with age (WMD = -0.93, 95% CI = -2.19 to 0.33, P = 0.149) or weight (WMD = 0.24, 95% CI = -2.24 to 2.72, P = 0.850). The severity of varicocele was inversely correlated with increased BMI but not with age. Conclusion The presence of varicoceles was significantly associated with height and inversely correlated with BMI.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Depression among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3406
Author(s):  
Beatriz Olaya ◽  
María Pérez-Moreno ◽  
Juan Bueno-Notivol ◽  
Patricia Gracia-García ◽  
Isabel Lasheras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Medical Doctors ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Prevalence Of Depression ◽  
Common Mental Health Problems

Background: There is evidence of a high psychological toll from the COVID-19 pandemic in healthcare workers. This paper was aimed at conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting levels of depression among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 and estimating the pooled prevalence of depression. Methods: We searched for cross-sectional studies listed on PubMed from 1 December 2019 to 15 September 2020 that reported prevalence of depression in healthcare workers, nurses, medical doctors, and COVID-19 frontline professionals. The pooled proportions of depression were calculated with random effects models. Results: We identified 57 studies from seventeen countries. The pooled prevalence of depression in healthcare workers was 24% (95% CI: 20%−28%), 25% for nurses (95% CI: 18%−33%), 24% for medical doctors (95% CI: 16%−31%), and 43% for frontline professionals (95% CI: 28%−59%). Conclusions: The proportion of depression in nurses and medical doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic was similar to that found in the general population as previously reported in other meta-analyses conducted with smaller numbers of studies. Importantly, almost half of the frontline healthcare workers showed increased levels of depression. There is need for a comprehensive, international response to prevent and treat common mental health problems in healthcare workers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document